1
|
Tekieli L, Dzierwa K, Grunwald IQ, Mazurek A, Urbanczyk-Zawadzka M, Wiewiorka L, Banys RP, Dabrowski W, Podlasek A, Weglarz E, Stefaniak J, Nizankowski RT, Musialek P. Outcomes in acute carotid-related stroke eligible for mechanical reperfusion: SAFEGUARD-STROKE Registry. THE JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY 2024; 65:231-248. [PMID: 39007556 DOI: 10.23736/s0021-9509.24.13093-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/16/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Carotid-related strokes (CRS) are largely unresponsive to intravenous thrombolysis and are often large and disabling. Little is known about contemporary CRS referral pathways and proportion of eligible patients who receive emergency mechanical reperfusion (EMR). METHODS Referral pathways, serial imaging, treatment data, and neurologic outcomes were evaluated in consecutive CRS patients presenting over 18 months in catchment area of a major carotid disease referral center with proximal-protected CAS expertise, on-site neurology, and stroke thrombectomy capability (Acute Stroke of CArotid Artery Bifurcation Origin Treated With Use oF the MicronEt-covered CGUARD Stent - SAFEGUARD-STROKE Registry; companion to SAFEGUARD-STROKE Study NCT05195658). RESULTS Of 101 EMR-eligible patients (31% i.v.-thrombolyzed, 39.5% women, age 39-89 years, 94.1% ASPECTS 9-10, 90.1% pre-stroke mRS 0-1), 57 (56.4%) were EMR-referred. Referrals were either endovascular (Comprehensive Stroke Centre, CSC, 21.0%; Stroke Thrombectomy-Capable CAS Centre, STCC, 70.2%) or to vascular surgery (VS, 1.8%), with >1 referral attempt in 7.0% patients (CSC/VS or VS/CSC or CSC/VS/STCC). Baseline clinical and imaging characteristics were not different between EMR-treated and EMR-untreated patients. EMR was delivered to 42.6% eligible patients (emergency carotid surgery 0%; STCC rejections 0%). On multivariable analysis, non-tandem CRS was a predictor of not getting referred for EMR (OR 0.36; 95%CI 0.14-0.93, P=0.03). Ninety-day neurologic status was profoundly better in EMR-treated patients; mRS 0-2 (83.7% vs. 34.5%); mRS 3-5 (11.6% vs. 53.4%), mRS 6 (4.6% vs. 12.1%); P<0.001 for all. CONCLUSIONS EMR-treatment substantially improves CRS neurologic outcomes but only a minority of EMR-eligible patients receive EMR. To increase the likelihood of brain-saving treatment, EMR-eligible stroke referral and management pathways, including those for CSC/VS-rejected patients, should involve stroke thrombectomy-capable centres with endovascular carotid treatment expertise.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lukasz Tekieli
- Stroke Thrombectomy-Capable Center, St. John Paul II Hospital, Krakow, Poland -
- Department of Cardiac and Vascular Diseases, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland -
- Department of Interventional Cardiology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland -
| | - Karolina Dzierwa
- Cardiovascular Imaging Laboratory, St. John Paul II Hospital, Krakow, Poland
| | - Iris Q Grunwald
- Division of Imaging Science and Technology, School of Medicine, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
- Department of Radiology, University of Dundee Ninewells Hospital, Dundee, UK
| | - Adam Mazurek
- Stroke Thrombectomy-Capable Center, St. John Paul II Hospital, Krakow, Poland
- Department of Cardiac and Vascular Diseases, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland
| | | | - Lukasz Wiewiorka
- Department of Radiology, St. John Paul II Hospital, Krakow, Poland
| | - R Pawel Banys
- Department of Radiology, St. John Paul II Hospital, Krakow, Poland
| | - Wladyslaw Dabrowski
- Department of Interventional Cardiology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland
| | - Anna Podlasek
- Tayside Innovation MedTech Ecosystem (TIME), University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
- Precison Imaging Beacon, Radiological Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Ewa Weglarz
- Department of Interventional Cardiology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland
- Department of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland
| | - Justyna Stefaniak
- Department of Bioinformatics and Telemedicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland
| | - Rafal T Nizankowski
- Quality Promotion in Healthcare, Sano Center for Computational Medicine, Krakow, Poland
| | - Piotr Musialek
- Stroke Thrombectomy-Capable Center, St. John Paul II Hospital, Krakow, Poland
