1
|
Zhou J, Luan X, Liu Y, Wang L, Wang J, Yang S, Liu S, Zhang J, Liu H, Yao D. Strategies and Methods for Improving the Efficiency of CRISPR/Cas9 Gene Editing in Plant Molecular Breeding. PLANTS (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2023; 12:1478. [PMID: 37050104 PMCID: PMC10097296 DOI: 10.3390/plants12071478] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2023] [Revised: 03/21/2023] [Accepted: 03/22/2023] [Indexed: 06/19/2023]
Abstract
Following recent developments and refinement, CRISPR-Cas9 gene-editing technology has become increasingly mature and is being widely used for crop improvement. The application of CRISPR/Cas9 enables the generation of transgene-free genome-edited plants in a short period and has the advantages of simplicity, high efficiency, high specificity, and low production costs, which greatly facilitate the study of gene functions. In plant molecular breeding, the gene-editing efficiency of the CRISPR-Cas9 system has proven to be a key step in influencing the effectiveness of molecular breeding, with improvements in gene-editing efficiency recently becoming a focus of reported scientific research. This review details strategies and methods for improving the efficiency of CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing in plant molecular breeding, including Cas9 variant enzyme engineering, the effect of multiple promoter driven Cas9, and gRNA efficient optimization and expression strategies. It also briefly introduces the optimization strategies of the CRISPR/Cas12a system and the application of BE and PE precision editing. These strategies are beneficial for the further development and optimization of gene editing systems in the field of plant molecular breeding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Junming Zhou
- College of Life Sciences, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun 130118, China; (J.Z.); (X.L.); (Y.L.); (L.W.); (J.W.); (S.L.)
| | - Xinchao Luan
- College of Life Sciences, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun 130118, China; (J.Z.); (X.L.); (Y.L.); (L.W.); (J.W.); (S.L.)
| | - Yixuan Liu
- College of Life Sciences, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun 130118, China; (J.Z.); (X.L.); (Y.L.); (L.W.); (J.W.); (S.L.)
| | - Lixue Wang
- College of Life Sciences, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun 130118, China; (J.Z.); (X.L.); (Y.L.); (L.W.); (J.W.); (S.L.)
| | - Jiaxin Wang
- College of Life Sciences, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun 130118, China; (J.Z.); (X.L.); (Y.L.); (L.W.); (J.W.); (S.L.)
| | - Songnan Yang
- College of Agronomy, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun 130118, China; (S.Y.); (J.Z.)
| | - Shuying Liu
- College of Life Sciences, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun 130118, China; (J.Z.); (X.L.); (Y.L.); (L.W.); (J.W.); (S.L.)
| | - Jun Zhang
- College of Agronomy, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun 130118, China; (S.Y.); (J.Z.)
| | - Huijing Liu
- College of Life Sciences, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun 130118, China; (J.Z.); (X.L.); (Y.L.); (L.W.); (J.W.); (S.L.)
| | - Dan Yao
- College of Life Sciences, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun 130118, China; (J.Z.); (X.L.); (Y.L.); (L.W.); (J.W.); (S.L.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Guzmán NM, Esquerra-Ruvira B, Mojica FJM. Digging into the lesser-known aspects of CRISPR biology. Int Microbiol 2021; 24:473-498. [PMID: 34487299 PMCID: PMC8616872 DOI: 10.1007/s10123-021-00208-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2021] [Revised: 08/30/2021] [Accepted: 08/31/2021] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
A long time has passed since regularly interspaced DNA repeats were discovered in prokaryotes. Today, those enigmatic repetitive elements termed clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) are acknowledged as an emblematic part of multicomponent CRISPR-Cas (CRISPR associated) systems. These systems are involved in a variety of roles in bacteria and archaea, notably, that of conferring protection against transmissible genetic elements through an adaptive immune-like response. This review summarises the present knowledge on the diversity, molecular mechanisms and biology of CRISPR-Cas. We pay special attention to the most recent findings related to the determinants and consequences of CRISPR-Cas activity. Research on the basic features of these systems illustrates how instrumental the study of prokaryotes is for understanding biology in general, ultimately providing valuable tools for diverse fields and fuelling research beyond the mainstream.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noemí M Guzmán
- Dpto. Fisiología, Genética y Microbiología, Universidad de Alicante, Alicante, Spain
| | - Belén Esquerra-Ruvira
- Dpto. Fisiología, Genética y Microbiología, Universidad de Alicante, Alicante, Spain
| | - Francisco J M Mojica
- Dpto. Fisiología, Genética y Microbiología, Universidad de Alicante, Alicante, Spain. .,Instituto Multidisciplinar para el Estudio del Medio, Universidad de Alicante, Alicante, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
McBride TM, Schwartz EA, Kumar A, Taylor DW, Fineran PC, Fagerlund RD. Diverse CRISPR-Cas Complexes Require Independent Translation of Small and Large Subunits from a Single Gene. Mol Cell 2020; 80:971-979.e7. [PMID: 33248026 DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2020.11.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2020] [Revised: 10/22/2020] [Accepted: 10/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
CRISPR-Cas adaptive immune systems provide prokaryotes with defense against viruses by degradation of specific invading nucleic acids. Despite advances in the biotechnological exploitation of select systems, multiple CRISPR-Cas types remain uncharacterized. Here, we investigated the previously uncharacterized type I-D interference complex and revealed that it is a genetic and structural hybrid with similarity to both type I and type III systems. Surprisingly, formation of the functional complex required internal in-frame translation of small subunits from within the large subunit gene. We further show that internal translation to generate small subunits is widespread across diverse type I-D, I-B, and I-C systems, which account for roughly one quarter of CRISPR-Cas systems. Our work reveals the unexpected expansion of protein coding potential from within single cas genes, which has important implications for understanding CRISPR-Cas function and evolution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tess M McBride
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand
| | - Evan A Schwartz
- Department of Molecular Biosciences, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712-1597, USA; Institute for Cellular and Molecular Biology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712-1597, USA
| | - Abhishek Kumar
- Centre for Protein Research, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand
| | - David W Taylor
- Department of Molecular Biosciences, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712-1597, USA; Institute for Cellular and Molecular Biology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712-1597, USA; Center for Systems and Synthetic Biology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712-1597, USA; LIVESTRONG Cancer Institutes, Dell Medical School, Austin, TX 78712-1597, USA
| | - Peter C Fineran
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand; Bio-Protection Research Centre, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand; Genetics Otago, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - Robert D Fagerlund
