Recent Perspectives on APP, Secretases, Endosomal Pathways and How they Influence Alzheimer's Related Pathological Changes in Down Syndrome

Reversal of ApoE4-induced recycling block as a novel prevention approach for Alzheimer's disease

ApoE4 genotype is the most prevalent and also clinically most important risk factor for late-onset Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Available evidence suggests that the root cause for this increased risk is a trafficking defect at the level of the early endosome. ApoE4 differs from the most common ApoE3 isoform by a single amino acid that increases its isoelectric point and promotes unfolding of ApoE4 upon endosomal vesicle acidification. We found that pharmacological and genetic inhibition of NHE6, the primary proton leak channel in the early endosome, in rodents completely reverses the ApoE4-induced recycling block of the ApoE receptor Apoer2/Lrp8 and the AMPA- and NMDA-type glutamate receptors that are regulated by, and co-endocytosed in a complex with, Apoer2. Moreover, NHE6 inhibition restores the Reelin-mediated modulation of excitatory synapses that is impaired by ApoE4. Our findings suggest a novel potential approach for the prevention of late-onset AD.

Alzheimer’s disease is a degenerative condition that destroys connections between brain cells leading to memory loss, confusion and difficulties in thinking. Apolipoprotein E is a protein that carries fatty substances called lipids and cholesterol around the brain, and plays an important role in repair mechanisms. There are three major forms of Apolipoprotein E, and individuals who carry a version known as ApoE4 are up to 10 times more likely to develop Alzheimer’s disease than those who carry other variations.

In nerve cells, or neurons, Apolipoprotein E binds to a specific family of receptors. One of these receptors, called Apoer2, is found in the synaptic gap between neurons, where it regulates their activities. Both Apolipoprotein E and Apoer2 are taken into the cell within compartments known as endosomal vesicles. Usually, the Apoer2 receptor is quickly recycled back to the surface of the cell, but this recycling process is delayed in individuals with the ApoE4 version of Apolipoprotein E.

Apoer2 is just one of many different receptors on the surface of neurons that are taken into vesicles before being recycled back to the cell surface. The fluid inside these vesicles becomes progressively more acidic as they move through the cell. This process helps to control the interaction of these receptors with their binding partners and to regulate their movement and recycling. Here, Xian, Pohlkamp et al. investigated whether changing the acidity of vesicles in rat neurons could overcome the block in recycling Apoer2 – and other receptors that travel with Apoer2 in the same compartments – in the presence of ApoE4.

A protein called NHE6 is embedded in the membrane of vesicles called early endosomes and acts to make the vesicles less acidic. Xian, Pohlkamp et al. used drugs to block the activity of NHE6, which led to the vesicles becoming more acidic and allowed Apoer2 to be recycled faster. Using a genetic approach known as siRNA knockdown to decrease the amount of NHE6 produced in neurons also had a similar effect on Apoer2 recycling.

Together these findings suggest that drugs that make vesicles in neurons more acidic may have the potential to help prevent individuals that carry the ApoE4 protein from developing Alzheimer’s disease. Current drugs that target NHE6 also affect other molecules, which can often lead to side effects. A next step will be to develop tailor-made, small molecule drugs that can enter the brain efficiently and selectively block NHE6.

The Impact of APP on Alzheimer-like Pathogenesis and Gene Expression in Down Syndrome iPSC-Derived Neurons

Early-onset Alzheimer disease (AD)-like pathology in Down syndrome is commonly attributed to an increased dosage of the amyloid precursor protein (APP) gene. To test this in an isogenic human model, we deleted the supernumerary copy of the APP gene in trisomic Down syndrome induced pluripotent stem cells or upregulated APP expression in euploid human pluripotent stem cells using CRISPRa. Cortical neuronal differentiation shows that an increased APP gene dosage is responsible for increased β-amyloid production, altered Aβ42/40 ratio, and deposition of the pyroglutamate (E3)-containing amyloid aggregates, but not for several tau-related AD phenotypes or increased apoptosis. Transcriptome comparisons demonstrate that APP has a widespread and temporally modulated impact on neuronal gene expression. Collectively, these data reveal an important role for APP in the amyloidogenic aspects of AD but challenge the idea that increased APP levels are solely responsible for increasing specific phosphorylated forms of tau or enhanced neuronal cell death in Down syndrome-associated AD pathogenesis.

Reasoning over genetic variance information in cause-and-effect models of neurodegenerative diseases

The work we present here is based on the recent extension of the syntax of the Biological Expression Language (BEL), which now allows for the representation of genetic variation information in cause-and-effect models. In our article, we describe, how genetic variation information can be used to identify candidate disease mechanisms in diseases with complex aetiology such as Alzheimer's disease and Parkinson's disease. In those diseases, we have to assume that many genetic variants contribute moderately to the overall dysregulation that in the case of neurodegenerative diseases has such a long incubation time until the first clinical symptoms are detectable. Owing to the multilevel nature of dysregulation events, systems biomedicine modelling approaches need to combine mechanistic information from various levels, including gene expression, microRNA (miRNA) expression, protein-protein interaction, genetic variation and pathway. OpenBEL, the open source version of BEL, has recently been extended to match this requirement, and we demonstrate in our article, how candidate mechanisms for early dysregulation events in Alzheimer's disease can be identified based on an integrative mining approach that identifies 'chains of causation' that include single nucleotide polymorphism information in BEL models.

Genetic heterogeneity in Alzheimer disease and implications for treatment strategies

Since the original publication describing the illness in 1907, the genetic understanding of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) has advanced such that it is now clear that it is a genetically heterogeneous condition, the subtypes of which may not uniformly respond to a given intervention. It is therefore critical to characterize the clinical and preclinical stages of AD subtypes, including the rare autosomal dominant forms caused by known mutations in the PSEN1, APP, and PSEN2 genes that are being studied in the Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network study and its associated secondary prevention trial. Similar efforts are occurring in an extended Colombian family with a PSEN1 mutation, in APOE ε4 homozygotes, and in Down syndrome. Despite commonalities in the mechanisms producing the AD phenotype, there are also differences that reflect specific genetic origins. Treatment modalities should be chosen and trials designed with these differences in mind. Ideally, the varying pathological cascades involved in the different subtypes of AD should be defined so that both areas of overlap and of distinct differences can be taken into account. At the very least, clinical trials should determine the influence of known genetic factors in post hoc analyses.