Femoral Large Bore Sheath Management: How to Prevent Vascular Complications From Vessel Puncture to Sheath Removal

Transfemoral access is nowadays required for an increasing number of percutaneous procedures, such as structural heart interventions, mechanical circulatory support, and interventional electrophysiology/pacing. Despite technological advancements and improved techniques, these devices necessitate large-bore (≥12 French) arterial/venous sheaths, posing a significant risk of bleeding and vascular complications, whose occurrence has been related to an increase in morbidity and mortality. Therefore, optimizing large-bore vascular access management is crucial in endovascular interventions. Technical options, including optimized preprocedural planning and proper selection and utilization of vascular closure devices, have been developed to increase safety. This review explores the comprehensive management of large-bore accesses, from optimal vascular puncture to sheath removal. It also discusses strategies for managing closure device failure, with the goal of minimizing vascular complications.

Iliofemoral artery predilation prior to transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with aortic valve stenosis and advanced peripheral artery disease

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the feasibility and safety of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) of the iliofemoral arteries (IFA) before transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation (Tf-TAVI) in patients with advanced peripheral artery disease (PAD).

BACKGROUND

Although Tf-TAVI represents the access of choice, alternative vascular access routes are preferred for patients displaying advanced PAD. PTA of the IFA represents a less invasive option, broadening the spectrum of patients eligible for Tf-TAVI.

METHODS

All patients requiring PTA of the IFA before Tf-TAVI, between 2012 and 2021, were included. Primary efficacy endpoint was the rate of successful transcatheter heart valve (THV) delivery and implantation. Primary safety endpoint was the rate of PTA and access-site-related vascular complications, procedural- and in-hospital complications.

RESULTS

Among 2726 Tf-TAVI procedures, 59 patients required IFA predilation. Successful THV delivery and implantation was achieved in 57 (96.6%) patients, respectively. Sheath placement was achieved in 59 (100%) patients with only one minor dissection and no major vascular complications following iliofemoral PTA. Regarding access site complications, two (3.4%) vessel perforations and one (1.7%) vessel rupture were observed, with eight (13.5%) patients requiring unplanned endovascular interventions. There was one intraprocedural death due to THV-induced vessel laceration, while in-hospital all-cause mortality was 8.5% in the present high-risk patient cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

Predilation of IFA is safe and effective in patients with advanced PAD. Careful preprocedural planning is paramount in improving procedural safety and efficacy. This strategy has the potential to broaden the spectrum of patients eligible for Tf-TAVI.

Pledget-assisted hemostasis to fix residual access-site bleedings after double pre-closure technique

BACKGROUND

The use of pre-closure suture-based devices represents a widely access-site hemostasis technique in percutaneous transfemoral transcatheter-aortic-valve-replacement (TF-TAVR); yet this technique is associated with the risk of a device failure that may result in clinically relevant residual bleeding. Thus, a bailout intervention is needed. So far, the best management of pre-closure device failure has not been recognized.

AIM

To report the first clinical results obtained using a novel bailout hemostasis technique for patients with double suture-based vascular closure device failure in the setting of TF-TAVR.

METHODS

We developed a "pledget-assisted hemostasis" technique to manage residual access-site bleeding. This consists of the insertion of a surgical, non-absorbable, polytetrafluoroethylene pledget over the sutures of the two ProGlide (Abbott Vascular, CA, United States). The ProGlide's knot-pushers are used to push down the pledget and the hand-made slipknot to seal the femoral artery leak. This technique was used as a bailout strategy in patients undergoing TF-TAVR with a systematic double pre-closure technique. Post-procedural access-site angiography was systematically performed. In-hospital complications were systematically detected and classified according to Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 criteria.

RESULTS

Out of 136 consecutive patients who underwent TF-TAVR, 15 patients (mean age 80.0 ± 7.2 years, 66.7% female) with access-site bleeding after double pre-closure technique failure were treated by pledget-assisted hemostasis. In the majority of patients, 16F sheath was used (n = 12; 80%). In 2 cases (13%), a peripheral balloon was also inflated in the iliac artery to limit blood loss during pledget preparation. Angiography-confirmed hemostasis (primary efficacy endpoint) was achieved in all patients. After the procedure, 1 patient required blood transfusion (2 units), and no other bleeding or major ischemic complication was noticed.

CONCLUSION

The "pledget assisted hemostasis" might be considered as a possible bailout technique to treat patients with residual access site bleeding. Further studies are needed to compare this approach with other bail-out techniques.

