Minimally-Invasive versus Conventional Repair of Spondylolysis in Athletes: A Review of Outcomes and Return to Play

Minimally invasive robot-assisted direct pars repair: illustrative cases

BACKGROUND

Robot-assisted techniques are increasingly integrated into the field of spine surgery, with the potential benefits of increased accuracy and reduced radiation exposure. The objective of this study was to describe the technique of minimally invasive robot-assisted direct pars repair with 2 case illustrations.

OBSERVATIONS

An 18-year-old male and a 42-year-old male, both with bilateral L5 spondylolysis, underwent successful minimally invasive L5 direct pars repairs with robotic assistance after conservative measures failed, and their cases are presented herein.

LESSONS

A robot-assisted direct pars repair is a safe and effective technique for treating bilateral lumbar spondylolysis. The integration of robot-assisted techniques in spine surgery has the potential to improve outcomes, decrease surgical time, and reduce the amount of radiation exposure to operating room staff. https://thejns.org/doi/10.3171/CASE2415.

Risk Factors for Nonunion After Nonoperative Treatment for Pediatric Lumbar Spondylolysis: A Retrospective Case-Control Study

BACKGROUND

Pediatric lumbar spondylolysis, a stress fracture of the lumbar spine, frequently affects young athletes, and nonoperative treatment is often the first choice of management. Because the union rate in lumbar spondylolysis is lower than that in general fatigue fractures, identifying risk factors for nonunion is essential for optimizing treatment.

PURPOSE

To determine the risk factors for nonunion after nonoperative treatment of acute pediatric lumbar spondylolysis through multivariate analysis.

STUDY DESIGN

Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

We analyzed 574 pediatric patients (mean age, 14.3 ± 1.9 years) with lumbar spondylolysis who underwent nonoperative treatment between 2015 and 2022. Nonoperative treatment included the elimination of sports activities, bracing, and weekly athletic rehabilitation, with follow-up computed tomography. Patient data, lesion characteristics, sports history, presence of spina bifida occulta at the lamina with a lesion or at the lumbosacral spine excluding the lesion level, and lumbosacral parameters were examined. Differences between the union and nonunion groups were investigated using multivariate analysis to determine the risk factors for nonunion.

RESULTS

Of the 574 patients, 81.7% achieved bone union. Multivariate analysis revealed that an L5 lesion and the progression of the main and contralateral lesion stages were significant independent risk factors for nonunion. An L5 lesion had a lower union rate than non-L5 lesions. As the main lesion progressed, the likelihood of nonunion increased significantly, and the progression of the contralateral lesion also showed a similar trend. Spina bifida occulta and lumbosacral parameters were not significant predictors of nonunion in this study.

CONCLUSION

We identified the L5 lesion level and the progression of the main and contralateral lesion stages as independent risk factors for nonunion in pediatric lumbar spondylolysis after nonoperative treatment. These findings aid in treatment decision-making. When bone union cannot be expected with nonoperative treatment, symptomatic treatment is required without prolonged external fixation and rest, and without aiming for bone union. Individualized treatment plans are crucial based on identified risk factors.

Rate and Duration of Bone Union for Conservative Treatment in Pediatric Lumbar Spondylolysis

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective case series.

OBJECTIVE

To report the detailed bone fusion rates and duration of treatment in unilateral and bilateral cases of pediatric lumbar spondylolysis (LS).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Early diagnosis and optimal conservative management for LS are crucial for achieving bony healing without surgery. However, existing research on the conservative treatment of pediatric LS, particularly regarding bone union rates and treatment duration for each stage of bilateral spondylolysis, is limited.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 590 pediatric patients (522 boys and 68 girls) under 18 years of age diagnosed with LS and treated conservatively from 2015 to 2021. The diagnosis was based on computed tomography scans and magnetic resonance imaging findings, with stages classified as very early, early, progressive, or terminal. Patient background, sports history, level and stage of spondylolysis, presence of spina bifida occulta, bone union rate, duration of conservative treatment, and recurrence rate were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

