Quality of life after endoscopic sinus surgery or balloon sinuplasty: a randomized clinical study

The Impact of Code Bundling on Medicare Volume and Reimbursements Within Endoscopic Sinus Surgery

In 2018, Medicare introduced new codes to the Endoscopic Sinus Surgery (FESS) and balloon sinus dilation (BSD) families of Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes. Using the Medicare Part B National Summary Data File from 2010 to 2022, an interrupted time-series analysis examined trends in volume and reimbursements before and after 2018. Prior to 2018, volume and reimbursements for FESS grew at a mean rate of 2.5% ± 2.2% per year and 6.9% ± 6.6% per year, respectively, before reimbursements decreased significantly in 2018 by -13.9% (P = .014), leading to a stabilization of volume (growth of 0.72%, P = .602). Volume and reimbursements for BSD saw rapid growth from 2011 to 2015 which plateaued prior to the introduction of bundled codes and did not appear to change significantly in 2018 (-0.6%, P = .306 and 11.9%, P = .392, respectively). In addition to concurrent devaluation of FESS and BSD codes, bundling appears to have further contributed to falling reimbursements in rhinology.

Long-Term Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps Associated with Expanded Types of Endoscopic Sinus Surgery

(1) Background: Surgical criteria for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) remain unresolved. This study addresses these discrepancies by comparing the clinical outcomes of expanded-functional endoscopic sinus surgeries (E-FESS) with more-limited FESS (L-FESS). (2) Methods: A database was analyzed retrospectively to compare surgical outcomes in CRSwNP patients who underwent E-FESS versus those subjected to L-FESS. Quality of life, endoscopic and radiological outcomes were compared at the baseline and two years after surgery. The clinical status of the responder was defined when a minimal clinically important difference of 12 points in SNOT-22 change was achieved. (3) Results: A total of 274 patients met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed; 111 underwent E-FESS and 163 were subjected to L-FESS. Both groups exhibited significant clinical improvements, although a greater magnitude of change in SNOT-22 (14.8 ± 4.8, p = 0.002) was shown after E-FESS. Higher significant improvements for endoscopic and radiological scores and lower surgical revision rates were also noted in the E-FESS group. (4) Conclusions: E-FESS provides better clinical outcomes and reduced revision surgery rates when compared to L-FESS in CRSwNP patients two years after surgery, irrespective of any comorbidity. Further randomized prospective studies are needed to comprehensively contrast these results.

The enlargement of the maxillary ostium after balloon sinuplasty evaluated by a novel measuring technique from 3D CBCT images

Our aim was to evaluate the effects of balloon sinuplasty on the size of the ostium in the maxillary sinuses in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis from cone beam computer tomography (CBCT) scans of the sinus. This is a blinded retrospective trial in patients who had undergone balloon sinuplasty of the maxillary sinus. CBCT scans were taken and SNOT-22 Quality of Life questionnaire completed before and 12 months after the operation. The size of the maxillary ostium was measured from the CBCT scans three-dimensionally. The association of changes in the SNOT-22 scores of the ostium was analysed. We discovered that the balloon sinuplasty increased the size of the maxillary ostium in all dimensions. The changes were statistically significant (p<0.05) in the axial diameter and the ostium area. The number of patent ostia increased after the intervention. The association between SNOT-22 score and ostium patency were statistically significant before the operation. Our conclusion is that the threedimensional measuring technique provides a reliable method to evaluate ostium dimensions. Balloon sinuplasty increased the size of the maxillary ostium and the result was maintained for 12 months after the operation.

Sino-Nasal outcome test-22 outcomes after sinus surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

The goal of the study was to perform a systematic review with meta-analysis to determine the mean change in the 22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) across patients who have had endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) for chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) in the literature.

METHODS

A literature search was performed to identify studies that assessed SNOT-22 scores before and after ESS in adult patients with CRS. A random effects model with inverse variance weighting was used to generate the mean change after surgery, along with the forest plot and 95% confidence interval (CI). The impact of patient-specific factors across studies was assessed using a mixed-effects meta-regression.

RESULTS

The final study list included 40 unique patient cohorts published from 2008 to 2016. All studies showed a statistically significant change in mean SNOT-22 scores between baseline and postoperative time points (P < .001), ranging from 12.7 to 44.8, at an average follow-up of 10.6 months. The summary change in mean SNOT-22 across all studies was 24.4 (95% CI: 22.0-26.8). After forward, step-wise multivariate modeling, studies with higher mean preoperative SNOT-22 score and higher asthma prevalence were associated with greater changes in SNOT-22 score after ESS, whereas studies with longer mean follow-up had smaller changes in SNOT-22 score.

CONCLUSIONS

Studies evaluating quality-of-life outcomes after sinus surgery using the SNOT-22 instrument universally show significant improvement after ESS. Across the published literature, the magnitude of change is quite variable and appears to be influenced by a number of factors including baseline SNOT-22 score, asthma prevalence, and length of follow-up. Laryngoscope, 128:581-592, 2018.

REMODEL larger cohort with long-term outcomes and meta-analysis of standalone balloon dilation studies

Objectives/Hypothesis

To provide the final results from the REMODEL (randomized evaluation of maxillary antrostomy versus ostial dilation efficacy through long‐term follow‐up) full‐study cohorts and perform meta‐analyses of standalone balloon sinus dilation studies to explore long‐term outcomes in a large patient sample.

Study Design

Randomized controlled trial and meta‐analysis.

Methods

Final outcomes from the REMODEL randomized trial, including a larger cohort of 135 patients treated with functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) or in‐office balloon dilation, were evaluated. One hundred thirty patients had 12‐month data, 66 had 18‐month data, and 25 had 24‐month data. In addition, a meta‐analysis evaluated outcomes from six studies including 358 standalone balloon dilation patients with up to 24 months follow‐up.

Results

Outcomes out to 2 years from the REMODEL full‐study cohort are consistent with 6‐month and 12‐month outcomes. In the meta‐analysis of standalone balloon dilation studies, technical success is 97.5%, and mean 20‐item Sino‐Nasal Outcomes Test scores are significantly and clinically improved at all time points (P < .0001). There are significant reductions (P < .0001) in work/school days missed, homebound days, physician/nurse visits, acute infections, and antibiotic prescriptions. Mean recovery time is 1.4 days. Comparison of 12‐month symptom improvements and revision rates between the REMODEL FESS arm (n = 59), REMODEL balloon dilation arm (n = 71), and pooled single‐arm standalone balloon dilation studies (n = 243) demonstrated no statistical difference.

Conclusions

All outcomes are comparable between FESS and balloon dilation at all time points from 6 months to 24 months. Balloon dilation produces faster recovery, less postoperative pain, and fewer debridements than FESS. There is significant, durable benefit in a large series of 358 patients undergoing standalone balloon dilation.

Level of Evidence

1b. Laryngoscope, 126:44–50, 2016