Reversal of hyperglycemia in diabetic mice by a marginal islet mass together with human blood outgrowth endothelial cells is independent of the delivery technique and blood clot-induced processes

Human endothelial colony-forming cells in regenerative therapy: A systematic review of controlled preclinical animal studies

Endothelial colony‐forming cells (ECFCs) hold significant promise as candidates for regenerative therapy of vascular injury. Existing studies remain largely preclinical and exhibit marked design heterogeneity. A systematic review of controlled preclinical trials of human ECFCs is needed to guide future study design and to accelerate clinical translation. A systematic search of Medline and EMBASE on 1 April 2019 returned 3131 unique entries of which 66 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Most studies used ECFCs derived from umbilical cord or adult peripheral blood. Studies used genetically modified immunodeficient mice (n = 52) and/or rats (n = 16). ECFC phenotypes were inconsistently characterized. While >90% of studies used CD31+ and CD45−, CD14− was demonstrated in 73% of studies, CD146+ in 42%, and CD10+ in 35%. Most disease models invoked ischemia. Peripheral vascular ischemia (n = 29), central nervous system ischemia (n = 14), connective tissue injury (n = 10), and cardiovascular ischemia and reperfusion injury (n = 7) were studied most commonly. Studies showed predominantly positive results; only 13 studies reported ≥1 outcome with null results, three reported only null results, and one reported harm. Quality assessment with SYRCLE revealed potential sources of bias in most studies. Preclinical ECFC studies are associated with benefit across several ischemic conditions in animal models, although combining results is limited by marked heterogeneity in study design. In particular, characterization of ECFCs varied and aspects of reporting introduced risk of bias in most studies. More studies with greater focus on standardized cell characterization and consistency of the disease model are needed.

Tissue-engineering approaches in pancreatic islet transplantation

Pancreatic islet transplantation is a promising alternative to whole-pancreas transplantation as a treatment of type 1 diabetes mellitus. This technique has been extensively developed during the past few years, with the main purpose of minimizing the complications arising from the standard protocols used in organ transplantation. By using a variety of strategies used in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine, pancreatic islets have been successfully introduced in host patients with different outcomes in terms of islet survival and functionality, as well as the desired normoglycemic control. Here, we describe and discuss those strategies to transplant islets together with different scaffolds, in combination with various cell types and diffusible factors, and always with the aim of reducing host immune response and achieving islet survival, regardless of the site of transplantation.

Islet heparan sulfate but not heparan sulfate proteoglycan core protein is lost during islet isolation and undergoes recovery post-islet transplantation

Islet beta cells in situ express intracellular heparan sulfate (HS), a property previously shown in vitro to be important for their survival. We report that HS levels inside islet beta cells correlate with the novel intracellular localization of the HSPG core proteins for collagen type XVIII (Col18), a conventional extracellular matrix component. Syndecan-1 (Sdc1) and CD44 core proteins were similarly localized inside beta cells. During isolation, mouse islets selectively lose HS to 11-27% of normal levels but retain their HSPG core proteins. Intra-islet HS failed to recover substantially during culture for 4 days and was not reconstituted in vitro using HS mimetics. In contrast, significant recovery of intra-islet HS to ∼40-50% of normal levels occurred by 5-10 days after isotransplantation. Loss of islet HS during the isolation procedure is independent of heparanase (a HS-degrading endoglycosidase) and due, in part, to oxidative damage. Treatment with antioxidants reduced islet cell death by ∼60% and increased the HS content of isolated islets by ∼twofold compared to untreated islets, preserving intra-islet HS to ∼60% of the normal HS content of islets in situ. These findings suggest that the preservation of islet HS during the islet isolation process may optimize islet survival posttransplant.