Tumor differentiation as related to sentinel lymph node status in gastric cancer

Assessment of lymphatic flow based on the sentinel node concept in early gastric adenocarcinoma that satisfies expanded endoscopic resection criteria

BACKGROUND

Even though indications for endoscopic resection (ER) in early gastric cancer are determined based on the potential risk of lymph node metastasis, the criteria for ER remain controversial. Sentinel node (SN) mapping for early gastric cancer can help determine regional lymphatic flow patterns. The aim of this study was to assess lymphatic flow according to the SN concept in patients with early gastric cancer, especially those who satisfy the expanded criteria for ER.

METHODS

We retrospectively enrolled 301 patients diagnosed with pT1 adenocarcinoma who had undergone gastrectomy with SN mapping and had no lymphovascular invasion. Patients were categorized into six groups based on oncological assessment. We analyzed lymphatic flow, including the number of identified SN and SN basin, and the rate of SN metastasis in each group.

RESULTS

Of the 301 patients, 128 (42.5%) met the criteria for ER, with 18 in the absolute group and 110 in the expanded group; 173 (57.5%) were assigned to the surgical group. SN metastasis rate tended to be higher in surgical group patients than in ER criteria patients. In the expanded criteria group, the sub-group of patients with intramucosal, undifferentiated adenocarcinoma measuring 20 mm or less had a significantly greater number of identified SNs (p = 0.013) and SN basins (p = 0.032). Furthermore, SN metastasis was observed only in this group.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with intramucosal, nonulcerated, undifferentiated adenocarcinoma measuring 20 mm or less could develop a lymphatic network. For these patients, careful follow-up is required after ER.

Clinical significance of lymphadenectomy in patients with gastric cancer

Approximately thirty percent of patients with gastric cancer undergo an avoidable lymph node dissection with a higher rate of postoperative complication. Comparing the D1 and D2 dissections, it was found that there is a significant difference in morbidity, favoured D1 dissection without any difference in overall survival. Subgroup analysis of patients with T3 tumor shows a survival difference favoring D2 lymphadenectomy, and there is a better gastric cancer-related death and non-statistically significant improvement of survival for node-positive disease in patients with D2 dissection. However, the extended lymphadenectomy could improve stage-specific survival owing to the stage migration phenomenon. The deployment of centralization and application of national guidelines could improve the surgical outcomes. The Japanese and European guidelines enclose the D2 lymphadenectomy as the gold standard in R0 resection. In the individualized, stage-adapted gastric cancer surgery the Maruyama computer program (MCP) can estimate lymph node involvement preoperatively with high accuracy and in addition the Maruyama Index less than 5 has a better impact on survival, than D-level guided surgery. For these reasons, the preoperative application of MCP is recommended routinely, with an aim to perform “low Maruyama Index surgery”. The sentinel lymph node biopsy (SNB) may decrease the number of redundant lymphadenectomy intraoperatively with a high detection rate (93.7%) and an accuracy of 92%. More accurate stage-adapted surgery could be performed using the MCP and SNB in parallel fashion in gastric cancer.