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand; Genetics Otago, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Liu Z, Feng J, Yu B, Ma Q, Liu B. The functional determinants in the organization of bacterial genomes. Brief Bioinform 2020; 22:5892344. [PMID: 32793986 DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbaa172] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2020] [Revised: 06/30/2020] [Accepted: 07/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Bacterial genomes are now recognized as interacting intimately with cellular processes. Uncovering organizational mechanisms of bacterial genomes has been a primary focus of researchers to reveal the potential cellular activities. The advances in both experimental techniques and computational models provide a tremendous opportunity for understanding these mechanisms, and various studies have been proposed to explore the organization rules of bacterial genomes associated with functions recently. This review focuses mainly on the principles that shape the organization of bacterial genomes, both locally and globally. We first illustrate local structures as operons/transcription units for facilitating co-transcription and horizontal transfer of genes. We then clarify the constraints that globally shape bacterial genomes, such as metabolism, transcription and replication. Finally, we highlight challenges and opportunities to advance bacterial genomic studies and provide application perspectives of genome organization, including pathway hole assignment and genome assembly and understanding disease mechanisms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Bin Yu
- College of Mathematics and Physics, Qingdao University of Science and Technology
| | - Qin Ma
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, the Ohio State University
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Nimkar S, Anand B. Cas3/I-C mediated target DNA recognition and cleavage during CRISPR interference are independent of the composition and architecture of Cascade surveillance complex. Nucleic Acids Res 2020; 48:2486-2501. [PMID: 31980818 PMCID: PMC7049708 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkz1218] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2019] [Revised: 12/17/2019] [Accepted: 01/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
In type I CRISPR-Cas system, Cas3—a nuclease cum helicase—in cooperation with Cascade surveillance complex cleaves the target DNA. Unlike the Cascade/I-E, which is composed of five subunits, the Cascade/I-C is made of only three subunits lacking the CRISPR RNA processing enzyme Cas6, whose role is assumed by Cas5. How these differences in the composition and organization of Cascade subunits in type I-C influence the Cas3/I-C binding and its target cleavage mechanism is poorly understood. Here, we show that Cas3/I-C is intrinsically a single-strand specific promiscuous nuclease. Apart from the helicase domain, a constellation of highly conserved residues—which are unique to type I-C—located in the uncharacterized C-terminal domain appears to influence the nuclease activity. Recruited by Cascade/I-C, the HD nuclease of Cas3/I-C nicks the single-stranded region of the non-target strand and positions the helicase motor. Powered by ATP, the helicase motor reels in the target DNA, until it encounters the roadblock en route, which stimulates the HD nuclease. Remarkably, we show that Cas3/I-C supplants Cas3/I-E for CRISPR interference in type I-E in vivo, suggesting that the target cleavage mechanism is evolutionarily conserved between type I-C and type I-E despite the architectural difference exhibited by Cascade/I-C and Cascade/I-E.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Siddharth Nimkar
- Department of Biosciences and Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati, Guwahati 781039, Assam, India
| | - B Anand
- Department of Biosciences and Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati, Guwahati 781039, Assam, India
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Cameron P, Coons MM, Klompe SE, Lied AM, Smith SC, Vidal B, Donohoue PD, Rotstein T, Kohrs BW, Nyer DB, Kennedy R, Banh LM, Williams C, Toh MS, Irby MJ, Edwards LS, Lin CH, Owen ALG, Künne T, van der Oost J, Brouns SJJ, Slorach EM, Fuller CK, Gradia S, Kanner SB, May AP, Sternberg SH. Harnessing type I CRISPR-Cas systems for genome engineering in human cells. Nat Biotechnol 2019; 37:1471-1477. [PMID: 31740839 DOI: 10.1038/s41587-019-0310-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 72] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2019] [Accepted: 10/06/2019] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
Type I CRISPR-Cas systems are the most abundant adaptive immune systems in bacteria and archaea1,2. Target interference relies on a multi-subunit, RNA-guided complex called Cascade3,4, which recruits a trans-acting helicase-nuclease, Cas3, for target degradation5-7. Type I systems have rarely been used for eukaryotic genome engineering applications owing to the relative difficulty of heterologous expression of the multicomponent Cascade complex. Here, we fuse Cascade to the dimerization-dependent, non-specific FokI nuclease domain8-11 and achieve RNA-guided gene editing in multiple human cell lines with high specificity and efficiencies of up to ~50%. FokI-Cascade can be reconstituted via an optimized two-component expression system encoding the CRISPR-associated (Cas) proteins on a single polycistronic vector and the guide RNA (gRNA) on a separate plasmid. Expression of the full Cascade-Cas3 complex in human cells resulted in targeted deletions of up to ~200 kb in length. Our work demonstrates that highly abundant, previously untapped type I CRISPR-Cas systems can be harnessed for genome engineering applications in eukaryotic cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Sanne E Klompe
- Caribou Biosciences, Inc., Berkeley, CA, USA.,Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Tomer Rotstein
- Caribou Biosciences, Inc., Berkeley, CA, USA.,Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | | | - Rachel Kennedy
- Caribou Biosciences, Inc., Berkeley, CA, USA.,Invitae Corporation, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Tim Künne
- Laboratory of Microbiology, Department of Agrotechnology and Food Sciences, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | - John van der Oost
- Laboratory of Microbiology, Department of Agrotechnology and Food Sciences, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | - Stan J J Brouns
- Laboratory of Microbiology, Department of Agrotechnology and Food Sciences, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.,Kavli Institute of Nanoscience, Department of Bionanoscience, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | - Andrew P May
- Caribou Biosciences, Inc., Berkeley, CA, USA.,Sana Biotechnology, South San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Samuel H Sternberg
- Caribou Biosciences, Inc., Berkeley, CA, USA. .,Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Dorman CJ, Ní Bhriain N. CRISPR-Cas, DNA Supercoiling, and Nucleoid-Associated Proteins. Trends Microbiol 2019; 28:19-27. [PMID: 31519332 DOI: 10.1016/j.tim.2019.08.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2019] [Revised: 08/02/2019] [Accepted: 08/08/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
In this opinion article we highlight links between the H-NS nucleoid-associated protein, variable DNA topology, the regulation of CRISPR-cas locus expression, CRISPR-Cas activity, and the recruitment of novel genetic information by the CRISPR array. We propose that the requirement that the invading mobile genetic element be negatively supercoiled limits effective CRISPR action to a window in the bacterial growth cycle when DNA topology is optimal, and that this same window is used for the efficient integration of new spacer sequences at the CRISPR array. H-NS silences CRISPR promoters, and we propose that antagonists of H-NS, such as the LeuO transcription factor, provide a basis for a stochastic genetic switch that acts at random in each cell in the bacterial population. In addition, we wish to propose a mechanism by which mobile genetic elements can suppress CRISPR-cas transcription using H-NS homologues. Although the individual components of this network are known, we propose a new model in which they are integrated and linked to the physiological state of the bacterium. The model provides a basis for cell-to-cell variation in the expression and performance of CRISPR systems in bacterial populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charles J Dorman
- Department of Microbiology, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland.
