De novo malignancy after liver transplantation: a single-center experience of 14 cases

Successful pancreatoduodenectomy of de novo duodenal malignancy after orthotopic liver transplantation: A case report

Introduction

Liver transplantation is a risk factor for premalignant and malignant changes of the duodenum. De novo duodenal malignancy is seldom reported after liver transplantation.

Case Report

The present study reports a case of an asymptomatic 67-year-old male patient who underwent liver transplantation more than 10 years ago and subsequently developed duodenal malignancy. Endoscopic biopsy of the de novo duodenal malignancy indicated duodenal carcinoma and pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) was performed. The patient was successfully discharged 12 days after the surgery. A metastatic lesion occurred at the right seventh rib 14 months after the pancreatoduodenectomy. Postoperative pathological examination indicated hepatocellular carcinoma metastasis.

Conclusions

To the best of our knowledge, this case type has not been previously reported. The present study sheds light on the development, the treatment, the prognosis, and the management of a new type of de novo duodenal malignancy.

De novo multiple primary carcinomas in a patient after liver transplantation: A case report

BACKGROUND

Liver transplantation (LT) is the most effective treatment strategy for advanced liver diseases. With the increasing survival rate and prolonged survival time, the postoperative long-term complications of LT recipients are becoming an important concern. Among them, the newly developed cancer after LT is the second complication and cause of LT-related death after cardiovascular disease. At present, few papers have reported multiple primary carcinomas (MPCs) after LT. Herein, we retrospectively analyzed an MPC case with gastric cancer and lung cancer after LT.

CASE SUMMARY

Herein, we retrospectively analyzed an MPC case with de novo gastric cancer and lung cancer after LT with no obvious complaints. Forty-one months after LT, the patient underwent radical distal gastrectomy (Billroth II) for intramucosal signet ring cell carcinoma, and then thoracoscopic wedge resection of the right lower lobe of the right lung and localized lymph node dissection 2 mo later. Therefore, paying attention to follow-up in LT recipients with early detection and intervention of de novo MPCs is the key to improving the survival rate and quality of life of LT recipients.

CONCLUSION

De novo MPCs after LT are rare, and the prognosis is poorer. However, early detection and related intervention can significantly improve the prognosis of patients. Therefore, we recommend that liver transplant recipients should be followed and screened for newly developed malignant tumors to improve the survival rate and quality of life.

Extrahepatic Malignancies and Liver Transplantation: Current Status

Recipients of liver transplantation (LT) remain at higher risk (adjusted for other risk factors) of de novo malignancies (DNMs). The higher risk can be attributed to the effect of immunosuppression and patient-related risk factors (age, tobacco, alcohol, etiology of liver disease). DNMs are an important cause of late mortality in liver transplant recipients. The pattern (type) of posttransplant malignancies reflects pattern in local population. The common types include skin cancers, solid organ malignancies, and post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders. Counseling of patients about risk factors and surveillance protocols may help in the prevention and diagnosis at early stage. We also discuss the results of LT in patients with a history of extrahepatic malignancy in the pretransplant period.

Current Challenges in the Post-Transplant Care of Liver Transplant Recipients in Germany

Improving long-term patient and graft survival after liver transplantation (LT) remains a major challenge. Compared to the early phase after LT, long-term morbidity and mortality of the recipients not only depends on complications immediately related to the graft function, infections, or rejection, but also on medical factors such as de novo malignancies, metabolic disorders (e.g., new-onset diabetes, osteoporosis), psychiatric conditions (e.g., anxiety, depression), renal failure, and cardiovascular diseases. While a comprehensive post-transplant care at the LT center and the connected regional networks may improve outcome, there is currently no generally accepted standard to the post-transplant management of LT recipients in Germany. We therefore described the structure and standards of post-LT care by conducting a survey at 12 German LT centers including transplant hepatologists and surgeons. Aftercare structures and form of cost reimbursement considerably varied between LT centers across Germany. Further discussions and studies are required to define optimal structure and content of post-LT care systems, aiming at improving the long-term outcomes of LT recipients.

