Evaluation of clinical efficacy of undenatured type II collagen supplementation compared to cimicoxib and their association in dogs affected by natural occurring osteoarthritis

The aim of the study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy of 30 days treatment of undenatured type II collagen(UC-II®), compared to cimicoxib and to their combination, in osteoarthritic dogs. Client-owned dogs were enrolled in a clinical, randomized, controlled and prospective study. Posture, lameness, pain, range of motion and x-ray of affected joint(s) were evaluated and scored based on severity (CLINICAL score). The Liverpool Osteoarthritis in Dogs survey was used to score the owner evaluation of dog's mobility (LOAD score and MOBILITY score). Osteoarthritis (OA) stage was defined through the Canine Osteoarthritis Staging tool (COAST). After diagnosis (T0), all patients were randomly assigned to different treatment groups: C group = cimicoxib 2 mg/kg/day orally OS, F group = UC-II® 1 tablet per day OS; C + F group = cimicoxib-UC-II® at the same previous dosages; CTR group = dogs who didn't received any treatment. All treatments were administered for 30 days. Seventy-six dogs completed the study. LOAD score was recorded significant lower after treatment for each group, with a reduction in percentage of 29.5% for C, 31.4% for F, 21.1% for C + F. LOAD score was lower in C(P = 0.04), F(P = 0.001) and C + F(P = 0.009) group at T30 than CTR group. MOBILITY and CLINICAL scores were significantly lower in all groups at T30, when compared to T0. MOBILITY score was lower than CTR in C(P = 0.02) and F(P = 0.01); CLINICAL score was lower in C + F(P = 0.016). The present findings prove that the treatment with UC-II®, cimicoxib and their combination provide significant reduction in clinical signs associated with OA.

Post-operative analgesia following TPLO surgery: A comparison between cimicoxib and tramadol

OBJECTIVE

To compare the analgesic effects of oral administration of cimicoxib and tramadol over a 30 day period following Tibial Plateau Leveling Osteotomy and partial menisectomy in dogs.

DESIGN

Randomized, double blinded, prospective clinical trial.

ANIMALS

42 adult client-owned dogs with unilateral cranial cruciate ligament disease and partial meniscal tears.

METHODS

Dogs were allocated into 2 treatment groups (cimicoxib or tramadol). Weight bearing while standing, thigh circumference, flexion and extension range of motions, wound classification, adverse effects, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Glasgow Composite Measure Pain Scale (CMPS-SF) and Helsinki Chronic Pain Index (HCPI) questionnaire and limb function by means of pressure platform gait analysis were recorded before surgery and at several time points after surgery for 30 days. Outcome measures were compared at each time point among groups.

RESULTS

A significant improvement in two objective measures of gait of the cimicoxib group: the vertical impulse on day 1 and day 20 and the peak vertical force on day 20 were significantly improved when compared to the tramadol group. However, no difference was seen for the VI or PVF of dogs on the other days compared. In addiction there was no difference in the weight bearing while standing, thigh circumference, wound classification, adverse effects, VAS, CMPS-SF and HCPI. We did not observe a difference in the number of adverse effects measured in this study with the exception of hock edaema.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

A significant difference was not found in long-term postoperative analgesia provided by cimicoxib or tramadol in dogs undergoing TPLO when subjective parameters (with the exception of knee joint range of motion) were evaluated, but use of the force plate analysis revealed a significant difference between groups at T20 for both PVF and VI. The use of cimicoxib improved the limb function and ROM and reduced the occurrence of hock edema, in the first 20 days after surgery, without any additional side effects, compared to tramadol. Thus, the use of cimicoxib should be preferred to tramadol alone in clinical cases similar to the ones included in this study.

Pain characterization and response to palliative care in dogs with naturally-occurring appendicular osteosarcoma: An open label clinical trial

This study aimed to characterize bone cancer pain (quantitative sensory testing (QST), stance asymmetry index, actimetry, scores of pain and quality of life (QoL)) in dogs with appendicular osteosarcoma (OSA), and to evaluate a stepwise palliative analgesic treatment.

