Hepatic resection after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients with liver metastases from colorectal cancer: need for cautious planning

Predictive Factors for the Survival Outcomes of Preoperative Chemotherapy in Patients with Resectable and Borderline Resectable Colorectal Cancer with Liver Metastasis

BACKGROUND

Preoperative chemotherapy increases resectability in borderline resectable colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) patients who undergo curative liver surgery. Most clinical risk scores and other predictive factors for survival have been extensively studied in patients who undergo upfront liver surgery. However, predictive factors of CRLM patients who received preoperative chemotherapy remains controversial.

METHODS

CRLM patients who received preoperative systemic therapy followed by curative liver surgery at our institution between 1/2012 and 12/2018 were included. This study aimed to investigate factors that predicted the outcomes of preoperative systemic treatment, optimal dose/duration, and toxicity in patients with CRLM.

OUTCOMES

Ninety-eight patients were eligible for analysis. Most patients received oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy (72.7%), while 15.9% received both oxaliplatin and irinotecan. Biologic agents were administered in 48.9% of patients. Overall, chemotherapy-induced liver injury was observed in 38.5%. The median disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were 8.7 months and 3.6 years, respectively. Baseline, pre-surgery, and increased Fong scores after preoperative chemotherapy were significantly associated with DFS and OS. In multivariate analysis, a high Fong score at baseline (p=0.018) was significantly associated with shorter DFS, whereas male sex (p=0.040) and liver surgery (p=0.044) were related to longer OS.

CONCLUSION

In our study, Fong clinical risk scores, female sex, and liver surgery as a part of liver-directed therapy were independent prognostic factors for survival in CRLM patients who received preoperative chemotherapy. These clinical factors should be considered as an option to guide physicians' decisions in selecting patients with CRLM who may benefit most from curative liver-directed therapy.

Survival nomograms for simultaneous resection of primary and hepatic lesions without neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with resectable colorectal liver metastasis

Background

No well-performing nomogram has been developed specifically to predict individual-patient cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) among patients with resectable colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) who undergo simultaneous resection of primary and hepatic lesions without neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). We aim to investigate the prognosis of patients with resectable CRLM undergoing simultaneous resection of primary and hepatic lesions without NAC.

Methods

Data of patients with CRLM in the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Program (cohort, n = 225) were collected as the training set, and data of patients with CRLM treated at the National Cancer Center (cohort, n = 180) were collected as the validation set. The prognostic value of the clinicopathological parameters in the training cohort was assessed using Kaplan‒Meier curves and univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models, and OS and CSS nomograms integrated with the prognostic variables were constructed. Calibration analyses, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, and decision curve analyses (DCAs) were then performed to evaluate the performance of the nomograms.

Results

There was no collinearity among the collected variables. Three factors were associated with OS and CSS: the pretreatment carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) concentration, pathologic N (pN) stage, and adjuvant chemotherapy (each p < 0.05). OS and CSS nomograms were constructed using these three parameters. The calibration plots revealed favorable agreement between the predicted and observed outcomes. The areas under the ROC curves were approximately 0.7. The DCA plots revealed that both nomograms had satisfactory clinical benefits. The ROC curves and DCAs also confirmed that the nomogram surpassed the tumor, node, and metastasis staging system.

Conclusion

The herein-described nomograms containing the pretreatment CEA concentration, pN stage, and adjuvant chemotherapy may be effective models for predicting postoperative survival in patients with CRLM.

Adjuvant oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy effect after treatment of colorectal hepatic metastasis

Purpose

We aimed to investigate whether adjuvant oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy after treatment for hepatic metastasis affects recurrence or survival and to determine the risk factors for recurrence or survival.

Methods

Forty-six patients who underwent curative treatment for hepatic metastasis from colorectal cancer between July 2009 and December 2017 were included from a retrospectively collected patient database. Curative resection included hepatic resection, radiofrequency ablation (RFA), or a combination of both, followed by adjuvant chemotherapy with oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy.

Results

Thirty-seven patients (80.4%) had colon cancer and 9 (19.6%) had rectal cancer. Twenty-six patients (56.5%) underwent hepatic resection, 7 (15.2%) RFA, and 13 (28.3%) hepatic resection and RFA. Thirty-two patients (69.6%) underwent chemotherapy after hepatic treatment. The recurrence incidence was 50% in the non-chemotherapy group and 46.9% in the chemotherapy group (P > 0.999). The incidence of death was 7.1% in the non-chemotherapy group and 18.8% in the chemotherapy group (P = 0.657). The recurrence risk factors were N stage (N0 vs. N2; P = 0.013, P = 0.005) and bilobed hepatic metastasis (P = 0.027, P = 0.009) in the univariate and multivariate analyses, respectively. However, chemotherapy after hepatic treatment was not a risk factor for disease-free survival (DFS) or overall survival (OS) in the univariate and multivariate analyses (P = 0.656 and P = 0.414, respectively; P = 0.510 and P = 0.459, respectively).

Conclusion

Oxaliplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy after colorectal hepatic metastasis treatment did not affect the DFS or OS. The N stage of the primary tumor and bilobed hepatic metastasis are risk factors for recurrence and death.

The prognostic significance of serum lactate dehydrogenase-to-albumin ratio in colorectal cancer

Purpose

The purpose of our study was initially to explore the prognostic role of LDH-to-albumin ratio in patients with colorectal carcinoma (CRC) undergoing curative resection.

Methods

The retrospective study included 295 CRC patients that underwent curative resection. According to time-dependent receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis, the optimal cutoff value for pretreatment LDH-to-albumin ratio was 52.7. Cox regression univariate and multivariate analyses were utilized to analyze the prognostic factors for disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS).

Results

The 295 participants included 117 women (39.7%) and had an overall mean age of 55.8 ± 14.1 years. The median follow-up period was 31.8 ± 21 months (range, 6–78 months) and 53 patients (18.0%) died from cancer during the follow-up period. The 5-year DFS and OS rates were 65.4% and 68.5% in patients with LDH-to-albumin ratio <52.7 (n = 152), and were 55.2% and 55.4% in patients with LDH-to-albumin ratio ≥52.7 (n = 143), respectively. Kaplan-Meier curves showed that LDH-to-albumin ratio ≥52.7 was significantly associated with worse DFS and OS (P = 0.003 and P < 0.001, respectively). Multivariate analyses revealed that LDH-to-albumin ratio was an independent predictor of resectable CRC (odds ratio, 2.104; 95% confidence interval, 1.112–3.982; P = 0.022).

Conclusion

Our study revealed that high pretreatment LDH-to-albumin ratio level was an unfavorable prognosticator in patients with CRC undergoing curative resection. LDH-to-albumin ratio is a candidate to be a prognostic biomarker in clinical practice.