Clinical Significance of De Novo Malignancy After Liver Transplant: A Single-Center Study

BACKGROUND

Several studies have reported that solid organ transplant recipients have a high risk for malignant tumors because the suppressed immune system fails in preventing malignant transformations. De novo malignancy after transplantation is the most common cause of death in the late period after liver transplant (LT). This study investigated the clinical significance of de novo malignancy after LT, and it is the largest study based in Korea to report long-term follow-up results associated with de novo malignancy after LT.

METHODS

Data of 1793 adults who underwent LT in Seoul National University Hospital were retrospectively collected, and medical charts and data from the Ministry of Public Administration and Security were reviewed to examine the causes of death and de novo malignancy status. The Fisher exact test and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis were used to analyze the data.

RESULTS

Of the 1793 recipients, 27 died of de novo malignancies. Of 875 hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients, 12 died, and of 918 non-HCC patients, 15 died. De novo malignancy was the main cause of death at 5 years after LT but was not in the initial 5 years. In Korea the most common cancers that developed after LT were gastric cancer (21.4%) and lymphoma (14.3%). De novo HCC in non-HCC cases was found in 2 patients.

CONCLUSION

De novo malignancy is a key factor affecting long-term survival after LT. Therefore, regular screening and education are important for improving long-term survival and quality of life in these patients after LT.

De Novo Malignancy After Living Donor Liver Transplantation: A Large Volume Experience

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Liver transplantation (LT) recipients such as all organ transplant recipients, have a risk of developing de novo malignancies owing to prolonged immunosuppression. However, there is limited data on this after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT), wherein immunosuppression levels are less than in deceased donor transplantation. We aim to describe experience of de novo malignancies from a predominantly LDLT center.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 2100 adults (age >18 years) who underwent LT between January 2006 and December 2017 were retrospectively analyzed from a prospectively collected database. The data were analyzed up to June 2019. Data are shown as number, percentage, mean ± standard deviation, and median (interquartile range).

RESULTS

Of 2100 patients who underwent LDLT, 21 (1%) patients developed de novo malignancy after transplantation. The de novo malignancy cohort comprised 20 males and 1 female, aged 50 ± 8.8 years. The distribution of de novo malignancies was as follows: 7 oropharyngeal (carcinoma of buccal and oral mucosa), 4 lung, 2 squamous cell carcinoma of skin, 2 lymphoma, 1 each of brain, colonic, gastric; ovary, pancreatic, and prostate. These malignancies were diagnosed at a median follow-up of 42 months (32-73) after LT. Over a median follow-up of 38 months (10-56) after the diagnosis of de novo malignancy, 6 patients (28.5%) died. Patients with de novo malignancy had a higher follow-up after LDLT, 94.3 ± 32.9 versus 62.5 ± 41.8 months, P = 0.000. Patients with alcohol as etiology for LT had higher trend of de novo malignancies (33.3% versus 26.4%), P = 0.46.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of de novo malignancy was 1% at a median follow-up of 42 (32-73) months. De novo malignancies following LDLT, although uncommon, are associated with significant mortality. A careful screening protocol should be followed after transplantation for early detection of de novo malignancies.

Long-term care of transplant recipients: de novo neoplasms after liver transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Since the first liver transplantation in the early 1960s, there have been significant improvements in the recipients' long-term outcome. Patients who have undergone transplantation are exposed to a high risk of developing neoplastic disease, not only because of their chronic immunosuppression, but also related to physiological aging, lifestyle, chronic viral infections, liver disease cause, and carcinogenic immunosuppressants. The present review covers the latest and most relevant data on de novo neoplasms after liver transplantation, and discusses their implications for clinical practice.

RECENT FINDINGS

Given the impact of de novo neoplasms, in terms of morbidity and mortality, transplant teams must be prepared to diagnose and treat these conditions promptly. Dedicated cancer screening protocols are warranted. Although surveillance strategies are based on data concerning the general population, they should be customized in the light of each transplant recipient's risk factors. The resulting risk stratification is crucially important to the design of early intervention programs, and for addressing the modulation of individualized immunosuppressive regimens.

SUMMARY

De novo malignancies are a significant issue for the liver transplant population, but targeted screening programs have shown that survival rates similar to those of nonimmunosuppressed patients can be achieved. New oncological surveillance strategies covering the prophylaxis, monitoring, and treatment of de novo neoplasms should take high priority in clinical research.