1
|
Vivo M, Rosti V, Cervone S, Lanzuolo C. Chromatin plasticity in mechanotransduction. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2024; 88:102376. [PMID: 38810318 DOI: 10.1016/j.ceb.2024.102376] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2024] [Revised: 04/24/2024] [Accepted: 05/07/2024] [Indexed: 05/31/2024]
Abstract
Living organisms can detect and respond to physical forces at the cellular level. The pathways that transmit these forces to the nucleus allow cells to react quickly and consistently to environmental changes. Mechanobiology involves the interaction between physical forces and biological processes and is crucial for driving embryonic development and adapting to environmental cues during adulthood. Molecular studies have shown that cells can sense mechanical signals directly through membrane receptors linked to the cytoskeleton or indirectly through biochemical cascades that can influence gene expression for environmental adaptation. This review will explore the role of epigenetic modifications, emphasizing the 3D genome architecture and nuclear structures as responders to mechanical stimuli, which ensure cellular memory and adaptability. Understanding how mechanical cues are transduced and regulate cell functioning, governing processes such as cell programming and reprogramming, is essential for advancing our knowledge of human diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Vivo
- Università degli Studi di Salerno, Fisciano, Italy.
| | - Valentina Rosti
- Institute of Biomedical Technologies, National Research Council (CNR), Milan, Italy; INGM Istituto Nazionale Genetica Molecolare Romeo ed Enrica Invernizzi, Milan, Italy
| | - Sara Cervone
- INGM Istituto Nazionale Genetica Molecolare Romeo ed Enrica Invernizzi, Milan, Italy
| | - Chiara Lanzuolo
- Institute of Biomedical Technologies, National Research Council (CNR), Milan, Italy; INGM Istituto Nazionale Genetica Molecolare Romeo ed Enrica Invernizzi, Milan, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Alvarez V, Bandau S, Jiang H, Rios-Szwed D, Hukelmann J, Garcia-Wilson E, Wiechens N, Griesser E, Ten Have S, Owen-Hughes T, Lamond A, Alabert C. Proteomic profiling reveals distinct phases to the restoration of chromatin following DNA replication. Cell Rep 2023; 42:111996. [PMID: 36680776 DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2023.111996] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2022] [Revised: 08/12/2022] [Accepted: 01/03/2023] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Chromatin organization must be maintained during cell proliferation to preserve cellular identity and genome integrity. However, DNA replication results in transient displacement of DNA-bound proteins, and it is unclear how they regain access to newly replicated DNA. Using quantitative proteomics coupled to Nascent Chromatin Capture or isolation of Proteins on Nascent DNA, we provide time-resolved binding kinetics for thousands of proteins behind replisomes within euchromatin and heterochromatin in human cells. This shows that most proteins regain access within minutes to newly replicated DNA. In contrast, 25% of the identified proteins do not, and this delay cannot be inferred from their known function or nuclear abundance. Instead, chromatin organization and G1 phase entry affect their reassociation. Finally, DNA replication not only disrupts but also promotes recruitment of transcription factors and chromatin remodelers, providing a significant advance in understanding how DNA replication could contribute to programmed changes of cell memory.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vanesa Alvarez
- Division of Molecular, Cell, and Developmental Biology, School of Life Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee DD1 5EH, Scotland, UK
| | - Susanne Bandau
- Division of Molecular, Cell, and Developmental Biology, School of Life Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee DD1 5EH, Scotland, UK
