1
|
Han Y, Taylor EB, Luthe D. Maize Endochitinase Expression in Response to Fall Armyworm Herbivory. J Chem Ecol 2021; 47:689-706. [PMID: 34056671 DOI: 10.1007/s10886-021-01284-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2021] [Revised: 04/21/2021] [Accepted: 05/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
A large percentage of crop loss is due to insect damage, especially caterpillar damage. Plant chitinases are considered excellent candidates to combat these insects since they can degrade chitin in peritrophic matrix (PM), an important protective structure in caterpillar midgut. Compared to chemical insecticides, chitinases could improve host plant resistance and be both economically and environmentally advantageous. The focus of this research was to find chitinase candidates that could improve plant resistance by effectively limiting caterpillar damage. Five classes of endochitinase (I-V) genes were characterized in the maize genome, and we isolated and cloned four chitinase genes (chitinase A, chitinase B, chitinase I, and PRm3) present in two maize (Zea mays L.) inbred lines Mp708 and Tx601, with different levels of resistance to caterpillar pests. We also investigated the expression of these maize chitinases in response to fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda, FAW) attack. The results indicated that both chitinase transcript abundance and enzymatic activity increased in response to FAW feeding and mechanical wounding. Furthermore, chitinases retained activity inside the caterpillar midgut and enzymatic activity was detected in the food bolus and frass. When examined under scanning electron microscopy, PMs from Tx601-fed caterpillars showed structural damage when compared to diet controls. Analysis of chitinase transcript abundance after caterpillar feeding and proteomic analysis of maize leaf trichomes in the two inbreds implicated chitinase PRm3 found in Tx601 as a potential insecticidal protein.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yang Han
- The Pennsylvania State University, Plant Science, University Park, PA, USA
| | - Erin B Taylor
- Department of Physiology and Biophysics, The University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS, 39216, USA
| | - Dawn Luthe
- The Pennsylvania State University, Plant Science, University Park, PA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rojas JC, Kolomiets MV, Bernal JS. Nonsensical choices? Fall armyworm moths choose seemingly best or worst hosts for their larvae, but neonate larvae make their own choices. PLoS One 2018; 13:e0197628. [PMID: 29795622 PMCID: PMC5967860 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197628] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2018] [Accepted: 05/04/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Selecting optimal host plants is critical for herbivorous insects, such as fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda), an important maize pest in the Americas and Africa. Fall armyworm larvae are presumed to have limited mobility, hence female moths are presumed to be largely responsible for selecting hosts. We addressed host selection by fall armyworm moths and neonate and older (3rd-instar) larvae, as mediated by resistance and herbivory in maize plants. Thus, we compared discrimination among three maize cultivars with varying degrees of resistance to fall armyworm, and between plants subjected or not to two types of herbivory. The cultivars were: (i) susceptible, and deficient in jasmonic acid (JA) production and green leaf volatiles (GLV) emissions (inbred line B73-lox10); (ii) modestly resistant (B73), and; (iii) highly resistant (Mp708). The herbivory types were: (i) ongoing (= fall armyworm larvae present), and; (ii) future (= fall armyworm eggs present). In choice tests, moths laid more eggs on the highly resistant cultivar, and least on the susceptible cultivar, though on those cultivars larvae performed poorest and best, respectively. In the context of herbivory, moths laid more eggs: (i) on plants subject to versus free of future herbivory, regardless of whether plants were deficient or not in JA and GLV production; (ii) on plants subject versus free of ongoing herbivory, and; (iii) on plants not deficient in compared to deficient in JA and GLV production. Neonate larvae dispersed aerially from host plants (i.e. ballooned), and most larvae colonized the modestly resistant cultivar, and fewest the highly resistant cultivar, suggesting quasi-directional, directed aerial descent. Finally, dispersing older larvae did not discriminate among the three maize cultivars, nor between maize plants and (plastic) model maize plants, suggesting random, visually-oriented dispersal. Our results were used to assemble a model of host selection by fall armyworm moths and larvae, including recommendations for future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julio C. Rojas
- Department of Entomology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States of America
| | - Michael V. Kolomiets
- Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States of America
| | - Julio S. Bernal
- Department of Entomology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Varsani S, Basu S, Williams WP, Felton GW, Luthe DS, Louis J. Intraplant communication in maize contributes to defense against insects. PLANT SIGNALING & BEHAVIOR 2016; 11:e1212800. [PMID: 27467304 PMCID: PMC5022405 DOI: 10.1080/15592324.2016.1212800] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/08/2023]
Abstract