| | - Niamh Ní Bhriain
- Department of Microbiology, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Hille F, Richter H, Wong SP, Bratovič M, Ressel S, Charpentier E. The Biology of CRISPR-Cas: Backward and Forward. Cell 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.11.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 333] [Impact Index Per Article: 55.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
|
9
|
Hille F, Charpentier E. CRISPR-Cas: biology, mechanisms and relevance. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2017; 371:rstb.2015.0496. [PMID: 27672148 PMCID: PMC5052741 DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2015.0496] [Citation(s) in RCA: 230] [Impact Index Per Article: 32.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/10/2016] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Prokaryotes have evolved several defence mechanisms to protect themselves from viral predators. Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) and their associated proteins (Cas) display a prokaryotic adaptive immune system that memorizes previous infections by integrating short sequences of invading genomes—termed spacers—into the CRISPR locus. The spacers interspaced with repeats are expressed as small guide CRISPR RNAs (crRNAs) that are employed by Cas proteins to target invaders sequence-specifically upon a reoccurring infection. The ability of the minimal CRISPR-Cas9 system to target DNA sequences using programmable RNAs has opened new avenues in genome editing in a broad range of cells and organisms with high potential in therapeutical applications. While numerous scientific studies have shed light on the biochemical processes behind CRISPR-Cas systems, several aspects of the immunity steps, however, still lack sufficient understanding. This review summarizes major discoveries in the CRISPR-Cas field, discusses the role of CRISPR-Cas in prokaryotic immunity and other physiological properties, and describes applications of the system as a DNA editing technology and antimicrobial agent. This article is part of the themed issue ‘The new bacteriology’.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frank Hille
- Department of Regulation in Infection Biology, Max Planck Institute for Infection Biology, Berlin 10117, Germany
| | - Emmanuelle Charpentier
- Department of Regulation in Infection Biology, Max Planck Institute for Infection Biology, Berlin 10117, Germany The Laboratory for Molecular Infection Medicine Sweden (MIMS), Umeå Centre for Microbial Research (UCMR), Department of Molecular Biology, Umeå University, Umeå 90187, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
|
11
|
Abstract
Bacteria and archaea use CRISPR-Cas adaptive immune systems to defend themselves from infection by bacteriophages (phages). These RNA-guided nucleases are powerful weapons in the fight against foreign DNA, such as phages and plasmids, as well as a revolutionary gene editing tool. Phages are not passive bystanders in their interactions with CRISPR-Cas systems, however; recent discoveries have described phage genes that inhibit CRISPR-Cas function. More than 20 protein families, previously of unknown function, have been ascribed anti-CRISPR function. Here, we discuss how these CRISPR-Cas inhibitors were discovered and their modes of action were elucidated. We also consider the potential impact of anti-CRISPRs on bacterial and phage evolution. Finally, we speculate about the future of this field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adair L Borges
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of California, San Francisco, California 94158;
| | - Alan R Davidson
- Department of Molecular Genetics and Department of Biochemistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 1A8, Canada
| | - Joseph Bondy-Denomy
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of California, San Francisco, California 94158;
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Tsui TKM, Hand TH, Duboy EC, Li H. The Impact of DNA Topology and Guide Length on Target Selection by a Cytosine-Specific Cas9. ACS Synth Biol 2017; 6:1103-1113. [PMID: 28277645 PMCID: PMC5706465 DOI: 10.1021/acssynbio.7b00050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
Cas9 is an RNA-guided DNA cleavage enzyme being actively developed for genome editing and gene regulation. To be cleaved by Cas9, a double stranded DNA, or the protospacer, must be complementary to the guide region, typically 20-nucleotides in length, of the Cas9-bound guide RNA, and adjacent to a short Cas9-specific element called Protospacer Adjacent Motif (PAM). Understanding the correct juxtaposition of the protospacer- and PAM-interaction with Cas9 will enable development of versatile and safe Cas9-based technology. We report identification and biochemical characterization of Cas9 from Acidothermus cellulolyticus (AceCas9). AceCas9 depends on a 5'-NNNCC-3' PAM and is more efficient in cleaving negative supercoils than relaxed DNA. Kinetic as well as in vivo activity assays reveal that AceCas9 achieves optimal activity when combined with a guide RNA containing a 24-nucleotide complementarity region. The cytosine-specific, DNA topology-sensitive, and extended guide-dependent properties of AceCas9 may be explored for specific genome editing applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tsz Kin Martin Tsui
- Institute of Molecular Biophysics, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida 32306, United States
| | - Travis H. Hand
- Institute of Molecular Biophysics, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida 32306, United States
| | - Emily C. Duboy
- Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida 32306, United States
| | - Hong Li
- Institute of Molecular Biophysics, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida 32306, United States
- Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida 32306, United States
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Cas1 and the Csy complex are opposing regulators of Cas2/3 nuclease activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2017; 114:E5113-E5121. [PMID: 28438998 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1616395114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
The type I-F CRISPR adaptive immune system in Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA14) consists of two CRISPR loci and six CRISPR-associated (cas) genes. Type I-F systems rely on a CRISPR RNA (crRNA)-guided surveillance complex (Csy complex) to bind foreign DNA and recruit a trans-acting nuclease (i.e., Cas2/3) for target degradation. In most type I systems, Cas2 and Cas3 are separate proteins involved in adaptation and interference, respectively. However, in I-F systems, these proteins are fused into a single polypeptide. Here we use biochemical and structural methods to show that two molecules of Cas2/3 assemble with four molecules of Cas1 (Cas2/32:Cas14) into a four-lobed propeller-shaped structure, where the two Cas2 domains form a central hub (twofold axis of symmetry) flanked by two Cas1 lobes and two Cas3 lobes. We show that the Cas1 subunits repress Cas2/3 nuclease activity and that foreign DNA recognition by the Csy complex activates Cas2/3, resulting in bidirectional degradation of DNA targets. Collectively, this work provides a structure of the Cas1-2/3 complex and explains how Cas1 and the target-bound Csy complex play opposing roles in the regulation of Cas2/3 nuclease activity.
