Predictors of malignancy in chronic calcific pancreatitis with head mass

Combination of Serum CA 19-9 and Endoscopic Ultrasound Findings Can Predict Malignancy Risk in Patients With Chronic Pancreatitis Presenting With Pancreatic Head Mass: A Proof-of-Concept Study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Inflammatory head mass of pancreas (IMP) developing in background of chronic pancreatitis (CP) is difficult to distinguish from carcinoma pancreas. We aimed to delineate natural course of IMP and predict their malignancy risk, avoiding unnecessary biopsies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this retrospective single-center study, clinical records of patients with CP with diagnosed pancreatic head mass were reviewed. Clinical, laboratory, imaging, endoscopic findings, and follow-up details were retrieved from prospectively maintained database. A diagnostic nomogram was developed combining serum cancer antigen 19-9 and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) findings to predict the risk of malignancy.

RESULTS

We identified 107 patients with pancreatic head mass with CP of whom 87 (81.3%) were IMP and 20 (18.7%) were malignant. Patients with IMP were more frequently young males with alcohol-related CP and low CA 19-9 in comparison with those with malignancy (age IMP: 41.3 ± 11.3 vs carcinoma: 49.3 ± 14.5 years [ P = 0.009]; males 89.7% vs 65% [ P = 0.011]; alcoholic etiology: 71.3% vs 20% [ P < 0.001]; median CA 19-9: 25.78 [interquartile range, 7.20-120.60] vs 1034.50 [106.65-7808.25] [ P < 0.001]). A diagnostic nomogram combining CA 19-9 and EUS findings could identify malignancy with an optimism-corrected c-statistic of 0.905, which was better than both CA 19-9 (0.80) and EUS alone (0.826). Patients with IMP had relatively benign disease course with 40.2% biliary obstruction, 20.7% portal venous thrombosis, 14.9% gastric outlet obstruction, and 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival being 97.3%, 92.7%, and 92.0%, respectively. Surgery was required in only 12 patients (13.8%) with IMP.

CONCLUSIONS

Combination of CA 19-9 and EUS best identifies malignancy risk in patients with IMP, who have otherwise benign course.

Diagnostic Differentiation between Pancreatitis and Pancreatic Cancer: A Scoping Review

Pancreatitis, encompassing acute and chronic forms, and pancreatic cancer pose significant challenges to the exocrine tissue of the pancreas. Recurrence rates and complications following acute pancreatitis episodes can lead to long-term risks, including diabetes mellitus. Chronic pancreatitis can develop in approximately 15% of cases, regardless of the initial episode's severity. Alcohol-induced pancreatitis, idiopathic causes, cigarette smoking, and hereditary pancreatitis contribute to the progression to chronic pancreatitis. Chronic pancreatitis is associated with an increased risk of pancreatic cancer, with older age at onset and smoking identified as risk factors. This scoping review aims to synthesise recent publications (2017-2022) on the diagnostic differentiation between pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer while identifying knowledge gaps in the field. The review focuses on biomarkers and imaging techniques in individuals with pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer. Promising biomarkers such as faecal elastase-1 and specific chemokines offer non-invasive ways to assess pancreatic insufficiency and detect early biomarkers for chronic pancreatitis. Imaging techniques, including computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), and positron emission tomography (PET), aid in differentiating between chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer. However, accurately distinguishing between the two conditions remains a challenge, particularly when a mass is present in the head of the pancreas. Several knowledge gaps persist despite advancements in understanding the association between pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer, including the correlation between histopathological grading systems, non-invasive imaging techniques, and biomarkers in chronic pancreatitis to determine the risk of progression to pancreatic cancer, as well as differentiating between the two conditions. Further research is necessary to enhance our understanding of these aspects, which can ultimately improve the diagnosis and management of pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer.

[Chronic pancreatitis : Characterization and differentiation from pancreatic cancer]

Klinisches/methodisches Problem

Bei der chronischen Pankreatitis (CP) handelt es sich um eine langanhaltende Entzündung der Bauchspeicheldrüse, welche die normale Struktur und Funktion des Organs schädigt. Das breite Spektrum an entzündlichen Pankreaserkrankungen umfasst einzelne Entitäten, wie die fokale Pankreatitis (FP) oder den Pseudotumor („mass-forming pancreatitis“), welche radiomorphologisch ein Adenokarzinom der Bauchspeicheldrüse (PDAC) nachahmen können. In weiterer Folge kann eine Fehldiagnose zu einem vermeidbaren und unnötigen operativen Eingriff oder zu einer Therapieverzögerung führen.

