1
|
Dahal A, Shakya M, Pant D, Adhikari A, Colin-Jones R, Theiss-Nyland K, Pollard AJ, Basnyat B, Shrestha S. Public engagement during a typhoid conjugate vaccine trial in Lalitpur, Nepal- experience, challenges and lessons learnt. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2022; 18:2043104. [PMID: 35240925 PMCID: PMC9196674 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2022.2043104] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Typhoid is a public health problem in Nepal. To generate evidence on the impact of Typhoid Conjugate Vaccine (TCV), a phase 3, double-blind, randomized controlled trial was conducted in Lalitpur, Nepal. 20,000 children aged between 9 months and ≤16 years were vaccinated with a new TCV, or control vaccine. Participants were actively followed for safety and efficacy over 2 years through passive surveillance (PS) clinics. Several challenges were encountered during vaccination and PS stemming from misinformation, misconception, and fear around clinical trials in the community. Public engagement (PE) activities were conducted across various tiers moving from decision makers in the first tier; to elected local representatives in the second tier; ending with interaction in community with parents/guardians of the targeted population. Prior and during vaccination, engagement was conducted to inform about the study and discuss the importance of vaccination. Post-vaccination, engagement was conducted to inform about PS clinics, alleviate study concerns and share study updates. Direct and continuous interaction with community stakeholders, including parents/guardians of the targeted population contributed to build trust around the study and community willingness to be involved. It helped to raise awareness, drive away misconceptions, and allowed adaptation according to feedback from community members.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashata Dahal
- Patan Academy of Health Sciences, Oxford University Clinical Research Unit-Nepal, Lalitpur, Nepal
| | - Mila Shakya
- Patan Academy of Health Sciences, Oxford University Clinical Research Unit-Nepal, Lalitpur, Nepal
| | - Dikshya Pant
- Department of Paediatrics, Patan Academy of Health Sciences, Lalitpur, Nepal
| | - Anup Adhikari
- Nepal Family Development Foundation, Lalitpur, Nepal
| | - Rachel Colin-Jones
- Oxford Vaccine Group, Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford and the NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, UK
| | - Katherine Theiss-Nyland
- Oxford Vaccine Group, Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford and the NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, UK
| | - Andrew J Pollard
- Oxford Vaccine Group, Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford and the NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, UK
| | - Buddha Basnyat
- Patan Academy of Health Sciences, Oxford University Clinical Research Unit-Nepal, Lalitpur, Nepal
| | - Shrijana Shrestha
- Department of Paediatrics, Patan Academy of Health Sciences, Lalitpur, Nepal
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Paramasivan S, Davies P, Richards A, Wade J, Rooshenas L, Mills N, Realpe A, Raj JP, Subramani S, Ives J, Huxtable R, Blazeby JM, Donovan JL. What empirical research has been undertaken on the ethics of clinical research in India? A systematic scoping review and narrative synthesis. BMJ Glob Health 2021; 6:e004729. [PMID: 34006518 PMCID: PMC8137180 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-004729] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2020] [Revised: 02/13/2021] [Accepted: 02/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The post-2005 rise in clinical trials and clinical research conducted in India was accompanied by frequent reports of unethical practices, leading to a series of regulatory changes. We conducted a systematic scoping review to obtain an overview of empirical research pertaining to the ethics of clinical trials/research in India. METHODS Our search strategy combined terms related to ethics/bioethics, informed consent, clinical trials/research and India, across nine databases, up to November 2019. Peer-reviewed research exploring ethical aspects of clinical trials/research in India with any stakeholder groups was included. We developed an evidence map, undertook a narrative synthesis and identified research gaps. A consultation exercise with stakeholders in India helped contextualise the review and identify additional research priorities. RESULTS Titles/Abstracts of 9699 articles were screened, full text of 282 obtained and 80 were included. Research on the ethics of clinical trials/research covered a wide range of topics, often conducted with little to no funding. Studies predominantly examined what lay (patients/public) and professional participants (eg, healthcare staff/students/faculty) know about topics such as research ethics or understand from the information given to obtain their consent for research participation. Easily accessible groups, namely ethics committee members and healthcare students were frequently researched. Research gaps included developing a better understanding of the recruitment-informed consent process, including the doctor-patient interaction, in multiple contexts and exploring issues of equity and justice in clinical trials/research. CONCLUSION The review demonstrates that while a wide range of topics have been studied in India, the focus is largely on assessing knowledge levels across different population groups. This is a useful starting point, but fundamental questions remain unanswered about informed consent processes and broader issues of inequity that pervade the clinical trials/research landscape. A priority-setting exercise and appropriate funding mechanisms to support researchers in India would help improve the clinical trials/research ecosystem.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sangeetha Paramasivan