Collapse
|
14
|
Choi KR, Lee SY. CRISPR technologies for bacterial systems: Current achievements and future directions. Biotechnol Adv 2016; 34:1180-1209. [PMID: 27566508 DOI: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2016.08.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 105] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2016] [Revised: 08/18/2016] [Accepted: 08/18/2016] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Throughout the decades of its history, the advances in bacteria-based bio-industries have coincided with great leaps in strain engineering technologies. Recently unveiled clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated proteins (Cas) systems are now revolutionizing biotechnology as well as biology. Diverse technologies have been derived from CRISPR/Cas systems in bacteria, yet the applications unfortunately have not been actively employed in bacteria as extensively as in eukaryotic organisms. A recent trend of engineering less explored strains in industrial microbiology-metabolic engineering, synthetic biology, and other related disciplines-is demanding facile yet robust tools, and various CRISPR technologies have potential to cater to the demands. Here, we briefly review the science in CRISPR/Cas systems and the milestone inventions that enabled numerous CRISPR technologies. Next, we describe CRISPR/Cas-derived technologies for bacterial strain development, including genome editing and gene expression regulation applications. Then, other CRISPR technologies possessing great potential for industrial applications are described, including typing and tracking of bacterial strains, virome identification, vaccination of bacteria, and advanced antimicrobial approaches. For each application, we note our suggestions for additional improvements as well. In the same context, replication of CRISPR/Cas-based chromosome imaging technologies developed originally in eukaryotic systems is introduced with its potential impact on studying bacterial chromosomal dynamics. Also, the current patent status of CRISPR technologies is reviewed. Finally, we provide some insights to the future of CRISPR technologies for bacterial systems by proposing complementary techniques to be developed for the use of CRISPR technologies in even wider range of applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyeong Rok Choi
- Metabolic and Biomolecular Engineering National Research Laboratory, Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering (BK21 Plus Program), Center for Systems and Synthetic Biotechnology, Institute for the BioCentury, KAIST, Daejeon 34141, Republic of Korea.
| | - Sang Yup Lee
- Metabolic and Biomolecular Engineering National Research Laboratory, Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering (BK21 Plus Program), Center for Systems and Synthetic Biotechnology, Institute for the BioCentury, KAIST, Daejeon 34141, Republic of Korea; BioProcess Engineering Research Center, KAIST, Daejeon 34141, Republic of Korea; BioInformatics Research Center, KAIST, Daejeon 34141, Republic of Korea; The Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Biosustainability, Technical University of Denmark, Kogle Alle 6, Hørsholm 2970, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Künne T, Westra ER, Brouns SJJ. Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay of DNA and CRISPR-Cas Ribonucleoprotein Complexes. Methods Mol Biol 2016; 1311:171-84. [PMID: 25981473 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-2687-9_11] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
The Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay is a straightforward and inexpensive method for the determination and quantification of protein-nucleic acid interactions. It relies on the different mobility of free and protein-bound nucleic acid in a gel matrix during electrophoresis. Nucleic acid affinities of crRNA-Cas complexes can be quantified by calculating the dissociation constant (Kd). Here, we describe how two types of EMSA assays are performed using the Cascade ribonucleoprotein complex from Escherichia coli as an example.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tim Künne
- Laboratory of Microbiology, Department of Agrotechnology and Food Sciences, Wageningen University, Dreijenplein 10, 6703 HB, Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
van Erp PBG, Jackson RN, Carter J, Golden SM, Bailey S, Wiedenheft B. Mechanism of CRISPR-RNA guided recognition of DNA targets in Escherichia coli. Nucleic Acids Res 2015; 43:8381-91. [PMID: 26243775 PMCID: PMC4787809 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkv793] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2015] [Accepted: 07/22/2015] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
In bacteria and archaea, short fragments of foreign DNA are integrated into Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeat (CRISPR) loci, providing a molecular memory of previous encounters with foreign genetic elements. In Escherichia coli, short CRISPR-derived RNAs are incorporated into a multi-subunit surveillance complex called Cascade (CRISPR-associated complex for antiviral defense). Recent structures of Cascade capture snapshots of this seahorse-shaped RNA-guided surveillance complex before and after binding to a DNA target. Here we determine a 3.2 Å x-ray crystal structure of Cascade in a new crystal form that provides insight into the mechanism of double-stranded DNA binding. Molecular dynamic simulations performed using available structures reveal functional roles for residues in the tail, backbone and belly subunits of Cascade that are critical for binding double-stranded DNA. Structural comparisons are used to make functional predictions and these predictions are tested in vivo and in vitro. Collectively, the results in this study reveal underlying mechanisms involved in target-induced conformational changes and highlight residues important in DNA binding and protospacer adjacent motif recognition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul B G van Erp
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59717, USA
| | - Ryan N Jackson
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59717, USA
| | - Joshua Carter
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59717, USA
| | - Sarah M Golden
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59717, USA
| | - Scott Bailey
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
| | - Blake Wiedenheft
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59717, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Majumdar S, Zhao P, Pfister NT, Compton M, Olson S, Glover CVC, Wells L, Graveley BR, Terns RM, Terns MP. Three CRISPR-Cas immune effector complexes coexist in Pyrococcus furiosus. RNA (NEW YORK, N.Y.) 2015; 21:1147-58. [PMID: 25904135 PMCID: PMC4436667 DOI: 10.1261/rna.049130.114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2014] [Accepted: 02/25/2015] [Indexed: 05/27/2023]
Abstract
