Is Facet Tropism Associated with Increased Risk of Disc Herniation in the Lumbar Spine?

The Correlation Between Facet Tropism and Intervertebral Disc Herniation in the Subaxial Cervical Spine

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective case-control study.

OBJECTIVE

Investigating the correlation between the facet tropism (FT) and subaxial cervical disc herniation (CDH).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Although debatable, it was widely reported that FT was associated with lumbar disc herniation. However, the exact correlation between FT and subaxial CDH is still unclear.

METHODS

Two-hundred patients with any disc herniation at C3/4, C4/5, C5/6, or C6/7 and 50 normal participants without CDH (normal control group) were included in this study. For patients, the cervical levels with CDH and the levels without herniation were classified into the "herniation group" and "patient control group," respectively. Bilateral facet joint angles at C3/4, C4/5, C5/6, and C6/7 on sagittal, axial, and coronal planes were measured on computed tomography (CT). The disc degeneration at each level was assessed on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

RESULTS

Both the mean difference between left and right facet angles and tropism incidence in herniation group were significantly greater than those in two control groups whenever at C3/4, C4/5, C5/6, or C6/7 level and whenever on sagittal, axial, or coronal plane. The mean differences of angles and tropism incidences in most patient control groups were not significantly greater than those of corresponding normal control groups. The incidence of greater facet angle at the left or right side was not significantly different among the left, central, and right herniation groups. The mean disc degeneration grades in both herniation and patient control groups were significantly higher than those in normal control groups while no difference between herniation and patient control groups.

CONCLUSION

The FT on the sagittal, axial, and coronal planes are all associated with CDH in the subaxial cervical spine. The greater facet angle at the left or right side does not affect the side of herniation. The severity of cervical disc degeneration is not associated with FT.Level of Evidence: 3.

Facet Tropism in Lumbar Spine and Cervical Spine: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Facet tropism (FT) refers to the difference in the orientation of facet joints with respect to each other in the sagittal plane. FT leads to unequal biomechanical forces on facet joint and intervertebral disc during rotation and other physiologic movements. Most of the studies have reported the incidence of FT in the lumbar spine to vary between 40% and 70%, with L4-5 level being the most commonly afflicted level. The objective of this study was to find the association between FT and various lumbar and cervical degenerative disorders.

METHODS

A systematic search of PubMed was performed with the keywords "facet tropism" and "facet asymmetry." Data for meta-analysis were extracted from the studies to obtain pooled impact of FT on lumbar disc herniation (LDH) and lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis (LDS).

RESULTS

Eighty-two articles were included in the systematic review and 18 studies had the required data to be included in the meta-analysis. The pooled standard mean difference between FT angles in patients with or without LDH was 0.31 with (P = 0.04). The pooled odds ratio for FT in patients with LDH was 3.27 with (P = 0.02). Subgroup analysis showed that there is no significant difference in the L3/4, L4/5, and L5S1 subgroups. The pooled standard mean difference between FT angles in patients with or without LDS was 0.54 (P = 0.009).

CONCLUSIONS

FT is significantly associated with LDH and LDS along with various other lumbar and cervical degenerative diseases.

Lumbar Facet Tropism on Different Facet Portions and Asymmetry Between Ipsilateral Cephalad and Caudad Portions: Their Correlations With L4/5 and L5/S1 Lumbar Disc Herniation

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective case-control study.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the correlation between lumbar disc herniation (LDH) and lumbar facet tropism (FT) on cephalad and caudad facet portions, respectively; to investigate the asymmetry between ipsilateral cephalad and caudad facet portions and its correlation with LDH.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

There are still heavy debates on the exact correlation between lumbar FT and LDH. However, no study ever focused on the FT on different facet portions and asymmetry between ipsilateral cephalad and caudad portions in patients with LDH.

METHODS

One hundred patients with L4/5 LDH, 100 patients with L5/S1 LDH, and 100 participants without LDH (control group) were age and sex matched and included in this study. Participants in each group were further divided into two subgroups based on age (≥ or < 50 yr old). Bilateral facet joint angles on both cephalad and caudad portions were measured. FT and asymmetry between ipsilateral cephalad and caudad portions in each LDH group were compared with those in corresponding control group.

RESULTS

Comparing with control participants, the mean difference of bilateral facet angles in older patients with L4/5 LDH was significantly greater either on cephalad portion and caudad portion, whereas significantly higher frequency of FT was only exhibited on cephalad portion. In older patients with L4/5 LDH, the mean difference of facet angle between ipsilateral cephalad and caudad portions was significantly greater than that of control participants, the frequency of ipsilateral cephalad, and caudad facet asymmetry was also significantly higher.

CONCLUSIONS

Only the FT on cephalad portion but not caudad portion of facet joint is associated with L4/5 LDH of older patients. The measurement on different portions of facet joint may result in discrepancy on FT identification. Asymmetry between ipsilateral cephalad and caudad facet portions is also associated with L4/5 LDH in older patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.