| | - Hao Jiang
- Laboratory of Quantitative Proteomics, Division of Molecular, Cell, and Developmental Biology, School of Life Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee DD1 5EH, Scotland, UK
| | - Diana Rios-Szwed
- Division of Molecular, Cell, and Developmental Biology, School of Life Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee DD1 5EH, Scotland, UK
| | - Jens Hukelmann
- Laboratory of Quantitative Proteomics, Division of Molecular, Cell, and Developmental Biology, School of Life Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee DD1 5EH, Scotland, UK
| | - Elisa Garcia-Wilson
- Division of Molecular, Cell, and Developmental Biology, School of Life Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee DD1 5EH, Scotland, UK
| | - Nicola Wiechens
- Laboratory of Chromatin Remodelling and Cancer Epigenetics, Division of Molecular, Cell & Developmental Biology, School of Life Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee DD1 5EH, Scotland, UK
| | - Eva Griesser
- Laboratory of Quantitative Proteomics, Division of Molecular, Cell, and Developmental Biology, School of Life Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee DD1 5EH, Scotland, UK
| | - Sara Ten Have
- Laboratory of Quantitative Proteomics, Division of Molecular, Cell, and Developmental Biology, School of Life Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee DD1 5EH, Scotland, UK
| | - Tom Owen-Hughes
- Laboratory of Chromatin Remodelling and Cancer Epigenetics, Division of Molecular, Cell & Developmental Biology, School of Life Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee DD1 5EH, Scotland, UK
| | - Angus Lamond
- Laboratory of Quantitative Proteomics, Division of Molecular, Cell, and Developmental Biology, School of Life Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee DD1 5EH, Scotland, UK
| | - Constance Alabert
- Division of Molecular, Cell, and Developmental Biology, School of Life Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee DD1 5EH, Scotland, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Rosti V, Gorini F, Santarelli P, Sarnicola ML, Magnani S, Lanzuolo C. Polycomb Bodies Detection in Murine Fibromuscular Stroma from Skin, Skeletal Muscles, and Aortic Tissues. Methods Mol Biol 2023; 2655:125-146. [PMID: 37212994 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-3143-0_11] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/23/2023]
Abstract
The regulation of chromatin structure depends on a dynamic, multiple mechanisms that modulate gene expression and constitute the epigenome. The Polycomb group (PcG) of proteins are epigenetic factors involved in the transcriptional repression. Among their multilevel, chromatin-associated functions, PcG proteins mediate the establishment and maintenance of higher-order structures at target genes, allowing the transmission of transcriptional programs throughout the cell cycle.In the nucleus, PcG proteins localize close to the pericentric heterochromatin forming microscopically foci, called Polycomb bodies. Here, to visualize the tissue-specific PcG distribution in the aorta, dorsal skin and hindlimb muscles, we combine a fluorescence-activated cell sorter (FACS)-based method with an immunofluorescence staining.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valentina Rosti
- Institute of Biomedical Technologies, National Research Council, Milan, Italy
- Istituto Nazionale di Genetica Molecolare "Romeo ed Enrica Invernizzi", INGM, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesca Gorini
- Istituto Nazionale di Genetica Molecolare "Romeo ed Enrica Invernizzi", INGM, Milan, Italy
| | - Philina Santarelli
- Istituto Nazionale di Genetica Molecolare "Romeo ed Enrica Invernizzi", INGM, Milan, Italy
| | - Maria Lucia Sarnicola
- Istituto Nazionale di Genetica Molecolare "Romeo ed Enrica Invernizzi", INGM, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Chiara Lanzuolo
- Institute of Biomedical Technologies, National Research Council, Milan, Italy.
