1
|
Fareh S, Nardi S, Argenziano L, Diamante A, Scala F, Mandurino C, Magnocavallo M, Poggio L, Scarano M, Gianfrancesco D, Palma F, Silvetti MS, Porcelli D, Racheli M, Montoy M, Charles P, Campari M, Valsecchi S, Lavalle C. Implantation of a novel insertable cardiac monitor: preliminary multicenter experience in Europe. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 2024:10.1007/s10840-024-01821-y. [PMID: 38755520 DOI: 10.1007/s10840-024-01821-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2024] [Accepted: 05/02/2024] [Indexed: 05/18/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The LUX-Dx™ is a novel insertable cardiac monitor (ICM) introduced into the European market since October 2022. PURPOSE The aim of this investigation was to provide a comprehensive description of the ICM implantation experience in Europe during its initial year of commercial use. METHODS The system comprises an incision tool and a single-piece insertion tool pre-loaded with the small ICM. The implantation procedure involves incision, creation of a device pocket, insertion of the ICM, verification of sensing, and incision closure. Patients receive a mobile device with a preloaded App, connecting to their ICM and transmitting data to the management system. Data collected at European centers were analyzed at the time of implantation and before patient discharge. RESULTS A total of 368 implantation procedures were conducted across 23 centers. Syncope (235, 64%) and cryptogenic stroke (34, 9%) were the most frequent indications for ICM. Most procedures (338, 92%) were performed in electrophysiology laboratories. All ICMs were successfully implanted in the left parasternal region, oriented at 45° in 323 (88%) patients. Repositioning was necessary after sensing verification in 9 (2%) patients. No procedural complications were reported, with a median time from skin incision to suture of 4 min (25th-75th percentiles 2-7). At implantation, the mean R-wave amplitude was 0.39 ± 0.30 mV and the P-wave visibility was 91 ± 20%. Sensing parameters remained stable until pre-discharge and were not influenced by patient characteristics or indications. Procedural times were fast, exhibited consistency across patient groups, and improved after an initial experience with the system. Operator Operator feedback on the system was positive. Patients reported very good ease of use of the App and low levels of discomfort after implantation. CONCLUSIONS LUX-Dx™ implantation appears efficient and straightforward, with favorable post-implantation sensing values and associated with positive feedback from operators and patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Fareh
- Department of Cardiology, Hôpital de La Croix Rousse Et Hôpital Lyon Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 103 Gd Rue de La Croix-Rousse, 69004, Lyon, France.
| | - S Nardi
- Pineta Grande" Hospital, Castel Volturno, CE, Italy
| | | | - A Diamante
- Casa Di Cura "Villa Azzurra", Siracusa, Italy
| | - F Scala
- Fatebenefratelli Hospital, Naples, Italy
| | - C Mandurino
- Santissima Annunziata" Hospital, Taranto, Italy
| | | | - L Poggio
- Ospedale Maggiore Di Lodi, Lodi, Italy
| | - M Scarano
- Madonna del Soccorso" Hospital, San Benedetto del Tronto (AP), Italy
| | | | - F Palma
- Mons. Dimiccoli" Hospital, Barletta, Italy
| | | | - D Porcelli
- San Pietro-Fatebenefratelli Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - M Racheli
- San Pellegrino Hospital, Castiglione Delle Stiviere (MN), Italy
| | - M Montoy
- Department of Cardiology, Hôpital de La Croix Rousse Et Hôpital Lyon Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 103 Gd Rue de La Croix-Rousse, 69004, Lyon, France
| | - P Charles
- Department of Cardiology, Hôpital de La Croix Rousse Et Hôpital Lyon Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 103 Gd Rue de La Croix-Rousse, 69004, Lyon, France
| | - M Campari
- Boston Scientific Italia, Milan, Italy
| | | | - C Lavalle