Radiologische Standardverfahren

Der Ultraschall (US) ist das primäre bildgebende Verfahren zur Abklärung von Pankreaserkrankungen, gefolgt von kontrastmittelverstärkter Computertomographie (KM-CT), die als meistverwendete Methode bei der diagnostischen Abklärung von Bauchspeicheldrüsenerkrankungen gilt. Die Magnetresonanztomographie (MRT) und/oder die MR-Cholangiopankreatographie (MRCP) können als Problemlöser eingesetzt werden, um zwischen soliden und zystischen Läsionen zu unterscheiden sowie auch Anomalien der Pankreasgänge auszuschließen, welche bei rezidivierender akuter Pankreatitis (AP) vorhanden sein können, oder um frühe Anzeichen einer CP zu visualisieren. Die MRCP hat dabei die diagnostische endoskopische retrograde Cholangiopankreatographie (ERCP) in der Abklärung von therapeutischen Interventionen im Wesentlichen ersetzt.

Empfehlung für die Praxis

Folgender Übersichtsartikel fasst die relevanten Merkmale in der Computertomographie (CT) und MRT zusammen, um eine akkurate, frühzeitige Diagnose einer CP zu stellen und eine Differenzierung zwischen FP und Pankreaskarzinom zu ermöglichen, um somit – auch in schwierigen Fällen – ein adäquates Therapiemanagement zu gewährleisten.

Transcriptome analysis identifies putative multi-gene signature distinguishing benign and malignant pancreatic head mass

Background

Most often, the patients with pancreatic diseases are presented with a mass in pancreatic head region and existing methods of diagnosis fail to confirm whether the head mass is malignant or benign. As subsequent management of the disease hugely depends on the correct diagnosis, we wanted to explore possible biomarkers which could distinguish benign and malignant pancreatic head masses.

Methods

In order to address that gap, we performed a case–control study to identify genome-wide differentially expressed coding and noncoding genes between pancreatic tissues collected from benign and malignant head masses. These genes were next shortlisted using stringent criteria followed by selection of top malignancy specific genes. They subsequently got validated by quantitative RT-PCR and also in other patient cohorts. Survival analysis and ROC analysis were also performed.

Results

We identified 55 coding and 13 noncoding genes specific for malignant pancreatic head masses. Further shortlisting and validation, however, resulted in 5 coding genes as part of malignancy specific multi-gene signature, which was validated in three independent patient cohorts of 145 normal and 153 PDAC patients. We also found that overexpression of these genes resulted in survival disadvantage in the patients and ROC analysis identified that combination of 5 coding genes had the AUROC of 0.94, making them potential biomarker.

Conclusions

Our study identified a multi-gene signature comprising of 5 coding genes (CDCA7, DLGAP5, FOXM1, TPX2 and OSBPL3) to distinguish malignant head masses from benign ones.

Quantitative shear wave elastography for noninvasive assessment of solid pancreatic masses

PURPOSE

To evaluate the diagnostic value of quantitative shear wave elastography (SWE) for the differential diagnosis of solid pancreatic tumors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 66 solid pancreatic masses were enrolled in this study and all the lesions underwent quantitative SWE. The stiffness of the masses was expressed in shear wave velocity (SWV, m/s). The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was plotted to assess the diagnostic performance of quantitative SWE. The optimal cutoff value for SWV in the differentiation of benign from malignant masses was determined.

RESULTS

The final diagnoses were 26 benign and 40 malignant masses. The SWVs were statistically higher for pancreatic malignant masses compared with those for benign masses (3.30±1.22 m/s versus 1.31±0.64 m/s; P < 0.001). The area under the curve (AUC, 0.93) was obtained. When the best cut-off point was 1.77 m/s, the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were 92.4%, 90.0%, and 96.2%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Quantitative SWE is a novel technique that can be considered as a quantitative and objective diagnostic tool for prediction of pancreas malignancy.

Imaging of Tropical Chronic Pancreatitis—A Unique Clinico-Radiological Entity

Tropical chronic pancreatitis (TCP) is a unique juvenile nonalcoholic form of chronic pancreatitis prevalent in tropical developing countries. TCP is characterized by the younger age of onset, rapid progression, higher prevalence of diabetes and pancreatic calculi, and greater propensity to develop pancreatic malignancy. Identifying the distinct imaging features is critical for the diagnosis of TCP. Awareness of this condition will not only enable the radiologist to recognize it early but also help in better management. In this article, we review the etiopathogenesis, distinct imaging features, and complications of TCP.

mutTCPdb: a comprehensive database for genomic variants of a tropical country neglected disease-tropical calcific pancreatitis

