1
|
Davis TC, Morris JD, Reed EH, Curtis LM, Wolf MS, Davis AB, Arnold CL. Design of a randomized controlled trial to assess the comparative effectiveness of a multifaceted intervention to improve three-year adherence to colorectal cancer screening among patients cared for in rural community health centers. Contemp Clin Trials 2022; 113:106654. [PMID: 34906745 PMCID: PMC8844093 DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2021.106654] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2021] [Revised: 11/11/2021] [Accepted: 12/08/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening has been shown to decrease CRC mortality, yet significant disparities persist among those living in rural areas, from minority backgrounds, and those having low income. The purpose of this two-arm randomized controlled trial is to test the effectiveness and fidelity of a stepped care (increasing intensity as needed) approach to promoting 3-year adherence to CRC screening via fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) or colonoscopy in rural community clinics serving high rates of low-income and minority patients. We hypothesize that, compared to enhanced usual care (EUC), patients receiving the multifaceted CRC screening intervention will demonstrate higher rates of CRC screening completion over 3 years. Participants from six federally qualified health centers (FQHCs; N = 1200 patients) serving predominately low-income populations in rural Louisiana will be randomized to the intervention or EUC arm. All participants will receive health literacy-directed CRC counseling, simplified materials about both the FIT and colonoscopy procedures, and motivational interviewing to aid in the determination of test preference. Participants in the intervention arm will also receive motivational reminder messages from their primary care provider (via audio recording or tailored text) for either a scheduled colonoscopy or return of a completed FIT. Participants in the EUC arm will receive the standard follow-up provided by their clinic or colonoscopy facility. The primary outcome will be completion of either colonoscopy or annual FIT over 3 years. Results will provide evidence on the effectiveness of the intervention to decrease disparities in CRC screening completion related to health literacy, race, and gender. Trial registration:Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier NCT04313114.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Terry C Davis
- Department of Medicine and Feist-Weiller Cancer Center, Louisiana State University Health, 1501 Kings Highway, Shreveport, LA 71130
| | - James D Morris
- Department of Medicine and Feist-Weiller Cancer Center, Louisiana State University Health, 1501 Kings Highway, Shreveport, LA 71130
| | - Elise H Reed
- Grambling State University, 403 Main Street, GSU Box 4267, Grambling, LA 71245
| | - Laura M Curtis
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 750 N. Lake Shore Drive, 10th Floor Chicago, IL 60611 USA
| | - Michael S Wolf
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 750 N. Lake Shore Drive, 10th Floor Chicago, IL 60611 USA
| | - Adrienne B Davis
- Department of Medicine and Feist-Weiller Cancer Center, Louisiana State University Health, 1501 Kings Highway, Shreveport, LA 71130
| | - Connie L Arnold
- Department of Medicine and Feist-Weiller Cancer Center, Louisiana State University Health, 1501 Kings Highway, Shreveport, LA 71130,Corresponding author at: Professor, Department of Medicine, Chief, Division of Health Disparities, LSU Health Shreveport, Feist-Weiller Cancer Center, 1501 Kings Highway, P.O. Box 33932, Shreveport, LA 71130-3932,
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Davis TC, Arnold CL, Mills G, Lesser GJ, Brown WM, Schulz R, Weaver KE, Pawloski PA. Assessment of Oral Chemotherapy Nonadherence in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients Using Brief Measures in Community Cancer Clinics: A Pilot Study. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2021; 18:ijerph182111045. [PMID: 34769563 PMCID: PMC8582838 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph182111045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2021] [Revised: 10/15/2021] [Accepted: 10/18/2021] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
The purpose of this pilot study was to assess Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) patients’ adherence to, beliefs about, and barriers to oral anticancer agents (OAC) using brief self-report measures in community-based cancer clinics. Patients completed a structured interview including a health literacy assessment, a Brief Medication Questionnaire, two single-item self-report adherence questions, and the Medications Adherence Reasons Scale. Of the 86 participants, 88.4% were white; 55.8% male; mean age, 58.7 years; and 22.1% had limited health literacy. Nonadherence (missing at least one dose in the last week) was reported by 18.6% of participants and associated (p < 0.003) with less-than-excellent perceived ability to take CML medications (16.3%). Black participants reported more difficulty taking CML medications than white participants (28.6% vs. 8.3%, p = 0.053). Among all participants, 43.0% reported their CML medicine was ineffective and 24.4% that taking CML pills was somewhat to very hard. The most common reasons for missing a dose were simply missed it (24.4%) and side effects (18.6%). Most patients perceived their ability to take CML medication was good to excellent, yet nearly one in five reported missing at least one dose in the last week. Brief, no-cost self-report assessments to screen CML patients’ OAC adherence, barriers, and beliefs could facilitate counseling in busy community cancer clinics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Terry C. Davis
- Department of Medicine, Louisiana State University Health—Shreveport, Shreveport, LA 71130, USA; (C.L.A.); (G.M.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +1-318-675-8694
| | - Connie L. Arnold
- Department of Medicine, Louisiana State University Health—Shreveport, Shreveport, LA 71130, USA; (C.L.A.); (G.M.)