- Department of Cardiovascular, Respiratory, NephrologicalAnesthesiological and Geriatric Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Adasuriya G, Barsky A, Kralj-Hans I, Mohan S, Gill S, Chen Z, Jarman J, Jones D, Valli H, Gkoutos GV, Markides V, Hussain W, Wong T, Kotecha D, Haldar S. Remote monitoring of atrial fibrillation recurrence using mHealth technology (REMOTE-AF). EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL. DIGITAL HEALTH 2024; 5:344-355. [PMID: 38774381 PMCID: PMC11104468 DOI: 10.1093/ehjdh/ztae011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2023] [Revised: 01/04/2024] [Accepted: 02/09/2024] [Indexed: 05/24/2024]
Abstract
Aims This proof-of-concept study sought to evaluate changes in heart rate (HR) obtained from a consumer wearable device and compare against implantable loop recorder (ILR)-detected recurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF) and atrial tachycardia (AT) after AF ablation. Methods and results REMOTE-AF (NCT05037136) was a prospectively designed sub-study of the CASA-AF randomized controlled trial (NCT04280042). Participants without a permanent pacemaker had an ILR implanted at their index ablation procedure for longstanding persistent AF. Heart rate and step count were continuously monitored using photoplethysmography (PPG) from a commercially available wrist-worn wearable. Photoplethysmography-recorded HR data were pre-processed with noise filtration and episodes at 1-min interval over 30 min of HR elevations (Z-score = 2) were compared with corresponding ILR data. Thirty-five patients were enrolled, with mean age 70.3 ± 6.8 years and median follow-up 10 months (interquartile range 8-12 months). Implantable loop recorder analysis revealed 17 out of 35 patients (49%) had recurrence of AF/AT. Compared with ILR recurrence, wearable-derived elevations in HR ≥ 110 beats per minute had a sensitivity of 95.3%, specificity 54.1%, positive predictive value (PPV) 15.8%, negative predictive value (NPV) 99.2%, and overall accuracy 57.4%. With PPG-recorded HR elevation spikes (non-exercise related), the sensitivity was 87.5%, specificity 62.2%, PPV 39.2%, NPV 92.3%, and overall accuracy 64.0% in the entire patient cohort. In the AF/AT recurrence only group, sensitivity was 87.6%, specificity 68.3%, PPV 53.6%, NPV 93.0%, and overall accuracy 75.0%. Conclusion Consumer wearable devices have the potential to contribute to arrhythmia detection after AF ablation. Study Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05037136 https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05037136.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gamith Adasuriya
- Heart Rhythm Centre, Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, Hill End Road, Harefield, London UB9 6JH, UK
| | - Andrey Barsky
- Health Data Research UK Midlands & the NIHR Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Ines Kralj-Hans
- Heart Rhythm Centre, Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, Hill End Road, Harefield, London UB9 6JH, UK
| | - Siddhartha Mohan
- Heart Rhythm Centre, Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, Hill End Road, Harefield, London UB9 6JH, UK
| | - Simrat Gill
- Health Data Research UK Midlands & the NIHR Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Zhong Chen
- Heart Rhythm Centre, Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, Hill End Road, Harefield, London UB9 6JH, UK
| | - Julian Jarman
- Heart Rhythm Centre, Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, Hill End Road, Harefield, London UB9 6JH, UK
| | - David Jones
- Heart Rhythm Centre, Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, Hill End Road, Harefield, London UB9 6JH, UK
| | - Haseeb Valli
- Heart Rhythm Centre, Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, Hill End Road, Harefield, London UB9 6JH, UK
| | - Georgios V Gkoutos
- Health Data Research UK Midlands & the NIHR Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Vias Markides
- Heart Rhythm Centre, Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, Hill End Road, Harefield, London UB9 6JH, UK
| | - Wajid Hussain
- Heart Rhythm Centre, Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, Hill End Road, Harefield, London UB9 6JH, UK
| | - Tom Wong
- Heart Rhythm Centre, Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, Hill End Road, Harefield, London UB9 6JH, UK
- National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Kings College Hospital, London, UK