- Department of Cardiac and Vascular Diseases, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mazurek A, Malinowski K, Sirignano P, Kolvenbach R, Capoccia L, DE Donato G, VAN Herzeele I, Siddiqui AH, Castrucci T, Tekieli L, Stefanini M, Wissgott C, Rosenfield K, Metzger DC, Snyder K, Karpenko A, Kuczmik W, Stabile E, Knapik M, Casana R, Pieniazek P, Podlasek A, Taurino M, Schofer J, Cremonesi A, Sievert H, Schmidt A, Grunwald IQ, Speziale F, Setacci C, Musialek P. Carotid artery revascularization using second generation stents versus surgery: a meta-analysis of clinical outcomes. THE JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY 2023; 64:570-582. [PMID: 38385840 DOI: 10.23736/s0021-9509.24.12933-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/23/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Meta-analyses and emerging randomized data indicate that second-generation ('mesh') carotid stents (SGS) may improve outcomes versus conventional (single-layer) stents but clinically-relevant differences in individual SGS-type performance have been identified. No comparisons exist for SGS versus carotid endarterectomy (CEA). EVIDENCE ACQUISITION Thirty-day death (D), stroke (S), myocardial infarction (M), and 12-month ipsilateral stroke and restenosis in SGS studies were meta-analyzed (random effect model) against CEA outcomes. Eligible studies were identified through PubMed/EMBASE/COCHRANE. Forest plots were formed for absolute adverse evet risk in individual studies and for relative outcomes with each SGS deign versus contemporary CEA outcomes as reference. Meta-regression was performed to identify potential modifiers of treatment modality effect. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Data were extracted from 103,642 patients in 25 studies (14 SGS-treated, 41% symptomatic; nine randomized controlled trial (RCT)-CEA-treated, 37% symptomatic; and two Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI)-CEA-treated, 23% symptomatic). Casper/Roadsaver and CGuard significantly reduced DSM versus RCT-CEA (-2.70% and -2.95%, P<0.001 for both) and versus VQI-CEA (-1.11% and -1.36%, P<0.001 for both). Gore stent 30-day DSM was similar to RCT-CEA (P=0.581) but increased against VQI-CEA (+2.38%, P=0.033). At 12 months, Casper/Roadsaver ipsilateral stroke rate was lower than RCT-CEA (-0.75%, P=0.026) and similar to VQI-CEA (P=0.584). Restenosis with Casper/Roadsaver was +4.18% vs. RCT-CEA and +4.83% vs. VQI-CEA (P=0.005, P<0.001). CGuard 12-month ipsilateral stroke rate was similar to VQI-CEA (P=0.850) and reduced versus RCT-CEA (-0.63%, P=0.030); restenosis was reduced respectively by -0.26% and -0.63% (P=0.033, P<0.001). Twelve-month Gore stent outcomes were overall inferior to surgery. CONCLUSIONS Meta-analytic integration of available clinical data indicates: 1) reduction in stroke but increased restenosis rate with Casper/Roadsaver, and 2) reduction in both stroke and restenosis with CGuard MicroNET-covered stent against contemporary CEA outcomes at 30 days and 12 months used as a reference. This may inform clinical practice in anticipation of large-scale randomized trials powered for low clinical event rates (PROSPERO-CRD42022339789).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam Mazurek
- Department of Cardiac and Vascular Diseases, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland -
- St. John Paul II Hospital Stroke Thrombectomy-Capable Center, Krakow, Poland -
| | - Krzysztof Malinowski
- Department of Bioinformatics and Telemedicine, Faculty of Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland
- KCRI, Krakow, Poland
| | - Pasqualino Sirignano
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Sant'Andrea Hospital, La Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Ralf Kolvenbach
- Department of Vascular Surgery in Sana Kliniken, Düsseldorf Gerresheim, Germany
| | - Laura Capoccia
- Department of Vascular Surgery "Paride Stefanini", Policlinico Umberto I, La Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | | | | | - Adnan H Siddiqui
- Department of Radiology, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, and Canon Stroke and Vascular Research Center, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA
- Jacobs Institute, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Tomaso Castrucci
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Sant' Eugenio Hospital, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Lukasz Tekieli
- Department of Cardiac and Vascular Diseases, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland
- St. John Paul II Hospital Stroke Thrombectomy-Capable Center, Krakow, Poland
- Department of Interventional Cardiology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland
| | - Matteo Stefanini
- Department of Radiology and Interventional Radiology, Casilino Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Christian Wissgott
- Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie/Neuroradiologie, Imland Klinik Rendsburg, Rendsburg, Germany
| | - Kenneth Rosenfield
- Section of Vascular Medicine and Intervention, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Kenneth Snyder
- Department of Neurosurgery, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Andrey Karpenko
- Center of Vascular and Hybrid Surgery, E.N. Meshalkin National Medical Research Center, Novosibirsk, Russia
| | - Waclaw Kuczmik
- Department of General, Vascular Surgery, Angiology and Phlebology, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland
| | - Eugenio Stabile
- Dipartimento Cardiovascolare, Azienda Ospedaliera Regionale "San Carlo", Potenza, Italy
| | - Magdalena Knapik
- Department of Radiology, Podhalanski Multispecialty Regional Hospital, Nowy Targ, Poland
| | - Renato Casana
- Vascular Surgery Unit, IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano, Milan, Italy
| | - Piotr Pieniazek
- Department of Cardiac and Vascular Diseases, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland
- Department of Interventional Cardiology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland
| | - Anna Podlasek
- Tayside Innovation MedTech Ecosystem (TIME), University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
- Precison Imaging Beacon, Radiological Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Maurizio Taurino
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Sant'Andrea Hospital, La Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Joachim Schofer
- MVZ-Department Structural Heart Disease, Asklepios Clinic St Georg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Alberto Cremonesi
- Department of Cardiology, Humanitas Gavazzeni, Bergamo, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| | - Horst Sievert
- Department of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, Cardiovascular Center, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Andrej Schmidt
- Department of Angiology, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Iris Q Grunwald
- Tayside Innovation MedTech Ecosystem (TIME), University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
- Department of Radiology Ninewells Hospital, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
| | - Francesco Speziale
- Department of Vascular Surgery "Paride Stefanini", Policlinico Umberto I, La Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Carlo Setacci
- Department of Vascular Surgery, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | - Piotr Musialek
- Department of Cardiac and Vascular Diseases, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland
- St. John Paul II Hospital Stroke Thrombectomy-Capable Center, Krakow, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Shahat M, Cieri E, Rocha-Neves J, Sa K. Carotid stenting: Does stent design matter? Vascular 2023:17085381231160957. [PMID: 36867405 DOI: 10.1177/17085381231160957] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Carotid artery stenting (CAS) is considered an important tool in carotid revascularization. Carotid artery stenting is usually performed by using self-expandable stent with different designs. The stent design influences many physical characteristics. Also, it may affect the complication rate with special relevance to perioperative stroke, hemodynamic instability, and late restenosis. METHODS This study comprised all consecutive patients who underwent carotid artery stenting for atherosclerotic carotid stenosis from March 2014 to May 2021. Both symptomatic patient and asymptomatic patients were included. Patients with a symptomatic carotid stenosis of ≥50% or asymptomatic carotid stenosis of ≥60% were selected for carotid artery stenting . Patients with fibromuscular dysplasia and acute or unstable plaque were not included. Variables of clinical relevance were tested in multivariable analysis using binary logistic regression model. RESULTS A total of 728 patients were enrolled. The majority of this cohort was asymptomatic (578/728, 79.4%), while 150/728 (20.6%) were symptomatic. The mean degree of carotid stenosis was 77.82 ± 4.73%, with a mean plaque length of 1.76 ± 0.55 cm. A total of 277 (38%) patients were treated with Xact® Carotid Stent System. Successful carotid artery stenting was achieved in 698 (96%) of patients. Of these patients, stroke rate in symptomatic patients was nine (5.8%), while in asymptomatic patients was 20 (3.4%). In a multivariable analysis, the open-cell carotid stent was not associated with a differential risk for combined acute and sub-acute neurologic complications as compared with closed-cell stents. Patients treated with open cell stents had a significantly lower rate of procedural hypotension (P 0.0188) at bivariate analysis. CONCLUSION Carotid artery stenting is considered a safe alternative to CEA that can be used in selected average surgical risk patient. Different stent designs can affect the rate of major adverse events in carotid artery stenting patients, but further studies are necessary with avoiding different bias to study the effect of different stent designs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamed Shahat