CRISPR-Cas immune systems function to defend prokaryotes against potentially harmful mobile genetic elements including viruses and plasmids. The multiple CRISPR-Cas systems (Types I, II, and III) each target destruction of foreign nucleic acids via structurally and functionally diverse effector complexes (crRNPs). CRISPR-Cas effector complexes are comprised of CRISPR RNAs (crRNAs) that contain sequences homologous to the invading nucleic acids and Cas proteins specific to each immune system type. We have previously characterized a crRNP in Pyrococcus furiosus (Pfu) that contains Cmr (Type III-B) Cas proteins associated with one of two size classes of crRNAs and cleaves complementary target RNAs. Here, we have isolated and characterized two additional native Pfu crRNPs containing either Csa (Type I-A) or Cst (Type I-G) Cas proteins and distinct profiles of associated crRNAs. For each complex, the Cas proteins were identified by mass spectrometry and immunoblotting and the crRNAs by RNA sequencing and Northern blot analysis. The crRNAs associated with both the Csa and Cst complexes originate from all seven Pfu CRISPR loci and contain identical 5' ends (8-nt repeat-derived 5' tag sequences) but heterogeneous 3' ends (containing variable amounts of downstream repeat sequences). These crRNA forms are distinct from Cmr-associated crRNAs, indicating different 3' end processing pathways following primary cleavage of common pre-crRNAs. Like other previously characterized Type I CRISPR-Cas effector complexes, we predict that the newly identified Pfu Csa and Cst crRNPs each function to target invading DNA, adding an additional layer of protection beyond that afforded by the previously characterized RNA targeting Cmr complex.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sonali Majumdar
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602, USA
| | - Peng Zhao
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602, USA
| | - Neil T Pfister
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602, USA
| | - Mark Compton
- Department of Poultry Science, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602, USA
| | - Sara Olson
- Department of Genetics and Genome Sciences, Institute for Systems Genomics, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, Connecticut 06030-6403, USA
| | - Claiborne V C Glover
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602, USA
| | - Lance Wells
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602, USA
| | - Brenton R Graveley
- Department of Genetics and Genome Sciences, Institute for Systems Genomics, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, Connecticut 06030-6403, USA
| | - Rebecca M Terns
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602, USA
| | - Michael P Terns
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602, USA Department of Genetics, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602, USA Department of Microbiology, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Jackson RN, Wiedenheft B. A Conserved Structural Chassis for Mounting Versatile CRISPR RNA-Guided Immune Responses. Mol Cell 2015; 58:722-8. [PMID: 26028539 DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2015.05.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
Bacteria and archaea rely on CRISPR (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats) RNA-guided adaptive immune systems for targeted elimination of foreign nucleic acids. These immune systems have been divided into three main types, and the first atomic-resolution structure of a type III RNA-guided immune complex provides new insights into the mechanisms of nucleic acid degradation. Here we compare the crystal structure of a type III complex to recently determined structures of DNA-targeting type I CRISPR complexes. Structural comparisons support previous assertions that type I and type III systems share a common ancestor and reveal how a conserved structural chassis is used to support RNA-, DNA-, or both RNA- and DNA-targeting mechanisms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan N Jackson
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59717, USA
| | - Blake Wiedenheft
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59717, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Plagens A, Richter H, Charpentier E, Randau L. DNA and RNA interference mechanisms by CRISPR-Cas surveillance complexes. FEMS Microbiol Rev 2015; 39:442-63. [PMID: 25934119 PMCID: PMC5965380 DOI: 10.1093/femsre/fuv019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 85] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/24/2015] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
The CRISPR (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats)-Cas (CRISPR-associated) adaptive immune systems use small guide RNAs, the CRISPR RNAs (crRNAs), to mark foreign genetic material, e.g. viral nucleic acids, for degradation. Archaea and bacteria encode a large variety of Cas proteins that bind crRNA molecules and build active ribonucleoprotein surveillance complexes. The evolution of CRISPR-Cas systems has resulted in a diversification of cas genes and a classification of the systems into three types and additional subtypes characterized by distinct surveillance and interfering complexes. Recent crystallographic and biochemical advances have revealed detailed insights into the assembly and DNA/RNA targeting mechanisms of the various complexes. Here, we review our knowledge on the molecular mechanism involved in the DNA and RNA interference stages of type I (Cascade: CRISPR-associated complex for antiviral defense), type II (Cas9) and type III (Csm, Cmr) CRISPR-Cas systems. We further highlight recently reported structural and mechanistic themes shared among these systems. This review details and compares the assembly and the DNA/RNA targeting mechanisms of the various surveillance complexes of prokaryotic CRISPR-Cas immune systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- André Plagens
- Max Planck Institute for Terrestrial Microbiology, Karl-von-Frisch Strasse 10, 35043 Marburg, Germany
| | - Hagen Richter
- Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research, Department of Regulation in Infection Biology, Braunschweig 38124, Germany
| | - Emmanuelle Charpentier
- Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research, Department of Regulation in Infection Biology, Braunschweig 38124, Germany The Laboratory for Molecular Infection Medicine Sweden (MIMS), Umeå Centre for Microbial Research (UCMR), Department of Molecular Biology, Umeå University, Umeå 90187, Sweden Hannover Medical School, Hannover 30625, Germany
| | - Lennart Randau
- Max Planck Institute for Terrestrial Microbiology, Karl-von-Frisch Strasse 10, 35043 Marburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Nicholson SA, Moyo B, Arbuthnot PB. Progress and prospects of engineered sequence-specific DNA modulating technologies for the management of liver diseases. World J Hepatol 2015; 7:859-873. [PMID: 25937863 PMCID: PMC4411528 DOI: 10.4254/wjh.v7.i6.859] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2014] [Revised: 12/16/2014] [Accepted: 01/20/2015] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Liver diseases are one of the leading causes of mortality in the world. The hepatic illnesses, which include inherited metabolic disorders, hemophilias and viral hepatitides, are complex and currently difficult to treat. The maturation of gene therapy has heralded new avenues for developing effective intervention for these diseases. DNA modification using gene therapy is now possible and available technology may be exploited to achieve long term therapeutic benefit. The ability to edit DNA sequences specifically is of paramount importance to advance gene therapy for application to liver diseases. Recent development of technologies that allow for this has resulted in rapid advancement of gene therapy to treat several chronic illnesses. Improvements in application of derivatives of zinc finger proteins (ZFPs), transcription activator-like effectors (TALEs), homing endonucleases (HEs) and clustered regularly interspaced palindromic repeats (CRISPR) and CRISPR associated (Cas) systems have been particularly important. These sequence-specific technologies may be used to modify genes permanently and also to alter gene transcription for therapeutic purposes. This review describes progress in development of ZFPs, TALEs, HEs and CRISPR/Cas for application to treating liver diseases.