The overall bone union rate was 81.9%, with a mean conservative treatment duration of 53.7 days. Unilateral LS cases showed decreased bone union rates with stage advancement (very early; 98.2%, early; 96.0%, progressive; 64.3%). Bilateral LS cases with progressive or terminal stage demonstrated low bone union rates (very early/very early; 100%, early/very early; 94.1%, progressive/very early; 66.7%, early/early; 82.9%, progressive/early; 32.3%, progressive/progressive; 23.7%, very early/terminal; 0%, early/terminal; 50.0%, progressive/terminal; 11.1%). The duration of conservative treatment extended as the stage of the main and contralateral lesions progressed, ranging from 39.1 days (very early/none) to 105 days (progressive/terminal). The recurrence rate after bone fusion was 16.6%, with no differences based on lesion stage.

CONCLUSIONS

In this series of 590 patients, conservative treatment yielded high bone union rates for pediatric LS. However, union rates decreased with stage advancement, especially in bilateral cases. These findings provide valuable insights for prognosticating natural history and outcome regarding LS treatment, bone union, and return to activity.

Return to Play Criteria After Adult Lumbar Spinal Fractures: A Review of Current Literature and Expert Recommendations

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Understanding the management of lumbar spinal fractures and return to play (RTP) criteria is an essential component of care for adult athletes. Appropriate management of lumbar spinal fractures must balance minimizing time away from physical activity while also minimizing risk of reinjury. The purpose of this review is to summarize current recommendations on lumbar spinal fracture management and RTP guidelines and to provide expert opinion on areas of discrepancy in the field.

RECENT FINDINGS

There is a paucity of high-level evidence on the management and return to play criteria for adult lumbar spine fractures in athletes. Much of the data and recommendations are based on expert opinion and studies in pediatric or osteoporotic patients, which may not be applicable to adult athletes. These data presented here may be used to aid patient-physician conversations and provide guidance on expectations for patients, coaches, and athletic trainers. In general, we recommend that patients be free of lumbar pain, neurologically intact, and have full strength and motion of the lumbar spine and lower extremities before returning to play. Adequate protective equipment is recommended to be worn at all times during practice and play.

Comparing the Wiltse approach and classical approach of pedicle screw and hook internal fixation system for direct repair of lumbar spondylolysis in young patients: A case-control study

The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical effect of direct isthmus repair via Wiltse approach and classical approach in the treatment of simple lumbar spondylolysis in young patients. Thirty-three patients with simple lumbar spondylolysis underwent direct isthmic repair via the Wiltse approach (n = 17) or the classical approach (n = 16). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage volume, hospital stay, fusion rate, visual analogue scale (VAS), and the Oswestry disability index were evaluated and compared between the 2 groups. The amount of intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage volume, and the duration of hospital stay in the Wiltse group were lower than those in the classical group (P < .05). There was no significant difference in Oswestry disability index score between the Wiltse group and the classical group at 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after operation, but the visual analogue scale score in the Wiltse group was lower than that in the classical group at 6 months after surgery (P < .05). The Wiltse approach was comparable to the classical approach in terms of bone graft fusion time and fusion rate. The Wiltse approach for isthmus repair can achieve the same or even better clinical effect than the classical approach, and the Wiltse approach is more minimally invasive. Pedicle screw-hook internal fixation system combined with autogenous iliac bone graft via Wiltse approach is a feasible, safe, and effective minimally invasive surgical method for the repair of isthmic spondylolysis in young patients.

Effect of Collagenase Chemonucleolysis on Residual Pain After Transforaminal Lumbar Endoscopic Discectomy

Purpose

To investigate the short-term clinical effect of collagenase chemonucleolysis (CCNL) in the treatment of residual pain after transforaminal lumbar endoscopic discectomy (TLED).

Patients and Methods

The clinical data of 40 patients with residual pain after TLED for lumbar disc herniation (LDH) in our hospital from January 2018 to December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. The visual analogue scale (VAS) and quality of recovery-15 (QoR-15) were used to evaluate the effect of the operation. Modified MacNab method was used to evaluate the efficacy of CCNL at 6 months and 12 months after operation.

