Role of the O-arm and Computer-assisted Navigation of Safe Screw Fixation in Children with Traumatic Rotatory Atlantoaxial Subluxation

Comparison of intraoperative CT- and cone beam CT-based spinal navigation for the treatment of atlantoaxial instability

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Due to the complexity of neurovascular structures in the atlantoaxial region, spinal navigation for posterior C1-C2 instrumentation is nowadays a helpful tool to increase accuracy of surgery and safety of patients. Many available intraoperative navigation devices have proven their reliability in this part of the spine. Two main imaging techniques are used: intraoperative CT (iCT) and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT).

PURPOSE

Comparison of iCT- and CBCT-based technologies for navigated posterior instrumentation in C1-C2 instability.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study.

PATIENT SAMPLE

A total of 81 consecutive patients from July 2014 to April 2020.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Screw accuracy and operating time.

METHODS

Patients with C1-C2 instability received posterior instrumentation using C2 pedicle screws, C1 lateral mass or pedicle screws. All screws were inserted using intraoperative imaging either using iCT or CBCT systems and spinal navigation with autoregistration technology. Following navigated screw insertion, a second intraoperative scan was performed to assess the accuracy of screw placement. Accuracy was defined as the percentage of correctly placed screws or with minor cortical breach (<2 mm) as graded by an independent observer compared to misplaced screws.

RESULTS

A total of 81 patients with C1-C2 instability were retrospectively analyzed. Of these, 34 patients were operated with the use of iCT and 47 with CBCT. No significant demographic difference was found between groups. In the iCT group, 97.7% of the C1-C2 screws were correctly inserted; 2.3% showed a minor cortical breach (<2 mm); no misplacement (>2 mm). In the CBCT group, 98.9% of screws were correctly inserted; no minor pedicle breach; 1.1% showed misplacement >2 mm. Accuracy of screw placement demonstrated no significant difference between groups. Both technologies allowed sufficient identification of screw misplacement intraoperatively leading to two screw revisions in the iCT and three in the CBCT group. Median time of surgery was significantly shorter using CBCT technology (166.5 minutes [iCT] vs 122 minutes [CBCT]; p<.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Spinal navigation using either iCT- or CBCT-based systems with autoregistration allows safe and reliable screw placement and intraoperative assessment of screw positioning. Using the herein presented procedural protocols, CBCT systems allow shorter operating time.

Comparison of surgical outcomes of C1-2 fusion surgery between O-arm-assisted operation and C-arm assisted operation in children with atlantoaxial rotatory fixation

Objective

Placement of the pedicle screw is technically challenging during C1-2 fusion surgery in children and different intraoperative image-guided systems have been developed to reduce the risk of screw malposition. The purpose of the present study was to compare surgical outcomes between C-arm fluoroscopy and O-arm navigated pedicle screw placement in the treatment of atlantoaxial rotatory fixation in children.

Methods

We retrospectively evaluated charts of all consecutive children with atlantoaxial rotatory fixation who underwent C-arm fluoroscopy or O-arm navigated pedicle screw placement from April 2014 to December 2020. Outcomes including operative time, estimated blood loss (EBL), accuracy of screw placement (Neo's classification) and completed fusion time were evaluated.

Results

A total of 340 screws were placed in 85 patients. The accuracy of screw placement of the O-arm group was 97.4%, which was significantly higher than that of the C-arm group (91.8%). Both groups had satisfied bony fusion (100%). Statistical significance (230.0 ± 34.6 ml for the C-arm group and 150.6 ± 47.3 ml for the O-arm group, p < 0.05) was observed with respect to the median blood loss. There were no statistically significant difference (122.0 ± 16.5 min for the C-arm group and 110.0 ± 14.4 min for the O-arm group, p = 0.604) with respect to the median operative time.

Conclusion

O-arm-assisted navigation allowed more accurate screw placement and less intraoperative blood loss. Both groups had satisfied bony fusion. O-arm navigation did not prolong the operative time despite the time required for setting and scanning.

Intraoperative imaging and navigation for C1-C2 posterior fusion

Background:

Cervical axial spine fusion is challenging as the anatomy is extremely variable, and screw misplacement can lead to severe complications. C1 lateral mass screws and C2 pedicle screws are routinely placed under either fluoroscopic guidance or imaging-assisted navigation. Here, we compared the two for axial screw placement.