Tropical calcific pancreatitis (TCP) is a juvenile, non-alcoholic form of chronic pancreatitis with its exclusive presence in tropical regions associated with the low economic status. TCP initiates in the childhood itself and then proliferates silently. mutTCPdb is a manually curated and comprehensive disease specific single nucleotide variant (SNV) database. Extensive search strategies were employed to create a repository while SNV information was collected from published articles. Several existing databases such as the dbSNP, Uniprot, miRTarBase2.0, HGNC, PFAM, KEGG, PROSITE, MINT, BIOGRID 3.4 and Ensemble Genome Browser 87 were queried to collect information specific to the gene. mutTCPdb is running on the XAMPP web server with MYSQL database in the backend for data storage and management. Currently, the mutTCPdb enlists 100 variants of all 11 genes identified in TCP, out of which 45 are non-synonymous (missense, nonsense, deletions and insertions), 46 are present in non-coding regions (UTRs, promoter region and introns) and 9 are synonymous variants. The database is highly curated for disease-specific gene variants and provides complete information on function, transcript information, pathways, interactions, miRNAs and PubMed references along with remarks. It is an informative portal for clinicians and researchers for a better understanding of the disease, as it may help in identifying novel targets and diagnostic markers, hence, can be a source to improve the strategies for TCP management.

Database URL: http://lms.snu.edu.in/mutTCPDB/index.php

Multi-modality imaging features distinguish pancreatic carcinoma from mass-forming chronic pancreatitis of the pancreatic head

The present study retrospectively analyzed computerized tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography-computerized tomography (PET/CT) data to identify features that may distinguish pancreatic carcinoma (PC) from mass-forming chronic pancreatitis (MFCP) of the pancreatic head. The mean diameter of the lesions was larger in the MFCP patients (n=24) than in the PC patients (n=30; 5.44±27 vs. 3.34±1.23 cm; P<0.001). PC lesions showed increased lobulation when compared with the MFCP cases (83.33 vs. 12.5%; P<0.001). Lesions in the MFCP patients exhibited diffuse and marginally distributed calcification. MFCP patients showed increased exudation around the lesion (83.33 vs. 13.33%), pseudocyst formation (58.33 vs. 10%) and thickening of the right renal fascia (83.33 vs. 13.33%) than in the PC patients. MFCP patients also exhibited visible remnants of normal pancreatic tissue within the lesions. MFCP and PC patients could be distinguished by a cutoff value of 4.40 cm for lesion size [area under the curve (AUC): 0.894; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.810-0.978)], 21.85 Hu for net-increased value in the arterial phase (AUC, 0.799; 95% CI, 0.670-0.928), 37.70 Hu for net-increased value in the portal phase (AUC, 0.798; 95% CI, 0.919-0.677), 4.85 for early standardized uptake value (SUV) of 18F-deoxyglucose (18F-FDG; AUC, 0.934; 95% CI, 0.850-1.018) and 4.90 for delayed SUV of 18F-FDG (AUC, 0.958; 95% CI, 0.878-1.038). These findings demonstrated that the integration of data from dynamic contrast-enhanced CT, MRI and PET/CT imaging may distinguish MFCP from PC.

Establishment and Verification of a Scoring Model for the Differential Diagnosis of Pancreatic Cancer and Chronic Pancreatitis

OBJECTIVES

The aims of this study were to establish a scoring model for the differential diagnosis of pancreatic cancer (PC) and chronic pancreatitis (CP) and to evaluate its diagnostic efficacy.

METHODS

The data of 502 patients with PC and 210 patients with CP at the Peking Union Medical College Hospital from January 1999 to December 2013 were retrospectively analyzed. Binary logistic regression was applied to establish the prediction model for the differential diagnosis. The model was verified using the method of leave-one-out cross-validation.

RESULTS

The scoring system was established with 5 variables including age, carbohydrate antigen 19-9 level, splenic vein invasion, irregular dilatation of the pancreatic duct, and nontruncated pancreatic duct stenosis. The score range was from -2 to 3. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the objects was 0.779 (95% confidence interval, 0.744-0.814) (P < 0.01), indicating that the scoring system is good at differentiation of PC with CP. With a score of 1 as the diagnostic cut-off value, the diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy rate were 71.3%, 69.0%, 70.0%, 71.4%, and 70.2%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The scoring model may improve the differential diagnosis of PC and CP and be useful in clinical practice.