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, 68866Assiut University Hospital, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt
| | - Enrico Cieri
- 9309Vascular and endovascular surgery unit university of Perugia, ospedale S.Maria della Misericordia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Joao Rocha-Neves
- Department of Biomedicine - Unit of Anatomy, 68797Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade do Porto, Portugal
| | - Khairy Sa
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, 68866Assiut University Hospital, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Stabile E, Gerardi D. Carotid Artery Stenting With Dual-Layer Stent: Expanding Evidence With a Randomized Trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2021; 14:2388-2390. [PMID: 34736738 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.08.051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2021] [Accepted: 08/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Eugenio Stabile
- Cardiovascular Department, Azienda Ospedaliera Regionale "San Carlo," Potenza, Italy.
| | - Donato Gerardi
- Division of Cardiology, Azienda Ospedaliera Regionale "San Carlo"-"San Giovanni di Dio" Hospital, Melfi, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Karpenko A, Bugurov S, Ignatenko P, Starodubtsev V, Popova I, Malinowski K, Musialek P. Randomized Controlled Trial of Conventional Versus MicroNet-Covered Stent in Carotid Artery Revascularization. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2021; 14:2377-2387. [PMID: 34736737 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.08.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2021] [Revised: 07/27/2021] [Accepted: 08/03/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to compare procedure-related ipsilateral cerebral embolism with a conventional (Acculink, Abbott Vascular) versus a MicroNet-covered (CGuard, InspireMD) stent in carotid artery stenting (CAS). BACKGROUND The MicroNet-covered stent may reduce periprocedural cerebral embolism in CAS, but level 1 evidence is lacking. METHODS A total of 100 consecutive patients were randomized 1:1 to filter-protected CAS using the Acculink or the CGuard device. The study was powered for its primary endpoint of at least 50% reduction in ipsilateral diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging lesion average volume 48 hours postprocedure (blinded external core laboratory analysis). RESULTS The baseline characteristics of the study groups were similar. Eighty-two (total volume = 18,212 mm3) diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging postprocedural cerebral lesions occurred in 26 Acculink-treated patients and 45 lesions (total volume = 3,930 mm3; 78.4% reduction) in 25 CGuard-treated patients. New cerebral lesion average volume was 171 mm3 vs 73 mm3 (P = 0.017) per affected patient and 222 mm3 vs 84 mm3 (P = 0.038) per lesion (Acculink vs CGuard). In lesion-affected patients, the average sum of lesion volumes was 701 mm3 vs 157 mm3 (P = 0.007). The Acculink significantly increased the risk for multiple (≥5) cerebral lesions (relative risk: 7.8; 95% CI: 1.3-14.9; P = 0.021). At 30 days, new permanent (fluid-attenuated inversion recovery) lesion prevalence was 3:1 (P < 0.001), with total permanent lesion volume 7,474 mm3 vs 574 mm3 (92.3% reduction with the CGuard). There were 6 vs 0 new ipsilateral lesions (P = 0.030) and 2 versus 0 strokes. CONCLUSIONS The MicroNet-covered stent significantly reduced periprocedural and abolished postprocedural cerebral embolism in relation to a conventional carotid stent. This is consistent with the MicroNet-covered stent's sustained embolism prevention, translating into cerebral protection not only during but also after CAS. The present findings may influence decision making in carotid revascularization. (The SIBERIA Trial [Acculink™ Versus CGuard™]; NCT03488199).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrey Karpenko
- Centre of Vascular and Hybrid Surgery, E.N. Meshalkin National Medical Research Center, Novosibirsk, Russia.