Vascular Complications Among Patients Undergoing Trans-femoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: Prostar vs ProGlide Parallel Technique

Reliable femoral artery closure devices are essential for the success of trans-femoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) procedures. Accordingly, device choice might affect vascular complications and bleeding rates. This was a retrospective analysis, comparing vascular complication rates among patients who underwent trans-femoral TAVI with vascular access closure using either the ProGlide parallel suture or Prostar closure devices. We included 191 patients: 106 were treated with Prostar and 85 with ProGlide. The ProGlide group had higher rate of diabetes, chronic kidney disease, peripheral arterial disease, and significantly smaller femoral arteries that were treated via larger sheaths. Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC)-2 major complications were similar between the groups. (4.7% for ProGlide vs 3.8% for Prostar, P=1), with similar incidence of closure device failure (2 vs 3, P=1). No differences were found after univariant analysis and propensity-score matching in the incidence of major and minor bleeding nor in the rate of in-hospital mortality between ProGlide and Prostar (4.7 vs 2.8%, P=.7, 1.2 vs 2.8%, P=.63, and 1.2 vs .0%, P=.45, respectively). Parallel suture technique using two ProGlide sutures showed comparable rates of vascular complications to the Prostar closure device in higher risk population of TAVI patients.

Successfully managed access-site complication was not associated with worse outcome after percutaneous transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation: Up-to-date insights from the OCEAN-TAVI registry

BACKGROUND

Access-site complications during transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TF-TAVI) cause serious issues in the future, if unresolved, but the best strategies to manage these complications remains unclear. This study aimed to comprehensively assess access-site complications during percutaneous TF-TAVI in terms of their management.

METHODS

Using the prospective, multicentre, observational registry OCEAN (Optimized Transcatheter Valvular Intervention), 1497 patients who underwent percutaneous TF-TAVI between October 2013 and May 2017 were identified. The incidence, predictors, temporal changes, and prognosis of access-site complications along with its treatment strategy and re-intervention rate were evaluated.

RESULTS

Access-site complications occurred in 105 patients (7.0%) and was predicted with lower body-mass-index (OR, 0.94; 95% CI; 0.89-0.99; p = 0.03) and higher sheath-to-femoral-artery-ratio (OR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.03-1.24; p < 0.002). The incidence of access-site complications declined over time, irrespective of the increasing number of percutaneous TF-TAVI cases. Access-site complications were treated by conservative therapy (n = 19, 18%), interventional procedures (n = 42, 40%), rescue surgical repair (SR) (n = 10, 10%), and primary SR (n = 34, 32%). The severity of complications differed but the re-intervention rate was similar among 4 groups (p = 0.46). Re-intervention was not needed, except for a case of common femoral artery stenosis/occlusion induced by ProGlide. The need for all SRs decreased annually. Access-site complications were not associated with 30 days- and 1 year-survival rate.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of access-site complications was not low but has declined annually. Access-site complications are not related to worse outcomes after successful management. Interventional procedure is acceptable as the first-line strategy to treat access-site complications.

Vascular complications with a plug‐based vascular closure device after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: Predictors and bail‐outs

Background

The MANTA vascular closure device (VCD) is dedicated to large bore access closure and associated with favorable results in selected study populations. Anatomical predictors for access site complications are lacking.

Aim

To evaluate MANTA in a real‐world population and identify predictors for vascular complications.

Methods

All patients undergoing transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) between January 2016 and May 2020 with MANTA closure were included. Baseline characteristics were collected, pre‐procedural computed tomography and post‐deployment femoral angiograms were analyzed for anatomical differences. The primary endpoint was a composite of access site related major and minor vascular complications at 30 days follow‐up according to the VARC‐2 definitions. Secondary endpoints included bleeding, time to hemostasis, procedural length and incomplete arteriotomy closure or arterial occlusion by angiography. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to compare all‐cause mortality for patients with and without an access site complication.

Results

The 512 patients underwent TAVR with MANTA access closure. Median age was 80 (IQR 75–85), 53% was male, median BMI was 26.4 kg/m2 (IQR 23.4–29.7). Access site related major‐ or minor vascular complication occurred in 20 (4%) and 23 (4%) of patients respectively. Median time to hemostasis was 42 s (IQR 28–98). Post deployment angiogram showed an occlusion in 24 patients (5%), incomplete closure in 60 patients (12%) or both in three patients (1%). Of these 87 patients, 36 (41%) had a vascular complication. Femoral artery diameter (OR 0.70 [0.53–0.93]), low‐ (OR 3.47 [1.21–10.00]) and high (OR 2.43 [1.16–5.10]) arteriotomies were independent predictors for vascular complications.

