Sedation and paralysis

Incidence of Delirium in ICU Patients With and Without COVID-19 in a Costa Rican Hospital

INTRODUCTION

 Delirium is a common and serious neurological complication in intensive care units (ICUs), often leading to poor patient outcomes and increased mortality. This study aimed to compare the incidence of delirium in ICU patients with COVID-19 to those with other respiratory infections in a private hospital in Costa Rica. Additionally, it evaluated the prevalence, severity, duration, and treatment of delirium in these critically ill patients.

METHODS

A retrospective observational study was conducted, analyzing multiple variables obtained from the electronic health records of patients hospitalized in the ICU of Hospital Clinica Biblica. The study included patients admitted between January 2020 and December 2023. It compared the incidence of delirium among patients admitted for COVID-19 and those admitted for other diagnoses. The main outcomes measured were the incidence of delirium and the correlation of its management with international guidelines. The measures included the use of mechanical ventilation, the development of delirium, and the use of sedatives.

RESULTS

A total of 137 patients were analyzed, of whom 57.7% were over 70 years old, 67.2% were men, 45.2% were admitted with a diagnosis of COVID-19, 90.5% used mechanical ventilation, and 49.6% of patients developed delirium. Dexmedetomidine was the most used sedative, which was the only one that showed a significant relationship with the development of delirium (p=0.0002). Delirium management was mainly done through the administration of dexmedetomidine (52.9%) and quetiapine (41.2%). There was no correlation between delirium development and mortality (p=0.2670).

CONCLUSION

The study results do not show a significant relationship between COVID-19-positive patients and the development of delirium. Similarly, no higher mortality was observed in those patients who experienced delirium during their ICU stay.

Propofol-Related Infusion Syndrome: A Bibliometric Analysis of the 100 Most-Cited Articles

Propofol-related infusion syndrome (PRIS) is a rare, yet life-threatening sequelae to prolonged administration of the anesthetic propofol in mechanically intubated patients. The condition is characterized by progressive multi-system organ failure and eventual mortality; of note, the predominant characteristics of PRIS involve but are not limited to cardiovascular impairment and collapse, metabolic and lactic acidosis, rhabdomyolysis, hyperkalemia, and acute renal failure. While potent or extended doses of propofol have been found to be the primary precipitating factor of this condition, others such as age, critical illness, steroid therapy, and hyperlipidemia have been discovered to play a role as well. This bibliometric analysis was done to reflect the current relevance and understanding of PRIS in recent literature. The SCOPUS database was utilized to conduct a search for articles with keywords "propofol infusion syndrome" and "propofol syndrome" from February 24, 2001, until April 16, 2023, with parameters for article title, citation number, citation per year, author, institution, publishing journal, and country of origin. PRIS was first defined in 1990, just a year after its approval by the Food and Drug Administration for use as a sedative-hypnotic. Since then, interest in PRIS slowly rose up to 13 publications per year in 2013. Seven papers on the topic were published in Critical Care Medicine, six in Neurocritical Care, and four in Anesthesia. The most common institutions were Mayo Clinic, Northeastern University, and Tufts Medical Center. To our knowledge, this is the first bibliometric analysis to evaluate the most influential publications about PRIS. A majority of the research is case-based, possibly owing to the rarity of the condition. Our research suggests that confounding factors outside the precipitating dosage of propofol may be implicated in the onset and progression of PRIS. This study could therefore bring renewed interest to the topic and lead to additional research focused on fully understanding the pathophysiology of PRIS in order to promote the development of novel diagnostics and treatment.

Association of analgosedation with psychiatric symptoms and health-related quality of life in ARDS survivors: Post hoc analyses of the DACAPO study

BACKGROUND

The acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a life-threatening condition with the risk of developing hypoxia and thus requires for invasive mechanical ventilation a long-term analgosedation. Yet, prolonged analgosedation may be a reason for declining health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and the development of psychiatric disorders.

METHODS

We used data from the prospective observational nation‑wide ARDS study across Germany (DACAPO) to investigate the influence of sedation and analgesia on HRQoL and the risk of psychiatric symptoms in ARDS survivors 3, 6 and 12 months after their discharge from the intensive care unit (ICU). HRQoL was measured with the Physical and Mental Component Scale of the Short‑Form 12 Questionnaire (PCS‑12, MCS‑12). The prevalence of psychiatric symptoms (depression and post‑traumatic stress disorder [PTSD]) was assessed using the Patient Health Questionnaire‑9 and the Post‑Traumatic Stress Syndrome‑14. The associations of analgosedation with HRQoL and psychiatric symptoms were investigated by means of multivariable linear regression models.

RESULTS

The data of 134 ARDS survivors (median age [IQR]: 55 [44-64], 67% men) did not show any significant association between analgosedation and physical or mental HRQoL up to 1 year after ICU discharge. Multivariable linear regression analysis (B [95%‑CI]) yielded a significant association between symptoms of psychiatric disorders and increased cumulative doses of ketamine up to 6 months after ICU discharge (after 3 months: depression: 0.15 [0.05, 0.25]; after 6 months: depression: 0.13 [0.03, 0.24] and PTSD: 0.42 [0.04, 0.80)]).