Collapse
|
21
|
Tay M, Liu S, Yuan YA. Crystal structure of Thermobifida fusca Cse1 reveals target DNA binding site. Protein Sci 2014; 24:236-45. [PMID: 25420472 DOI: 10.1002/pro.2609] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2014] [Revised: 11/21/2014] [Accepted: 11/21/2014] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
The Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR)-CRISPR-associated (Cas) defense system is the only adaptive and inheritable immunity found in prokaryotes. The immunity is achieved through a multistep process of adaptation, expression, and interference. In the Type I-E system, interference is mediated by the CRISPR-associated complex for antiviral defense (Cascade), which recognizes invading double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) through the protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) by one of the Cascade components, Cse1. Here, we report the crystal structure of Thermobifida fusca Cse1 at 3.3 Å resolution. T. fusca Cse1 reveals the chair-like two-domain architecture with a well-defined flexible loop, L1, located at the larger N-terminal domain, which was not observed in previous structures of the single Cse1 protein. Structure-based mutagenesis analysis demonstrates that the well-defined flexible loop and a partially conserved structural motif ([FW]-X-[TH]) are involved in PAM binding and recognition, respectively. Moreover, structural docking of T. fusca Cse1 into Escherichia coli Cascade cryoelectron microscopy maps, coupled with structural comparison, reveals a conserved positive patch that is contiguous with Cse2 in the Cascade complex and adjacent to the Cas3 binding site, suggesting its role in R-loop formation/stabilization and the recruitment of Cas3 for target cleavage. Consistent with the structural observation, the introduction of alanine mutations at this positive patch abolished DNA binding activity by Cse1. Taken together, these results suggest that Cse1 is a critical Cascade component involved in Cascade assembly, dsDNA target recognition, R-loop formation, and Cas3 recruitment for target cleavage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melanie Tay
- Department of Biological Sciences and Centre for Bioimaging Sciences, National University of Singapore, Singapore, 117543, Singapore
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Molecular insights into DNA interference by CRISPR-associated nuclease-helicase Cas3. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2014; 111:16359-64. [PMID: 25368186 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1410806111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 74] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Mobile genetic elements in bacteria are neutralized by a system based on clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPRs) and CRISPR-associated (Cas) proteins. Type I CRISPR-Cas systems use a "Cascade" ribonucleoprotein complex to guide RNA specifically to complementary sequence in invader double-stranded DNA (dsDNA), a process called "interference." After target recognition by Cascade, formation of an R-loop triggers recruitment of a Cas3 nuclease-helicase, completing the interference process by destroying the invader dsDNA. To elucidate the molecular mechanism of CRISPR interference, we analyzed crystal structures of Cas3 from the bacterium Thermobaculum terrenum, with and without a bound ATP analog. The structures reveal a histidine-aspartate (HD)-type nuclease domain fused to superfamily-2 (SF2) helicase domains and a distinct C-terminal domain. Binding of ATP analog at the interface of the SF2 helicase RecA-like domains rearranges a motif V with implications for the enzyme mechanism. The HD-nucleolytic site contains two metal ions that are positioned at the end of a proposed nucleic acid-binding tunnel running through the SF2 helicase structure. This structural alignment suggests a mechanism for 3' to 5' nucleolytic processing of the displaced strand of invader DNA that is coordinated with ATP-dependent 3' to 5' translocation of Cas3 along DNA. In agreement with biochemical studies, the presented Cas3 structures reveal important mechanistic details on the neutralization of genetic invaders by type I CRISPR-Cas systems.
Collapse
|
23
|
van der Oost J, Westra ER, Jackson RN, Wiedenheft B. Unravelling the structural and mechanistic basis of CRISPR-Cas systems. Nat Rev Microbiol 2014; 12:479-92. [PMID: 24909109 PMCID: PMC4225775 DOI: 10.1038/nrmicro3279] [Citation(s) in RCA: 501] [Impact Index Per Article: 50.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Bacteria and archaea have evolved sophisticated adaptive immune systems, known as CRISPR-Cas (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats-CRISPR-associated proteins) systems, which target and inactivate invading viruses and plasmids. Immunity is acquired by integrating short fragments of foreign DNA into CRISPR loci, and following transcription and processing of these loci, the CRISPR RNAs (crRNAs) guide the Cas proteins to complementary invading nucleic acid, which results in target interference. In this Review, we summarize the recent structural and biochemical insights that have been gained for the three major types of CRISPR-Cas systems, which together provide a detailed molecular understanding of the unique and conserved mechanisms of RNA-guided adaptive immunity in bacteria and archaea.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John van der Oost
- Laboratory of Microbiology, Wageningen University, Dreijenplein 10, 6703 HB Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | - Edze R Westra
- 1] Laboratory of Microbiology, Wageningen University, Dreijenplein 10, 6703 HB Wageningen, The Netherlands. [2] Environment and Sustainability Institute, University of Exeter, Penryn, Cornwall, TR10 9FE, UK
| | - Ryan N Jackson
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Montana State University, PO Box 173520, Bozeman, Montana 59717, USA
| | - Blake Wiedenheft
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Montana State University, PO Box 173520, Bozeman, Montana 59717, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Molecular mechanisms of CRISPR-mediated microbial immunity. Cell Mol Life Sci 2014; 71:449-65. [PMID: 23959171 PMCID: PMC3890593 DOI: 10.1007/s00018-013-1438-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2013] [Revised: 07/21/2013] [Accepted: 07/24/2013] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Bacteriophages (phages) infect bacteria in order to replicate and burst out of the host, killing the cell, when reproduction is completed. Thus, from a bacterial perspective, phages pose a persistent lethal threat to bacterial populations. Not surprisingly, bacteria evolved multiple defense barriers to interfere with nearly every step of phage life cycles. Phages respond to this selection pressure by counter-evolving their genomes to evade bacterial resistance. The antagonistic interaction between bacteria and rapidly diversifying viruses promotes the evolution and dissemination of bacteriophage-resistance mechanisms in bacteria. Recently, an adaptive microbial immune system, named clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) and which provides acquired immunity against viruses and plasmids, has been identified. Unlike the restriction–modification anti-phage barrier that subjects to cleavage any foreign DNA lacking a protective methyl-tag in the target site, the CRISPR–Cas systems are invader-specific, adaptive, and heritable. In this review, we focus on the molecular mechanisms of interference/immunity provided by different CRISPR–Cas systems.