| | - Savr Bugurov
- Centre of Vascular and Hybrid Surgery, E.N. Meshalkin National Medical Research Center, Novosibirsk, Russia
| | - Pavel Ignatenko
- Centre of Vascular and Hybrid Surgery, E.N. Meshalkin National Medical Research Center, Novosibirsk, Russia
| | - Vladimir Starodubtsev
- Centre of Vascular and Hybrid Surgery, E.N. Meshalkin National Medical Research Center, Novosibirsk, Russia
| | - Irina Popova
- Centre of Vascular and Hybrid Surgery, E.N. Meshalkin National Medical Research Center, Novosibirsk, Russia
| | | | - Piotr Musialek
- Jagiellonian University, Department of Cardiac and Vascular Diseases, John Paul II Hospital, Krakow, Poland.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Schneider G, Massmann A, Fries P, Frenzel F, Buecker A, Raczeck P. Safety of Catheter Embolization of Pulmonary Arteriovenous Malformations-Evaluation of Possible Cerebrovascular Embolism after Catheter Embolization of Pulmonary Arteriovenous Malformations in Patients with Hereditary Hemorrhagic Telangiectasia/Osler Disease by Pre- and Post-Interventional DWI. J Clin Med 2021; 10:887. [PMID: 33671708 PMCID: PMC7926997 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10040887] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2021] [Revised: 02/11/2021] [Accepted: 02/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This paper aimed to prospectively evaluate the safety of embolization therapy of pulmonary arteriovenous malformations (PAVMs) for the detection of cerebral infarctions by pre- and post-interventional MRI. Method One hundred and five patients (male/female = 44/61; mean age 48.6+/-15.8; range 5-86) with pre-diagnosed PAVMs on contrast-enhanced MRA underwent embolization therapy. The number of PAVMs treated in each patient ranged from 1-8 PAVMs. Depending on the size and localization of the feeding arteries, either Nester-Coils or Amplatzer vascular plugs were used for embolization therapy. cMRI was performed immediately before, and at the 4 h and 3-month post-embolization therapy. Detection of peri-interventional cerebral emboli was performed via T2w and DWI sequences using three different b-values, with calculation of ADC maps. Results Embolization did not show any post-/peri-interventional, newly developed ischemic lesions in the brain. Only one patient who underwent re-embolization and was previously treated with tungsten coils that corroded over time showed newly developed, small, diffuse emboli in the post-interventional DWI sequence. This patient already had several episodes of brain emboli before re-treatment due to the corroded coils, and during treatment, when passing the corroded coils, experienced additional small, clinically inconspicuous brain emboli. However, this complication was anticipated but accepted, since the vessel had to be occluded distally. Conclusion Catheter-based embolization of PAVMs is a safe method for treatment and does not result in clinically inconspicuous cerebral ischemia, which was not demonstrated previously.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guenther Schneider
- Clinic of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Saarland University Medical Center, Kirrberger Str. 1, 66421 Homburg, Germany; (A.M.); (P.F.); (F.F.); (A.B.); (P.R.)