- Istituto Nazionale di Genetica Molecolare "Romeo ed Enrica Invernizzi", INGM, Milan, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hime GR, Stonehouse SLA, Pang TY. Alternative models for transgenerational epigenetic inheritance: Molecular psychiatry beyond mice and man. World J Psychiatry 2021; 11:711-735. [PMID: 34733638 PMCID: PMC8546770 DOI: 10.5498/wjp.v11.i10.711] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2021] [Revised: 07/19/2021] [Accepted: 08/25/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Mental illness remains the greatest chronic health burden globally with few in-roads having been made despite significant advances in genomic knowledge in recent decades. The field of psychiatry is constantly challenged to bring new approaches and tools to address and treat the needs of vulnerable individuals and subpopulations, and that has to be supported by a continuous growth in knowledge. The majority of neuropsychiatric symptoms reflect complex gene-environment interactions, with epigenetics bridging the gap between genetic susceptibility and environmental stressors that trigger disease onset and drive the advancement of symptoms. It has more recently been demonstrated in preclinical models that epigenetics underpins the transgenerational inheritance of stress-related behavioural phenotypes in both paternal and maternal lineages, providing further supporting evidence for heritability in humans. However, unbiased prospective studies of this nature are practically impossible to conduct in humans so preclinical models remain our best option for researching the molecular pathophysiologies underlying many neuropsychiatric conditions. While rodents will remain the dominant model system for preclinical studies (especially for addressing complex behavioural phenotypes), there is scope to expand current research of the molecular and epigenetic pathologies by using invertebrate models. Here, we will discuss the utility and advantages of two alternative model organisms–Caenorhabditis elegans and Drosophila melanogaster–and summarise the compelling insights of the epigenetic regulation of transgenerational inheritance that are potentially relevant to human psychiatry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gary R Hime
- Department of Anatomy and Physiology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville 3010, VIC, Australia
| | - Sophie LA Stonehouse
- Mental Health Theme, The Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Parkville 3052, VIC, Australia
| | - Terence Y Pang
- Department of Anatomy and Physiology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville 3010, VIC, Australia
- Mental Health Theme, The Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Parkville 3052, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bire S, Casteret S, Piégu B, Beauclair L, Moiré N, Arensbuger P, Bigot Y. Mariner Transposons Contain a Silencer: Possible Role of the Polycomb Repressive Complex 2. PLoS Genet 2016; 12:e1005902. [PMID: 26939020 PMCID: PMC4777549 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005902] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2014] [Accepted: 02/05/2016] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Transposable elements are driving forces for establishing genetic innovations such as transcriptional regulatory networks in eukaryotic genomes. Here, we describe a silencer situated in the last 300 bp of the Mos1 transposase open reading frame (ORF) which functions in vertebrate and arthropod cells. Functional silencers are also found at similar locations within three other animal mariner elements, i.e. IS630-Tc1-mariner (ITm) DD34D elements, Himar1, Hsmar1 and Mcmar1. These silencers are able to impact eukaryotic promoters monitoring strong, moderate or low expression as well as those of mariner elements located upstream of the transposase ORF. We report that the silencing involves at least two transcription factors (TFs) that are conserved within animal species, NFAT-5 and Alx1. These cooperatively act with YY1 to trigger the silencing activity. Four other housekeeping transcription factors (TFs), neuron restrictive silencer factor (NRSF), GAGA factor (GAF) and GTGT factor (GTF), were also found to have binding sites within mariner silencers but their impact in modulating the silencer activity remains to be further specified. Interestingly, an NRSF binding site was found to overlap a 30 bp motif coding a highly conserved PHxxYSPDLAPxD peptide in mariner transposases. We also present experimental evidence that silencing is mainly achieved by co-opting the host Polycomb Repressive Complex 2 pathway. However, we observe that when PRC2 is impaired another host silencing pathway potentially takes over to maintain weak silencer activity. Mariner silencers harbour features of Polycomb Response Elements, which are probably a way for mariner elements to self-repress their transcription and mobility in somatic and germinal cells when the required TFs are expressed. At the evolutionary scale, mariner elements, through their exaptation, might have been a source of silencers playing a role in the chromatin configuration in eukaryotic genomes. Transposons are mobile DNA sequences that have long co-evolved with the genome of their hosts. Consequently, they are involved in the generation of mutations, as well as the creation of genes and regulatory networks. Controlling the transposon activity, and consequently its negative effects on both the host soma and germ line, is a challenge for the survival of both the host and the transposon. To silence transposons, hosts often use defence