Methods:

We retrospectively evaluated patients’ treated from 2011–2016 utilizing the Harm’s procedure for C1-C2 screw fixation performed under either fluoroscopic guidance (nine patients) or image-assisted O-arm navigation (five patients). The groups had similar demographic and risk factors. Variables studied included operative time, estimated blood loss (EBL), accuracy of screw placement, screw reposition rates, and reoperation rates.

Results:

The mean EBL was 555CC and 260CC, respectively (not a significant difference) utilizing fluoroscopic versus O-arm navigation. Of interest, the mean surgical duration was 27 min longer in the O-arm versus fluoroscopy group (P = 0.03). Ten C2 pedicle screws were performed using O-arm navigation. Alternatively, as 9 of 18 C2 pedicles were considered “risky” for the placement of fluoroscopic-guided pedicle screws, laminar screws were utilized. Although the accuracy rate of C1 and C2 screw placement was higher for the navigated group, this finding was not significant. Similarly, despite complications involving two unacceptably placed screws from the fluoroscopic guidance group, there were no neurological sequelae.

Conclusion:

Axial cervical spine instrumentation is challenging. Utilization of Imaging-assisted navigation increases the accuracy and safety of screw placement.

Spinal navigation for posterior instrumentation of C1-2 instability using a mobile intraoperative CT scanner

OBJECTIVE Spinal navigation techniques for surgical fixation of unstable C1-2 pathologies are challenged by complex osseous and neurovascular anatomy, instability of the pathology, and unreliable preoperative registration techniques. An intraoperative CT scanner with autoregistration of C-1 and C-2 promises sufficient accuracy of spinal navigation without the need for further registration procedures. The aim of this study was to analyze the accuracy and reliability of posterior C1-2 fixation using intraoperative mobile CT scanner-guided navigation. METHODS In the period from July 2014 to February 2016, 10 consecutive patients with instability of C1-2 underwent posterior fixation using C-2 pedicle screws and C-1 lateral mass screws, and 2 patients underwent posterior fixation from C-1 to C-3. Spinal navigation was performed using intraoperative mobile CT. Following navigated screw insertion in C-1 and C-2, intraoperative CT was repeated to check for the accuracy of screw placement. In this study, the accuracy of screw positioning was retrospectively analyzed and graded by an independent observer. RESULTS The authors retrospectively analyzed the records of 10 females and 2 males, with a mean age of 80.7 ± 4.95 years (range 42-90 years). Unstable pathologies, which were verified by fracture dislocation or by flexion/extension radiographs, included 8 Anderson Type II fractures, 1 unstable Anderson Type III fracture, 1 hangman fracture Levine Effendi Ia, 1 complex hangman-Anderson Type III fracture, and 1 destructive rheumatoid arthritis of C1-2. In 4 patients, critical anatomy was observed: high-riding vertebral artery (3 patients) and arthritis-induced partial osseous destruction of the C-1 lateral mass (1 patient). A total of 48 navigated screws were placed. Correct screw positioning was observed in 47 screws (97.9%). Minor pedicle breach was observed in 1 screw (2.1%). No screw displacement occurred (accuracy rate 97.9%). CONCLUSION Spinal navigation using intraoperative mobile CT scanning was reliable and safe for posterior fixation in unstable C1-2 pathologies with high accuracy in this patient series.

A Modified Personalized Image-Based Drill Guide Template for Atlantoaxial Pedicle Screw Placement: A Clinical Study

Background

Atlantoaxial posterior pedicle screw fixation has been widely used for treatment of atlantoaxial instability (AAI). However, precise and safe insertion of atlantoaxial pedicle screws remains challenging. This study presents a modified drill guide template based on a previous template for atlantoaxial pedicle screw placement.

Material/Methods

Our study included 54 patients (34 males and 20 females) with AAI. All the patients underwent posterior atlantoaxial pedicle screw fixation: 25 patients underwent surgery with the use of a modified drill guide template (template group) and 29 patients underwent surgery via the conventional method (conventional group). In the template group, a modified drill guide template was designed for each patient. The modified drill guide template and intraoperative fluoroscopy were used for surgery in the template group, while only intraoperative fluoroscopy was used in the conventional group.

Results

Of the 54 patients, 52 (96.3%) completed the follow-up for more than 12 months. The template group had significantly lower intraoperative fluoroscopy frequency (p<0.001) and higher accuracy of screw insertion (p=0.045) than the conventional group. There were no significant differences in surgical duration, intraoperative blood loss, or improvement of neurological function between the 2 groups (p>0.05).