Dysregulation of signaling pathways associated with innate antibacterial immunity in patients with pancreatic cancer

Disorders of innate antibacterial response are of fundamental importance in the development of gastrointestinal cancers, including pancreatic cancer. Multi-regulatory properties of the Toll-like receptors (TLRs) (e.g., regulation of proliferation, the activity of NF-κB, gene transcription of apoptosis proteins, regulation of angiogenesis, HIF-1α protein expression) are used in experimental studies to better understand the pathogenesis of pancreatic cancer, for early diagnosis, and for more effective therapeutic intervention. There are known numerous examples of TLR agonists (e.g., TLR2/5 ligands, TLR6, TLR9) of antitumor effect. The direction of these studies is promising, but a small number of them does not allow for an accurate assessment of the impact of TLR expression disorders, proteins of these signaling pathways, or attempts to block or stimulate them, on the results of treatment of pancreatic cancer patients. It is known, however, that the expression disorders of proteins of innate antibacterial response signaling pathways occur not only in tumor tissue but also in peripheral blood leukocytes of pancreatic cancer patients (e.g., increased expression of TLR4, NOD1, TRAF6), which is one of the most important factors facilitating further tumor development. This review mainly focuses on the genetic aspects of signaling pathway disorders associated with innate antibacterial response in the pathogenesis and diagnosis of pancreatic cancer.

[Surgical management of chronic pancreatitis complicated by biliary and duodenal obstruction]

AIM

To compare different surgical approaches to chronic pancreatitis complicated by biliary and duodenal obstruction.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In the study (n=42) and control (n=36) groups 18 and 4 resections were performed respectively (p=0.004). Early postoperative complications occurred in 15 cases of the study group and 4 cases of the control group (p=0.024). 7 and 1 re-operations were made in both groups respectively (p=0.99). There was no postoperative mortality in both groups. There were 4 cases of return to false-negative results of intraoperative biopsy in the control group. In these patients resection was possible during primary surgery.

CONCLUSION

Resections are advisable for chronic pancreatitis complicated by obstructive jaundice and duodenal obstruction because it eliminates biliary and duodenal obstruction and can accurately determine the nature of disease.

Chronic Pancreatitis: A Review

This is to incorporate the recent trends in chronic pancreatitis. Extensive literature search was done from Pubmed and Ovid SP. Full text articles and abstracts related to chronic pancreatitis were reviewed and the article was prepared. Chronic pancreatitis is evolving fast on its etiology and treatment areas. The main etiological factors are pointing towards genetic, alcohol, and smoking. Autoimmune has also been added as a cause. Endoscopic ultra sound (EUS) becoming the standard diagnostic procedure. Surgery is becoming the treatment of choice for pain and mechanical complications and not the endotherapy in the long-term follow-up. The numbers of surgeries are getting narrowed down. The two etiological groups of chronic pancreatitis namely alcohol + smoking and genetic getting clearer, where the later group present at an early age. Endoscopic ultrasound and imaging with secretin is diagnostic of chronic pancreatitis before the structural changes. Endotherapy is found to be inferior to surgery in long-term pain relief. Diagnostic criteria for autoimmune pancreatitis are established. Pancreaticogenic diabetes (Type3c) and its problem associated with fat malabsorption are being understood.

Clinical profile of PanIN lesions in tropical chronic pancreatitis

BACKGROUND

Chronic pancreatitis (CP) found in the tropical countries is known to have a higher risk for carcinoma of the pancreas. This study aimed to explore the clinical profile of pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PanIN), one of the precursors of carcinoma of the pancreas, in tropical CP and to identify the possible clinical predictors of the same.

METHODOLOGY

A retrospective study was done enrolling patients who underwent either Frey's procedure or pancreatic resection for symptomatic CP, between January 2008 and December 2012. They were grouped into PanIN positive and PanIN negative based on histopathology. Their clinical and laboratory parameters were compared statistically to identify the predictors of the PanIN status.

RESULTS

Sixty-two tropical CP patients who had Frey's procedure or pancreatic resection were enrolled into this study; 38.7 % cases showed PanIN changes and 61.29 % had no PanIN changes. Majority of the clinical and laboratory parameters were found comparable between the two groups except obstructive jaundice and CA 19-9 value >137.5 which were there in 54.2 % of PanIN-positive cases. On histopathology, 54.83 % cases were benign CP and 45.16 % were malignant CP. Among the benign CP, 33.3 % were PanIN positive and among those with malignancy 66.7 % were PanIN positive. Low-grade PanINs were seen in 73 % cases of benign CP and in 26.1 % of malignancy whereas high-grade PanIN-3 lesions were seen exclusively in patients with malignancy.

CONCLUSION

High-grade PanIN-3 lesions showed significant association with pancreatic malignancy. Obstructive jaundice and CA 19-9 ≥ 137.5 could predict PanIN positivity.

Pancreatic cancer in chronic pancreatitis

Data exists to indicate a definite association between chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer. The strength of this association varies between various causes of pancreatitis, with hereditary and tropical pancreatitis more likely to result in malignancy. Pathogenesis may involve genetic factors, diabetes, smoking and alcohol consumption. Clinically a significant overlap exists between the two conditions, with histology difficult to obtain and interpret in this setting. Biomarkers like CA19-9 and others may be useful, as is a variety of newer imaging modalities. Treatment needs to be individualised as surgery offers the only chance of cure, albeit in but a few.