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Transient flow reversal combined with sustained embolic prevention in transcervical revascularization of symptomatic and highly-emboligenic carotid stenoses for optimized endovascular lumen reconstruction and improved peri- and post-procedural outcomes. ADVANCES IN INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY 2020; 16:495-506. [PMID: 33598027 PMCID: PMC7863838 DOI: 10.5114/aic.2020.102134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2020] [Accepted: 12/20/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
|
8
|
Traenka C, Engelter ST, Brown MM, Dobson J, Frost C, Bonati LH. Silent brain infarcts on diffusion-weighted imaging after carotid revascularisation: A surrogate outcome measure for procedural stroke? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Stroke J 2019; 4:127-143. [PMID: 31259261 DOI: 10.1177/2396987318824491] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2018] [Accepted: 12/20/2018] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim To investigate whether lesions on diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI+) after carotid artery stenting (CAS) or endarterectomy (CEA) might provide a surrogate outcome measure for procedural stroke. Materials and Methods Systematic MedLine® database search with selection of all studies published up to the end of 2016 in which DWI scans were obtained before and within seven days after CAS or CEA. The correlation between the underlying log odds of stroke and of DWI+ across all treatment groups (i.e. CAS or CEA groups) from included studies was estimated using a bivariate random effects logistic regression model. Relative risks of DWI+ and stroke in studies comparing CAS vs. CEA were estimated using fixed-effect Mantel-Haenszel models. Results We included data of 4871 CAS and 2099 CEA procedures (85 studies). Across all treatment groups (CAS and CEA), the log odds for DWI+ was significantly associated with the log odds for clinically manifest stroke (correlation coefficient 0.61 (95% CI 0.27 to 0.87), p = 0.0012). Across all carotid artery stenting groups, the correlation coefficient was 0.19 (p = 0.074). There were too few CEA groups to reliably estimate a correlation coefficient in this subset alone. In 19 studies comparing CAS vs. CEA, the relative risks (95% confidence intervals) of DWI+ and stroke were 3.83 (3.17-4.63, p < 0.00001) and 2.38 (1.44-3.94, p = 0.0007), respectively. Discussion This systematic meta-analysis demonstrates a correlation between the occurrence of silent brain infarcts on diffusion-weighted imaging and the risk of clinically manifest stroke in carotid revascularisation procedures. Conclusion Our findings strengthen the evidence base for the use of DWI as a surrogate outcome measure for procedural stroke in carotid revascularisation procedures. Further randomised studies comparing treatment effects on DWI lesions and clinical stroke are needed to fully establish surrogacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher Traenka
- Stroke Center and Department of Neurology, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.,Neurorehabilitation Unit, University of Basel and University Center for Medicine of Aging and Rehabilitation, Felix Platter Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Stefan T Engelter
- Stroke Center and Department of Neurology, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.,Neurorehabilitation Unit, University of Basel and University Center for Medicine of Aging and Rehabilitation, Felix Platter Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Martin M Brown
- Stroke Research Group, Department of Brain Repair & Rehabilitation, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, UK
| | - Joanna Dobson
- Department of Medical Statistics, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Chris Frost
- Department of Medical Statistics, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Leo H Bonati
