Role of lipid-lowering agents in the management of diabetic retinopathy

Fenofibrate and diabetic retinopathy

Background

Diabetic retinopathy (DR), a sight-threatening ocular complication of diabetes mellitus, is one of the main causes of blindness in the working-age population. Dyslipidemia is a potential risk factor for the development or worsening of DR, with conflicting evidence in epidemiological studies. Fenofibrate, an antihyperlipidemic agent, has lipid-modifying and pleiotropic (non-lipid) effects that may lessen the incidence of microvascular events.

Methods

Relevant studies were identified through a PubMed/MEDLINE search spanning the last 20 years, using the broad term "diabetic retinopathy" and specific terms "fenofibrate" and "dyslipidemia". References cited in these studies were further examined to compile this mini-review. These pivotal investigations underwent meticulous scrutiny and synthesis, focusing on methodological approaches and clinical outcomes. Furthermore, we provided the main findings of the seminal studies in a table to enhance comprehension and comparison.

Results

Growing evidence indicates that fenofibrate treatment slows DR advancement owing to its possible protective effects on the blood-retinal barrier. The protective attributes of fenofibrate against DR progression and development can be broadly classified into two categories: lipid-modifying effects and non-lipid-related (pleiotropic) effects. The lipid-modifying effect is mediated through peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-α activation, while the pleiotropic effects involve the reduction in serum levels of C-reactive protein, fibrinogen, and pro-inflammatory markers, and improvement in flow-mediated dilatation. In patients with DR, the lipid-modifying effects of fenofibrate primarily involve a reduction in lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 levels and the upregulation of apolipoprotein A1 levels. These changes contribute to the anti-inflammatory and anti-angiogenic effects of fenofibrate. Fenofibrate elicits a diverse array of pleiotropic effects, including anti-apoptotic, antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and anti-angiogenic properties, along with the indirect consequences of these effects. Two randomized controlled trials-the Fenofibrate Intervention and Event Lowering in Diabetes and Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes studies-noted that fenofibrate treatment protected against DR progression, independent of serum lipid levels.

Conclusions

Fenofibrate, an oral antihyperlipidemic agent that is effective in decreasing DR progression, may reduce the number of patients who develop vision-threatening complications and require invasive treatment. Despite its proven protection against DR progression, fenofibrate treatment has not yet gained wide clinical acceptance in DR management. Ongoing and future clinical trials may clarify the role of fenofibrate treatment in DR management.

Associations between lipid abnormalities and diabetic retinopathy across a large United States national database

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

While dyslipidaemia has been suggested as a potential risk factor for diabetic retinopathy (DR), previous studies have reported conflicting findings. This study aimed to better characterize the relationship between abnormal serum levels of various lipid markers and the risk of the development and progression of DR.

SUBJECTS/METHODS

This retrospective cohort study utilized a United States national database of electronic medical records. Adults with a history of type 2 diabetes mellitus without type 1 diabetes mellitus were divided into cohorts based on the presence of abnormal serum levels of various lipid markers. Propensity score matching was performed to match cohorts with abnormal lipid levels to those with normal lipid levels on covariates. The cohorts were then compared to evaluate the hazard ratios (HR) of receiving a new DR diagnosis, pars plana vitrectomy, panretinal photocoagulation, vitreous haemorrhage, proliferative diabetic retinopathy, diabetic macular oedema (DMO), and traction retinal detachment.

RESULTS

The database contained 1,126,231 eligible patients (mean age: 60.8 [14.2] years; 46.0% female). Among patients without prior DR, low HDL (HR = 0.94, CI = 0.90-0.98), total cholesterol (HR = 0.88, CI = 0.85-0.91), and high triglyceride (HR = 0.91, CI = 0.86-0.97) levels were associated with a decreased risk of receiving a DR diagnosis. Among patients with preexisting DR, high LDL levels was associated with an increased risk of DMO (HR = 1.42, CI = 1.15-1.75), whereas low HDL levels was associated with a marginally decreased risk (HR = 0.92, CI = 0.85-0.99).