Results

All patients successfully completed the operation without serious complications, such as intervertebral space infection, vascular injury and nerve injury. The VAS 3 days after TLED was not significantly lower than that Pre-TLED (P > 0.05). The VAS at each time point after CCNL was significantly lower than that at Pre-TLED, and the QoR-15 score at each time point after CCNL was significantly higher than that 3 days after CCNL (P < 0.05). The modified MacNab criteria for the last follow-up was 95%.

Conclusion

CCNL can effectively relieve the residual pain after TLED, and the quality of life of patients after TLED is improved with time, and the safety of CCNL is higher.

Percutaneous Direct Pars Repair in Young Athletes

BACKGROUND

Lumbar pars defects are common in adolescent athletes and are often due to recurrent axial loading and traumatic stressors.

OBJECTIVE

To present an updated case series of young athletes who underwent percutaneous direct pars repair after failure of conservative management.

METHODS

A single-center, nonrandomized, retrospective observation study of athletes who were referred for minimally invasive direct pars repair after failure of at least 6 months of conservative management was performed. Summary demographic information, clinical features of presentation, perioperative and intraoperative radiographic imaging, and visual analog scale back pain scores were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 21 patients were included (mean age [± SD] 17.47 ± 3.02 years, range 14-25 years), 6 of whom were female (29%). All patients presented with bilateral pars fractures, with L5 being the most frequent level involved (n = 13). The average follow-up time was 31.52 ± 9.38 months (range 3-110 months). The visual analog scale score for back pain was significantly reduced from 7.62 ± 1.83 preoperatively to 0.28 ± 0.56 at the final postoperative examination (P < .01). Fusion was noted in 20 of the 21 patients on final follow-up (95%).

CONCLUSION

Percutaneous direct pars repair is a safe and effective means in treating young adolescents who have failed conservative management. The advantages included minimized muscle and soft tissue dissection, reduced blood loss, and early mobilization and recovery. In young athletes who desire return to high-level physical activity, this surgical technique is of particular benefit and should be considered in this patient population.

Surgical repair of lumbar stress fractures in professional cricketers

Background

Professional cricket fast bowlers sustain high rates of lumbar stress fractures (spondylolysis). Limited research exists around the success of surgical repair when these injuries fail conservative treatment. We present an ambispective cohort study of spondylolysis surgical repair in a consecutive group of multi-national professional cricket fast bowler using a technique not previously reported in this unique sporting group.

Methods

Between 2004 and 2019, a consecutive series of male professional fast bowlers with lumbar spondylolysis who had repeatedly failed conservative treatment and subsequently received surgical repair using a cable-screw construct were reviewed. Analysis comprised of ambispective outcome and radiological data collection and a survey at final follow-up.

Results

The cohort included 13 elite (7 state and 6 international) cricket fast bowlers from 3 countries (New Zealand, Australian and India) with an average age of 26 years (range, 20.3-29.5 years). All returned to play professional cricket at a median time of 8 months (IQR, 7-11 months) post surgery. All ten players surveyed at final follow-up [median, 38 (IQR, 31-103) months, range, 15-197 months] rated their bowling performance as the 'same or better' compared with prior to surgery. At final follow-up, 10 players continue to play cricket professionally ranging from 15 to 107 months post-surgery [median 35 (IQR, 24-43) months].

Conclusions

Our cohort demonstrated favorable return to play rates and career longevity following surgical repair of spondylolysis. To our knowledge it is the largest published surgical series of spondylolysis repair in cricketers, and the first to document the success of a cable-screw surgical technique in this sporting group.

Comparing Surgical Treatments for Spondylolysis: Review on Current Research

STUDY DESIGN

Narrative review.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the various surgical methods of repairing spondylolysis defects in regard to improving pain, restoration of function, radiographic improvement, and complication rate.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Spondylolysis is a defect in the pars interarticularis of the vertebral arch, typically in the lumbar vertebra. Treatment can be nonoperative and/or surgical. There are various types of surgical repair including spinal compression, fusion, and direct pars repair.

