Managing acute colorectal obstruction by "bridge stenting" to laparoscopic surgery: Our experience

Definition of large bowel obstruction by primary colorectal cancer: A systematic review

AIM

Controversies on therapeutic strategy for large bowel obstruction by primary colorectal cancer mainly concern acute conditions, being essentially different from subacute obstruction. Clearly defining acute obstruction is important for design and interpretation of studies as well as for guidelines and daily practice. This systematic review aimed to evaluate definitions of obstruction by colorectal cancer in prospective studies.

METHOD

A systematic search was performed in PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library. Eligibility criteria included randomized or prospective observational design, publication between 2000 and 2019, and the inclusion of patients with an obstruction caused by colorectal cancer. Provided definitions of obstruction were extracted with assessment of common elements.

RESULTS

A total of 16 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 99 prospective observational studies were included. Obstruction was specified as acute in 28 studies, complete/emergency in five, (sub)acute or similar terms in four and unspecified in 78. Five of 16 RCTs (31%) and 37 of 99 cohort studies (37%) provided a definition. The definitions included any combination of clinical symptoms, physical signs, endoscopic features and radiological imaging findings in 25 studies. The definition was only based on clinical symptoms in 11 and radiological imaging in six studies. Definitions included a radiological component in 100% of evaluable RCTs (5/5) vs. 54% of prospective observational studies (20/37, P = 0.07).

CONCLUSION

In this systematic review, the majority of prospective studies did not define obstruction by colorectal cancer and its urgency, whereas provided definitions varied hugely. Radiological confirmation seems to be an essential component in defining acute obstruction.

Biopsy sampling during self-expandable metallic stent placement in acute malignant colorectal obstruction: a narrative review

BACKGROUND

Histopathology is a crucial part of diagnosis and treatment guidance of colorectal cancer. In Denmark, it is not routine to biopsy during self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) placement as a treatment option for acute colorectal obstruction of unknown etiology. This is due to lack of knowledge about the risks of hemorrhage, and thus the risk to aggravate the deteriorating overview conditions. Therefore, the aim of this study is to investigate whether there is evidence to avoid biopsy sampling during acute SEMS placement.

METHODS

The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for relevant studies. Studies were included if they described biopsy sampling in relation to SEMS placement. Additionally, national and international guidelines were scrutinized on Google and by visiting the websites of national and international gastrointestinal societies.

RESULTS

In total, 43 studies were included in the review. Among these, one recommended biopsy during SEMS placement, three advised against biopsy, 23 just reported biopsy was performed during the procedure, and 16 reported biopsy before or after the procedure, or the timing was not specified. Among the 12 included guidelines, only two described biopsy during SEMS placement.

CONCLUSION

The literature on the subject is limited. In 24 of the 43 included studies, biopsy sampling was done during SEMS placement without reporting a decrease in the technical success rate. The included guidelines were characterized by a general lack of description of whether biopsy during SEMS placement should be performed or not. Prospective studies are needed in order to establish the real risk of hemorrhage, if any, when a biopsy is obtained.

Laparoscopic Inferior Mesenteric Artery Peeling: An Alternative to High or Low Vascular Ligation for Sigmoid Colon Cancer Resection

BACKGROUND

In sigmoid cancer, both inferior mesenteric artery high or low ligations are accepted for curative purposes. Since inferior mesenteric artery ligation could compromise blood flow to the anastomosis, potentially increasing anastomotic leakage onset, real oncological benefits and possible disadvantages related to vascular transection level are still on debate. We introduce totally laparoscopic inferior mesenteric artery peeling technique to release from the concept of lymph nodal harvesting linked to arterial transection level.

METHODS

Over a period of 24 months, 31 patients presenting with sigmoid cancer were submitted to laparoscopic sigmoidectomy associated with inferior mesenteric artery peeling. Data on intraoperative and postoperative outcomes have been prospectively collected.

RESULTS

Mean operative time was 180 min (range 110-330 min); mean intraoperative blood loss was 60 ml (range 30-150 ml), and mean postoperative hospitalization was 6.2 days (range 4-11 days). Mean number of lymph node harvested was 16.7 (range 12-28).

CONCLUSIONS

Given a proper selection of patients, laparoscopic sigmoidectomy comprehensive of sub-adventitial IMA skeletonization from its aortic origin could provide good oncological outcomes and recanalization rate. Further data are advocated to confirm these preliminary results.

Stenting as a bridge to resection versus emergency surgery for left-sided colorectal cancer with malignant obstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

This study aims to discuss the safety and feasibility of a combined treatment consisting of stent insertion and elective surgery for left-sided colorectal cancer with malignant obstruction.

METHODS

Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) that discussed the safety and feasibility of stenting as a bridge to surgery in malignant colorectal cancer were identified in a search of medical databases, including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and SCIENCE. Each paper's quality was assessed using the Jadad scale. A meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.3, and statistical heterogeneity between RCTs was defined as I²>50%.