Conclusion

In this contemporary TAVR population, access‐site related complications occurred in 8% of patients and were mainly due to percutaneous closure device failure. Small artery diameter and off‐target punctures were independent predictors.

The ARAHKEY technique: A novel method for the management of access site bleeding during percutaneous transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement

OBJECTIVE

This retrospective study assessed the safety and efficacy of the ARAHKEY (ARterial sealing with Additional Hemostatic device Kissing with Extravascular and suture-based device deeplY) technique during transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).

BACKGROUND

Access site complications are still a major issue to be solved during TAVR using a large caliber sheath.

METHODS

From February 2014 to June 2019, a total of 302 patients underwent TAVR in our hospital. Twenty-five patients (10.2% of patients who underwent percutaneous transfemoral TAVR [n = 246]) were treated using the ARAHKEY technique, which is the additional use of Exoseal for the common femoral artery puncture site when hemostasis was not achieved with ProGlide alone.

RESULTS

Complete hemostasis was achieved in all patients (100%). The mean procedural time for hemostasis was 9.8 ± 4.5 min. No complications, including recurrent bleeding, infection, and late acquired hematoma, were observed in this study cohort.

CONCLUSION

The ARAHKEY technique is a safe method and should be considered as a secondary option when hemostasis is not achieved with ProGlide during TAVR.

Pivotal Clinical Study to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of the MANTA Percutaneous Vascular Closure Device

Background:

Open surgical closure and small-bore suture-based preclosure devices have limitations when used for transcatheter aortic valve replacement, percutaneous endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, or percutaneous thoracic endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. The MANTA vascular closure device is a novel collagen-based technology designed to close large bore arteriotomies created by devices with an outer diameter ranging from 12F to 25F. In this study, we determined the safety and effectiveness of the MANTA vascular closure device.

Methods and Results:

A prospective, single arm, multicenter investigation in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement, percutaneous endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, or thoracic endovascular aortic aneurysm repair at 20 sites in North America. The primary outcome was time to hemostasis. The primary safety outcomes were accessed site-related vascular injury or bleeding complications. A total of 341 patients, 78 roll-in, and 263 in the primary analysis cohort, were entered in the study between November 2016 and September 2017. For the primary analysis cohort, transcatheter aortic valve replacement was performed in 210 (79.8%), and percutaneous endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair or thoracic endovascular aortic aneurysm repair was performed in 53 (20.2%). The 14F MANTA was used in 42 cases (16%), and the 18F was used in 221 cases(84%). The mean effective sheath outer diameter was 22F (7.3 mm). The mean time to hemostasis was 65±157 seconds with a median time to hemostasis of 24 seconds. Technical success was achieved in 257 (97.7%) patients, and a single device was deployed in 262 (99.6%) of cases. Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 major vascular complications occurred in 11 (4.2%) cases: 4 received a covered stent (1.5%), 3 had access site bleeding (1.1%), 2 underwent surgical repair (0.8%), and 2 underwent balloon inflation (0.8%).

Conclusions:

In a selected population, this study demonstrated that the MANTA percutaneous vascular closure device can safely and effectively close large bore arteriotomies created by current generation transcatheter aortic valve replacement, percutaneous endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, and thoracic endovascular aortic aneurysm repair devices.

Clinical Trial Registration:

URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT02908880.

Transaxillary transcatheter aortic valve implantation utilizing a novel vascular closure device with resorbable collagen material: a feasibility study

OBJECTIVES

We herein aimed to evaluate technical feasibility of transaxillary (Tax) transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) utilizing a novel vascular closure device with a resorbable collagen plug and absence of suture material.

METHODS

Between 05/2018 and 8/2018, eight patients (76.0 ± 5.9 years, 62.5% male, logEuroSCORE I 23.6 ± 4.7) received Tax-TAVI using the MANTA™ vascular closure device. Implanted transcatheter heart valves consisted of Edwards Sapien 3, NVT Allegra, Medtronic CoreValve EvolutR and SJM Portico.

RESULTS

Puncture location depth was variable (3.5-7.5 cm). The left subclavian artery was used in five cases, the right subclavian artery in three cases. Low-pressure balloon-angioplasty for vessel closure was performed in 5/8 patients. VARC-2 defined device success was met in all patients. Major access site complication occurred in one patient with aneurysma spurium of the subclavian artery and consecutive stent implantation on postoperative day 5.

CONCLUSION

The MANTA™ device is applicable in Tax-TAVI, with potential particular advantages regarding easiness of use and marked access for subsequent interventions in case of vascular complications. Before conclusions regarding clinical efficacy and safety can be made, the device has to be evaluated in larger patient cohorts.