CONCLUSIONS

Up to 1 year after ICU discharge, analgosedation did not influence HRQoL of ARDS survivors. Prolonged administration of ketamine during ICU treatment, however, was positively associated with the risk of psychiatric symptoms. The administration of ketamine to ICU patients with ARDS should be with caution.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02637011 (Registered 15 December 2015, retrospectively registered).

Rocuronium-Induced Dilated Nonreactive Pupils in a Patient With Coronavirus Disease 2019: A Case Report

We report the clinical case of a patient with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) who had recently undergone neurosurgery and presented with dilated nonreactive pupils during continuous rocuronium infusion, which was reversible with the suspension of the drug. Both the neurosurgical procedure and possible disruption of the blood-brain barrier due to COVID-19 infection may have led to the action of rocuronium in the central nervous system (CNS). Thus, clinicians must remember that neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) can cause dilated nonreactive pupils in patients with COVID-19.

Dystonic storm: a practical clinical and video review

Dystonic storm is a frightening hyperkinetic movement disorder emergency. Marked, rapid exacerbation of dystonia requires prompt intervention and admission to the intensive care unit. Clinical features of dystonic storm include fever, tachycardia, tachypnea, hypertension, sweating and autonomic instability, often progressing to bulbar dysfunction with dysarthria, dysphagia and respiratory failure. It is critical to recognize early and differentiate dystonic storm from other hyperkinetic movement disorder emergencies. Dystonic storm usually occurs in patients with known dystonia, such as DYT1 dystonia, Wilson’s disease and dystonic cerebral palsy. Triggers such as infection or medication adjustment are present in about one-third of all events. Due to the significant morbidity and mortality of this disorder, we propose a management algorithm that divides decision making into two periods: the first 24 h, and the next 2–4 weeks. During the first 24 h, supportive therapy should be initiated, and appropriate patients should be identified early as candidates for pallidal deep brain stimulation or intrathecal baclofen. Management in the next 2–4 weeks aims at symptomatic dystonia control and supportive therapies.

Resistance to rocuronium and cisatracurium in a patient with a spinal injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome

PURPOSE

A case of resistance to rocuronium and cisatracurium in a patient with a spinal injury who developed acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is reported.

SUMMARY

A 34-year-old, 88-kg Caucasian man with a history of polysubstance abuse fell from a bridge approximately 30-ft high, landing head first in about 2-3 ft of water. The patient sustained anterior subluxation at cervical spine levels C5-C6 and severe spinal canal compromise with cord compression and edema from C5 to C7, resulting in quadriplegia. The patient developed aspiration pneumonia for which he was given vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam. His pneumonia progressed to ARDS, and drug-induced paralysis was attempted to reduce barotrauma and improve ventilation. Rocuronium was initiated, but the patient did not adequately respond to this treatment. Cisatracurium was then initiated, but the patient did not respond. The decision was made to discontinue the cisatracurium infusion at that time and manage the patient's ARDS without a neuromuscular blocking agent (NMBA). After several attempts to manage the patient's ARDS by adjusting ventilatory values, the patient required the reinitiation of an NMBA. The decision was made to try cisatracurium again. Cisatracurium was again unsuccessful and therefore discontinued. As a last attempt to improve oxygenation, the patient received nitric oxide and sedation with propofol. The patient died due to his complicated hospital course that included quadriplegia, ARDS, cardiac arrest, and sepsis secondary to a gastric perforation.

CONCLUSION

Inadequate paralysis was achieved with rocuronium and cisatracurium in a patient who sustained a significant trauma resulting in quadriplegia.

Evidence and consensus based guideline for the management of delirium, analgesia, and sedation in intensive care medicine. Revision 2015 (DAS-Guideline 2015) - short version

In 2010, under the guidance of the DGAI (German Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine) and DIVI (German Interdisciplinary Association for Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine), twelve German medical societies published the “Evidence- and Consensus-based Guidelines on the Management of Analgesia, Sedation and Delirium in Intensive Care”. Since then, several new studies and publications have considerably increased the body of evidence, including the new recommendations from the American College of Critical Care Medicine (ACCM) in conjunction with Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM) and American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP) from 2013. For this update, a major restructuring and extension of the guidelines were needed in order to cover new aspects of treatment, such as sleep and anxiety management. The literature was systematically searched and evaluated using the criteria of the Oxford Center of Evidence Based Medicine. The body of evidence used to formulate these recommendations was reviewed and approved by representatives of 17 national societies. Three grades of recommendation were used as follows: Grade “A” (strong recommendation), Grade “B” (recommendation) and Grade “0” (open recommendation). The result is a comprehensive, interdisciplinary, evidence and consensus-based set of level 3 guidelines. This publication was designed for all ICU professionals, and takes into account all critically ill patient populations. It represents a guide to symptom-oriented prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of delirium, anxiety, stress, and protocol-based analgesia, sedation, and sleep-management in intensive care medicine.