Abstract
BACKGROUND CONTEXT
Traumatic spinal injuries often require surgical fixation. Specific three-dimensional degrees of instability after spinal injury, which represent criteria for optimum treatment concepts, however, are still not well investigated.
PURPOSE
The aim of this review therefore was to summarize and quantify multiplanar instability increases due to spinal injury from experimental studies.
STUDY DESIGN/SETTING
Systematic review.
METHODS
A systematic review of the literature was performed using keyword-based search on PubMed and Web of Science databases in order to detect all in vitro studies investigating the destabilizing effect of simulated and provoked traumatic injury in human spine specimens. Together with the experimental designs, the instability parameters range of motion, neutral zone and translation were extracted from the studies and evaluated regarding type and level of injury.
RESULTS
A total of 59 studies was included in this review, of which 43 studies investigated the effect of cervical spine injury. Range of motion increase, which was reported in 58 studies, was generally lower compared to the neutral zone increase, given in 37 studies, despite of injury type and level. Instability increases were highest in flexion/extension for most injury types, while axial rotation was predominantly affected after cervical unilateral dislocation injury and lateral bending solely after odontoid fracture. Whiplash injuries and wedge fractures were found to increase instability equally in all motion planes.
CONCLUSIONS
Specific traumatic spinal injuries produce characteristic but complex three-dimensional degrees of instability, which depend on the type, level, and morphology of the injury. Future studies should expand research on the cervicothoracic, thoracic, and lumbosacral spine and should additionally investigate the destabilizing effects of the injury morphology as well as concomitant rib cage injuries in case of thoracic spinal injuries. Moreover, neutral zone and translation should be measured in addition to the range of motion, while mechanical injury simulation should be preferred to resection or transection of structures to ensure high comparability with the clinical situation.
Collapse