CONCLUSIONS

Elevated levels of markers of dyslipidaemia are inversely associated with the risk of receiving a DR diagnosis, but this relationship is blunted after the onset of DR.

The effects of probiotics supplements on metabolic indices and clinical signs in patients with diabetic retinopathy, a randomized double blind clinical trial

Purpose

This study was carried out to evaluate the effects of probiotics administration on clinical status and metabolic profiles in diabetic retinopathy (DR) patients.

Methods

This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was conducted among 72 DR patients. Subjects received probiotics including Lactobacillus acidophilus, Bifidobacterium bifidum, Bifidobacterium langum, Bifidobacterium lactis daily (2 × 109 CFU/each strain) (n = 36) or placebo (starch) (n = 36) and were instructed to take one capsule daily for 12 weeks. Finally, 55 participants [probiotic group (n = 30) and placebo group (n = 25)] completed the study. Fasting blood samples were obtained at baseline and after the 12-week intervention to determine metabolic profiles. To determine the effects of probiotic supplementation on clinical symptoms and biochemical variables, we used one-way repeated measures analysis of variance.

Results

After the 12-week intervention, compared with the placebo, probiotic supplementation significantly decreased means serum insulin concentrations (Probiotic group: -4.9 ± 6.5vs. Placebo group: 3.0 ± 7.7 µIU/mL, Ptime×group<0.001), homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance (Probiotic group: -2.5 ± 3.8 vs. Placebo group: 1.1 ± 2.7, Ptime×group<0.001) and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1C) (Probiotic group: -0.4 ± 0.7 vs. Placebo group: -0.02 ± 0.2%, Ptime×group=0.01), and significantly increased the quantitative insulin sensitivity check index (QUICKI) (Probiotic group: 0.02 ± 0.03 vs. Placebo group: -0.03 ± 0.04, Ptime×group<0.001). There was no significant effect of probiotic administration on other metabolic profiles and clinical symptoms.

Conclusions

Overall, probiotic supplementation after 12 weeks in DR patients had beneficial effects on few metabolic profiles. This study was registered under the Iranian website for clinical trials as http://www.irct.ir: IRCT20130211012438N29.

Impact of Dyslipidemia Medications on the Prevalence of Diabetic Retinopathy Among a Large US Cohort

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Dyslipidemia medications such as statins and fibrates may be associated with a reduction in diabetic retinopathy (DR) progression, but real-world data is lacking. This study evaluates cholesterol-lowering medications and their association with the prevalence of DR and advanced DR complications.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data was collected using codes from the International Classification of Diseases on TriNetX, a cross-sectional database of over 79 million Americans, between June and August 2022. Prevalence and prevalence odds ratios (POR) were calculated.

RESULTS

Patients taking pitavastatin (OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.49, 0.84), fenofibrate (OR 0.83, CI 0.79, 0.87), or evolocumab (OR 0.80, CI 0.68, 0.95) had lower POR of proliferative DR compared to nonproliferative DR. Patients taking any cholesterol medication had a lower POR of vitreous hemorrhage. Patients taking fibrates also had lower POR of neovascular glaucoma.

CONCLUSION

This exploratory study highlights positive associations between DR and dyslipidemia and medications that may have fewer worsening events in DR patients. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina 2023;54:626-633.].

Contact lenses for pravastatin delivery to eye segments: Design and in vitro-in vivo correlations