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, NIHR ARC West, Bristol, UK
| | - Philippa Davies
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- Medical Research Council (MRC) ConDuCT-II Trials Methodology Hub, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Alison Richards
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- Medical Research Council (MRC) ConDuCT-II Trials Methodology Hub, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Julia Wade
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Leila Rooshenas
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, NIHR ARC West, Bristol, UK
| | - Nicola Mills
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, NIHR ARC West, Bristol, UK
| | - Alba Realpe
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, NIHR ARC West, Bristol, UK
| | - Jeffrey Pradeep Raj
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Seth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Supriya Subramani
- Institute of Biomedical Ethics and History of Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Jonathan Ives
- Centre for Ethics in Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Richard Huxtable
- Centre for Ethics in Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Jane M Blazeby
- University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, NIHR ARC West, Bristol, UK
- University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, NIHR Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, Bristol, UK
| | - Jenny L Donovan
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, NIHR ARC West, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Colin-Jones R, Shakya M, Voysey M, Theiss-Nyland K, Smith N, Pant D, Liu X, Tonks S, Mazur O, Farooq YG, Kelly S, Adhikari A, Dongol S, Karkey A, Shrestha S, Basnyat B, Pollard AJ. Logistics of Implementing a Large-scale Typhoid Vaccine Trial in Kathmandu, Nepal. Clin Infect Dis 2020; 68:S138-S145. [PMID: 30845335 PMCID: PMC6405269 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciy1125] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Typhoid fever is estimated to affect over 20 million people per year worldwide, with infants, children, and adolescents in south-central and southeast Asia experiencing the greatest burden of disease. The Typhoid Vaccine Acceleration Consortium (TyVAC) aims to support the introduction of typhoid conjugate vaccines into Gavi-eligible countries in an effort to reduce morbidity and mortality from typhoid. TyVAC-Nepal is a large-scale, participant- and observer-blind, individually randomized, controlled trial evaluating the efficacy of a newly developed typhoid conjugate vaccine in an urban setting in Nepal. In order to effectively deliver the trial, a number of key elements required meticulous planning. Public engagement strategies were considered early, and involved the implementation of a tiered approach. Approximately 300 staff were employed and trained in order to achieve the mass vaccination of 20 000 children aged 9 months to ≤16 years old over a 4-month period. There were 19 vaccination clinics established across the Lalitpur metropolitan city in the Kathmandu valley. Participants will be followed for 2 years post-vaccination to measure the rate reduction of blood culture–confirmed typhoid fever in the vaccination arm as compared to the control arm. The experience of conducting this large-scale vaccine trial suggests that comprehensive planning, continuous monitoring, and an ability to adapt plans in response to feedback are key.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel Colin-Jones
- Oxford Vaccine Group, Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Mila Shakya
- Oxford University Clinical research Unit - Nepal
| | - Merryn Voysey
- Oxford Vaccine Group, Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, United Kingdom
| | | | - Nicola Smith
- Oxford Vaccine Group, Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Dikshya Pant
- Oxford University Clinical research Unit - Nepal
| | - Xinxue Liu
- Oxford Vaccine Group, Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Susan Tonks
- Oxford Vaccine Group, Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Olga Mazur
- Oxford Vaccine Group, Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Yama G Farooq
- Oxford Vaccine Group, Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Sarah Kelly
- Oxford Vaccine Group, Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Andrew J Pollard
- Oxford Vaccine Group, Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Day S, Blumberg M, Vu T, Zhao Y, Rennie S, Tucker JD. Stakeholder engagement to inform HIV clinical trials: a systematic review of the evidence. J Int AIDS Soc 2018; 21 Suppl 7:e25174. [PMID: 30334358 PMCID: PMC6192899 DOI: 10.1002/jia2.25174] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2018] [Accepted: 07/20/2018] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Stakeholder engagement is an essential component of HIV clinical trials. We define stakeholder engagement as an input by individuals or groups with an interest in HIV clinical trials to inform the design or conduct of said trials. Despite its value, stakeholder engagement to inform HIV clinical trials has not been rigorously examined. The purpose of our systematic review is to examine stakeholder engagement for HIV clinical trials and compare it to the recommendations of the UNAIDS/AVAC Good Participatory Practice (GPP) guidelines. METHODS We used the PRISMA checklist and identified English language studies describing stakeholder engagement to inform HIV clinical trials. Four databases (PubMed, Ovid, CINAHL and Web of Science) and six journals were searched, with additional studies identified using handsearching and expert input. Two independent reviewers examined citations, abstracts and full texts. Data were extracted on country, engagement methods, stakeholder types and purpose of stakeholder engagement. Based on the GPP guidelines, we examined how frequently stakeholder engagement was conducted to inform clinical trial research question development, protocol development, recruitment, enrolment, follow-up, results and dissemination. