A dopamine D1 agonist vs. methylphenidate in modulating prefrontal cortical working memory

Methylphenidate is used widely to treat symptoms of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), but like other stimulants has significant side effects. This study utilized a rodent model (spontaneously hypertensive rat) of spatial working memory (sWM) to compare the effects of methylphenidate with the novel dopamine D₁-like receptor agonist 2-methyldihydrexidine. Acute oral administration of methylphenidate (1.5 mg/kg) caused sWM improvement in half of the tested rats, but impairment in the others. Both improvement or impairment were eliminated by administration of the D₁ antagonist SCH39266 directly into the prefrontal cortex (PFC). Conversely, 2-methyldihydrexidine showed greater sWM improvement compared to methylphenidate without significant impairment in any subject. Its effects correlated negatively with vehicle-treated baseline performance (i.e., rats with lower baseline performance improved more than rats with higher baseline performance). These behavioral effects were associated with neural activities in the PFC. Single neuron firing rate was changed, leading to the alteration in neuronal preference to correct or error behavioral responses. Overall, 2-methyldihydrexidine was superior to methylphenidate in decreasing the neuronal preference, prospectively, in the animals whose behavior was improved. In contrast, methylphenidate, but not 2-methyldihydrexidine, significantly decreased neuronal preference, retrospectively, in those animals who had impaired performance. These results suggest that a D₁ agonist may be more effective than methylphenidate in regulating sWM-related behavior through neural modulation of the PFC, and thus may be superior to methylphenidate or other stimulants as ADHD pharmacotherapy. Significance Statement Methylphenidate is effective in ADHD by its indirect agonist stimulation of dopamine and/or adrenergic receptors, but the precise effects on specific targets are unclear. We compared methylphenidate to a dopamine D₁ receptor-selective agonist by investigating effects on working memory occurring via neural modulation in the prefrontal cortex. The data suggest that pharmacological treatment selectively targeting the dopamine D₁ may offer a superior approach to ADHD pharmacotherapy.

The prefrontal cortex and the caudate nucleus respond conjointly to methylphenidate (Ritalin). Concomitant behavioral and neuronal recording study

Methylphenidate (MPD) is commonly used to treat attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Recently, it is being abused for cognitive enhancement and recreation leading to concerns regarding its addictive potential. The prefrontal cortex (PFC) and caudate nucleus (CN) are two of the brain structures involved in the motive/reward circuit most affected by MPD and are also thought to be responsible for ADHD phenomena. This study is unique in that it investigated acute and chronic, dose-response MPD exposure on animals' behavior activity concomitantly with PFC and CN neuronal circuitry in freely behaving adult animals without the interference of anesthesia. Further, it compared acute and chronic MPD action on over 1,000 subcortical and cortical neurons simultaneously, allowing for a more accurate interpretation of drug action on corticostriatal neuronal circuitry. For this experiment, four groups of animals were used: saline (control), 0.6, 2.5, and 10.0 mg/kg MPD following acute and repetitive exposure. The data shows that the same MPD dose elicits behavioral sensitization in some animals and tolerance in others and that the PFC and CN neuronal activity correlates with the animals' behavioral responses to MPD. The expression of sensitization and tolerance are experimental biomarkers indicating that a drug has addictive potential. In general, a greater percentage of CN units responded to both acute and chronic MPD exposure as compared to PFC units. Dose response differences between the PFC and the CN units were observed. The dichotomy that some PFC and CN units responded to the same MPD dose by excitation and other units by attenuation in neuronal firing rate is discussed. In conclusion, to understand the mechanism of action of the drug, it is essential to study, simultaneously, on more than one brain site, the electrophysiological and behavioral effects of acute and chronic drug exposure, as sensitization and tolerance are experimental biomarkers indicating that a drug has addictive potential. The behavioral and neuronal data obtained from this study indicates that chronic MPD exposure results in behavioral and biochemical changes consistent with a substance abuse disorder.

Concomitant behavioral and prefrontal cortex neuronal responses following acute and chronic methylphenidate exposure in adolescent and adult rats

There is growing concern that the psychostimulant Methylphenidate (MPD) is being abused for cognitive enhancement and recreation by healthy adults and adolescents seeking to improve their work or academic performance. This study concomitantly recorded the behavioral and prefrontal cortex (PFC) neuronal activity in freely behaving animals exposed to acute and chronic MPD doses (0.6, 2.5, and 10.0 mg/kg MPD) in order to compare MPD effects on adult and adolescent rats. The PFC is one of the primary brain areas affected by MPD and the drug of choice for treating ADHD. Moreover, the PFC is one of the last brain areas to complete development, suggesting that the behavioral and neurophysiological response to MPD may differ in adolescents and adults. In both adult and adolescent animals, it was observed that the same repetitive (chronic) dose of either 0.6, 2.5, or 10.0 mg/kg MPD elicited behavioral sensitization in some animals and tolerance in others, experimental biomarkers indicating drug of abuse symptoms, and the majority of PFC units recorded in animals expressing behavioral sensitization or tolerance to chronic MPD exposure responded by increasing and decreasing their neuronal firing rate, respectively. Further, it was shown that high doses of 10.0 mg/kg MPD significantly modified adolescent behavioral activity but did not impact adults suggesting that adolescents may be more receptive to chronic MPD exposure. These findings raise concerns regarding the use and abuse of MPD in normal, healthy individuals and support the notion that the adolescent PFC is more susceptible than the adult PFC to neuromodulation from chronic MPD use.