Oral administration of cholesterol-lowering statins, HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, is associated with beneficial effects on eye conditions. This work aims to design contact lenses (CLs) that can sustainedly deliver pravastatin and thus improve the ocular efficacy while avoiding systemic side effects of statins. Bioinspired hydrogels were prepared with monomers that resemble hydrophobic (ethylene glycol phenyl ether methacrylate) and amino (2-aminoethyl methacrylamide hydrochloride) functionalities of the active site of HMG-CoA. Best performing CLs loaded >6 mg/g, in vitro fulfilled the release demands for daily wearing, and showed anti-inflammatory activity (lowering TNF-α). High hydrostatic pressure sterilization preserved the stability of both the drug and the hydrogel network. Ex vivo tests revealed the ability of pravastatin to accumulate in cornea and sclera and to penetrate through transscleral route. In vivo tests (rabbits) confirmed that, compared to eye drops and for the same dose, CLs provided significantly higher pravastatin levels in tear fluid within 1 to 7 h of wearing. Moreover, after 8 h wearing pravastatin was present in cornea, sclera, aqueous humour and vitreous humour. Strong correlations between percentages of drug released in vitro and in vivo were found. Effects of volume and proteins on release rate and Levy plots were identified.

MG53 represses high glucose-induced inflammation and angiogenesis in human retinal endothelial cells by repressing the EGR1/STAT3 axis

BACKGROUND

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a vascular complication of diabetes mellitus that leads to visual injury and blindness. Both angiogenesis and inflammation play an important role in the pathogenesis of DR. Here we aimed to explore the mechanisms of mitsugumin 53 (MG53) in ameliorating the dysfunction induced by high glucose (HG) in humans retinal microvascular endothelial cells (HRECs).

METHODS

HRECs were subjected to HG in the presence or absence of MG53 overexpression. The effect of MG53 on cell viability and inflammatory response in HG-treated HRECs was measured using the Cell Counting Kit-8 and ELISAs, respectively. Expression of MG53, EGR1, p-STAT3, FGF2, TGFB1, and Angiopoietin-1 in HG-treated HRECs was quantified by western blot or quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction.

RESULTS

HG significantly downregulated MG53 in HRECs, which reduced cell viability while inducing angiogenesis and inflammatory response. Upregulation of MG53 reversed these effects of HG. MG53 directly interacted with EGR1 and repressed its expression, which decreased phosphorylation of STAT3 and downregulated FGF2, TGFB1, and Angiopoietin-1. EGR1 up-regulation or STAT3 activation antagonized the protective effects of MG53.

CONCLUSION

MG53 alleviates HG-induced dysfunction in HRECs by repressing EGR1/STAT3 signaling. Thereby MG53 may have therapeutic potential in DR.

Statin Use and the Risk of Progression to Vision Threatening Diabetic Retinopathy

PURPOSE

This study aims to assess the effect of statins on progression from nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) to vision-threatening diabetic retinopathy (VTDR), proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) or diabetic macular edema (DME).

METHODS

Two cohort studies using a U.S. medical claims database from 2002 to 2019 including NPDR patients 18 years or older. A risk factor analysis performed a time-updating cox regression model assessing statin usage. A second new-user active comparator design analysis replicating a previously published study. Main outcomes included a new diagnosis of VTDR (composite of either PDR or DME) or DME and PDR individually for the risk factor study and included additional outcomes of new DR, NPDR, vitreous hemorrhage (VH) and tractional retinal detachment (TRD) for the new user study.

RESULTS

Risk factor analysis included 66 617 statin users with NPDR at baseline and 83 365 nonstatin users. Of these, 27 325 (18.2%) progressed to VTDR, 4086 (2.71%) progressed to PDR, and 22 750 (15.1%) progressed to DME. After multivariable analysis, no protective effect of statin use was found for progression to VTDR, PDR, or DME (HR = 1.01-3, p >0.33 for all comparisons). Replicated new user design analysis also showed no protective effect for statins on risk of development of DR (HR = 1.03, 95% CI: 0.99-1.07, p = 0.13), PDR (HR = 0.89, 95% CI: 0.79-1.02, p = 0.09), DME (HR = 0.94, 95% CI: 0.86-1.03, p = 0.21), VH (HR = 1.00, 95% CI: 0.86-1.16, p = 0.99), and TRD (HR = 1.11, 95% CI: 0.89-1.38, p = 0.36).