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Of the 917 citations identified, 108 studies were included in the analysis. Forty-eight studies (44.4%) described stakeholder engagement in high-income countries, thirty (27.8%) in middle-income countries and nine (8.3%) in low-income countries. Fourteen methods for stakeholder engagement were identified, including individual (e.g. interviews) and group (e.g. community advisory boards) strategies. Thirty-five types of stakeholders were engaged, with approximately half of the studies (60; 55.6%) engaging HIV-affected community stakeholders (e.g. people living with HIV, at-risk or related populations of interest). We observed greater frequency of stakeholder engagement to inform protocol development (49 studies; 45.4%) and trial recruitment (47 studies; 43.5%). Fewer studies described stakeholder engagement to inform post-trial processes related to trial results (3; 2.8%) and dissemination (11; 10.2%). CONCLUSIONS Our findings identify important directions for future stakeholder engagement research and suggestions for policy. Most notably, we found that stakeholder engagement was more frequently conducted to inform early stages of HIV clinical trials compared to later stages. In order to meet recommendations established in the GPP guidelines, greater stakeholder engagement across all clinical trial stages is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suzanne Day
- Institute for Global Health and Infectious DiseasesUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillNCUSA
| | - Meredith Blumberg
- Institute for Global Health and Infectious DiseasesUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillNCUSA
| | - Thi Vu
- Institute for Global Health and Infectious DiseasesUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillNCUSA
| | - Yang Zhao
- University of North Carolina – Project ChinaGuangzhouChina
| | - Stuart Rennie
- Department of Social MedicineUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillNCUSA
- Center for BioethicsUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillNCUSA
| | - Joseph D. Tucker
- Institute for Global Health and Infectious DiseasesUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillNCUSA
- University of North Carolina – Project ChinaGuangzhouChina
- School of MedicineUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillNCUSA
- Faculty of Infectious DiseasesLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical MedicineLondonUK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Craig SR, Lahey T, Dixit A, Fordham von Reyn C. Altruism, Scepticism, and collective decision-making in foreign-born U.S. residents in a tuberculosis vaccine trial. BMC Public Health 2018; 18:535. [PMID: 29685114 PMCID: PMC5914029 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-018-5460-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2017] [Accepted: 04/12/2018] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The current vaccine against tuberculosis, BCG, is effective when given in most TB-endemic countries at birth but has diminished efficacy against pulmonary TB after 15-20 years. As a result, new booster vaccines for adolescents and adults are being developed to realize the World Health Organization target of global elimination of TB by 2035. Multiple TB candidates thus are in active clinical development. METHODS One of these, DAR-901, is advancing in human clinical trials. These clinical trials are conducted in BCG immunized adults with and without HIV infection in order to assess safety and efficacy among the people most in need of a new vaccine. A Phase I dose escalation trial of DAR-901 in BCG-immunized adults with or without HIV infection was conducted between 2014 and 2016. This offered an unusual opportunity to qualitatively examine why foreign-born adults living in the United States - a poorly studied population - decide to participate, or not, in clinical trials. RESULTS We conducted a qualitative study of individuals who were recruited to participate in this Phase I vaccine trial, interviewing those who agreed and declined to participate. We found diverse motivations for participation or refusal; varied understandings of tuberculosis and vaccines; and complex views about how 'informed consent' can be at odds with cultural understandings of power, authority, and medical decision-making. These dynamics included: knowledge (direct or indirect) of tuberculosis, a desire to be altruistic and simultaneous hopes for personal gain as well as concerns over what remuneration for participation could mean, the importance of personal relationships with care providers in shaping volunteerism, concerns over privacy, and evidence of how culture and history shape medical decision-making. CONCLUSIONS This US-based trial, aimed at addressing a crucible global health issue, raises productive questions about the interface between altruism and scepticism regarding clinical research participation. TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT02063555 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sienna R Craig
- Department of Anthropology, Dartmouth College, 6047 Silsby Hall, Hanover, NH, 03755, USA.
