Peri-strut low-intensity area assessed by midterm follow-up optical coherence tomography may predict target lesion revascularisation after everolimus-eluting stent implantation

Comparison of MECHANISM of early and late vascular responses following treatment of ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction with two different everolimus-eluting stents: a randomized controlled trial of biodegradable versus durable polymer stents

The early and mid-term arterial healing profile of biodegradable polymer-coated everolimus-eluting stents (BP-EES) is unclear, especially in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) culprit lesions. This study aimed to compare early- and mid-term arterial healing between durable polymer-coated everolimus-eluting stents (DP-EES) and BP-EES in STEMI patients. In a prospective, multicenter, non-inferiority trial, STEMI patients were randomized to receive BP-EES (n = 60) or DP-EES (n = 60). The primary endpoint of this study was the mean percentage of covered struts (%covered struts) on FD-OCT 2 weeks post-PCI. Key secondary endpoints included the percentage of uncovered struts, frequency of abnormal intra-stent tissue, and percentage of malapposed struts by FD-OCT 2 weeks and 12 months post-PCI. They underwent serial frequency-domain optical coherence tomography (FD-OCT) evaluations immediately after percutaneous coronary intervention, and at 2 weeks and at 12 months after the procedure. The primary endpoint of %covered struts at 2 weeks was 71.4% in BP-EES and 72.3% in DP-EES [risk difference - 0.94%, lower limit of one-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) - 5.6; P_{non-inferiority} = 0.0756]. At 12 months, the mean percentage of uncovered struts was significantly lower [1.73% (95% CI 0.28-3.17) vs. 4.81% (95% CI 3.52-6.09); p = 0.002], and the average malapposed volume was significantly smaller in the BP-EES group than in the DP-EES group (p = 0.002). At 12 months, BP-EES had a significantly larger average neointimal area with a significantly smaller average intra-stent tissue unevenness score than DP-EES, suggesting more uniform neointimal coverage with BP-EES. Strut coverage was comparable between BP-EES and DP-EES at 2 weeks. Non-inferiority could not be proven because of an insufficient sample size. The significantly better arterial healing with BP-EES at 12 months suggests a safer profile for STEMI culprit lesions.Trial registration: jRCTs022180024 https://jrct.niph.go.jp/en-latest-detail/jRCTs022180024.

Long-Term Intracoronary Structural and Vasomotor Assessment of the ABSORB Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold

We systematically categorized the longer-term (≥3 years) structural and functional characteristics of the ABSORB bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) using optical coherence tomography imaging and coronary vasomotor reactivity testing and further compared the functional characteristics of BVS stented versus remote coronary segments. A total of 92 patients (mean age 56.4 ± 9.7 years, 22.8% women) who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (76% with acute coronary syndrome) using the ABSORB BVS (112 lesions) were included. Optical coherence tomography analysis (38,790 visible struts) comprised in-segment quantitative lumen/plaque and semiquantitative plaque composition analysis of the neointimal pattern. Epicardial endothelium-dependent and-independent vasomotion was defined as any vasodilatation at low/intermediate intracoronary dose of acetylcholine (ACh) and nitroglycerine, assessed using quantitative coronary angiography. At a median time of 3.2 years follow-up, 79.8% of BVS segments still demonstrated visible struts with a predominant neointimal fibrotic healing pattern in 84% of BVS segments, with 99.5% of struts demonstrating coverage with apposition. Compared with remote segments, BVS segments demonstrated less endothelium-dependent vasodilatation at low (p = 0.06) and intermediate ACh doses (p = 0.04). Hypertension, longer time interval from index percutaneous coronary intervention, and the degree of in-BVS segment neointimal volume (p <0.03 for all) were each independently associated with abnormal BVS endothelium-dependent vasomotor function. Endothelium-independent function was more likely preserved in non-BVS (remote) segments compared with BVS segments (p = 0.06). In conclusion, at 3+ years post-ABSORB BVS insertion, the rate of complete scaffold resorption was low and residual strut presence was high, with a dominant fibrous healing response contributing toward neointimal hyperplasia and endothelium-dependent and-independent vasomotor dysfunction.

