EGFR expression levels affect the mode of action of EGFR-targeting monoclonal antibodies

Different costs of therapeutic resistance in cancer: Short- and long-term impact of population heterogeneity

Therapeutic resistance continues to undercut long-term success of many promising cancer treatments. At times, development of therapeutic resistance can come at a fitness cost for the cancer cell population, which could potentially be leveraged to the patient's advantage. A mathematical formulation of such a situation was proposed by Pressley et al. (2020), who discussed two scenarios, namely, when developing therapeutic resistance can come at a cost to proliferative capacity (such as when a drug targets a growth receptor), or to the total tumor carrying capacity (such as when a drug targets neovascularization). Here we expand the analysis of the two models and evaluate both short- and long-term dynamics of a population heterogeneous with respect to resistance. We analyze the four initial distributions with respect to resistance at the time of treatment initiation: uniform, bell-shaped, exponential, and U-shaped. We show that final population composition is invariant to the initial distribution, with a single clone eventually dominating within the population; the value of the resistance parameter of the final clone depends on other system parameters but not on the initial distribution. Transitional behaviors, however, which may have more significant implications for immediate treatment decisions, depend critically on the initial distribution. Furthermore, we show that depending on the mechanism for the cost of resistance (i.e., proliferation vs carrying capacity), increase in natural cell death rate has opposite effects, with higher natural death rate selecting for less resistant cell clones in the long term for proliferation-dependent model, and selecting for more resistant cell clones for carrying capacity-dependent model, a prediction that may have implications for combination therapy with cytotoxic agents. We conclude with a discussion of strengths and limitations of using modeling for understanding treatment trajectory, as well as the promise of model-informed evolutionary steering for improved long-term therapeutic outcomes.

Structure and activity of an anti-epidermal growth factor receptor antibody without galactose-α-1,3-galactose residues

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is a transmembrane glycoprotein, which has been considered as one of the key targets for cancer therapy. However, currently approved therapeutic anti-EGFR antibody may cause the hypersensitivity reaction induced by galactose-α-1,3-galactose (α-Gal) structure, which is inevitable in insect cell expression system. In this study, the Chinese hamster ovary cell line was used to produce a monoclonal antibody containing simplified glycosylation patterns (code: AB01). And cetuximab was used as a control. The two antibodies were highly similar in molecular weight, secondary structure, binding affinity and endocytosis behavior, whereas the glycotypes are extremely distinct. The flow cytometry assay suggested that AB01 induced cell cycle arrest in G1, thus inhibit cell proliferation. Moreover, both cetuximab and AB01 showed similar sensitivity for all tested cell lines in this research. In conclusion, AB01 could be a potential anti-EGFR drug candidate for cancer therapy.

Trial Watch: Tumor-targeting monoclonal antibodies in cancer therapy

In 1997, for the first time in history, a monoclonal antibody (mAb), i.e., the chimeric anti-CD20 molecule rituximab, was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for use in cancer patients. Since then, the panel of mAbs that are approved by international regulatory agencies for the treatment of hematopoietic and solid malignancies has not stopped to expand, nowadays encompassing a stunning amount of 15 distinct molecules. This therapeutic armamentarium includes mAbs that target tumor-associated antigens, as well as molecules that interfere with tumor-stroma interactions or exert direct immunostimulatory effects. These three classes of mAbs exert antineoplastic activity via distinct mechanisms, which may or may not involve immune effectors other than the mAbs themselves. In previous issues of OncoImmunology, we provided a brief scientific background to the use of mAbs, all types confounded, in cancer therapy, and discussed the results of recent clinical trials investigating the safety and efficacy of this approach. Here, we focus on mAbs that primarily target malignant cells or their interactions with stromal components, as opposed to mAbs that mediate antineoplastic effects by activating the immune system. In particular, we discuss relevant clinical findings that have been published during the last 13 months as well as clinical trials that have been launched in the same period to investigate the therapeutic profile of hitherto investigational tumor-targeting mAbs.

