Benefits of post-operative oral protein supplementation in gastrointestinal surgery patients: A systematic review of clinical trials

The effect of post-discharge oral nutritional supplements on outcomes after gastrointestinal surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Malnutrition is a risk-factor for adverse postoperative outcomes. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the impact of post-discharge oral nutritional supplements (ONS) on outcomes in patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery.

METHODS

The Medline and Embase databases were searched for randomised clinical trials in patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery who had received ONS for at least two weeks after discharge from hospital. The primary endpoint was weight change. Secondary endpoints included quality of life, total lymphocyte count, total serum protein and serum albumin. Analysis was performed using RevMan5.4 software.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies with 2480 participants (1249 ONS/1231 controls) were included. Pooling of results revealed that a reduction in postoperative weight loss in patients taking ONS, when compared with control: overall weighted mean difference (WMD) -1.69 kg, 95% CI -2.98 to -0.41, P = 0.01. Serum albumin concentration was increased in the ONS group: WMD = 1.06 g/L, 95% CI 0.04 to 2.07, P = 0.04. Haemoglobin was also increased: WMD = 2.91 g/L, 95% CI 0.58 to 5.25, P = 0.01. Total serum protein, total lymphocyte count, total cholesterol and quality of life did not differ between the groups. Patient compliance was relatively poor across the studies and there was variability in the composition of ONS, volume consumed and surgical procedures performed.

CONCLUSIONS

There was a reduction in postoperative weight loss and an improvement in some biochemical parameters in patients receiving ONS after gastrointestinal surgery. Future RCTs with more consistent methodologies are needed to investigate the efficacy of ONS after discharge from hospital following gastrointestinal surgery.

Feasibility study of a randomised controlled trial of preoperative and postoperative nutritional supplementation in major lung surgery

OBJECTIVES

Malnutrition and weight loss are important risk factors for complications after lung surgery. However, it is uncertain whether modifying or optimising perioperative nutritional state with oral supplements results in a reduction in malnutrition, complications or quality of life.

DESIGN

A randomised, open label, controlled feasibility study was conducted to assess the feasibility of carrying out a large multicentre randomised trial of nutritional intervention. The intervention involved preoperative carbohydrate-loading drinks (4×200 mL evening before surgery and 2×200 mL the morning of surgery) and early postoperative nutritional protein supplement drinks two times per day for 14 days compared with the control group receiving an equivalent volume of water.

SETTING

Single adult thoracic centre in the UK.

PARTICIPANTS

All adult patients admitted for major lung surgery. Patients were included if were able to take nutritional drinks prior to surgery and give written informed consent. Patients were excluded if they were likely unable to complete the study questionnaires, they had a body mass index <18.5 kg/m², were receiving parenteral nutrition or known pregnancy.

RESULTS

All patients presenting for major lung surgery were screened over a 6-month period, with 163 patients screened, 99 excluded and 64 (41%) patients randomised. Feasibility criteria were met and the study completed recruitment 5 months ahead of target. The two groups were well balanced and tools used to measure outcomes were robust. Compliance with nutritional drinks was 97% preoperatively and 89% postoperatively; 89% of the questionnaires at 3 months were returned fully completed. The qualitative interviews demonstrated that the trial and the intervention were acceptable to patients. Patients felt the questionnaires captured their experience of recovery from surgery well.

CONCLUSION

A large multicentre randomised controlled trial of nutritional intervention in major lung surgery is feasible and required to test clinical efficacy in improving outcomes after surgery.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ISRCTN16535341.

Effects of Postdischarge High-Protein Oral Nutritional Supplements and Resistance Training in Malnourished Surgical Patients: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

The presence of malnutrition is increasingly becoming a postdischarge problem in surgical patients. We aimed to investigate whether oral nutritional supplements combined with resistance training could minimize skeletal muscle atrophy in surgical patients after discharge. This randomized controlled study was conducted at the Department of Surgery, National Hospital of Faroe Islands from 2018 to 2020. A total of 45 patients aged 37−74 years participated and were allocated to one of three groups: diet (DI; n = 13), exercise and diet (EX + DI; n = 16), or control (CON; n = 16). The intervention period lasted 8 weeks. The intervention groups received individual dietary counselling and a protein-rich oral nutritional supplement twice a day containing 22 g of protein/day. Patients in the EX + DI group were assigned to resistance training sessions. Patients in the CON group received standard care. The primary outcome was change in lean body mass (LBM). Secondary outcomes were change in body weight, handgrip strength, quality of life, surgery-related side effects, energy and protein intake, length of stay and one-year mortality. To estimate within-group changes, linear mixed models including group−time interactions as fixed effects and patients as random effects were fitted. Within-group change in LBM was 233, 813 and 78 g in the DI, EX + DI and CON groups, respectively, with no significant between-group difference (p > 0.05). Pain score declined more (p = 0.04) in the EX + DI group compared with the CON group. Body weight, handgrip strength, quality of life and surgery-related side effects did not differ between groups. At the end of study, mean cumulative weight change in the DI and EX + DI groups was 0.4% and 1.6%, respectively, whereas the CON group experienced a weight loss of −0.6%. No significant difference in primary outcome between groups was noted. However, our results indicate some benefits from exercise and nutrition for malnourished surgical patients.