CONCLUSION

Statin use was found not to be protective for progression of DR regardless of study methodology. These results suggest that the specifics of the population studied rather than differing study methodology are important in assessing the effect of statins on DR progression.

Statin reduces the incidence of diabetic retinopathy and its need for intervention: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Purpose:

We aimed to perform a systematic literature search on the latest evidence of the role of statin in reducing diabetic retinopathy and its need for intervention.

Methods:

A comprehensive search on cohort studies/clinical trials that assess statins and diabetic retinopathy up until August 2019 was performed. The outcome measured was the incidence of diabetic retinopathy and its need for intervention.

Results:

There were 558.177 patients from six studies. Statin was associated with a lower incidence of diabetic retinopathy (hazard ratio: 0.68 (0.55, 0.84), p < 0.001; I2: 95%). For the subtypes of diabetic retinopathy, statin lowers the incidence of proliferative diabetic retinopathy (hazard ratio: 0.69 (0.51, 0.93), p = 0.01; I2: 90%), non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (hazard ratio: 0.80 (0.66, 0.96), p = 0.02; I2: 93%), and diabetic macular edema (hazard ratio: 0.56 (0.39, 0.80), p = 0.002; I2: 82%). Statin was associated with a reduced need for retinal laser treatment with a hazard ratio of 0.70 (0.64, 0.76) (p < 0.001; I2: 0%), intravitreal injection with a hazard ratio of 0.82 (0.79, 0.85) (p < 0.001; I2: 0%), and vitrectomy with a hazard ratio of 0.64 (0.48, 0.85) (p < 0.001; I2: 75%). Overall, statin was associated with a reduced need for intervention for diabetic retinopathy with a hazard ratio of 0.72 (0.64, 0.80) (p < 0.001; I2: 73%). The regression-based Egger’s test showed statistically significant small-study effects for non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (p = 0.011) outcomes.

Conclusion:

Statin was associated with a decreased risk of diabetic retinopathy and its subtypes. Statin also reduced the need for intervention with retinal laser treatment, intravitreal injection, and vitrectomy.

Effects of lipid-lowering agents on diabetic retinopathy: a Meta-analysis and systematic review

AIM

To clarify this controversy and to provide evidence for application of lipid lowering agents in treatment of diabetic retinopathy (DR).

METHODS

We searched the databases of PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) and abstracts from main annual meetings up to January 1, 2017. Google scholar and ClinicalTrials.gov were also searched for unpublished relevant studies. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that studied lipid-lowering agents in type 1 or type 2 diabetes in this Meta-analysis. The primary endpoint was the progression of DR, and the secondary endpoints included vision loss, development of diabetic macular edema (DME) and aggravation of hard exudates. The pooled odds ratios (OR) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95%CIs) were calculated.

RESULTS

After systemic and manual literature search by two independent investigators, we included 8 RCTs from 7 published articles with 13 454 participants in this Meta-analysis. The results revealed that lipid-lowering drugs were associated with reduced risk in DR progression [OR=0.77 (95%CI: 0.62, 0.96), P=0.02]. Lipid-lowering agents might have protective effect on DME compared to placebo, although the difference was not statistically significant [OR=0.60 (95%CI: 0.34, 1.08), P=0.09]. However, no significant differences in the worsening of vision acuity [OR=0.96 (95%CI: 0.81,1.14), P=0.64] and hard exudates [OR=0.50 (95%CI:0.15, 1.74), P=0.28] were found between the lipid-lowering drugs and the placebo groups.

CONCLUSION

In DR patients, lipid-lowering agents show a protective effect on DR progression and might be associated with reduced risk in the development of DME. However, lipid-lowering agents have no effects on vision loss and hard exudates aggravation. Further clinical trials in larger scale are required to confirm the conclusion of this study and thus justify the use of intensive control lipids with anti-lipid agents at the early stages of DR.