METHODS

A comprehensive review of the English literature was performed utilizing Medline, Embase, and Web of Science. Inclusion criteria included papers or abstracts that evaluated the surgical techniques. Exclusion criteria included non-English-language papers or abstracts with inadequate information about outcomes.

RESULTS

Postoperative pain levels and patient function were consistently improved, regardless of surgical technique chosen. Positive clinical outcomes after surgery were seen more often in patients under age 20 and those who underwent minimally invasive repairs. Positive radiographic improvements were reported broadly, although some reported higher rates of nonunion with spinal compression. Complication rates were low throughout and minimally invasive techniques reported decreased blood loss and shorter hospital stays.

CONCLUSIONS

Present surgical options appear largely comparable in terms of their ability to provide meaningful treatment for spondylolysis where conservative treatments have failed or otherwise remain unattempted.

Spondylolysis Repair Using a Minimally Invasive Modified Buck Technique with Neuronavigation and Neuromonitoring in High School and Professional Athletes: Technical Notes, Case Series, and Literature Review

BACKGROUND

Spondylolysis is a defect in the pars interarticularis of the vertebra that occurs frequently in high-performance young athletes. Although nonsurgical management is the mainstay of treatment, surgery is an option for patients with persistent symptoms despite multiple cycles of nonsurgical treatment. Performing a minimally invasive technique reduces complications, postsurgery pain, and hospitalization time and leads to a quick recovery. The aim of this study was to report the clinical results of a series of 3 patients treated with a modification of the Buck technique with a minimally invasive approach.

METHODS

Three high-performance athletes between 17 and 18 years old who were managed nonsurgically for at least 6 months underwent a modified Buck technique repair with a minimally invasive approach using cannulated compression screws, with neuronavigation and neuromonitoring. Patients were followed at least 6 months with computed tomography scans to assess consolidation and fixation status. Following rehabilitation and in the absence of pain, all 3 athletes returned to their respective sports. No complications were reported.

RESULTS

All patients presented with bilateral spondylolysis, at L3 in 1 case and at L5 in 2 cases. Patients received conservative management for 12-36 months before surgery. After surgery, consolidation was obtained at 4 months in all patients, who returned to their sports activities in <6 months.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed technique shows the advantages of performing minimally invasive surgery in young high-performance athletes, ensuring consolidation and early return to sports activity without complications.

Lumbosacral Spondylolysis and Spondylolisthesis

Repetitive stress on the lumbosacral spine during sporting activity places the athletic patient at risk of developing symptomatic pars defect. Clinical history, physical examination, and diagnostic imaging are important to distinguish spondylolysis from other causes of lower back pain. Early pars stress reaction can be identified with advanced imaging, before the development of cortical fracture or vertebral slip progression to spondylolisthesis. Conservative management is first-line for low-grade injury with surgical intervention indicated for refractory symptoms, severe spondylolisthesis, or considerable neurologic deficit. Prompt diagnosis and management of spondylolysis leads to good outcomes and return to competition for most athletes.

Return to play after spondylolysis: An overview

Spondylolysis is increasingly associated with specific sports, timely and effective management of which underpins successful return to sports. Hence, the main purpose of this systematic review of reviews [RoR] is to summarize data from published reviews exploring the return to play in athletes with spondylolysis managed conservatively or surgically, thereby providing for recommendations for future practice and research. A systematic review of review of articles published in English and since 2015 was conducted online using PubMed and Google Scholar, as per Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. Predefined eligibility criteria were applied, and the data thus compiled were analyzed. Study quality was assessed using the AMSTAR-2 checklist. A total of 7 systematic reviews and meta-analysis consisting of 51 primary studies were included in the review. The result of this RoR highlights the knowledge gap and limitations in RTP research post spondylolysis with existing heterogeneity in methods and reporting amid other factors within primary studies. Further quality of the study was found to be of low to critically low confidence based on the AMSTAR-2 scale, suggesting that the results should be interpreted with great caution. Though both conservative and surgical approaches increase the percentage of athletes returning to play, the evidence remains largely limited and inconclusive as to which is better. However, it appears that surgical interventions give those who failed a trial of conservative approach, a better shot at return to play. There is a need for further high-quality, appropriately powered, well-designed, multicentered studies, and also for consensus regarding "returning to play" definition and outcome measures.