Conclusions

Based on the results of this study, it is feasible to use the modified drill guide template for atlantoaxial pedicle screw placement. Using the template can significantly lower the screw malposition rate and the frequency of intraoperative fluoroscopy.

The delayed presentation of atlantoaxial rotatory fixation in children: a review of the management

AIMS

Although atlantoaxial rotatory fixation (AARF) is a common cause of torticollis in children, the diagnosis may be delayed. The condition is characterised by a lack of rotation at the atlantoaxial joint which becomes fixed in a rotated and subluxed position. The management of children with a delayed presentation of this condition is controversial. This is a retrospective study of a group of such children.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Children who were admitted to two institutions between 1988 and 2014 with a diagnosis of AARF were included. We identified 12 children (four boys, eight girls), with a mean age of 7.3 years (1.5 to 13.4), in whom the duration of symptoms on presentation was at least four weeks (four to 39). All were treated with halo traction followed by a period of cervical immobilisation in a halo vest or a Minerva jacket. We describe a simple modification to the halo traction that allows the child to move their head whilst maintaining traction. The mean follow-up was 59.6 weeks (24 to 156).

RESULTS

Despite the delay in referral, the subluxation was successfully reduced in all children. Only two children required atlantoaxial fusion.

CONCLUSION

The results of our study suggest that normal anatomy with restoration of movement may be achieved even in cases of AARF presenting late, obviating the need for fusion. We also show a simple modification to the halo traction that allows the child to move their head about while still maintaining traction.

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

Prompt diagnosis and management with halo traction (with a simple modification as described) is associated with good results in patients with AARF who present late. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2016;98-B:715-20.

Stereotactic guidance for navigated percutaneous sacroiliac joint fusion

Arthrodesis of the sacroiliac joint (SIJ) for surgical treatment of SIJ dysfunction has regained interest among spine specialists. Current techniques described in the literature most often utilize intraoperative fluoroscopy to aid in implant placement; however, image guidance for SIJ fusion may allow for minimally invasive percutaneous instrumentation with more precise implant placement. In the following cases, we performed percutaneous stereotactic navigated sacroiliac instrumentation using O-arm^® multidimensional surgical imaging with StealthStation^® navigation (Medtronic, Inc. Minneapolis, MN). Patients were positioned prone and an image-guidance reference frame was placed contralateral to the surgical site. O-arm® integrated with StealthStation® allowed immediate auto-registration. The skin incision was planned with an image-guidance probe. An image-guided awl, drill and tap were utilized to choose a starting point and trajectory. Threaded titanium cage(s) packed with autograft and/or allograft were then placed. O-arm® image-guidance allowed for implant placement in the SIJ with a small skin incision. However, we could not track the cage depth position with our current system, and in one patient, the SIJ cage had to be revised secondary to the anterior breach of sacrum.

Feasibility of CT-based intraoperative 3D stereotactic image-guided navigation in the upper cervical spine of children 10 years of age or younger: initial experience

OBJECT Rigid screw fixation may be technically difficult in the upper cervical spine of young children. Intraoperative stereotactic navigation may potentially assist a surgeon in precise placement of screws in anatomically challenging locations. Navigation may also assist in defining abnormal anatomy. The object of this study was to evaluate the authors' initial experience with the feasibility and accuracy of this technique, both for resection and for screw placement in the upper cervical spine in younger children. METHODS Eight consecutive pediatric patients 10 years of age or younger underwent upper cervical spine surgery aided by image-guided navigation. The demographic, surgical, and clinical data were recorded. Screw position was evaluated with either an intraoperative or immediately postoperative CT scan. RESULTS One patient underwent navigation purely for guidance of bony resection. A total of 14 navigated screws were placed in the other 7 patients, including 5 C-2 pedicle screws. All 14 screws were properly positioned, defined as the screw completely contained within the cortical bone in the expected trajectory. There were no immediate complications associated with navigation. CONCLUSIONS Image-guided navigation is feasible within the pediatric cervical spine and may be a useful surgical tool for placing screws in a patient with small, often difficult bony anatomy. The authors describe their experience with their first 8 pediatric patients who underwent navigation in cervical spine surgery. The authors highlight differences in technique compared with similar navigation in adults.