| | - Timothy Lahey
- Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Harrington L, Van Damme P, Vandermeulen C, Mali S. Recruitment barriers for prophylactic vaccine trials: A study in Belgium. Vaccine 2017; 35:6598-6603. [PMID: 29074202 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.10.041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2017] [Revised: 10/12/2017] [Accepted: 10/13/2017] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Recruitment of volunteers is one of the main challenges in clinical trial management, and there is little information about recruitment barriers for preventative vaccine trials. We investigated both the recruitment barriers and recruitment strategies for preventive vaccine trials in Belgium. A 10 min survey was used as well as interviews of staff at all clinical trial sites in Belgium that regularly perform vaccine trials. We observed that there are successful recruitment strategies and few recruitment issues for trials involving healthy adults and those over 65 years old. However, challenges face the recruitment of paediatric populations, pregnant women, patients and the very elderly (over 85 years old). From these results, we identified three priority areas to increase recruitment for prophylactic vaccine trials in Belgium. These are: the lack of public knowledge about infectious diseases; the lack of resources of healthcare professionals to take part in clinical trials; and the burden to potential volunteers to take part in a trial. These were discussed with stakeholders and solutions were proposed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Pierre Van Damme
- Centre for the Evaluation of Vaccination, Vaccine & Infectious Disease Institute, University of Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Corinne Vandermeulen
- Leuven University Vaccinology Center, Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Belgium
| | - Stéphanie Mali
- Federal Agency for Medicines and Health Products (FAMHP), Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Volunteer motivators for participating in HIV vaccine clinical trials in Nairobi, Kenya. PLoS One 2017; 12:e0183788. [PMID: 28880880 PMCID: PMC5589082 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183788] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2016] [Accepted: 08/12/2017] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background 1.5 million Kenyans are living with HIV/AIDS as per 2015 estimates. Though there is a notable decline in new HIV infections, continued effort is still needed to develop an efficacious, accessible and affordable HIV vaccine. HIV vaccine clinical trials bear risks, hence a need to understand volunteer motivators for enrolment, retention and follow-up. Understanding the factors that motivate volunteers to participate in a clinical trial can help to strategize, refine targeting and thus increase enrolment of volunteers in future HIV vaccine clinical trials. The health belief model classifies motivators into social benefits such as ‘advancing research’ and collaboration with science, and personal benefits such as health benefits and financial interests. Method A thematic analysis was carried out on data obtained from four HIV clinical trials conducted at KAVI-Institute of Clinical Research in Nairobi Kenya from 2009 to 2015. Responses were obtained from a Questionnaire administered to the volunteers during their screening visit at the research site. Results Of the 281 healthy, HIV-uninfected volunteers participating in this study; 38% were motivated by personal benefits including, 31% motivated by health benefits and 7% motivated by possible financial gains. In addition, 62% of the volunteers were motivated by social benefits with 20% of who were seeking to help their family/society/world while 42% were interested in advancing research. Conclusion The majority of volunteers in the HIV vaccine trials at our site were motivated by social benefits, suggesting that altruism can be a major contributor to participation in HIV vaccine studies. Personal benefits were a secondary motivator for the volunteers. The motivators to volunteer in HIV clinical trials were similar across ages, education level and gender. Education on what is needed (including volunteer participation) to develop an efficacious vaccine could be the key to greater volunteer motivation to participate in HIV vaccine clinical trials.
Collapse
|
8
|
Rubincam C, Lacombe-Duncan A, Newman PA. Taking culture seriously in biomedical HIV prevention trials: a meta-synthesis of qualitative studies. Expert Rev Vaccines 2015; 15:331-47. [PMID: 26560332 DOI: 10.1586/14760584.2016.1118349] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
A substantial gap exists between widespread acknowledgement of the importance of incorporating cultural sensitivity in biomedical HIV prevention trials and empirical evidence to guide the operationalization of cultural sensitivity in these trials. We conducted a systematic literature search and qualitative meta-synthesis to explore how culture is conceptualized and operationalized in global biomedical HIV prevention trials. Across 29 studies, the majority (n = 17) were conducted in resource-limited settings. We identified four overarching themes: (1) semantic cultural sensitivity - challenges in communicating scientific terminology into local vernaculars; (2) instrumental cultural sensitivity - understanding historical experiences to guide tailoring of trial activities; (3) budgetary, logistical, and personnel implications of operationalizing cultural sensitivity; and (4) culture as an asset. Future investigations should address how sociocultural considerations are operationalized across the spectrum of trial preparedness, implementation, and dissemination in particular sociocultural contexts, including intervention studies and evaluations of the effectiveness of methods used to operationalize culturally sensitive practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clara Rubincam
- a Factor-Inwentash Faculty of Social Work , University of Toronto , Toronto , Canada
| | - Ashley Lacombe-Duncan
- a Factor-Inwentash Faculty of Social Work , University of Toronto , Toronto , Canada
| | - Peter A Newman
- a Factor-Inwentash Faculty of Social Work , University of Toronto , Toronto , Canada
| |
Collapse
|