mechanisms involving DNA methylation and RNA interference pathways. Here we show that mariner transposons can self-regulate their activity by using a silencer element located in their DNA sequence. The silencer element interferes with host housekeeping protein transcription factors involved in the polycomb silencing pathways. As the regulation of chromatin configuration by polycomb is an important regulator of animal development, our findings open the possibility that mariner silencers might have been exapted during animal evolution to participate in certain regulation pathways of their hosts. Since some of the TFs involved in mariner silencer activity play a role at different stages of nervous system development and neuron differentiation, it might be possible that mariner transposons can be active during some steps of cell differentiation. Interestingly, mariner transposons (i.e. IS630-Tc1-mariner (ITm) DD34D transposons) have so far only been found in genomes of animals having a nervous system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Solenne Bire
- PRC, UMR INRA-CNRS 7247, PRC, Nouzilly, France
- Institute of Biotechnology, University of Lausanne, and Center for Biotechnology UNIL-EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | | | | | | | | | - Peter Arensbuger
- Biological Sciences Department, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona, California, United States of America
| | - Yves Bigot
- PRC, UMR INRA-CNRS 7247, PRC, Nouzilly, France
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Marullo F, Cesarini E, Antonelli L, Gregoretti F, Oliva G, Lanzuolo C. Nucleoplasmic Lamin A/C and Polycomb group of proteins: An evolutionarily conserved interplay. Nucleus 2016; 7:103-11. [PMID: 26930442 PMCID: PMC4916880 DOI: 10.1080/19491034.2016.1157675] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Nuclear lamins are the main components of the nuclear lamina at the nuclear periphery, providing mechanical support to the nucleus. However, recent findings suggest that lamins also reside in the nuclear interior, as a distinct and dynamic pool with critical roles in transcriptional regulation. In our work we found a functional and evolutionary conserved crosstalk between Lamin A/C and the Polycomb group (PcG) of proteins, this being required for the maintenance of the PcG repressive functions. Indeed, Lamin A/C knock-down causes PcG foci dispersion and defects in PcG-mediated higher order structures, thereby leading to impaired PcG mediated transcriptional repression. By using ad-hoc algorithms for image analysis and PLA approaches we hereby show that PcG proteins are preferentially located in the nuclear interior where they interact with nucleoplasmic Lamin A/C. Taken together, our findings suggest that nuclear components, such as Lamin A/C, functionally interact with epigenetic factors to ensure the correct transcriptional program maintenance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Marullo
- a CNR Institute of Cell Biology and Neurobiology, IRCCS Santa Lucia Foundation , Rome , Italy
| | - E Cesarini
- a CNR Institute of Cell Biology and Neurobiology, IRCCS Santa Lucia Foundation , Rome , Italy
| | - L Antonelli
- b CNR Institute for High Performance Computing and Networking (ICAR) , Naples, Italy
| | - F Gregoretti
- b CNR Institute for High Performance Computing and Networking (ICAR) , Naples, Italy
| | - G Oliva
- b CNR Institute for High Performance Computing and Networking (ICAR) , Naples, Italy
| | - C Lanzuolo
- a CNR Institute of Cell Biology and Neurobiology, IRCCS Santa Lucia Foundation , Rome , Italy.,c Istituto Nazionale Genetica Molecolare Romeo ed Enrica Invernizzi , Milan , Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Minarovits J, Banati F, Szenthe K, Niller HH. Epigenetic Regulation. ADVANCES IN EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY 2016; 879:1-25. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-24738-0_1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
|
8
|
Montecino M, Stein G, Stein J, Zaidi K, Aguilar R. Multiple levels of epigenetic control for bone biology and pathology. Bone 2015; 81:733-738. [PMID: 25865577 PMCID: PMC4600412 DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2015.03.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2015] [Accepted: 03/13/2015] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Multiple dimensions of epigenetic control contribute to regulation of gene expression that governs bone biology and pathology. Once confined to DNA methylation and a limited number of post-translational modifications of histone proteins, the definition of epigenetic mechanisms is expanding to include contributions of non-coding RNAs and mitotic bookmarking, a mechanism for retaining phenotype identity during cell proliferation. Together these different levels of epigenetic control of physiological processes and their perturbations that are associated with compromised gene expression during the onset and progression of disease, have contributed to an unprecedented understanding of the activities (operation) of the genomic landscape. Here, we address general concepts that explain the contribution of epigenetic control to the dynamic regulation of gene expression during eukaryotic transcription. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled Epigenetics and Bone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Montecino
- Center for Biomedical Research and FONDAP Center for Genome Regulation, Faculty of Biological Sciences and Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Andres Bello, Avenida Republica 239, Santiago, Chile.