The vasculature of plants act as a channel for transport of signal(s) that facilitate long-distance intraplant communication. In maize, Maize insect resistance1-Cysteine Protease (Mir1-CP), which has homology to papain-like proteases, provides defense to different feeding guilds of insect pests. Furthermore, accumulation of Mir1-CP in the vasculature suggests that Mir1-CP can potentially function as a phloem-mobile protein. In a recent study, we provided evidence that Mir1-CP can curtail the growth of phloem-sap sucking insect, corn leaf aphid (CLA; Rhopalosiphum maidis). Our current study further examined whether aboveground feeding by CLA can induce resistance to subsequent herbivory by belowground feeding western corn rootworm (WCR; Diabrotica virgifera virgifera). Aboveground feeding by CLA systemically induced the accumulation of Mir1-CP in the roots. Furthermore, foliage feeding by CLA provided enhanced resistance to subsequent herbivory by belowground feeding of WCR. Taken together, our previous findings and results presented here indicate that long-distance transport of Mir1-CP is critical for providing enhanced resistance to insect attack in maize.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suresh Varsani
- Department of Entomology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA
| | - Saumik Basu
- Department of Entomology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA
| | - W. Paul Williams
- USDA-ARS Corn Host Plant Resistance Research Unit, USA, Mississippi State, MS, USA
| | - Gary W. Felton
- Department of Entomology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA
| | - Dawn S. Luthe
- Department of Plant Science, Pennsylvania State University, USA, University Park, PA, USA
| | - Joe Louis
- Department of Entomology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA
- CONTACT Joe Louis
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Louis J, Basu S, Varsani S, Castano-Duque L, Jiang V, Williams WP, Felton GW, Luthe DS. Ethylene Contributes to maize insect resistance1-Mediated Maize Defense against the Phloem Sap-Sucking Corn Leaf Aphid. PLANT PHYSIOLOGY 2015; 169:313-24. [PMID: 26253737 PMCID: PMC4577432 DOI: 10.1104/pp.15.00958] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2015] [Accepted: 08/06/2015] [Indexed: 05/04/2023]
Abstract
Signaling networks among multiple phytohormones fine-tune plant defense responses to insect herbivore attack. Previously, it was reported that the synergistic combination of ethylene (ET) and jasmonic acid (JA) was required for accumulation of the maize insect resistance1 (mir1) gene product, a cysteine (Cys) proteinase that is a key defensive protein against chewing insect pests in maize (Zea mays). However, this study suggests that mir1-mediated resistance to corn leaf aphid (CLA; Rhopalosiphum maidis), a phloem sap-sucking insect pest, is independent of JA but regulated by the ET-signaling pathway. Feeding by CLA triggers the rapid accumulation of mir1 transcripts in the resistant maize genotype, Mp708. Furthermore, Mp708 provided elevated levels of antibiosis (limits aphid population)- and antixenosis (deters aphid settling)-mediated resistance to CLA compared with B73 and Tx601 maize susceptible inbred lines. Synthetic diet aphid feeding trial bioassays with recombinant Mir1-Cys Protease demonstrates that Mir1-Cys Protease provides direct toxicity to CLA. Furthermore, foliar feeding by CLA rapidly sends defensive signal(s) to the roots that trigger belowground accumulation of the mir1, signifying a potential role of long-distance signaling in maize defense against the phloem-feeding insects. Collectively, our data indicate that ET-regulated mir1 transcript accumulation, uncoupled from JA, contributed to heightened resistance to CLA in maize. In addition, our results underscore the significance of ET acting as a central node in regulating mir1 expression to different feeding guilds of insect herbivores.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joe Louis
- Department of Entomology (J.L., S.B., S.V.) and Department of Biochemistry (J.L.), University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Nebraska 68583; Department of Plant Science (L.C.-D., V.J., D.S.L.) and Department of Entomology (G.W.F.), Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802; and United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, Corn Host Plant Resistance Research Unit (W.P.W.), Mississippi State, Mississippi 39762
| | - Saumik Basu
- Department of Entomology (J.L., S.B., S.V.) and Department of Biochemistry (J.L.), University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Nebraska 68583; Department of Plant Science (L.C.-D., V.J., D.S.L.) and Department of Entomology (G.W.F.), Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802; and United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, Corn Host Plant Resistance Research Unit (W.P.W.), Mississippi State, Mississippi 39762
| | - Suresh Varsani
- Department of Entomology (J.L., S.B., S.V.) and Department of Biochemistry (J.L.), University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Nebraska 68583; Department of Plant Science (L.C.-D., V.J., D.S.L.) and Department of Entomology (G.W.F.), Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802; and United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, Corn Host Plant Resistance Research Unit (W.P.W.), Mississippi State, Mississippi 39762
| | - Lina Castano-Duque
- Department of Entomology (J.L., S.B., S.V.) and Department of Biochemistry (J.L.), University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Nebraska 68583; Department of Plant Science (L.C.-D., V.J., D.S.L.) and Department of Entomology (G.W.F.), Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802; and United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, Corn Host Plant Resistance Research Unit (W.P.W.), Mississippi State, Mississippi 39762
| | - Victoria Jiang