Harnessing the immune system via FcγR function in immune therapy: a pathway to next-gen mAbs

The human fragment crystallizable (Fc)γ receptor (R) interacts with antigen‐complexed immunoglobulin (Ig)G ligands to both activate and modulate a powerful network of inflammatory host‐protective effector functions that are key to the normal physiology of immune resistance to pathogens. More than 100 therapeutic monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are approved or in late stage clinical trials, many of which harness the potent FcγR‐mediated effector systems to varying degrees. This is most evident for antibodies targeting cancer cells inducing antibody‐dependent killing or phagocytosis but is also true to some degree for the mAbs that neutralize or remove small macromolecules such as cytokines or other Igs. The use of mAb therapeutics has also revealed a “scaffolding” role for FcγR which, in different contexts, may either underpin the therapeutic mAb action such as immune agonism or trigger catastrophic adverse effects. The still unmet therapeutic need in many cancers, inflammatory diseases or emerging infections such as severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) requires increased effort on the development of improved and novel mAbs. A more mature appreciation of the immunobiology of individual FcγR function and the complexity of the relationships between FcγRs and antibodies is fueling efforts to develop more potent “next‐gen” therapeutic antibodies. Such development strategies now include focused glycan or protein engineering of the Fc to increase affinity and/or tailor specificity for selective engagement of individual activating FcγRs or the inhibitory FcγRIIb or alternatively, for the ablation of FcγR interaction altogether. This review touches on recent aspects of FcγR and IgG immunobiology and its relationship with the present and future actions of therapeutic mAbs.

Monitoring kinetics reveals critical parameters of IgA-dependent granulocyte-mediated anti-tumor cell cytotoxicity

Human IgA antibodies effectively engage myeloid cells for the FcαRI-dependent antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC) of tumor cells. Established methods to investigate ADCC are the ⁵¹chromium and Calcein release assays. Their critical limitations are the end-point measurement, the unspecific release of the probes, the requirement of target cells in suspension and thus do not reflect physiologic conditions of adherently growing cells. Here we report the label-free real-time monitoring of granulocyte-mediated ADCC using an impedance-based method. We investigated the efficacy of an engineered epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-directed IgA2 antibody to engage neutrophils for ADCC against a panel of adherently growing EGFR-expressing cancer cell lines majorly head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). The impedance assay allowed the documentation of the IgA-neutrophil-and FcαRI-signaling dependent ADCC of adherently growing target cells. While at a short-term it provided comparable results to release assays, in the long run real time monitoring also revealed cell-line specific kinetics and long-term efficacy. Although short-term results may depend on EGFR expression, long-term efficacy did not correlate with the surface level of EGFR nor of the myeloid checkpoint CD47 pointing to additional critical parameters to predict the treatment efficacy. Real-time monitoring of neutrophil-mediated ADCC allowed documenting effector cell activity and exhaustion. Along with excess expression of Mac-1 ligands, which may explain the target cell resistance, this eventually leads to tumor cell outgrowth at later time points. In conclusion, the impedance assay provides valuable information on the kinetics, effector cell performance, efficacy and critical parameters of IgA-dependent granulocyte-mediated cytotoxicity and is expected to become an important tool in its evaluation.

Trial watch: Tumor-targeting monoclonal antibodies for oncological indications

An expanding panel of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) that specifically target malignant cells or intercept trophic factors delivered by the tumor stroma is now available for cancer therapy. These mAbs can exert direct antiproliferative/cytotoxic effects as they inhibit pro-survival signal transduction cascades or activate lethal receptors at the plasma membrane of cancer cells, they can opsonize neoplastic cells to initiate a tumor-targeting immune response, or they can be harnessed to specifically deliver toxins or radionuclides to transformed cells. As an indication of the success of this immunotherapeutic paradigm, international regulatory agencies approve new tumor-targeting mAbs for use in cancer patients every year. Moreover, the list of indications for previously licensed molecules is frequently expanded to other neoplastic disorders as the results of large, randomized clinical trials become available. Here, we discuss recent advances in the preclinical and clinical development of tumor-targeting mAbs for oncological indications.

Classification of current anticancer immunotherapies

During the past decades, anticancer immunotherapy has evolved from a promising therapeutic option to a robust clinical reality. Many immunotherapeutic regimens are now approved by the US Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency for use in cancer patients, and many others are being investigated as standalone therapeutic interventions or combined with conventional treatments in clinical studies. Immunotherapies may be subdivided into "passive" and "active" based on their ability to engage the host immune system against cancer. Since the anticancer activity of most passive immunotherapeutics (including tumor-targeting monoclonal antibodies) also relies on the host immune system, this classification does not properly reflect the complexity of the drug-host-tumor interaction. Alternatively, anticancer immunotherapeutics can be classified according to their antigen specificity. While some immunotherapies specifically target one (or a few) defined tumor-associated antigen(s), others operate in a relatively non-specific manner and boost natural or therapy-elicited anticancer immune responses of unknown and often broad specificity. Here, we propose a critical, integrated classification of anticancer immunotherapies and discuss the clinical relevance of these approaches.