| | - Gary Stein
- Department of Biochemistry and Vermont Cancer Center, University of Vermont College of Medicine, 89 Beaumont Avenue, Burlington, VT, USA.
| | - Janet Stein
- Department of Biochemistry and Vermont Cancer Center, University of Vermont College of Medicine, 89 Beaumont Avenue, Burlington, VT, USA
| | - Kaleem Zaidi
- Department of Biochemistry and Vermont Cancer Center, University of Vermont College of Medicine, 89 Beaumont Avenue, Burlington, VT, USA
| | - Rodrigo Aguilar
- Center for Biomedical Research and FONDAP Center for Genome Regulation, Faculty of Biological Sciences and Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Andres Bello, Avenida Republica 239, Santiago, Chile
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Bajusz I, Sipos L, Pirity MK. Nucleotide substitutions revealing specific functions of Polycomb group genes. Mol Genet Metab 2015; 114:547-56. [PMID: 25669595 DOI: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2015.01.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2015] [Accepted: 01/22/2015] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
POLYCOMB group (PCG) proteins belong to the family of epigenetic regulators of genes playing important roles in differentiation and development. Mutants of PcG genes were isolated first in the fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster, resulting in spectacular segmental transformations due to the ectopic expression of homeotic genes. Homologs of Drosophila PcG genes were also identified in plants and in vertebrates and subsequent experiments revealed the general role of PCG proteins in the maintenance of the repressed state of chromatin through cell divisions. The past decades of gene targeting experiments have allowed us to make significant strides towards understanding how the network of PCG proteins influences multiple aspects of cellular fate determination during development. Being involved in the transmission of specific expression profiles of different cell lineages, PCG proteins were found to control wide spectra of unrelated epigenetic processes in vertebrates, such as stem cell plasticity and renewal, genomic imprinting and inactivation of X-chromosome. PCG proteins also affect regulation of metabolic genes being important for switching programs between pluripotency and differentiation. Insight into the precise roles of PCG proteins in normal physiological processes has emerged from studies employing cell culture-based systems and genetically modified animals. Here we summarize the findings obtained from PcG mutant fruit flies and mice generated to date with a focus on PRC1 and PRC2 members altered by nucleotide substitutions resulting in specific alleles. We also include a compilation of lessons learned from these models about the in vivo functions of this complex protein family. With multiple knockout lines, sophisticated approaches to study the consequences of peculiar missense point mutations, and insights from complementary gain-of-function systems in hand, we are now in a unique position to significantly advance our understanding of the molecular basis of in vivo functions of PcG proteins.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Izabella Bajusz
- Biological Research Centre, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Institute of Genetics, H-6701 Szeged, Hungary.