| | - Glenn Mills
- Department of Medicine, Louisiana State University Health—Shreveport, Shreveport, LA 71130, USA; (C.L.A.); (G.M.)
| | - Glenn J. Lesser
- Department of Internal Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27101, USA;
| | - W. Mark Brown
- Department of Biostatistics and Data Science, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27101, USA;
| | - Richard Schulz
- College of Pharmacy, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA;
| | - Kathryn E. Weaver
- Department of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27101, USA;
| | - Pamala A. Pawloski
- Metro-Minnesota Community Oncology Research Consortium, St. Louis Park, MN 55416, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Arnold CL, Rademaker AW, Morris JD, Ferguson LA, Wiltz G, Davis TC. Follow-up approaches to a health literacy intervention to increase colorectal cancer screening in rural community clinics: A randomized controlled trial. Cancer 2019; 125:3615-3622. [PMID: 31355924 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.32398] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2018] [Revised: 02/28/2019] [Accepted: 04/05/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Significant disparities exist in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening rates among those of low socioeconomic status, with fewer years of education, lacking health insurance, or living in rural areas. METHODS A randomized controlled trial was conducted to compare the effectiveness of 2 follow-up approaches to a health literacy intervention to improve CRC screening: automated telephone call or personal call. Patients aged 50 to 75 years residing in 4 rural community clinics in Louisiana were given a structured interview that assessed demographic, health literacy and CRC screening barriers, knowledge, and attitudes. All were given health literacy-informed CRC education, a patient-friendly CRC screening pamphlet, simplified fecal immunochemical test (FIT) instructions, and a FIT kit, and a "teach-back" method was used to confirm understanding. Patients were randomized to 1 of 2 telephone follow-up arms. If they did not mail their FIT kit within 4 weeks, they received a reminder call and were called again at 8 weeks if the test still was not received. RESULTS A total of 620 patients were enrolled. Approximately 55% were female, 66% were African American, and 40% had limited literacy. The overall FIT completion rate was 68%: 69.2% in the automated telephone call arm and 67% in the personal call arm. Greater than one-half of the patients (range, 58%-60%) returned the FIT kit without receiving a telephone call. There was no difference noted with regard to the effectiveness of the follow-up calls; each increased the return rate by 9%. CONCLUSIONS Providing FIT kits and literacy-appropriate education at regularly scheduled clinic visits with a follow-up telephone call when needed was found to increase CRC screening among low-income, rural patients. The lower cost automated call was just as effective as the personal call.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Connie L Arnold
- Department of Medicine, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center-Shreveport, Shreveport, Louisiana
| | - Alfred W Rademaker
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - James D Morris
- Department of Medicine, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center-Shreveport, Shreveport, Louisiana
| | - Laurie Anne Ferguson
- College of Nursing and Health, Loyola University New Orleans, New Orleans, Louisiana
| | - Gary Wiltz
- Teche Action Clinic, Franklin, Louisiana
| | - Terry C Davis
- Department of Medicine, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center-Shreveport, Shreveport, Louisiana
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Davis TC, Rademaker A, Morris J, Ferguson LA, Wiltz G, Arnold CL. Repeat Annual Colorectal Cancer Screening in Rural Community Clinics: A Randomized Clinical Trial to Evaluate Outreach Strategies to Sustain Screening. J Rural Health 2019; 36:307-315. [PMID: 31523848 DOI: 10.1111/jrh.12399] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2019] [Revised: 07/17/2019] [Accepted: 08/19/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The majority of colorectal cancer (CRC) research using the fecal immunochemical test (FIT) has studied short-term screening results in predominantly urban areas. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of 2 outreach strategies embedded in a health literacy intervention on repeat CRC screening in rural community clinics. METHODS A 2-arm randomized controlled trial was conducted in 4 rural clinics in Louisiana. During a regularly scheduled clinic visit, participants ages 50-75 received a FIT kit and brief educational intervention. Participants were randomized to receive an automated call or a personal call by a prevention counselor after 4 weeks and 8 weeks if FIT kits were not returned. In year 2, materials were mailed, and follow-up calls were conducted as in year 1. The primary outcome was repeat FIT-the return of the FIT kit in both years. PARTICIPANTS Of 568 eligible participants, 55% were female, 67% were African American, and 39% had low health literacy. FINDINGS Repeat FIT rates were 36.5% for those receiving the automated call and 33.6% for those receiving a personal call (P = .30). No annual FITs were returned in 30% of participants, while only 1 FIT was returned by 35% of participants (31% only year 1 and 4% only year 2). CONCLUSION Sustaining CRC screening with FIT is challenging in rural clinics. A lower cost automated call was just as effective as the personal call in promoting repeat annual screening. However, more intensive strategies are needed to improve long-term FIT screening among rural participants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Terry C Davis
- Department of Medicine, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, Louisiana
| | - Alfred Rademaker
- Department of Preventive Medicine and the Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - James Morris
- Department of Medicine, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, Louisiana
| | | | - Gary Wiltz
- Teche Action Clinic, Franklin, Louisiana
| | - Connie L Arnold
- Department of Medicine, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, Louisiana
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Meenan RT, Coronado GD, Petrik A, Green BB. A cost-effectiveness analysis of a colorectal cancer screening program in safety net clinics. Prev Med 2019; 120:119-125. [PMID: 30685318 PMCID: PMC6392039 DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.01.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2018] [Revised: 01/17/2019] [Accepted: 01/23/2019] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
STOP CRC is a cluster-randomized pragmatic study of a colorectal cancer (CRC) screening program within eight federally-qualified health centers (FQHCs) in Oregon and California promoting fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) with appropriate colonoscopy follow-up. Results are presented of a cost-effectiveness analysis of STOP CRC. Organization staff completed activity-based costing spreadsheets, assigning labor hours by intervention activity and job-specific wage rates. Non-labor costs were from study data. Data were collected over February 2014-February 2016; analyses were performed in 2016-2017. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) using completed FITs adjusted for number of screening-eligible patients (SEPs), as the effectiveness measure were calculated overall and by organization. Intervention delivery costs totaled $305 K across eight organizations (range: $10.2 K-$110 K). Overall delivery cost per SEP was $14.43 (range: $10.37-$19.10). The largest cost category across organizations was implementation, specifically mailing preparation. The overall ICER was $483 per SEP-adjusted completed FIT (range: $96-$1021 among organizations with positive effectiveness). Lagged data accounting for implementation delay produced comparable results. The costs of colonoscopies following abnormal FITs decreased the overall ICER to S409 because usual care clinics generated more such colonoscopies than intervention clinics. Using lagged data, follow-up colonoscopies increase the ICER by 4.3% to $460. Results indicate the complex implications for cost-effectiveness of implementing standard CRC screening within a pragmatic setting involving FQHCs with varied patient populations, clinical structures, and resources. Performance variation across organizations emphasizes the need for future evaluations that inform the introduction of efficient CRC screening to underserved populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard T Meenan
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, 3800 N Interstate Ave, Portland, OR 97227, USA.
| | - Gloria D Coronado
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, 3800 N Interstate Ave, Portland, OR 97227, USA
| | - Amanda Petrik
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, 3800 N Interstate Ave, Portland, OR 97227, USA
| | - Beverly B Green
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, 1730 Minor Ave, Seattle, WA 98101, USA
| |
Collapse
|