A Bench Evaluation of Eight Home-Care Ventilators

Mask interfaces and devices for home noninvasive ventilation in children

Home noninvasive ventilation (NIV), including continuous (CPAP) and bilevel (BPAP) positive airway pressure, is increasingly used in children worldwide. In this narrative review, we present a comprehensive summary of the equipment available for home NIV in pediatrics, excluding neonates. NIV may be challenging in young children, as the majority of the equipment has been developed for adults. Regarding the interfaces, only a few masks have been specifically developed for young children in recent years, while older children may benefit from a large variety of interfaces. Even though much progress has been made, skin injuries are still present, and need to be managed rapidly. Several studies addressed the management of the side effects, but recent studies are lacking regarding orofacial anomalies. No recent study reported the available interfaces for young children and the strategies for an optimal mask fit. Regarding the devices, an adapted NIV device to pediatrics that allows an adequate patient's breathing detection should guarantee optimal ventilatory efficiency and monitoring of NIV. A close follow-up and regular monitoring should be mandatory to rule out the potential issues, optimize NIV therapy and ascertain the efficacy of NIV. However, studies are lacking to guide the choice of devices in young children and the optimal management of home NIV in pediatrics. We summarized the characteristics of the different interfaces available for young children and the limitations of NIV devices. We finally addressed potential areas for future research on long-term home NIV in children.

Are all ventilators for NIV performing the same? A bench analysis

Global pandemic due to COVID-19 has increased the interest for ventilators´ use worldwide. New devices have been developed and older ones have undergone a renewed interest, but we lack robust evidence about performance of each ventilator to match appropriate device to a given patient and care environment. The aim of this bench study was to investigate the performance of six devices for noninvasive ventilation, and to compare them in terms of volume delivered, trigger response, pressurization capacity and synchronization in volume assisted controlled and pressure support ventilation. All ventilators were tested under thirty-six experimental conditions by using the lung model ASL5000® (IngMar Medical, Pittsburgh, PA). Two leak levels, two muscle inspiratory efforts and three mechanical patterns were combined for simulation. Trigger function was assessed by measurement of trigger-delay time. Pressurization capacity was evaluated as area under the pressure-time curve over the first 500 ms after inspiratory effort onset. Synchronization was evaluated by the asynchrony index and by incidence and type of asynchronies in each condition. All ventilators showed a good performance, even if pressurization capacity was worse than expected. Leak level did not affect their function. Differences were found during low muscle effort and obstructive pattern. In general, Philips Trilogy Evo/EV300 and Hamilton C3 showed the best results. NIV devices successfully compensate air leaks but still underperform with low muscle effort and obstructive lungs. Clinicians´ must have a clear understanding of the goals of NIV both for devices´ choice and set main parameters to achieve therapy success.

Pediatric Simulation of Intrinsic PEEP and Patient-Ventilator Trigger Asynchrony During Mechanical Ventilation

BACKGROUND

Intrinsic PEEP during mechanical ventilation occurs when there is insufficient time for expiration to functional residual capacity before the next inspiration, resulting in air trapping. Increased expiratory resistance (R_E), too rapid of a patient or ventilator breathing rate, or a longer inspiratory to expiratory time ratio (T_I/T_E) can all be causes of intrinsic PEEP. Intrinsic PEEP can result in increased work of breathing and patient-ventilator asynchrony (PVA) during patient-triggered breaths. We hypothesized that the difference between intrinsic PEEP and ventilator PEEP acts as an inspiratory load resulting in trigger asynchrony that needs to be overcome by increased respiratory muscle pressure (P_mus).

METHODS

Using a Servo lung model (ASL 5000) and LTV 1200 ventilator in pressure control mode, we developed a passive model demonstrating how elevated R_E increases intrinsic PEEP above ventilator PEEP. We also developed an active model investigating the effects of R_E and intrinsic PEEP on trigger asynchrony (expressed as percentage of patient-initiated breaths that failed to trigger). We then studied if trigger asynchrony could be reduced by increased P_mus.

RESULTS

Intrinsic PEEP increased significantly with increasing R_E (r = 0.97, P = .006). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that both R_E and negative P_mus levels affect trigger asynchrony (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

A passive lung model describes the development of increasing intrinsic PEEP with increasing R_E at a given ventilator breathing rate. An active lung model shows how this can lead to trigger asynchrony since the P_mus needed to trigger a breath is greater with increased R_E, as the inspiratory muscles must overcome intrinsic PEEP. This model will lend itself to the study of intrinsic PEEP engendered by a higher ventilator breathing rate, as well as higher T_I/T_E, and will be useful in ventilator simulation scenarios of PVA. The model also suggests that increasing ventilator PEEP to match intrinsic PEEP can improve trigger asynchrony through a reduction in R_E.

From bedside to bench - In vivo and in vitro evaluation of mechanically assisted cough treatment in a patient with bulbar Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

When the ability to cough is impaired, secretion clearance may be assisted and augmented by Mechanical Insufflation-Exsufflation (MI-E) treatment. In patients with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, the efficacy of MI-E may be hampered by counterproductive upper airway responses. Careful adjustment of MI-E settings can be beneficial. During the disease progression, a 41-year-old woman with bulbar Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis experienced that treatment with MI-E was exhausting and inefficient. Despite adjustments of settings, all treatment led to retching. A change of MI-E device led to more effective treatment. A bench test revealed variations in flow and pressure waveforms in the two devices. When MI-E treatment fails, differences in equipment delivery need to be considered in addition to the adjustment of MI-E settings.

•

Effective airway clearance and subjective tolerance must be targeted to maintain compliance with MI-E therapy in ALS.

•

Examination of MI-E waveforms may provide clinically relevant information.

•

Skillful adjustment of MI-E settings and knowledge of performance between devices may be important with challenging patients.