RESULTS

Nine RCTs included 594 patients were selected and analyzed. Of the included patients, 281 underwent stent insertion followed by elective surgery (SG group), and 313 underwent emergency surgery (EG group). The meta-analysis revealed that the patients in the SG group had a higher one-stage anastomosis rate. Patients in the SG had lower mortality rates and minor complications. There was no significant difference in anastomotic leakage between the two groups. The funnel plot showed that there was no publication bias in these outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Stenting as a bridge to surgery was safe and feasible in left-sided colorectal cancer with malignant obstruction. Compared with the patients in the EG group, the SG patients had an improved primary anastomosis rate and experienced no increase in the risk of other complications.

Palliative care and end-stage colorectal cancer management: The surgeon meets the oncologist

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a common neoplasia in the Western countries, with considerable morbidity and mortality. Every fifth patient with CRC presents with metastatic disease, which is not curable with radical intent in roughly 80% of cases. Traditionally approached surgically, by resection of the primitive tumor or stoma, the management to incurable stage IV CRC patients has significantly changed over the last three decades and is nowadays multidisciplinary, with a pivotal role played by chemotherapy (CHT). This latter have allowed for a dramatic increase in survival, whereas the role of colonic and liver surgery is nowadays matter of debate. Although any generalization is difficult, two main situations are considered, asymptomatic (or minimally symptomatic) and severely symptomatic patients needing aggressive management, including emergency cases. In asymptomatic patients, new CHT regimens allow today long survival in selected patients, also exceeding two years. The role of colonic resection in this group has been challenged in recent years, as it is not clear whether the resection of primary CRC may imply a further increase in survival, thus justifying surgery-related morbidity/mortality in such a class of short-living patients. Secondary surgery of liver metastasis is gaining acceptance since, under new generation CHT regimens, an increasing amount of patients with distant metastasis initially considered non resectable become resectable, with a significant increase in long term survival. The management of CRC emergency patients still represents a major issue in Western countries, and is associated to high morbidity/mortality. Obstruction is traditionally approached surgically by colonic resection, stoma or internal by-pass, although nowadays CRC stenting is a feasible option. Nevertheless, CRC stent has peculiar contraindications and complications, and its long-term cost-effectiveness is questionable, especially in the light of recently increased survival. Perforation is associated with the highest mortality and remains mostly matter for surgeons, by abdominal lavage/drainage, colonic resection and/or stoma. Bleeding and other CRC-related symptoms (pain, tenesmus, etc.) may be managed by several mini-invasive approaches, including radiotherapy, laser therapy and other transanal procedures.

Endoscopic stenting combined with neoadjuvant chemotherapy for treatment of malignant colorectal obstruction

AIM: To investigate the clinical effect of endoscopic stenting combined with neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of malignant colorectal obstruction.

METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 75 malignant colorectal obstruction patients who were treated at Liaoning Provincial People's Hospital between 2003 and 2008 was performed. The patients were divided into three groups, a control group (n = 30) treated using traditional methods, a stent placement group (n = 30) treated using self-expanding metal stents, and a stent placement plus chemotherapy group (n = 15) treated using self-expanding metal stents in combination with neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

RESULTS: The percentage of surgical patients undergoing colostomy was significantly higher in the control group than in the stent placement group and the stent placement plus chemotherapy group (62.5% vs 30.0%, 25.0%, χ² = 4.619, 4.500, both P < 0.05). The tumor resection rate was significantly lower in the control group than in the stent placement group and the stent placement plus chemotherapy group (37.5% vs 70.0%, 75.0%, χ² = 4.619, 4.500, both P < 0.05). The radical surgery rate was significantly higher in the stent placement plus chemotherapy than in the control group (41.7% vs 12.5%, χ² = 3.938, P < 0.05), but showed no significant difference between the control group and stent placement group (χ² = 0.059, P > 0.05). The five-year survival rate was significantly higher in the stent placement plus chemotherapy group than in the control group (26.7% vs 3.3%, χ² = 5.513, P < 0.05), but showed no significant difference between the control group and stent placement group (χ² = 1.071, P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION: Endoscopic stenting combined with neoadjuvant chemotherapy can effectively improve tumor resection rate and radical surgery rate and prolong survival time in patients with advanced colorectal cancer.

Colorectal stenting as first-line treatment in acute colonic obstruction

Tumoral obstructions in almost the entire gastrointestinal tract can be resolved with interventional digestive endoscopy techniques. Self-expanding metal stent (SEMS) insertion in the obstructed colon is a minimally invasive and relatively simple procedure providing an effective first-line treatment for relief of acute malignant obstruction symptoms and serving either as a preoperative or “bridge to surgery” procedure or as palliative definitive care. This technique was introduced in the early 1990s. Although there is still debate about its real value, a lot of reports have been published since then and the procedure is advocated by many surgical groups as the method of choice for the initial treatment of left-sided tumoral colonic obstruction. Before the procedure, colonic obstruction has to be diagnosed by abdominal radiographs, water contrast enema and/or a computed tomography scan. The greatest information is provided by the latter and it is perhaps the method of choice prior to stenting. Skills and training are mandatory, as in all interventional procedures. The key step for success is to cross the malignant stricture with a guidewire. Care must be taken not to over insufflate an obstructed colon during the procedure. SEMS slide over the guidewire through the endoscope working channel or in parallel, outside the endoscope. An average 7% perforation rate has been reported during the procedure and other minor complications can appear in the follow up. However, as a whole, this technique seems to compare favorably with surgery.