The pain profile of thirteen client-owned dogs with OSA was compared with seven healthy dogs. Dogs with OSA were then enrolled in a prospective, open-label, clinical trial. Outcome measures included: primary and secondary mechanical thresholds (MT), conditioned pain modulation (CPM), stance asymmetry index, actimetry (most and least active periods), visual analog scales and QoL. After baseline assessments, stepwise treatment comprised orally administered cimicoxib (2 mg/kg q 24h), amitriptyline (1–1.5 mg/kg q 24h) and gabapentin (10 mg/kg q 8h); re-evaluations were performed after 14 (D14), 21 (D21) and 28 (D28) days, respectively. Statistics used mixed linear models (α = 5%; one-sided). Centralized nociceptive sensitivity (primary and secondary MT, and dynamic allodynia) was recorded in OSA dogs. Healthy dogs had responsive CPM, but CPM was deficient in OSA dogs. Construct validity was observed for the QST protocol. Asymmetry index was significantly present in OSA dogs. The CPM improved significantly at D14. When compared with baseline (log mean ± SD: 4.1 ± 0.04), most active actimetry significantly improved at D14 (4.3 ± 0.04), D21 and D28 (4.2 ± 0.04 for both). When compared with baseline, least active actimetry significantly decreased after treatment at all time-points indicating improvement in night-time restlessness. No other significant treatment effect was observed. Except for tactile threshold and actimetry, all outcomes worsened when gabapentin was added to cimicoxib-amitriptyline. Dogs with bone cancer are affected by widespread somatosensory sensitivity characterized by peripheral and central sensitization and have a deficient inhibitory system. This severe pain is mostly refractory to palliative analgesic treatment, and the latter was only detected by specific and sensitive outcomes.

Comparison of the postoperative analgesic effects of cimicoxib, buprenorphine and their combination in healthy dogs undergoing ovariohysterectomy

OBJECTIVE

To determine the noninferior postoperative analgesic efficacy of cimicoxib compared to buprenorphine following elective ovariohysterectomy in healthy bitches.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective, randomized, blinded, controlled clinical trial.

ANIMALS

A total of 63 healthy dogs.

METHODS

To provide perioperative analgesia, cimicoxib 2 mg kg^-1 (orally), buprenorphine 0.02 mg kg^-1 (two doses, intramuscularly), or both drugs combined, were administered. Dogs were sedated with acepromazine and anaesthetized with propofol and isoflurane. Pain was assessed with the short form of the Glasgow Composite Pain Scale (GCPS), a pain numerical rating scale (NRS) and mechanical nociceptive thresholds (MNT), preoperatively and at 1, 2, 4, 6, 20 and 23 hours after extubation. Sedation was also scored at the same time points. A noninferiority approach was employed to determine the efficacy of cimicoxib compared to buprenorphine. Treatment groups were compared with parametric [analysis of variance (anova), t test] and nonparametric test as appropriate (Kruskal-Wallis, chi-square).

RESULTS

The GCPS, pain NRS and MNT tests demonstrated noninferiority of cimicoxib compared to buprenorphine (rejection of inferiority: p < 0.001, all). Furthermore, cimicoxib provided better analgesia compared to buprenorphine alone according to the GCPS (p < 0.01) and NRS (p < 0.05), but not the MNT. Conversely, an increase in the analgesic effect when cimicoxib was combined with buprenorphine was only observed with the MNT (p < 0.01). There were no differences in rescue analgesia requirements both intra- and postoperatively between treatments. Gastrointestinal side effects were increased in dogs administered cimicoxib, whereas dogs treated with buprenorphine had higher sedation scores 1-hour postoperatively and required lower doses of propofol for the induction of anaesthesia.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Cimicoxib has noninferior postoperative analgesic efficacy compared to buprenorphine, and both drugs have comparable analgesic effects for the control of postoperative pain in bitches undergoing ovariohysterectomy.