Is radical surgery for clinical stage I right-sided colon cancer relevant? A retrospective review

Three-dimensional laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: A 2-year follow-up study at Hue Central Hospital

Background

Laparoscopic surgery has brought about a revolution in clinical practice since its inception. Using a new generation three-dimensional (3D) HD laparoscopic system can be seen as a beneficial "hybrid" created by fusing two different elements: increased vision quality and the viability and diffusion of laparoscopy. This study aims to determine the surgical outcomes and two-year survival of colorectal cancer patients after 3D laparoscopic surgery.

Methods

A prospective study was conducted on 60 patients with a definitive diagnosis of primary colorectal cancer. All patients underwent 3D laparoscopic colorectal resection from January 2020 to December 2021 by a single surgical team. Data were prospectively collected from Hue Central Hospital, including operative parameters and survival time.

Results

The mean age was 62.0 ± 10.6 years old. D3 lymphadenectomy accounted for most cases (96.7 %). There were no intraoperative complications or conversion to open surgery. The mean operation time was 162.3 ± 25.8 min. Postoperative complications included incisional fluid collection (5 %), wound infection (3.3 %), and drainage site bleeding (1.7 %). The average length of hospital stay was 10.4 ± 4.6 days. Overall survival rate after two years was 93 %.

Conclusions

3D laparoscopic surgery for radical treatment of colorectal cancer is feasible, effective, and safe. This surgical technique offers a positive prognosis for patients.

Weighing the benefits of lymphadenectomy in early-stage colorectal cancer

Recent advancements in endoscopic procedures have resulted in a growing diagnosis of early colorectal cancer (CRC) cases, where classical en bloc lymph node (LN) dissection is not performed and treatment is terminated with the removal of the main cancer lesion by endoscopy without pathologic LN staging. Although many studies report noninferior outcomes of endoscopic resection in comparison to surgical resection, a cautious approach to completing treatment with endoscopic resection alone is recommended because LN metastases may be present even in early-stage CRC. In most countries, including the United States, Europe, and South Korea, the guidelines for additional surgery after endoscopic resection are very similar. If LN metastasis is suspected, even in T1 stage or lower lesions, further surgery is an essential treatment modality, but confirmation of the presence of LN metastasis is perhaps the most difficult part of this process. Another paradoxical recent trend is the expansion of more extensive and complete surgical lymphadenectomy for CRC. The success rate of surgery has improved dramatically over the past decade with the introduction of surgical devices and minimally invasive surgery, and the associated risks have been significantly reduced. While the burden of surgery on patients is understandable, the indications for surgery in early colon cancer need to be carefully reviewed to improve cure rates. In this process, we believe that an integrated decision-making process with surgeons, radiologists, and pathologists, in addition to the opinions of endoscopists, will be an important process to improve the cure rate.

Proper surgical extent for clinical Stage I right colon cancer

Purpose:

Pre-operative evaluation identifying clinical-stage affects the decision regarding the extent of surgical resection in right colon cancer. This study was designed to predict a proper surgical resection through the prognosis of clinical Stage I right colon cancer.

Patients and Methods:

We included patients who were diagnosed with clinical and pathological Stage I right-sided colon cancer, including appendiceal, caecal, ascending, hepatic flexure and proximal transverse colon cancer, between August 2010 and December 2016 in two tertiary teaching hospitals. Patients who underwent open surgeries were excluded because laparoscopic surgery is the initial approach for colorectal cancer in our institutions.

Results:

Eighty patients with clinical Stage I and 104 patients with pathological Stage I were included in the study. The biopsy reports showed that the tumour size was larger in the clinical Stage I group than in the pathological Stage I group (3.4 vs. 2.3 cm, P < 0.001). Further, the clinical Stage I group had some pathological Stage III cases (positive lymph nodes, P = 0.023). The clinical Stage I group had a higher rate of distant metastases (P = 0.046) and a lower rate of overall (P = 0.031) and cancer-specific survival (P = 0.021) than the pathological Stage I group. Compared to pathological Stage II included in the period, some of the survival curves were located below the pathological Stage II, but there was no statistical difference.

Conclusion:

The study results show that even clinical Stage I cases, radical resection should be considered in accordance with T3 and T4 tumours.