Successful treatment of type I endoleak of common iliac artery with balloon expandable stent (Palmaz XL stent) during endovascular aneurysm repair

A systematic review of treatment modalities and outcomes of type Ib endoleak after endovascular abdominal aneurysm repair

Objectives

To collect specific literature on type Ib endoleak after aorto-iliac endografting for abdominal aortic aneurysm, reporting data on diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up results.

Methods

Publications about type Ib endoleak after aorto-iliac endografting for abdominal aortic or iliac aneurysm were searched in PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus. Considered studies were in English and published until 3 November 2016. Research methods and reporting were performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Inclusion criteria were: (1) reporting on abdominal aortic or iliac aneurysm as primary diagnosis; (2) reporting on distal endoleak after aorto-iliac endografting. Patient data, data on endovascular treatment, endoleak, reintervention, and follow-up were collected by two independent authors.

Results

Included studies were 11 (five original articles, six case reports), corresponding to 29 patients and 30 type Ib endoleak. Excluding missing data (2/30, 6.7%), type Ib endoleak was treated intra-operatively, within six months and after six months in six cases (21.4%), eight cases (28.6%), and fourteen cases (50%), respectively. Treatment of type Ib endoleak was endovascular in 27 cases (90%) (7 embolizations + extender cuffs, 10 extender cuffs, 8 embolizations without extender cuff, 1 Palmaz stenting and 1 iliac branched endograft), hybrid in 1 case (3.3%) and surgical in 2 cases (6.6%). Buttock claudication occurred in two cases (6.7%). One-month mortality was 3.4% (2/29) without events due to type Ib endoleak. In 14 cases (46.7%), median follow-up was six months (interquartile range: 2.75–14; range: 0.75–53). Type Ib endoleak persisted or reappeared in three cases (10%), all after endovascular treatment. Two of these (2/3, 66.7%) needed endovascular reintervention. No death during follow-up was reported.

Conclusions

Few specific data are available in literature about type Ib endoleak after aorto-iliac endografting for abdominal aortic aneurysm. About 50% of type Ib endoleak occurred after six months from the endovascular abdominal aneurysm repair procedure. Treatment is mainly endovascular and distal endograft extension is the main and effective treatment. Buttock claudication is the most frequent complication in case of exclusion of internal iliac artery. Persistent type Ib endoleak is possible, and adjunctive endovascular procedures are necessary.

Predeployed aortic extension cuff (kilt) in EVAR with hostile neck anatomy using Endurant II system: preliminary results

INTRODUCTION

Various modifications of standard endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) have been developed to solve the problem of difficult neck anatomy.

AIM

The authors propose the implantation of a predeployed extension cuff (kilt) using on-shelf Endurant II elements. In a vast majority of cases, the proposed method provides a solution for the hostile neck problem using standard Endurant II elements available in all centers performing subrenal EVAR procedures.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The early outcomes of kilt implantation were evaluated in 11 patients (three with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms, one symptomatic) in 2 vascular centers in Silesia (Poland). All patients presented with hostile neck anatomy defined as neck length < 10 mm, diameter > 28 mm, angulation > 60°, mural thrombus or calcium > 2 mm in thickness or > 180° circumference.

RESULTS

No intraoperative type I endoleak or device migration was observed. Two perioperative deaths occurred in patients in a severe condition with ruptured aneurysms. One case of type III endoleak was managed by the implantation of an additional iliac extension with complete endoleak sealing.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed method seems to be effective in early endoleak prevention in patients with hostile neck anatomy undergoing EVAR procedures; however, studies with long-term follow-up are needed.