Epidemiology, Treatment, and Performance-Based Outcomes in American Professional Baseball Players With Symptomatic Spondylolysis and Isthmic Spondylolisthesis

BACKGROUND

Repetitive lumbar hyperextension and rotation during athletic activity affect the structural integrity of the lumbar spine. While many sports have been associated with an increased risk of developing a pars defect, few previous studies have systematically investigated spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis in professional baseball players.

PURPOSE

To characterize the epidemiology and treatment of symptomatic lumbar spondylolysis and isthmic spondylolisthesis in American professional baseball players. We also sought to report the return-to-play (RTP) and performance-based outcomes associated with the diagnosis of a pars defect in this elite athlete population.

STUDY DESIGN

Descriptive epidemiology study.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted among all Major and Minor League Baseball (MLB and MiLB, respectively) players who had low back pain and underwent lumbar spine imaging between 2011 and 2016. Players with radiological evidence of a pars defect (with or without listhesis) were included. Analyses were conducted to assess the association between player-specific characteristics and RTP time. Baseball performance metrics were also compared before and after the injury episode to determine whether there was an association between the diagnosis of a pars defect and diminished player performance.

RESULTS

During the study period of 6 MLB seasons, 272 professional baseball players had low back pain and underwent lumbar spine imaging. Overall, 75 of these athletes (27.6%) received a diagnosis of pars defect. All affected athletes except one (98.7%) successfully returned to professional baseball, with a median RTP time of 51 days. Players with spondylolisthesis returned to play faster than those with spondylolysis, MLB athletes returned faster than MiLB athletes, and position players returned faster than pitchers. Athletes with a diagnosed pars defect did not show a significant decline in performance after returning to competition after their injury episode.

CONCLUSION

Lumbar pars defects were a common cause of low back pain in American professional baseball players. The vast majority of affected athletes were able to return to competition without demonstrating a significant decline in baseball performance.

Percutaneous endoscopic-assisted direct repair of pars defect without general anesthesia could be a satisfying treatment alternative for young patient with symptomatic lumbar spondylolysis: a technique note with case series

Background

Multiple surgical procedures are applied in young patients with symptomatic lumbar spondylolysis when conservative treatments fail. Although the optimal surgical procedure option is controversial, the treatment paradigm has shifted from open surgery to minimally invasive spine surgery. To date, a limited number of studies on the feasibility of percutaneous endoscopic-assisted direct repair of pars defect have been carried out. Herein, for the first time, we retrospectively explore the outcomes of pars defect via percutaneous endoscopy.

Methods

We retrospectively examined young patients with spondylolysis treated using the percutaneous endoscopic-assisted direct repair of pars defect supplemented with autograft as well as percutaneous pedicle screw fixation between September 2014 and December 2018. Six patients with a mean age of 18.8 years were enrolled in the study. We used preoperatively computed tomographic (CT) scans to evaluate the size of pars defect, and graded disc degeneration using Pfirrmann’s classification through magnetic resonance images (MRI). We assessed the clinical outcomes using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) as well as Visual Analogue Scale for back pain (VAS-B).

Results

Our findings revealed that pain intensity and function outcomes, including VAS-B, ODI, and SF-36 (PCS and MCS) scores, were markedly improved after surgery and at the final follow-up visit. The change in the gap distance of the pars defect was remarkably significant after surgery and during the follow-up period. Only one of the 12 pars repaired was reported as a non-union at the final follow-up visit. Moreover, no surgery-related complications were reported in any of the cases.

Conclusion

Percutaneous endoscopic-assisted direct repair of pars defect without general anesthesia, a minimally invasive treatment option, supplemented with autograft and percutaneous pedicle screw fixation, could be a satisfying treatment alternative for young patients with symptomatic lumbar spondylolysis.

