1
|
Yang S, Peng R, Zhou L. The impact of hepatic steatosis on outcomes of colorectal cancer patients with liver metastases: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Med (Lausanne) 2022; 9:938718. [PMID: 36160137 PMCID: PMC9498207 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.938718] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2022] [Accepted: 08/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background It is unclear how hepatic steatosis impacts patient prognosis in the case of colorectal cancer with liver metastases (CRLM). The purpose of this review was to assess the effect of hepatic steatosis on patient survival and disease-free survival (DFS) in the case of CRLM. Methods We examined the databases of PubMed, CENTRAL, Embase, Google Scholar, and ScienceDirect for studies reporting outcomes of CRLM patients with and without hepatic steatosis. We performed a random-effects meta-analysis using multivariable adjusted hazard ratios (HR). Results Nine studies reporting data of a total of 14,197 patients were included. All patients had undergone surgical intervention. Pooled analysis of seven studies indicated that hepatic steatosis had no statistically significant impact on patient survival in CRLM (HR: 0.92 95% CI: 0.82, 1.04, I2 = 82%, p = 0.18). Specifically, we noted that there was a statistically significant improvement in cancer-specific survival amongst patients with hepatic steatosis (two studies; HR: 0.85 95% CI: 0.76, 0.95, I2 = 41%, p = 0.005) while there was no difference in overall survival (five studies; HR: 0.97 95% CI: 0.83, 1.13, I2 = 78%, p = 0.68). On meta-analysis of four studies, we noted that the presence of hepatic steatosis resulted in statistically significant reduced DFS in patients with CRLM (HR: 1.32 95% CI: 1.08, 1.62, I2 = 67%, p = 0.007). Conclusion The presence of hepatic steatosis may not influence patient survival in CRLM. However, scarce data is suggestive of poor DFS in CRLM patients with hepatic steatosis. Further prospective studies taking into account different confounding variables are needed to better assess the effect of hepatic steatosis on outcomes of CRLM. Systematic review registration [https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/#searchadvanced], identifier [CRD42022320665].
Collapse
|
2
|
Polk N, Budai B, Hitre E, Patócs A, Mersich T. High Neutrophil-To-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) and Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index (SII) Are Markers of Longer Survival After Metastasectomy of Patients With Liver-Only Metastasis of Rectal Cancer. Pathol Oncol Res 2022; 28:1610315. [PMID: 35570841 PMCID: PMC9091167 DOI: 10.3389/pore.2022.1610315] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2022] [Accepted: 03/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
Background: The literature data regarding colon cancer patients with liver-only metastases (CLM) show that NLR determined before metastasectomy is a prognostic marker of shorter relapse-free survival (RFS), but no results has been reported to date for rectal cancer patients with liver-only metastases (RLM). This study aimed to investigate the NLR and SII in CLM and RLM. Methods: Relapse-free (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated in 67 CLM and 103 RLM patients with a median follow-up of 46.5 and 59.8 months, respectively. Pre- and/or postoperative chemotherapy ± targeted treatment was applied in 96% and 87% of CLM and RLM patients, respectively. The cut-off level for hematologic parameters were determined by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Univariate analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier method and log rank test. For multivariate analysis Cox regression was applied. Results: In univariate analysis low NLR (cut-off 2) and SII (535) were predictors of longer RFS in case of CLM (p < 0.01). In contrast, for RLM high NLR (2.42) and SII (792) were predictors of longer RFS (p < 0.001). For RLM both NLR and SII proved to be independent markers of RFS (HR 0.66 (95% CI 0.52–0.84) and 0.73 (0.57–0.91), respectively) and OS (0.76 (0.58–0.99) and 0.66 (0.5–0.87), respectively). Only NLR (1.44 (1.04–1.99)) was independent marker of RFS for CLM. The preoperative treatment has not influenced the role of NLR or SII. Conclusion: In contrast to CLM, in RLM the high NLR or SII determined before metastasectomy proved to be independent prognostic factors of longer RFS and OS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nándor Polk
- Departmet of Visceral Surgery, National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Barna Budai
- Department of Molecular Genetics, National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Erika Hitre
- Medical Oncology and Clinical Pharmacology "B" Department, National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Attila Patócs
- Department of Molecular Genetics, National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary.,Clinical Central Laboratory, National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary.,Department of Laboratory Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Tamás Mersich
- Departmet of Visceral Surgery, National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kanikarla Marie P, Fowlkes NW, Afshar-Kharghan V, Martch SL, Sorokin A, Shen JP, Morris VK, Dasari A, You N, Sood AK, Overman MJ, Kopetz S, Menter DG. The Provocative Roles of Platelets in Liver Disease and Cancer. Front Oncol 2021; 11:643815. [PMID: 34367949 PMCID: PMC8335590 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.643815] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2020] [Accepted: 06/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Both platelets and the liver play important roles in the processes of coagulation and innate immunity. Platelet responses at the site of an injury are rapid; their immediate activation and structural changes minimize the loss of blood. The majority of coagulation proteins are produced by the liver—a multifunctional organ that also plays a critical role in many processes: removal of toxins and metabolism of fats, proteins, carbohydrates, and drugs. Chronic inflammation, trauma, or other causes of irreversible damage to the liver can dysregulate these pathways leading to organ and systemic abnormalities. In some cases, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratios can also be a predictor of disease outcome. An example is cirrhosis, which increases the risk of bleeding and prothrombotic events followed by activation of platelets. Along with a triggered coagulation cascade, the platelets increase the risk of pro-thrombotic events and contribute to cancer progression and metastasis. This progression and the resulting tissue destruction is physiologically comparable to a persistent, chronic wound. Various cancers, including colorectal cancer, have been associated with increased thrombocytosis, platelet activation, platelet-storage granule release, and thrombosis; anti-platelet agents can reduce cancer risk and progression. However, in cancer patients with pre-existing liver disease who are undergoing chemotherapy, the risk of thrombotic events becomes challenging to manage due to their inherent risk for bleeding. Chemotherapy, also known to induce damage to the liver, further increases the frequency of thrombotic events. Depending on individual patient risks, these factors acting together can disrupt the fragile balance between pro- and anti-coagulant processes, heightening liver thrombogenesis, and possibly providing a niche for circulating tumor cells to adhere to—thus promoting both liver metastasis and cancer-cell survival following treatment (that is, with minimal residual disease in the liver).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Preeti Kanikarla Marie
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Natalie W Fowlkes
- Department of Veterinary Medicine and Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Vahid Afshar-Kharghan
- Division of Internal Medicine, Benign Hematology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Stephanie L Martch
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Alexey Sorokin
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - John Paul Shen
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Van K Morris
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Arvind Dasari
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Nancy You
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Anil K Sood
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Michael J Overman
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Scott Kopetz
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - David George Menter
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| |
Collapse
|