Collapse
|
25
|
Ramia NF, Tang L, Cocozaki AI, Li H. Staphylococcus epidermidis Csm1 is a 3'-5' exonuclease. Nucleic Acids Res 2013; 42:1129-38. [PMID: 24121684 PMCID: PMC3902914 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkt914] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR) offer an adaptive immune system that protects bacteria and archaea from nucleic acid invaders through an RNA-mediated nucleic acid cleavage mechanism. Our knowledge of nucleic acid cleavage mechanisms is limited to three examples of widely different ribonucleoprotein particles that target either DNA or RNA. Staphylococcus epidermidis belongs to the Type III-A CRISPR system and has been shown to interfere with invading DNA in vivo. The Type III-A CRISPR system is characterized by the presence of Csm1, a member of Cas10 family of proteins, that has a permuted histidine–aspartate domain and a nucleotidyl cyclase-like domain, both of which contain sequence features characteristic of nucleases. In this work, we show in vitro that a recombinant S. epidermidis Csm1 cleaves single-stranded DNA and RNA exonucleolytically in the 3′–5′ direction. We further showed that both cleavage activities are divalent-metal-dependent and reside in the GGDD motif of the cyclase-like domain. Our data suggest that Csm1 may work in the context of an effector complex to degrade invading DNA and participate in CRISPR RNA maturation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nancy F Ramia
- Institute of Molecular Biophysics, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306, USA and Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Abstract
CRISPR (cluster of regularly interspaced palindromic repeats) is a prokaryotic adaptive defence system, providing immunity against mobile genetic elements such as viruses. Genomically encoded crRNA (CRISPR RNA) is used by Cas (CRISPR-associated) proteins to target and subsequently degrade nucleic acids of invading entities in a sequence-dependent manner. The process is known as ‘interference’. In the present review we cover recent progress on the structural biology of the CRISPR/Cas system, focusing on the Cas proteins and complexes that catalyse crRNA biogenesis and interference. Structural studies have helped in the elucidation of key mechanisms, including the recognition and cleavage of crRNA by the Cas6 and Cas5 proteins, where remarkable diversity at the level of both substrate recognition and catalysis has become apparent. The RNA-binding RAMP (repeat-associated mysterious protein) domain is present in the Cas5, Cas6, Cas7 and Cmr3 protein families and RAMP-like domains are found in Cas2 and Cas10. Structural analysis has also revealed an evolutionary link between the small subunits of the type I and type III-B interference complexes. Future studies of the interference complexes and their constituent components will transform our understanding of the system.
Collapse
|
27
|
Exploiting CRISPR/Cas: interference mechanisms and applications. Int J Mol Sci 2013; 14:14518-31. [PMID: 23857052 PMCID: PMC3742257 DOI: 10.3390/ijms140714518] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2013] [Revised: 06/26/2013] [Accepted: 07/01/2013] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
The discovery of biological concepts can often provide a framework for the development of novel molecular tools, which can help us to further understand and manipulate life. One recent example is the elucidation of the prokaryotic adaptive immune system, clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated (Cas) that protects bacteria and archaea against viruses or conjugative plasmids. The immunity is based on small RNA molecules that are incorporated into versatile multi-domain proteins or protein complexes and specifically target viral nucleic acids via base complementarity. CRISPR/Cas interference machines are utilized to develop novel genome editing tools for different organisms. Here, we will review the latest progress in the elucidation and application of prokaryotic CRISPR/Cas systems and discuss possible future approaches to exploit the potential of these interference machineries.
Collapse
|
28
|
Mulepati S, Bailey S. In vitro reconstitution of an Escherichia coli RNA-guided immune system reveals unidirectional, ATP-dependent degradation of DNA target. J Biol Chem 2013; 288:22184-92. [PMID: 23760266 DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m113.472233] [Citation(s) in RCA: 140] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Many prokaryotes utilize small RNA transcribed from clustered, regularly interspaced, short palindromic repeats (CRISPRs) to protect themselves from foreign genetic elements, such as phage and plasmids. In Escherichia coli, this small RNA is packaged into a surveillance complex (Cascade) that uses the RNA sequence to direct binding to invasive DNA. Once bound, Cascade recruits the Cas3 nuclease-helicase, which then proceeds to progressively degrade the invading DNA. Here, using individually purified Cascade and Cas3 from E. coli, we reconstitute CRISPR-mediated plasmid degradation in vitro. Analysis of this reconstituted assay suggests that Cascade recruits Cas3 to a single-stranded region of the DNA target exposed by Cascade binding. Cas3 then nicks the exposed DNA. Recruitment and nicking is stimulated by the presence, but not hydrolysis, of ATP. Following nicking and powered by ATP hydrolysis, the concerted actions of the helicase and nuclease domains of Cas3 proceed to unwind and degrade the entire DNA target in a unidirectional manner.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabin Mulepati
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Westra ER, Staals RH, Gort G, Høgh S, Neumann S, de la Cruz F, Fineran PC, Brouns SJ. CRISPR-Cas systems preferentially target the leading regions of MOBF conjugative plasmids. RNA Biol 2013; 10:749-61. [PMID: 23535265 PMCID: PMC3737333 DOI: 10.4161/rna.24202] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2012] [Revised: 02/28/2013] [Accepted: 03/05/2013] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Most prokaryotes contain CRISPR-Cas immune systems that provide protection against mobile genetic elements. We have focused on the ability of CRISPR-Cas to block plasmid conjugation, and analyzed the position of target sequences (protospacers) on conjugative plasmids. The analysis reveals that protospacers are non-uniformly distributed over plasmid regions in a pattern that is determined by the plasmid's mobilization type (MOB). While MOBP plasmids are most frequently targeted in the region entering the recipient cell last (lagging region), MOBF plasmids are mostly targeted in the region entering the recipient cell first (leading region). To explain this protospacer distribution bias, we propose two mutually non-exclusive hypotheses: (1) spacers are acquired more frequently from either the leading or lagging region depending on the MOB type (2) CRISPR-interference is more efficient when spacers target these preferred regions. To test the latter hypothesis, we analyzed Type I-E CRISPR-interference against MOBF prototype plasmid F in Escherichia coli. Our results show that plasmid conjugation is effectively inhibited, but the level of immunity is not affected by targeting the plasmid in the leading or lagging region. Moreover, CRISPR-immunity levels do not depend on whether the incoming single-stranded plasmid DNA, or the DNA strand synthesized in the recipient is targeted. Our findings indicate that single-stranded DNA may not be a target for Type I-E CRISPR-Cas systems, and suggest that the protospacer distribution bias might be due to spacer acquisition preferences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edze R. Westra