A serial optical frequency-domain imaging study of early and late vascular responses to bioresorbable-polymer sirolimus-eluting stents for the treatment of acute myocardial infarction and stable coronary artery disease patients: results of the MECHANISM-ULTIMASTER study

The purpose of this study was to assess early and late vascular healing in response to bioresorbable-polymer sirolimus-eluting stents (BP-SESs) for the treatment of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and stable coronary artery disease (CAD). A total of 106 patients with STEMI and 101 patients with stable-CAD were enrolled. Optical frequency-domain images were acquired at baseline, at 1- or 3-month follow-up, and at 12-month follow-up. In the STEMI and CAD cohorts, the percentage of uncovered struts (%US) was significantly and remarkably decreased during early two points and at 12-month (the STEMI cohort: 1-month: 18.75 ± 0.78%, 3-month: 10.19 ± 0.77%, 12-month: 1.80 ± 0.72%; p < 0.001, the CAD cohort: 1-month: 9.44 ± 0.78%, 3-month: 7.78 ± 0.78%, 12-month: 1.07 ± 0.73%; p < 0.001 respectively). The average peri-strut low-intensity area (PLIA) score in the STEMI cohort was significantly decreased during follow-up period (1.90 ± 1.14, 1.18 ± 1.25, and 1.01 ± 0.72; p ≤ 0.001), whereas the one in the CAD cohort was not significantly changed (0.89 ± 1.24, 0.67 ± 1.07, and 0.64 ± 0.72; p = 0.59). In comparison with both groups, differences of %US and PLIA score at early two points were almost disappeared or close at 12 months. The strut-coverage and healing processes in the early phase after BP-SES implantation were significantly improved in both cohorts, especially markedly in STEMI patients. At 1 year, qualitatively and quantitatively consistent neointimal coverage was achieved in both pathogenetic groups.

Inflammation as a determinant of healing response after coronary stent implantation

Cardiovascular disease remains the leading cause of death and morbidity worldwide. Inflammation plays an important role in the development of atherosclerosis and is associated with adverse clinical outcomes in patients after percutaneous coronary interventions. Data on stent elements that lead to excessive inflammatory response, proper identification of high-risk patients, prevention and treatment targeting residual inflammatory risk are limited. This review aims to present the role of inflammation in the context of evolving stent technologies and appraise the potential imaging modalities in detection of inflammatory response and anti-inflammatory therapies.

Comparison of post-stent irregular protrusion and subsequent neointimal characteristics between second- and third-generation drug-eluting stent implantation

BACKGROUND

Third-generation drug-eluting-stents (3rd DES) may improve coronary arterial healing and reduce neoatherosclerosis formation. We evaluated post-stent findings and subsequent vascular healing of 3rd DES by comparing to second-generation drug-eluting-stents (2nd DES) at intermediate-term follow-up using optical coherence tomography (OCT).

METHOD

We evaluated 170 patients with 170 lesions who underwent DES implantation (2nd DES, n = 98; 3rd DES, n = 72) and OCT-guided follow-up examination. After propensity score (PS) matching for baseline clinical characteristics, OCT findings from 56 pairs of patients with 2nd DES and 3rd DES implants were compared. Post-stent irregular protrusion (IP) was defined as the protrusion of material with an irregular surface into the lumen between the stent struts. Neoatheroscleosis was defined as neointima contained heterogeneous pattern, rupture, lipid-laden, thin-cap fibroatheroma, or calcification. The presence of peri-strut low-intensity area (PLIA) and in-stent neointimal tissue characteristics were also analyzed at 6- to 8-month follow-up.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between the incidence of post-stent IP or neoatherosclerosis formation in the 2nd DES and the 3rd DES (45% vs. 38%, p = 0.44; 30% vs. 20%, p = 0.19, respectively). However, the incidences of PLIA and layered neointimal pattern, which indicate immature neointimal healing, were significantly lower in the 3rd DES compared to the 2nd DES (41% vs. 61%, p = 0.04; 2% vs. 11%, p = 0.04, respectively). As comparing intermediate-term follow-up OCT neointimal findings in patients with IP between 2nd DES and 3rd DES, most neointima tended to have a homogeneous pattern (95% versus 76%, p = 0.06) in the 3rd DES than in the 2nd DES.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of post-stent IP and subsequent neoatherosclerosis formation at intermediate-term follow-up after stent implantation were similar between patients with 2nd DES and 3rd DES, however, vascular healing might be favorable when using 3rd DES.