Effect of recombinant human endostatin on the expression of c-Myc and bFGF in mouse gastric cancer cells

Role of Basic Fibroblast Growth Factor in Cancer: Biological Activity, Targeted Therapies, and Prognostic Value

Cancer is the leading cause of death worldwide; thus, it is necessary to find successful strategies. Several growth factors, such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF, FGF2), and transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β), are involved in the main processes that fuel tumor growth, i.e., cell proliferation, angiogenesis, and metastasis, by activating important signaling pathways, including PLC-γ/PI3/Ca2+ signaling, leading to PKC activation. Here, we focused on bFGF, which, when secreted by tumor cells, mediates several signal transductions and plays an influential role in tumor cells and in the development of chemoresistance. The biological mechanism of bFGF is shown by its interaction with its four receptor subtypes: fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) 1, FGFR2, FGFR3, and FGFR4. The bFGF–FGFR interaction stimulates tumor cell proliferation and invasion, resulting in an upregulation of pro-inflammatory and anti-apoptotic tumor cell proteins. Considering the involvement of the bFGF/FGFR axis in oncogenesis, preclinical and clinical studies have been conducted to develop new therapeutic strategies, alone and/or in combination, aimed at intervening on the bFGF/FGFR axis. Therefore, this review aimed to comprehensively examine the biological mechanisms underlying bFGF in the tumor microenvironment, the different anticancer therapies currently available that target the FGFRs, and the prognostic value of bFGF.

Endostatin Inhibits Blood-Retinal Barrier Breakdown in Diabetic Rats by Increasing the Expression of ICAM-1 and VCAM-1 and Decreasing the Expression of VEGF

Objective

Endostatin has become the strongest endogenous angiogenesis inhibitor due to suppressing VEGF expression. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of endostatin on the blood-retinal barrier (BRB) in diabetic rats.

Methods

SD rats were induced to develop diabetes by streptozotocin, and endostatin was administrated by intravitreal injection. The body weight, the level of blood glucose, the expressions of C-reactive protein (CRP), adhesion molecules intercellular cell adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) and vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1), junction proteins (occludin, claudin-5, and zonula occluden-1), and VEGF were measured in rats' retinas of diabetes. The BRB breakdown was evaluated using Evans blue.

Results

The level of CRP and adhesion molecules (ICAM-1 and VCAM-1) was increased in retinas of diabetic rats, while endostatin significantly inhibited the upregulation of these. Diabetes increased the BRB permeability and retinal thickness. Diabetes also decreased the levels of occludin, claudin-5, and ZO-1 in retinals. These changes were inhibited by endostatin treatment. Upregulation of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β), and protein kinase C- (PKC-) β2 was also reversed by endostatin in retinas of diabetic rats.

Conclusions

Endostatin provides protection against diabetic retinopathy, which may involve its barrier-enhancing effects.

Clinical efficacy of endostar combined with chemotherapy in the treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis in gastric cancer: results from a retrospective study

Peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) resulting from metastatic dissemination of gastric cancer (GC) cells carries a dismal prognosis, and current treatments have shown little efficacy. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of recombinant human endostatin (Endostar), a broad-spectrum anti-angiogenic peptide, in combination with chemotherapy in PC derived from GC. From January 2014 to December 2016, 33 patients with advanced stage GC associated with PC were enrolled. Pathological, imaging, and treatment data were retrospectively analyzed. Twenty-one patients received systemic chemotherapy (control group), while 12 patients were administered Endostar and chemotherapy. Combined treatment with Endostar/chemotherapy showed the tendency to increase objective response rate (41.7% vs. 23.8%) and disease control rate (83.3% vs. 61.9%) compared with the control group, although the differences were not statistically significant. Endostar plus chemotherapy effectively extended time to progression (4.6 ± 0.3 months vs. 3.5 ± 0.3 months, P = 0.03) and median overall survival (15.8 ± 1.7 months vs. 9.8 ± 0.9 months, P = 0.01) compared with chemotherapy alone. The combination therapy did not cause more adverse reactions than chemotherapy alone. Thus, the addition of Endostar to conventional chemotherapy treatment effectively attenuated the development of PC and extended survival, with high safety and tolerance.