Clinical application of protein-enhanced diet using mealworms in patients undergoing hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery

OBJECTIVE

Patients with or without cancers who undergo major gastrointestinal surgery experience malnutrition owing to their catabolic status during the postoperative period. In this study, we evaluated the effect of the clinical application of protein-enhanced diet using mealworms in patients who underwent hepato-pancreato-biliary surgeries.

METHODS

This study was designed as a prospective, two-armed, and double-blinded phase III study. The target number of enrolled patients was 216, and the patients were randomized on a 1:1 basis, either to the trial group (consuming mealworms) or to the control group (consuming grain powder). The primary endpoint was to examine the changes in body composition, including phase angle. For secondary outcomes, the activities of immune cells were evaluated using the patients' blood samples.

RESULTS

No difference in the demographic characteristics of patients was observed. The ratio of the actual protein intake to the recommended daily intake in the trial group was significantly higher than that in the control group (110.03% vs. 98.80%, P = 0.023). In the data on body composition measured by InBody S-10 (Biospace, Seoul, South Korea), the ratios in body cell mass, fat free mass, muscle mass, and phase angle at the study endpoint compared with those at admission showed no statistically significant difference between the two groups. Immune cell analyses suggested that cytotoxic T cells in the trial group had higher activity than in the study group (1.192 vs. 0.974, P = 0.028).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, protein-enhanced diet using mealworms clinically improved the activity of immune cells. However, it did not significantly improve the patients' nutritional status after they experienced hepato-pancreato-biliary surgeries.

Oral nutrition interventions in patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery for cancer: A systematic literature review

PURPOSE

Weight loss and poor food intake have been shown to affect several outcomes in patients undergoing surgery for gastrointestinal cancer. This review aims to examine the effect of pre-, post- or perioperative nutrition interventions focused on increasing oral energy or protein intake in patients undergoing surgery for gastrointestinal cancer. Interventions using standard oral nutrition supplements and/or dietary counselling were included. The primary outcome was weight change, and secondary outcomes were energy and protein intake. A secondary aim was to examine this effect in malnourished patients.

METHODS

Embase, Medline, CINAHL and CENTRAL were searched from inception to September 2019 for relevant randomised controlled trials. Study quality was assessed using the revised Cochrane Collaboration risk of bias tool for randomised trials. The quality of evidence for each outcome was assessed using GRADE.

RESULTS

Fourteen articles met the inclusion criteria. Studies assessed patients undergoing surgery for gastric, colorectal, oesophageal and pancreatic cancers. The interventions studied included oral nutrition supplements and/or dietary counselling. Five studies reported preoperative interventions; five studies reported post-operative interventions; six studies reported post-discharge interventions; and two studies reported perioperative interventions. Overall, low or very low quality evidence was found to support the use of oral nutrition supplements to positively influence weight and increase energy and protein intake in the preoperative period and immediate post-operative period. Very low quality evidence was found to support the use of oral nutrition interventions to influence weight, energy or protein intake in the post-discharge period. Very limited evidence with high risk of bias was found to support positive effects of nutrition intervention in malnourished patients.

CONCLUSIONS

This review demonstrates limited evidence for the use of oral nutrition supplements to increase intake and positively influence weight in patients undergoing surgery for gastrointestinal cancer. Overall, results were heterogeneous leading to inconsistent results. Further research into optimal nutrition support interventions and timing of interventions is required.

ACERTO guidelines of perioperative nutritional interventions in elective general surgery

ABSTRACT Objective: to present recommendations based on the ACERTO Project (Acceleration of Total Post-Operative Recovery) and supported by evidence related to perioperative nutritional care in General Surgery elective procedures. Methods: review of relevant literature from 2006 to 2016, based on a search conducted in the main databases, with the purpose of answering guiding questions previously formulated by specialists, within each theme of this guideline. We preferably used randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews and meta-analyzes but also selected some cohort studies. We contextualized each recommendation-guiding question to determine the quality of the evidence and the strength of this recommendation (GRADE). This material was sent to authors using an open online questionnaire. After receiving the answers, we formalized the consensus for each recommendation of this guideline. Results: the level of evidence and the degree of recommendation for each item is presented in text form, followed by a summary of the evidence found. Conclusion: this guideline reflects the recommendations of the group of specialists of the Brazilian College of Surgeons, the Brazilian Society of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition and the ACERTO Project for nutritional interventions in the perioperative period of Elective General Surgery. The prescription of these recommendations can accelerate the postoperative recovery of patients submitted to elective general surgery, with decrease in morbidity, length of stay and rehospitalization, and consequently, of costs.