Rural Emergency Medical Service Providers Perceptions on the Causes of and Solutions to the Opioid Crisis: A Qualitative Assessment

Introduction:

The continuing opioid crisis poses unique challenges to remote and often under-resourced rural communities. Emergency medical service (EMS) providers serve a critical role in responding to opioid overdose for individuals living in rural or remote areas who experience opioid overdoses. They are often first at the scene of an overdose and are sometimes the only health care provider in contact with an overdose patient who either did not survive or refused additional care. As such, EMS providers have valuable perspectives to share on the causes and consequences of the opioid crisis in rural communities.

Methods:

EMS providers attending a statewide EMS conference serving those from greater Minnesota and surrounding states were invited to take a 2-question survey asking them to reflect upon what they believed to be the causes of the opioid crisis and what they saw as the solutions to the opioid crisis. Results were coded and categorized using a Consensual Qualitative Research approach.

Results:

EMS providers’ perceptions on causes of the opioid crisis were categorized into 5 main domains: overprescribing, ease of access, socioeconomic vulnerability, mental health concerns, and lack of resources and education. Responses focused on solutions to address the opioid crisis were categorized into 5 main domains: need for increased education, enhanced opioid oversight, increased access to treatment programs, alternative therapies for pain management, and addressing socioeconomic vulnerabilities.

Conclusion:

Along with the recognition that the opioid crisis was at least partially caused by overprescribing, rural EMS providers who participated in this study recognized the critical role of social determinants of health in perpetuating opioid-related harm. Participants in this study reported that education and increased access to treatment facilities and appropriate pain management, along with recognition of the role of social determinants of health in opioid dependency, were necessary steps to address the opioid crisis.

Cannabis use and stigma among Canadian high school students: Results from the 2015 and 2017 Cancer Risk Assessment in Youth Survey

BACKGROUND

Adolescent cannabis use is perceived as a risky behavior, has been linked with many negative health outcomes, and is increasingly being connected with stigma.

METHODS

The purpose of this study is to investigate how cannabis use is associated with potentially stigmatizing markers of identity among adolescents two waves of a repeat cross-sectional survey (2015 N = 12,110; 2017 N = 15,191) of high schools students in seven Canadian provinces. Students were asked about ever use of cannabis, as well as "stigma markers", including their current living arrangement, mother's education, and ethnicity. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to examine associations between cannabis use and stigma markers.

RESULTS

After adjusting models for grade, gender, and province of residence, students who did not live with their mothers had higher odds of cannabis use relative to students living with their mothers [OR = 1.94, 95% CI 1.62-2.31]. Low maternal education was also significantly associated with cannabis use, as was ethnicity (students who identified as Indigenous had 3.38 (95% CI 2.29-4.99) times higher odds of using cannabis compared to students who identified as "white" in 2017). Findings related to attending school in a rural (vs. urban) area (2015 OR = 1.33 95% CI 0.99-1.78; 2017 OR = 1.44 95% CI 0.9 to -2.15) and low SES (2015 OR = 0.99, 95% 0.98-1.00; 2017 OR = 1.00, 95% CI 0.98-1.01) were more marginal.

CONCLUSIONS

Future research should explore cannabis initiation experiences among vulnerable groups to better understand potential stigma triggers.

A scoping review of opioid misuse in the rural United States

INTRODUCTION

This study is a scoping review of the original research literature onthe misuse of opioids in the rural United States (US) and maps theliterature of interest to address the question: What does theoriginal research evidence reveal about the misuse of opioids inrural US communities?

METHODS

This study used a modified preferred reporting items for systematicreviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) approach which is organized byfive distinct elements or steps: beginning with a clearly formulatedquestion, using the question to develop clear inclusion criteria toidentify relevant studies, using an approach to appraise the studiesor a subset of the studies, summarizing the evidence using anexplicit methodology, and interpreting the findings of the review.

RESULTS

The initial search yielded 119 peer reviewed articles and aftercoding, 41 papers met the inclusion criteria. Researcher generatedsurveys constituted the most frequent source of data. Most studieshad a significant quantitative dimension to them. All the studieswere observational or cross-sectional by design.

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis found an emerging research literature that hasgenerated evidence supporting the claim that rural US residents andcommunities suffer a disproportionate burden from the misuseof opioidscompared to their urban or metropolitan counterparts.