- Laboratory of Microbiology; Department of Agrotechnology and Food Sciences; Wageningen University; Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | - Raymond H.J. Staals
- Laboratory of Microbiology; Department of Agrotechnology and Food Sciences; Wageningen University; Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | - Gerrit Gort
- Biometris; Wageningen University and Research Center; Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | - Søren Høgh
- Laboratory of Microbiology; Department of Agrotechnology and Food Sciences; Wageningen University; Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | - Sarah Neumann
- Laboratory of Microbiology; Department of Agrotechnology and Food Sciences; Wageningen University; Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | - Fernando de la Cruz
- Departamento de Biología Molecular e Instituto de Biomedicina y Biotecnología de Cantabria; Universidad de Cantabria-Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas-SODERCAN; Santander, Spain
| | - Peter C. Fineran
- Laboratory of Microbiology; Department of Agrotechnology and Food Sciences; Wageningen University; Wageningen, The Netherlands
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology; University of Otago; Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - Stan J.J. Brouns
- Laboratory of Microbiology; Department of Agrotechnology and Food Sciences; Wageningen University; Wageningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Reeks J, Graham S, Anderson L, Liu H, White MF, Naismith JH. Structure of the archaeal Cascade subunit Csa5: relating the small subunits of CRISPR effector complexes. RNA Biol 2013; 10:762-9. [PMID: 23846216 PMCID: PMC3737334 DOI: 10.4161/rna.23854] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
The Cascade complex for CRISPR-mediated antiviral immunity uses CRISPR RNA (crRNA) to target invading DNA species from mobile elements such as viruses, leading to their destruction. The core of the Cascade effector complex consists of the Cas5 and Cas7 subunits, which are widely conserved in prokaryotes. Cas7 binds crRNA and forms the helical backbone of Cascade. Many archaea encode a version of the Cascade complex (denoted Type I-A) that includes a Csa5 (or small) subunit, which interacts weakly with the core proteins. Here, we report the crystal structure of the Csa5 protein from Sulfolobus solfataricus. Csa5 comprises a conserved α-helical domain with a small insertion consisting of a weakly conserved β-strand domain. In the crystal, the Csa5 monomers have multimerized into infinite helical threads. At each interface is a strictly conserved intersubunit salt bridge, deletion of which disrupts multimerization. Structural analysis indicates a shared evolutionary history among the small subunits of the CRISPR effector complexes. The same α-helical domain is found in the C-terminal domain of Cse2 (from Type I-E Cascade), while the N-terminal domain of Cse2 is found in Cmr5 of the CMR (Type III-B) effector complex. As Cmr5 shares no match with Csa5, two possibilities present themselves: selective domain loss from an ancestral Cse2 to create two new subfamilies or domain fusion of two separate families to create a new Cse2 family. A definitive answer awaits structural studies of further small subunits from other CRISPR effector complexes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Judith Reeks
- Biomedical Sciences Research Complex, University of St. Andrews, North Haugh, St. Andrews, Fife, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Elmore JR, Yokooji Y, Sato T, Olson S, Glover CVC, Graveley BR, Atomi H, Terns RM, Terns MP. Programmable plasmid interference by the CRISPR-Cas system in Thermococcus kodakarensis. RNA Biol 2013; 10:828-40. [PMID: 23535213 PMCID: PMC3737340 DOI: 10.4161/rna.24084] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
CRISPR-Cas systems are RNA-guided immune systems that protect prokaryotes against viruses and other invaders. The CRISPR locus encodes crRNAs that recognize invading nucleic acid sequences and trigger silencing by the associated Cas proteins. There are multiple CRISPR-Cas systems with distinct compositions and mechanistic processes. Thermococcus kodakarensis (Tko) is a hyperthermophilic euryarchaeon that has both a Type I-A Csa and a Type I-B Cst CRISPR-Cas system. We have analyzed the expression and composition of crRNAs from the three CRISPRs in Tko by RNA deep sequencing and northern analysis. Our results indicate that crRNAs associated with these two CRISPR-Cas systems include an 8-nucleotide conserved sequence tag at the 5' end. We challenged Tko with plasmid invaders containing sequences targeted by endogenous crRNAs and observed active CRISPR-Cas-mediated silencing. Plasmid silencing was dependent on complementarity with a crRNA as well as on a sequence element found immediately adjacent to the crRNA recognition site in the target termed the PAM (protospacer adjacent motif). Silencing occurred independently of the orientation of the target sequence in the plasmid, and appears to occur at the DNA level, presumably via DNA degradation. In addition, we have directed silencing of an invader plasmid by genetically engineering the chromosomal CRISPR locus to express customized crRNAs directed against the plasmid. Our results support CRISPR engineering as a feasible approach to develop prokaryotic strains that are resistant to infection for use in industry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua R Elmore
- Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Sorek R, Lawrence CM, Wiedenheft B. CRISPR-mediated adaptive immune systems in bacteria and archaea. Annu Rev Biochem 2013; 82:237-66. [PMID: 23495939 DOI: 10.1146/annurev-biochem-072911-172315] [Citation(s) in RCA: 423] [Impact Index Per Article: 38.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
Effective clearance of an infection requires that the immune system rapidly detects and neutralizes invading parasites while strictly avoiding self-antigens that would result in autoimmunity. The cellular machinery and complex signaling pathways that coordinate an effective immune response have generally been considered properties of the eukaryotic immune system. However, a surprisingly sophisticated adaptive immune system that relies on small RNAs for sequence-specific targeting of foreign nucleic acids was recently discovered in bacteria and archaea. Molecular vaccination in prokaryotes is achieved by integrating short fragments of foreign nucleic acids into a repetitive locus in the host chromosome known as a CRISPR (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat). Here we review the mechanisms of CRISPR-mediated immunity and discuss the ecological and evolutionary implications of these adaptive defense systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rotem Sorek
- Department of Molecular Genetics, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|