Role of the Self-Administered, Self-Reported History Questionnaire to Identify Types of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Sensitivity Analysis

Diagnostic clinical prediction rules for categorising low back pain: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Low back pain (LBP) is a common complex condition, where specific diagnoses are hard to identify. Diagnostic clinical prediction rules (CPRs) are known to improve clinical decision-making. A review of LBP diagnostic-CPRs by Haskins et al. (2015) identified six diagnostic-CPRs in derivation phases of development, with one tool ready for implementation. Recent progress on these tools is unknown. Therefore, this review aimed to investigate developments in LBP diagnostic-CPRs and evaluate their readiness for implementation.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed on five databases (Medline, Amed, Cochrane Library, PsycInfo, and CINAHL) combined with hand-searching and citation-tracking to identify eligible studies. Study and tool quality were appraised for risk of bias (Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2), methodological quality (checklist using accepted CPR methodological standards), and CPR tool appraisal (GRade and ASsess Predictive).

RESULTS

Of 5021 studies screened, 11 diagnostic-CPRs were identified. Of the six previously known, three have been externally validated but not yet undergone impact analysis. Five new tools have been identified since Haskin et al. (2015); all are still in derivation stages. The most validated diagnostic-CPRs include the Lumbar-Spinal-Stenosis-Self-Administered-Self-Reported-History-Questionnaire and Diagnosis-Support-Tool-to-Identify-Lumbar-Spinal-Stenosis, and the StEP-tool which differentiates radicular from axial-LBP.

CONCLUSIONS

This updated review of LBP diagnostic CPRs found five new tools, all in the early stages of development. Three previously known tools have now been externally validated but should be used with caution until impact evaluation studies are undertaken. Future funding should focus on externally validating and assessing the impact of existing CPRs on clinical decision-making.

Similarities and differences across patient completed voice case history questionnaires - A scoping review

BACKGROUND

Case history assessments are ubiquitously performed across various health professions for diagnostic purposes. Questionnaires are considered a valuable tool within this process. There is currently no standardized tool available to collect such information in the assessment of voice disorders. Conflicting advice from peak bodies and research evidence makes the process heterogenous, haphazard and difficult to compare findings.

OBJECTIVE

To systematically identify existing case history questionnaires available for general clinical practice and provide synthesis and analysis of the questions within.

METHODS

A scoping review was conducted across published and unpublished literature using the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews framework. The broad search included research papers within six electronic databases, textbooks, online publishing sites, voice clinic websites and peak body websites. Search criteria were uniformly applied. Descriptive analysis and content analysis was conducted. At each stage, transparency and replicability was achieved through an independent review process.

RESULTS

Identified voice case history questionnaires were few (n = 23) with 80% from unpublished sources. A total of 581 unique questions were identified. No single question was common across all 23 questionnaires. The most frequently asked questions, excluding demographics, included medicines taken (n = 21), smoking (n = 20) and alcohol (n = 19). These questions were not reflected in the highest frequency categories: Health Status/Medical Conditions/Reports (n = 200), Vocal Symptoms (n = 88), Voice Use (n = 51) despite these categories representing 58% of all questions asked. Within the highest frequency category, the subcategory of Systemic Diseases was the highest, representing 19% of all questions within the category.

CONCLUSIONS

This study illuminates the similarities yet many differences that exist across identified voice case history questionnaires in terms of number of questions, number of categories, preference for question-type and structure. It demonstrates the need for standardization of a voice case history questionnaire which would potentially enable more accurate diagnosis and data comparison between voice clinics to aid future research.

[Neurogenic intermittent claudication in patients with degenerative lumbar stenosis]

OBJECTIVE

To study the clinical manifestations of neurogenic intermittent claudication (NIC) in patients with degenerative lumbar stenosis (DLS).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The neurological status, intensity and nature of pain syndrome, and pain-free walking distance were evaluated in 83 NIC patients with DPS, who underwent surgical treatment.

RESULTS

The predominance of the clinical picture of sensorimotor pain (n=30; 36.1%) and isolated pain (n=31; 37.3%) forms of NIC was established. Isolated sensory (n=1; 1.2%), sensorimotor (n=3; 3.6%), and motor-pain (n=4; 4.8%) forms were significantly less common. In 6 (7.2%) patients, there was a pain-free form of NIC. In most patients, surgical treatment led to regression of neurological symptoms and an increase in the distance of pain-free walking. No relationship was found between the demographic and clinical characteristics of patients (gender, age, pain severity, pain-free walking distance), MRI results and the features of NIC clinical picture. In 4 patients, the phenomenon of pacing was revealed in the form of an increase in pain at the beginning of walking and a significant decrease or complete regression as walking continues.

CONCLUSION

The clinical picture of NIC is polymorphic, its pain-free course is possible. The decision on the feasibility of surgical treatment of patients with PLS is possible taking into account the clinical picture of NIC and MRI results.