Spondylolysis in Young Athletes: An Overview Emphasizing Nonoperative Management

Lumbar spondylolysis is a unilateral or bilateral defect of the pars interarticularis, an isthmus of bone connecting the superior and inferior facet surfaces in the lumbar spine at a given level. Spondylolysis is common in young athletes participating in sports, particularly those requiring repetitive hyperextension movements. The majority of young athletes are able to return to full sport participation following accurate diagnosis and conservative management, including a structured treatment program. Surgical intervention for isolated pars injuries is seldom necessary. A progressive physical therapy (PT) program is an important component of recovery after sustaining an acute pars fracture. However, there is a paucity of literature detailing PT programs specific to spondylolysis. Here, we provide an overview of the epidemiology, natural history, radiographic evaluation, and management of pars fractures in young athletes. In addition, a detailed description of a physiotherapy program for this population that was developed at a spine center within an academic medical center is provided.

Return to play after conservative and surgical treatment in athletes with spondylolysis: A systematic review

PURPOSE

Analyze the return to sports rate and timing after conservative and surgical treatment in athletes with spondylolysis.

METHODS

Comprehensive search using Pubmed, Cochrane Library and SPORTDiscus databases to identify English language studies that assessed the return to sports after conservative or surgical treatment of symptomatic spondylolysis in athletes. The main outcome of interest was the return to sports rate and timing, as well as, the follow-up clinical and functional outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 14 trials (592 participants) were included. Eight and seven studies reported the outcomes of conservative and surgical approach, respectively. A total of 92% (n = 492) and 88% (n = 100) of athletes return to sports at any level, and 89% (n = 185) and 81% (n = 103) returned to their pre-injury level of sports for conservative and surgical approaches, respectively. The time to return to sports was 4.6 and 6.8 months for conservative and surgical approaches, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Conservative management (bracing, sports modification and physiotherapy) of athletes with spondylolysis show excellent return to sports rates at any level and at the pre-injury level at a mean of 4.6 months. Those who fail the conservative treatment can be successfully managed with surgical treatment with a high rate of return to sports at 6.8 months.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, Systematic review of level IV studies.

Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Diskectomy for Axillar Herniation at L5-S1 via the Transforaminal Approach Versus the Interlaminar Approach: A Prospective Clinical Trial

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the results of percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal diskectomy (PETD) in comparison with percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar diskectomy (PEID) for axillar herniation at L5-S1.

METHODS

From January 2017 to March 2018, 80 patients admitted with axillar herniation at L5-S1 were randomly recruited into 2 groups: 40 cases in the PETD group and 40 in the PEID group. Each group separately underwent PETD or PEID. Patient sex, age, body mass index, axillar herniation size, number of C-arm fluoroscopies, operation time, postoperative bed time, complications, and clinical effect were compared. Both groups were followed-up using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), visual analog scale (VAS), and Macnab criteria.

RESULTS

Except for 1 case in the PETD group that switched to the PEID group, the patients completed the study as expected. All patients were followed-up. Preoperative demographics were not significantly different (P > 0.05) between the 2 groups. The mean number of C-arm fluoroscopies (12.44 ± 3.21) and the operation time (66.49 ± 16.29 minutes) of the PETD group were significantly improved compared with the PEID group (number of fluoroscopies: 3.41 ± 0.81, P < 0.001; operation time: 53.56 ± 10.82 minutes, P < 0.001), but the postoperative bed rest time and complication rate were not (P > 0.05). The postoperative ODI and VAS scores were obviously improved in both groups when compared with preoperation (P < 0.001). There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in the Macnab criteria or VAS and ODI scores at the same time point (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

For axillar herniation at L5-S1, PEID can ignore the anatomic obstruction with advantages including a shorter operation time and less intraoperative radiation exposure. PETD has a clinical effect similar to that of PEID, but the process of it is more dangerous and harder than PEID.

