|
1
|
Jeżewski MP, Kubisa MJ, Eyileten C, De Rosa S, Christ G, Lesiak M, Indolfi C, Toma A, Siller-Matula JM, Postuła M. Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds-Dead End or Still a Rough Diamond? J Clin Med 2019; 8:E2167. [PMID: 31817876 PMCID: PMC6947479 DOI: 10.3390/jcm8122167] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2019] [Revised: 12/02/2019] [Accepted: 12/04/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Percutaneous coronary interventions with stent-based restorations of vessel patency have become the gold standard in the treatment of acute coronary states. Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS) have been designed to combine the efficiency of drug-eluting stents (DES) at the time of implantation and the advantages of a lack of foreign body afterwards. Complete resolution of the scaffold was intended to enable the restoration of vasomotor function and reduce the risk of device thrombosis. While early reports demonstrated superiority of BVS over DES, larger-scale application and longer observation exposed major concerns about their use, including lower radial strength and higher risk of thrombosis resulting in higher rate of major adverse cardiac events. Further focus on procedural details and research on the second generation of BVS with novel properties did not allow to unequivocally challenge position of DES. Nevertheless, BVS still have a chance to present superiority in distinctive indications. This review presents an outlook on the available first and second generation BVS and a summary of results of clinical trials on their use. It discusses explanations for unfavorable outcomes, proposed enhancement techniques and a potential niche for the use of BVS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mateusz P. Jeżewski
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, Centre for Preclinical Research and Technology, Medical University of Warsaw, 02091 Warsaw, Poland; (M.P.J.); (M.J.K.); (C.E.); (M.P.)
| | - Michał J. Kubisa
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, Centre for Preclinical Research and Technology, Medical University of Warsaw, 02091 Warsaw, Poland; (M.P.J.); (M.J.K.); (C.E.); (M.P.)
| | - Ceren Eyileten
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, Centre for Preclinical Research and Technology, Medical University of Warsaw, 02091 Warsaw, Poland; (M.P.J.); (M.J.K.); (C.E.); (M.P.)
| | - Salvatore De Rosa
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Division of Cardiology, “Magna Graecia” University, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy; (S.D.R.); (C.I.)
| | - Günter Christ
- Department of Cardiology, 5th Medical Department with Cardiology, Kaiser Franz Josef Hospital, 31100 Vienna, Austria;
| | - Maciej Lesiak
- 1st Department of Cardiology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 1061701 Poznań, Poland;
| | - Ciro Indolfi
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Division of Cardiology, “Magna Graecia” University, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy; (S.D.R.); (C.I.)
| | - Aurel Toma
- Department of Internal Medicine II, Division of Cardiology, Medical University of Vienna, 231090 Vienna, Austria;
| | - Jolanta M. Siller-Matula
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, Centre for Preclinical Research and Technology, Medical University of Warsaw, 02091 Warsaw, Poland; (M.P.J.); (M.J.K.); (C.E.); (M.P.)
- Department of Internal Medicine II, Division of Cardiology, Medical University of Vienna, 231090 Vienna, Austria;
| | - Marek Postuła
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, Centre for Preclinical Research and Technology, Medical University of Warsaw, 02091 Warsaw, Poland; (M.P.J.); (M.J.K.); (C.E.); (M.P.)
| |
Collapse
|