- Stroke Center and Department of Neurology, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.,Stroke Research Group, Department of Brain Repair & Rehabilitation, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Musiałek P, Hopkins LN, Siddiqui AH. One swallow does not a summer make but many swallows do: accumulating clinical evidence for nearly-eliminated peri-procedural and 30-day complications with mesh-covered stents transforms the carotid revascularisation field. ADVANCES IN INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY 2017; 13:95-106. [PMID: 28798779 PMCID: PMC5545669 DOI: 10.5114/pwki.2017.69012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2017] [Accepted: 07/10/2017] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Atherosclerotic carotid artery stenosis (CS) continues to be a common cause of acute ischaemic stroke. Optimised medical therapy (OMT), the first-line treatment modality in CS, may reduce or delay - but it does not abolish - CS-related strokes. As per current AHA/ASA and ESC/ESVS/ESO guidelines, carotid artery stenting (CAS) is a less-invasive alternative to carotid endarterectomy (CEA) for CS revascularisation in primary and secondary stroke prevention. Ten-year follow-up from the CREST trial in patients with symptomatic and asymptomatic CS confirmed equipoise of CAS and CEA in the primary endpoint. Nevertheless CAS - using a widely open-cell, first-generation stent and first-generation (distal/filter) neuroprotection - has been criticised for its relative excess of (mostly minor) strokes by 30 days, a significant proportion of which were post-procedural. Atherosclerotic plaque protrusion through conventional carotid stent struts, confirmed on intravascular imaging, has been implicated as a leading mechanism of the relative excess of strokes with CAS vs. CEA, including delayed strokes with CAS. Different designs of mesh-covered carotid stents have been developed to prevent plaque prolapse. Several multi-centre/multi-specialty clinical studies with CGurad MicroNet-Covered Embolic Prevention Stent System (EPS) and RoadSaver/Casper were recently published and included routine DW-MRI cerebral imaging peri-procedurally and at 30 days (CGuard EPS). Data from more than 550 patients in mesh-covered carotid stent clinical studies to-date show an overall 30-day complication rate of ~1% with near-elimination of post-procedural events. While more (and long-term) evidence is still anticipated, these results - taken together with optimised intra-procedural neuroprotection in CAS (increased use of proximal systems including trans-carotid dynamic flow reversal) and the positive 12-month mesh-covered stent data reports in 2017 - are transforming the carotid revascularisation field today. Establishing effective algorithms to identify the asymptomatic subjects at stroke risk despite OMT, and large-scale studies with mesh-covered stents including long-term clinical and duplex ultrasound outcomes, are the next major goals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Piotr Musiałek
- Department of Cardiac and Vascular Diseases, Jagiellonian University, School of Medicine, John Paul II Hospital, Krakow, Poland
| | - L. Nelson Hopkins
- Departments of Neurosurgery and Radiology, School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Jacobs Institute, Gates Vascular Institute Kaleida Health, Buffalo, New York, USA
| | - Adnan H. Siddiqui
- Departments of Neurosurgery and Radiology, School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Jacobs Institute, Gates Vascular Institute Kaleida Health, Buffalo, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kuliha M, Roubec M, Goldírová A, Hurtíková E, Jonszta T, Procházka V, Gumulec J, Herzig R, Školoudík D. Laboratory-Based Markers as Predictors of Brain Infarction During Carotid Stenting: a Prospective Study. J Atheroscler Thromb 2016; 23:839-47. [PMID: 26783048 PMCID: PMC7399266 DOI: 10.5551/jat.31799] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2015] [Accepted: 11/17/2015] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
AIM New ischemic lesions in the brain can be detected in approximately 50% of patients undergoing carotid artery stenting (CAS). We wished to discover the laboratory-based predictors of new infarctions in the brain after CAS. METHODS All consecutive patients with internal carotid artery stenosis of ≥70% with indication for CAS were enrolled in a prospective study for 16 months. All patients used dual antiplatelet therapy for ≥7 days before CAS. Neurologic examination and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain were undertaken before and at 24 h after CAS. Samples of venous blood were collected at <24 h before CAS for the evaluation of hematology, reticulocytes, coagulation markers (PT, APTT, Fbg, Clauss), vWF antigen, PAI-1 activity, PAI-1 polymorphism 4G/5G, and the multiplate (aspirin and clopidogrel) resistance test. Blood samples for the assessment of anti-Xa activity were collected during