Patient-Oriented Aesthetic Outcome After Lumbar Spine Surgery: A 1-Year Follow-Up Prospective Observational Study Comparing Minimally Invasive and Standard Open Procedures

BACKGROUND

Despite recent treatment developments, back pain and related disabilities still represent a challenge for practitioners. Among the available surgical techniques, many different features and outcomes have been investigated; however, aesthetic result was missing among them. The present investigation was designed to prospectively compare patient-oriented aesthetic results after minimally invasive surgery (MIS) and standard open surgery (SOS) for the lumbar spine.

METHODS

This was a prospective observational study with 1-year follow-up. Patients who underwent SOS were assigned to group 1 and MIS to group 2. Patient-oriented aesthetic result evaluation was collected using a dedicated visual aesthetic analogue scale. The Vancouver Scar Scale was used to exclude objective underlying influencing factors. The Oswestry Disability Index and a 10-point itemized visual analogue scale for back pain were administered to assess the clinical and functional status. Follow-up data were collected before discharge at 1, 6, and 12 months. Statistical analysis was conducted, and P < 0.05 was considered as significant.

RESULTS

We enrolled 74 patients, 44 in group 1 and 30 in group 2. The 2 groups were homogeneous for demographic and clinical data. No clinical or functional differences were measured at the end of follow-up. Visual aesthetic analogue scale reported greater mean values in group 1 at every follow-up time.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients seem to prefer the aesthetic result from a single midline incision after SOS compared with MIS. The use of specific techniques could be considered if there is scientific evidence reporting greater aesthetic outcome, having similar clinical and functional ones.

Outcomes of Various Treatment Modalities for Lumbar Spinal Ailments in Elite Athletes: A Literature Review

Lumbar spinal injuries are common in elite athletes, who can present with a spectrum of ailments ranging from lumbar strain to prolapsed intervertebral discs. Sequelae can include neurological impairment and lumbar instability among other possible outcomes. This group of patients is unique in terms of their clinicoradiological presentation and treatment modalities. The primary goals of treatment are a rapid return to play and prevention of recurrence, thus prolonging the athlete’s professional career. Treatment modalities can range from activity restriction to nerve root blocks and surgery. A successful treatment outcome is based on timely diagnosis, treatment suiting the demands of the particular sport, and early rehabilitation. A multidisciplinary team approach involving the coach, rehabilitation specialist, pain management specialist, and spine surgeon helps in planning appropriate treatment. In this article, we review special considerations in the elite athletic population with lumbar spinal ailments as well as the outcomes of various treatment modalities.

Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy for L5S1 Lumbar Disc Herniation Using a Transforaminal Approach Versus an Interlaminar Approach: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Several studies have compared the clinical efficacy of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for L5-S1 lumbar disc herniation (LDH) using a transforaminal approach with an interlaminar approach, but with contradictory results. The aim of this study was to explore the comparison of efficacy and safety between percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal discectomy (PETD) and percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy (PEID) for L5-S1 LDH.

METHODS

Six common databases were comprehensively searched, and relevant studies were included into the analysis when they met all the inclusion criteria.

RESULTS

Nine studies involving 621 patients were included into the study. The results indicated that PETD was significantly associated with greater fluoroscopy times (mean difference [MD], 9.28 times; 95% confidence interval [CI], 6.84-11.71; P < 0.01) and longer operative time (MD, 16.51 minutes; 95% CI, 4.01-29.02; P = 0.01) compared with PEID. However, there were no distinct differences between PETD and PEID in estimated blood loss (P = 0.24), bed time after surgery (P = 0.32), hospitalization time (P = 0.27), or MacNab evaluation (P = 0.78). Similarly, no obvious differences were detected between PETD and PEID regarding Visual Analogue Scale score, Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score, or Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) when measured preoperatively, 1 day postoperatively, 3 months postoperatively, or at the last follow up. In addition, no significant difference was found regarding overall incidence of complications between PETD and PEID (P = 0.14). Nevertheless, a significantly lower incidence rate of dural tear was observed in PETD compared with PEID (P = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

PETD had comparable clinical efficacy and safety compared with PEID; however, PEID was superior to PETD regarding fluoroscopy times and operative time. Therefore, PEID might be a better surgical procedure for L5S1 LDH.