| | - László Sipos
- Biological Research Centre, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Institute of Genetics, H-6701 Szeged, Hungary
| | - Melinda K Pirity
- Biological Research Centre, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Institute of Genetics, H-6701 Szeged, Hungary
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Abstract
Correct expression of specific sets of genes in time and space ensures the establishment and maintenance of cell identity, which is required for proper development of multicellular organisms. Polycomb and Trithorax group proteins form multisubunit complexes that antagonistically act in epigenetic gene repression and activation, respectively. The traditional view of Polycomb repressive complexes (PRCs) as executors of long-lasting and stable gene repression is being extended by evidence of flexible repression in response to developmental and environmental cues, increasing the complexity of mechanisms that ensure selective and properly timed PRC targeting and release of Polycomb repression. Here, we review advances in understanding of the composition, mechanisms of targeting, and function of plant PRCs and discuss the parallels and differences between plant and animal models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iva Mozgova
- Department of Plant Biology, Uppsala BioCenter, and Linnean Center for Plant Biology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, SE-75007 Uppsala, Sweden; ,
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Steffen PA, Ringrose L. What are memories made of? How Polycomb and Trithorax proteins mediate epigenetic memory. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2014; 15:340-56. [PMID: 24755934 DOI: 10.1038/nrm3789] [Citation(s) in RCA: 249] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
In any biological system with memory, the state of the system depends on its history. Epigenetic memory maintains gene expression states through cell generations without a change in DNA sequence and in the absence of initiating signals. It is immensely powerful in biological systems - it adds long-term stability to gene expression states and increases the robustness of gene regulatory networks. The Polycomb group (PcG) and Trithorax group (TrxG) proteins can confer long-term, mitotically heritable memory by sustaining silent and active gene expression states, respectively. Several recent studies have advanced our understanding of the molecular mechanisms of this epigenetic memory during DNA replication and mitosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philipp A Steffen
- Institute of Molecular Biotechnology (IMBA), Dr. Bohr-Gasse 3, 1030 Vienna, Austria
| | - Leonie Ringrose
- Institute of Molecular Biotechnology (IMBA), Dr. Bohr-Gasse 3, 1030 Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Kolybaba A, Classen AK. Sensing cellular states--signaling to chromatin pathways targeting Polycomb and Trithorax group function. Cell Tissue Res 2014; 356:477-93. [PMID: 24728925 DOI: 10.1007/s00441-014-1824-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2013] [Accepted: 01/22/2014] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Cells respond to extra- and intra-cellular signals by dynamically changing their gene expression patterns. After termination of the original signal, new expression patterns are maintained by epigenetic DNA and histone modifications. This represents a powerful mechanism that enables long-term phenotypic adaptation to transient signals. Adaptation of epigenetic landscapes is important for mediating cellular differentiation during development and allows adjustment to altered environmental conditions throughout life. Work over the last decade has begun to elucidate the way that extra- and intra-cellular signals lead to changes in gene expression patterns by directly modulating the function of chromatin-associated proteins. Here, we review key signaling-to-chromatin pathways that are specifically thought to target Polycomb and Trithorax group complexes, a classic example of epigenetically acting gene silencers and activators important in development, stem cell differentiation and cancer. We discuss the influence that signals triggered by kinase cascades, metabolic fluctuations and cell-cycle dynamics have on the function of these protein complexes. Further investigation into these pathways will be important for understanding the mechanisms that maintain epigenetic stability and those that promote epigenetic plasticity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Addie Kolybaba
- Ludwig Maximilians University Munich, Faculty of Biology, Grosshaderner Strasse 2-4, 82152, Planegg-Martinsried, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
How is epigenetic information maintained through DNA replication? Epigenetics Chromatin 2013; 6:32. [PMID: 24225278 PMCID: PMC3852060 DOI: 10.1186/1756-8935-6-32] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2013] [Accepted: 09/12/2013] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
DNA replication is a highly conserved process that accurately copies the genetic information from one generation to the next. The processes of chromatin disassembly and reassembly during DNA replication also have to be precisely regulated to ensure that the genetic material is compactly packaged to fit into the nucleus while also maintaining the epigenetic information that is carried by the histone proteins bound to the DNA, through cell divisions. Half of the histones that are deposited during replication are from the parental chromatin and carry the parental epigenetic information, while the other half of the histones are newly-synthesized. It has been of growing interest to understand how the parental pattern of epigenetic marks is re-established on the newly-synthesized histones, in a DNA sequence-specific manner, in order to maintain the epigenetic information through cell divisions. In this review we will discuss how histone chaperone proteins precisely coordinate the chromatin assembly process during DNA replication. We also discuss the recent evidence that histone-modifying enzymes, rather than the parental histones, are themselves epigenetic factors that remain associated with the DNA through replication to re-establish the epigenetic information on the newly-assembled chromatin.