| | - Dipak Kotecha
- Health Data Research UK Midlands & the NIHR Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
- Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Shouvik Haldar
- Heart Rhythm Centre, Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, Hill End Road, Harefield, London UB9 6JH, UK
- National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Cronin EM, Green JC, Lande J, Holmes TR, Lexcen D, Taigen T. Performance of alert transmissions from cardiac implantable electronic devices to the CareLinkTM network: A retrospective analysis. CARDIOVASCULAR DIGITAL HEALTH JOURNAL 2023. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cvdhj.2023.03.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/08/2023] Open
|
4
|
Stolen C, Rosman J, Manyam H, Kwan B, Kelly J, Perschbacher D, Garner J, Richards M. Preliminary results from the LUX-Dx insertable cardiac monitor remote programming and performance (LUX-Dx PERFORM) study. Clin Cardiol 2022; 46:100-107. [PMID: 36208096 PMCID: PMC9849434 DOI: 10.1002/clc.23930] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2022] [Revised: 09/15/2022] [Accepted: 09/20/2022] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Despite the wide adoption of insertable cardiac monitors (ICMs), high false-positive rates, suboptimal signal quality, limited ability to detect atrial flutter, and lack of remote programming remain challenging. The LUX-Dx PERFORM study was designed to evaluate novel technologies engineered to address these issues. Here, we present preliminary results from the trial focusing on the safety of ICM insertion, remote monitoring rates, and the feasibility of remote programming. LUX-Dx PERFORM is a multicenter, prospective, single-arm, post-market, observational study with planned enrollment of up to 827 patients from 35 sites in North America. A preliminary cohort consisting of the first 369 patients who were enrolled between March and October 2021 was selected for analysis. Three hundred sixty-three (363) patients had ICM insertions across inpatient and outpatient settings. The mean time followed was 103.4 ± 61.8 days per patient. The total infection rate was 0.8% (3/363). Interim results show high levels of remote monitoring with a median 94% of days with data transmission (interquartile range: 82-99). Thirteen (13) in-clinic and 24 remote programming sessions were reported in 34 subjects. Reprogramming examples are presented to highlight signal quality, the ability to detect atrial flutter, and the positive impact of remote programming on patient management. Interim results from LUX-Dx PERFORM study demonstrate the safety of insertion, high data transmission rates, the ability to detect atrial flutter, and the feasibility of remote programming to optimize arrhythmia detection and improve clinical workflow. Future results from LUX-Dx PERFORM will further characterize improvements in signal quality and arrhythmia detection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Craig Stolen
- Cardiac Rythm ManagementBoston ScientificSt PaulMinnesotaUSA
| | - Jonathan Rosman
- Cardiac Arrhythmia ServiceFlorida Atlantic University CESCOMBoca RatonFloridaUSA
| | - Harish Manyam
- Department of Cardiology, Erlanger HospitalUniversity of TennesseeKnoxvilleTennesseeUSA
| | - Brian Kwan
- Cardiac Rythm ManagementBoston ScientificSt PaulMinnesotaUSA
| | - Jonathan Kelly
- Cardiac Rythm ManagementBoston ScientificSt PaulMinnesotaUSA
| | | | - John Garner
- Department of Clinical MedicineUniversity of Missouri School of MedicineColumbiaMissouriUSA
| | - Mark Richards