- Department of Entomology (J.L., S.B., S.V.) and Department of Biochemistry (J.L.), University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Nebraska 68583; Department of Plant Science (L.C.-D., V.J., D.S.L.) and Department of Entomology (G.W.F.), Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802; and United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, Corn Host Plant Resistance Research Unit (W.P.W.), Mississippi State, Mississippi 39762
| | - W Paul Williams
- Department of Entomology (J.L., S.B., S.V.) and Department of Biochemistry (J.L.), University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Nebraska 68583; Department of Plant Science (L.C.-D., V.J., D.S.L.) and Department of Entomology (G.W.F.), Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802; and United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, Corn Host Plant Resistance Research Unit (W.P.W.), Mississippi State, Mississippi 39762
| | - Gary W Felton
- Department of Entomology (J.L., S.B., S.V.) and Department of Biochemistry (J.L.), University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Nebraska 68583; Department of Plant Science (L.C.-D., V.J., D.S.L.) and Department of Entomology (G.W.F.), Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802; and United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, Corn Host Plant Resistance Research Unit (W.P.W.), Mississippi State, Mississippi 39762
| | - Dawn S Luthe
- Department of Entomology (J.L., S.B., S.V.) and Department of Biochemistry (J.L.), University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Nebraska 68583; Department of Plant Science (L.C.-D., V.J., D.S.L.) and Department of Entomology (G.W.F.), Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802; and United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, Corn Host Plant Resistance Research Unit (W.P.W.), Mississippi State, Mississippi 39762
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Balmer D, de Papajewski DV, Planchamp C, Glauser G, Mauch-Mani B. Induced resistance in maize is based on organ-specific defence responses. THE PLANT JOURNAL : FOR CELL AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY 2013; 74:213-25. [PMID: 23302050 DOI: 10.1111/tpj.12114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 93] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2012] [Revised: 12/19/2012] [Accepted: 01/02/2013] [Indexed: 05/07/2023]
Abstract
To obtain further insight into the intricate inter-play between maize (Zea mays) and the fungal pathogen Colletotrichum graminicola, the local and systemic molecular and chemical defence responses of maize leaves and roots were simultaneously investigated and compared. Similar gene expression and hormonal patterns were detected in both above- and below-ground organs; however, roots responded more rapidly and accumulated higher levels of defence-related hormones than leaves. Leaf and root infection with C. graminicola triggered systemic resistance in the foliage against the same fungus. This systemic defence response was associated with systemic transcriptional adaptations, and elevated levels of salicylic acid and abscisic acid. Metabolomic profiling revealed significant differences in the composition of secondary metabolites in leaves and roots, indicating that these organs employ distinct chemical defence systems. In addition, higher basal levels of antimicrobial flavonoids suggest an enhanced basal defensive state of roots. Our findings reveal tissue-specific local and systemic antifungal defence mechanisms in maize.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dirk Balmer
- Laboratory of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Neuchâtel, Rue Emile-Argand 11, 2000, Neuchâtel, Switzerland
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ankala A, Kelley RY, Rowe DE, Williams WP, Luthe DS. Foliar herbivory triggers local and long distance defense responses in maize. PLANT SCIENCE : AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PLANT BIOLOGY 2013; 199-200:103-12. [PMID: 23265323 DOI: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2012.09.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2012] [Revised: 09/04/2012] [Accepted: 09/23/2012] [Indexed: 05/09/2023]
Abstract
Many studies have documented the induction of belowground defenses in plants in response to aboveground herbivory and vice versa, but the genes and signaling molecules mediating systemic induction are not well understood. We performed comparative microarray analysis on maize whorl and root tissues from the insect resistant inbred Mp708 in response to foliar feeding by fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda) caterpillars. Although Mp708 has elevated jasmonic acid (JA) levels prior to herbivory, genes involved in JA biosynthesis were up-regulated in whorls in response to fall armyworm feeding. Alternatively, genes possibly involved in regulating ethylene (ET) perception and signaling were up-regulated in roots following foliar herbivory. Transcript levels of genes encoding proteins involved in direct defenses against herbivores were enhanced both in roots and leaves, but transcriptional factors and genes involved in various biosynthetic pathways were selectively down-regulated in the whorl. The results indicate that foliar herbivory by fall armyworm changes root gene expression pathways suggesting profound long distance signaling. Tissue specific induction and suppression of JA and ET signaling pathway genes provides a clue to their possible roles in signaling between the two distant tissue types that eventually triggers defense responses in the roots in response to foliar herbivory.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arunkanth Ankala
- Department of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology, Entomology and Plant Pathology Mississippi State University, MS, United States.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|