Collapse
|
14
|
Lo Sardo F, Lanzuolo C, Comoglio F, De Bardi M, Paro R, Orlando V. PcG-mediated higher-order chromatin structures modulate replication programs at the Drosophila BX-C. PLoS Genet 2013; 9:e1003283. [PMID: 23437006 PMCID: PMC3578750 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003283] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2012] [Accepted: 12/14/2012] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Polycomb group proteins (PcG) exert conserved epigenetic functions that convey maintenance of repressed transcriptional states, via post-translational histone modifications and high order structure formation. During S-phase, in order to preserve cell identity, in addition to DNA information, PcG-chromatin-mediated epigenetic signatures need to be duplicated requiring a tight coordination between PcG proteins and replication programs. However, the interconnection between replication timing control and PcG functions remains unknown. Using Drosophila embryonic cell lines, we find that, while presence of specific PcG complexes and underlying transcription state are not the sole determinants of cellular replication timing, PcG-mediated higher-order structures appear to dictate the timing of replication and maintenance of the silenced state. Using published datasets we show that PRC1, PRC2, and PhoRC complexes differently correlate with replication timing of their targets. In the fully repressed BX-C, loss of function experiments revealed a synergistic role for PcG proteins in the maintenance of replication programs through the mediation of higher-order structures. Accordingly, replication timing analysis performed on two Drosophila cell lines differing for BX-C gene expression states, PcG distribution, and chromatin domain conformation revealed a cell-type-specific replication program that mirrors lineage-specific BX-C higher-order structures. Our work suggests that PcG complexes, by regulating higher-order chromatin structure at their target sites, contribute to the definition and the maintenance of genomic structural domains where genes showing the same epigenetic state replicate at the same time. DNA replication is a tightly orchestrated process that precisely duplicates the entire genome during cell division to ensure that daughter cells inherit the same genetic information. The genome is replicated following a specific temporal program, where different segments replicate in distinct moments of the S phase correlating with active (early) and repressed (late) transcriptional state of resident genes. Moreover, replicating chromosomal domains are organized in the nuclear space, perhaps to guarantee the conservation of the same topological order in daughter cells. Epigenetic mechanisms, acting via chromatin organization, determine transcriptional states and must be maintained through cell division. Here, we analyzed in detail the link between Polycomb Group (PcG) proteins, higher-order chromatin structure, and replication timing in Drosophila. By using bioinformatic analyses combined with functional experiments, we show that Polycomb Repressive Complex 1 (PRC1), PRC2, and PhoRC differently correlate with replication timing of their targets and that transcription per se does not determine replication timing. Strikingly, by analyzing the PcG-regulated Bithorax Complex, where PRC1, PRC2, and PhoRC complexes are bound to repressed targets, we provide evidence for a synergistic role of PcG proteins in the modulation and maintenance of replication timing through the definition of specific, topologically distinct genomic domains.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Federica Lo Sardo
- Dulbecco Telethon Institute, IRCCS Santa Lucia Foundation, Rome, Italy
| | - Chiara Lanzuolo
- Dulbecco Telethon Institute, IRCCS Santa Lucia Foundation, Rome, Italy
- CNR Institute of Cellular Biology and Neurobiology, IRCCS Santa Lucia Foundation, Rome, Italy
| | - Federico Comoglio
- Department of Biosystems Science and Engineering, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zürich, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Marco De Bardi
- Neuroimmunology Unit, IRCCS Santa Lucia Foundation, Rome, Italy
| | - Renato Paro
- Department of Biosystems Science and Engineering, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zürich, Basel, Switzerland
- Faculty of Science, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Valerio Orlando
- Dulbecco Telethon Institute, IRCCS Santa Lucia Foundation, Rome, Italy
- Neuroimmunology Unit, IRCCS Santa Lucia Foundation, Rome, Italy
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Lin X, Tirichine L, Bowler C. Protocol: Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) methodology to investigate histone modifications in two model diatom species. PLANT METHODS 2012; 8:48. [PMID: 23217141 PMCID: PMC3546051 DOI: 10.1186/1746-4811-8-48] [Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2012] [Accepted: 12/05/2012] [Indexed: 05/18/2023]