[Diabetic dyslipidemia and microvascular complications of diabetes]

Diabetic dyslipidemia is one of the main risk factors for atherosclerosis. Although its participation in diabetic microvascular complications is not that dominant, dyslipidemia may play an important role in formation and progression of these complications. Pathophysiological mechanisms by which diabetic dyslipidemia affects the etiopathogenesis of diabetic nephropathy, retinopathy, neuropathy and diabetic foot are presented. The data from clinical studies and treatment possibilities for particular microvascular complications using lipid-lowering therapy are discussed.Key words: diabetes mellitus - diabetic foot - dyslipidemia - nephropathy - neuropathy - retinopathy.

Shared and distinct lipid-lipid interactions in plasma and affected tissues in a diabetic mouse model

Lipids are ubiquitous metabolites with diverse functions; abnormalities in lipid metabolism appear to be related to complications from multiple diseases, including type 2 diabetes. Through technological advances, the entire lipidome has been characterized and researchers now need computational approaches to better understand lipid network perturbations in different diseases. Using a mouse model of type 2 diabetes with microvascular complications, we examined lipid levels in plasma and in renal, neural, and retinal tissues to identify shared and distinct lipid abnormalities. We used correlation analysis to construct interaction networks in each tissue, to associate changes in lipids with changes in enzymes of lipid metabolism, and to identify overlap of coregulated lipid subclasses between plasma and each tissue to define subclasses of plasma lipids to use as surrogates of tissue lipid metabolism. Lipid metabolism alterations were mostly tissue specific in the kidney, nerve, and retina; no lipid changes correlated between the plasma and all three tissue types. However, alterations in diacylglycerol and in lipids containing arachidonic acid, an inflammatory mediator, were shared among the tissue types, and the highly saturated cholesterol esters were similarly coregulated between plasma and each tissue type in the diabetic mouse. Our results identified several patterns of altered lipid metabolism that may help to identify pathogenic alterations in different tissues and could be used as biomarkers in future research into diabetic microvascular tissue damage.

ACE Inhibitors and Statins in Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes

BACKGROUND

Among adolescents with type 1 diabetes, rapid increases in albumin excretion during puberty precede the development of microalbuminuria and macroalbuminuria, long-term risk factors for renal and cardiovascular disease. We hypothesized that adolescents with high levels of albumin excretion might benefit from angiotensin-converting-enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and statins, drugs that have not been fully evaluated in adolescents.

METHODS

We screened 4407 adolescents with type 1 diabetes between the ages of 10 and 16 years of age and identified 1287 with values in the upper third of the albumin-to-creatinine ratios; 443 were randomly assigned in a placebo-controlled trial of an ACE inhibitor and a statin with the use of a 2-by-2 factorial design minimizing differences in baseline characteristics such as age, sex, and duration of diabetes. The primary outcome for both interventions was the change in albumin excretion, assessed according to the albumin-to-creatinine ratio calculated from three early-morning urine samples obtained every 6 months over 2 to 4 years, and expressed as the area under the curve. Key secondary outcomes included the development of microalbuminuria, progression of retinopathy, changes in the glomerular filtration rate, lipid levels, and measures of cardiovascular risk (carotid intima-media thickness and levels of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein and asymmetric dimethylarginine).

RESULTS

The primary outcome was not affected by ACE inhibitor therapy, statin therapy, or the combination of the two. The use of an ACE inhibitor was associated with a lower incidence of microalbuminuria than the use of placebo; in the context of negative findings for the primary outcome and statistical analysis plan, this lower incidence was not considered significant (hazard ratio, 0.57; 95% confidence interval, 0.35 to 0.94). Statin use resulted in significant reductions in total, low-density lipoprotein, and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, in triglyceride levels, and in the ratio of apolipoprotein B to apolipoprotein A1, whereas neither drug had significant effects on carotid intima-media thickness, other cardiovascular markers, the glomerular filtration rate, or progression of retinopathy. Overall adherence to the drug regimen was 75%, and serious adverse events were similar across the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of an ACE inhibitor and a statin did not change the albumin-to-creatinine ratio over time. (Funded by the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation and others; AdDIT ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01581476 .).