- Yakima Heart Lung & Vascular ClinicYakima Valley MemorialYakimaWashingtonUSA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Mariani JA, Weerasooriya R, van den Brink O, Mohamed U, Gould PA, Pathak RK, Lin T, Conradie A, Illes P, Pavia S, Rajamani K, Lovibond S, Matthews I, DiFiore D, Arumugam D, Schrader J, Lau DH. Miniaturized implantable cardiac monitor with a long sensing vector (BIOMONITOR III): Insertion procedure assessment, sensing performance, and home monitoring transmission success. J Electrocardiol 2020; 60:118-125. [PMID: 32361086 DOI: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2020.04.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2020] [Revised: 03/26/2020] [Accepted: 04/07/2020] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Implantable Cardiac Monitors (ICMs) are used for long-term monitoring of arrhythmias. BIOMONITOR III is a novel ICM with a miniaturized profile, long sensing vector due to a flexible antenna, simplified implantation with a dedicated insertion tool for pocket formation and ICM placement in a single step, and daily automatic Home Monitoring (HM) function. METHODS In 47 patients undergoing BIOMONITOR III insertion for any ICM indication, 16 investigators at 10 Australian sites assessed handling characteristics of the insertion tool, R-wave amplitudes, noise burden, P-wave visibility, and HM transmission success. Patients were followed for 1 month. RESULTS All 47 attempted insertions were successful. Median time from skin incision to removal of the insertion tool after ICM insertion was 39 s (IQR 19-65) and to wound closure and cleaning was 4.7 min (IQR 3.5-7.8). All aspects of the insertion tool were rated as "good" or "excellent" in ≥97.9% and "fair" in ≤2.1% of patients, except for "force needed for tunnelling" (91.5% good/excellent, 8.5% fair). Based on HM data, R-waves in the first month were stable at 0.70 ± 0.37 mV. Median noise burden (disabling automatic rhythm evaluation) was 0.19% (IQR 0.00-0.93), equivalent to 2.7 min (IQR 0.0-13.4) per day. In HM-transmitted ECG strips with regular sinus rhythm, P-waves were visible in 89 ± 24% of heart cycles. Patient-individual automatic Home Monitoring transmission success was 98.0% ± 5.5%. CONCLUSIONS The novel ICM performed well in all aspects studied, including fast insertion, reliable R-wave sensing, good P-wave visibility, and highly successful HM transmissions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justin A Mariani
- The Alfred Hospital, 55 Commercial Rd, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia; Central Clinical School, Monash University, 99 Commercial Rd, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia.
| | - Rukshen Weerasooriya
- University of Western Australia, Department of Medicine, Crawley, WA 6000, Australia.
| | - Olivier van den Brink
- The Alfred Hospital, 55 Commercial Rd, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia; Central Clinical School, Monash University, 99 Commercial Rd, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia.
| | - Uwais Mohamed
- St Vincent's Hospital, 41 Victoria Parade, Fitzroy, VIC 3065, Australia.
| | - Paul A Gould
- The University of Queensland, and Department of Cardiology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, 199 Ipswich Road, Woolloongabba, QLD 4102, Australia.
| | - Rajeev K Pathak
- Australian National University and The Canberra Hospital, Yamba Dr, Canberra, ACT 2605, Australia.
| | - Tina Lin
- GenesisCare Victoria, 5/126 Wellington Pde, East Melbourne, VIC 3002, Australia.
| | - Andre Conradie
- GenesisCare, Friendly Society Private Hospital, 19-23 Bingera Street, Bundaberg, QLD 4670, Australia.
| | - Peter Illes
- Sydney Adventist Hospital, 185 Fox Valley Road, Wahroonga, NSW 2076, Australia
| | - Stephen Pavia
- GenesisCare, The Wesley Hospital, 30 Chasely St, Auchenflower, QLD 4066, Australia.
| | - Kushwin Rajamani
- University of Western Australia, Department of Medicine, Crawley, WA 6000, Australia
| | - Sam Lovibond
- The Alfred Hospital, 55 Commercial Rd, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia; Central Clinical School, Monash University, 99 Commercial Rd, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia
| | - Ian Matthews
- St Vincent's Hospital, 41 Victoria Parade, Fitzroy, VIC 3065, Australia.
| | - David DiFiore
- GenesisCare, Friendly Society Private Hospital, 19-23 Bingera Street, Bundaberg, QLD 4670, Australia.
| | - Deepak Arumugam
- GenesisCare, The Wesley Hospital, 30 Chasely St, Auchenflower, QLD 4066, Australia.
| | - Jürgen Schrader
- Biotronik SE & Co. KG, Woermannkehre 1, 12359 Berlin, Germany.
| | - Dennis H Lau
- Centre for Heart Rhythm Disorders, The University of Adelaide and Royal Adelaide Hospital, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|