Abstract
In this report we describe a chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) protocol for two fully sequenced model diatom species Phaeodactylum tricornutum and Thalassiosira pseudonana. This protocol allows the extraction of satisfactory amounts of chromatin and gives reproducible results. We coupled the ChIP assay with real time quantitative PCR. Our results reveal that the two major histone marks H3K4me2 and H3K9me2 exist in P. tricornutum and T. pseudonana. As in other eukaryotes, H3K4me2 marks active genes whereas H3K9me2 marks transcriptionally inactive transposable elements. Unexpectedly however, T. pseudonana housekeeping genes also show a relative enrichment of H3K9me2. We also discuss optimization of the procedure, including growth conditions, cross linking and sonication. Validation of the protocol provides a set of genes and transposable elements that can be used as controls for studies using ChIP in each diatom species. This protocol can be easily adapted to other diatoms and eukaryotic phytoplankton species for genetic and biochemical studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xin Lin
- Ecole Normale Supérieure, Institut de Biologie de l’ENS, IBENS, Inserm, U1024, CNRS, UMR 8197, Génomique, Environnementale et Evolutive Section 3 CNRS UMR8197, 46 rue d’Ulm, Paris, 75005, France
| | - Leïla Tirichine
- Ecole Normale Supérieure, Institut de Biologie de l’ENS, IBENS, Inserm, U1024, CNRS, UMR 8197, Génomique, Environnementale et Evolutive Section 3 CNRS UMR8197, 46 rue d’Ulm, Paris, 75005, France
| | - Chris Bowler
- Ecole Normale Supérieure, Institut de Biologie de l’ENS, IBENS, Inserm, U1024, CNRS, UMR 8197, Génomique, Environnementale et Evolutive Section 3 CNRS UMR8197, 46 rue d’Ulm, Paris, 75005, France
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Abstract
The first genes composing the Polycomb group (PcG) were identified 50 years ago in Drosophila melanogaster as essential developmental functions that regulate the correct segmental expression of homeotic selector genes. In the past two decades, what was initially described as a large family of chromatin-associated proteins involved in the maintenance of transcriptional repression to maintain cellular memory of homeotic genes turned out to be a highly conserved and sophisticated network of epigenetic regulators that play key roles in multiple aspects of cell physiology and identity, including regulation of all developmental genes, cell differentiation, stem and somatic cell reprogramming and response to environmental stimuli. These myriad phenotypes further spread interest for the contribution that PcG proteins revealed in the pathogenesis and progression of cancer and other complex diseases. Recent novel insights have increasingly clarified the molecular regulatory mechanisms at the basis of PcG-mediated epigenetic silencing and opened new visions about PcG functions in cells. In this review, we focus on the multiple modes of action of the PcG complexes and describe their biological roles.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chiara Lanzuolo
- Dulbecco Telethon Institute, Epigenetics and Genome Reprogramming, IRCCS Santa Lucia Foundation, 00143 Rome, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Lanzuolo C. Epigenetic alterations in muscular disorders. Comp Funct Genomics 2012; 2012:256892. [PMID: 22761545 PMCID: PMC3385594 DOI: 10.1155/2012/256892] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2012] [Revised: 04/11/2012] [Accepted: 04/19/2012] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Epigenetic mechanisms, acting via chromatin organization, fix in time and space different transcriptional programs and contribute to the quality, stability, and heritability of cell-specific transcription programs. In the last years, great advances have been made in our understanding of mechanisms by which this occurs in normal subjects. However, only a small part of the complete picture has been revealed. Abnormal gene expression patterns are often implicated in the development of different diseases, and thus epigenetic studies from patients promise to fill an important lack of knowledge, deciphering aberrant molecular mechanisms at the basis of pathogenesis and diseases progression. The identification of epigenetic modifications that could be used as targets for therapeutic interventions could be particularly timely in the light of pharmacologically reversion of pathological perturbations, avoiding changes in DNA sequences. Here I discuss the available information on epigenetic mechanisms that, altered in neuromuscular disorders, could contribute to the progression of the disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chiara Lanzuolo
- CNR Institute of Cellular Biology and Neurobiology, IRCCS Santa Lucia Foundation, Via Del Fosso di Fiorano 64, 00143 Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|