CAS. Differences in the values of laboratory markers between patients with and without new ischemic lesions of the brain on control MRI were evaluated. RESULTS The cohort comprised 81 patients (53 males; mean age, 67.3±7.2 years). New ischemic infarctions in the brain on control MRI were found in 46 (56.8%) patients. Three of seven patients with resistance to aspirin or clopidogrel had a new ischemic infarction in the brain. No significant differences for particular markers were found between patients with and without an ischemic lesion in the brain. CONCLUSION A high risk of a new ischemic infarction in the brain was detected in patients undergoing CAS, but a laboratory-based predictor of such an infarction could not be identified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Kuliha
- Department of Neurology, Comprehensive Stroke Center, University Hospital Ostrava, Czech Republic
- Department of Neurology and Center of Clinical Neuroscience, Charles University in Prague, 1st Faculty of Medicine and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Martin Roubec
- Department of Neurology, Comprehensive Stroke Center, University Hospital Ostrava, Czech Republic
| | - Andrea Goldírová
- Department of Neurology, Comprehensive Stroke Center, University Hospital Ostrava, Czech Republic
| | - Eva Hurtíková
- Department of Neurology, Comprehensive Stroke Center, University Hospital Ostrava, Czech Republic
| | - Tomáš Jonszta
- Department of Radiology, Comprehensive Stroke Center, University Hospital Ostrava, Czech Republic
| | - Václav Procházka
- Department of Radiology, Comprehensive Stroke Center, University Hospital Ostrava, Czech Republic
| | - Jaromír Gumulec
- Department of Hematology, Comprehensive Stroke Center, University Hospital Ostrava, Czech Republic
| | - Roman Herzig
- Department of Neurology, Comprehensive Stroke Center, Charles University Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic
| | - David Školoudík
- Department of Neurology, Comprehensive Stroke Center, University Hospital Ostrava, Czech Republic
- Department of Neurology and Center of Clinical Neuroscience, Charles University in Prague, 1st Faculty of Medicine and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
- Department of Nursing, Faculty of Health Science, Palacký University Olomouc, Czech Republic
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Fanous AA, Natarajan SK, Jowdy PK, Dumont TM, Mokin M, Yu J, Goldstein A, Wach MM, Budny JL, Hopkins LN, Snyder KV, Siddiqui AH, Levy EI. High-Risk Factors in Symptomatic Patients Undergoing Carotid Artery Stenting With Distal Protection. Neurosurgery 2015; 77:531-42; discussion 542-3. [DOI: 10.1227/neu.0000000000000871] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
BACKGROUND:
Demographics and vascular anatomy may play an important role in predicting periprocedural complications in symptomatic patients undergoing carotid artery stenting (CAS).
OBJECTIVE:
To predict factors associated with increased risk of complications in symptomatic patients undergoing CAS and to devise a CAS scoring system that predicts such complications in this patient population.
METHODS:
A retrospective study was conducted that included patients who underwent CAS for symptomatic carotid stenosis during a 3-year period. Demographics and anatomic characteristics were subsequently correlated with 30-day outcome measures.
RESULTS:
A total of 221 patients were included in the study. The cumulative rate of periprocedural complications was 7.2%, including stroke (3.2%), myocardial infarction (3.2%), and death (1.4%). Renal disease increased the risk of all complications. National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score ≥10 at presentation, difficult femoral access, and diseased calcified aortic arch increased the risk of stroke and all complications. Type III aortic arch correlated with increased risk of stroke. Pseudo-occlusion and concentric calcification of the carotid artery increased the risk of myocardial infarction, death, and all complications. Carotid tortuosity and anatomy hostile to the deployment of distal protection devices increased the risk of stroke, myocardial infarction, death, and all complications.
CONCLUSION:
Our results suggest that CAS should be avoided in patients with multiple anatomic risk factors. High presenting National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score and renal disease also increase the complication risk. The CAS scoring system devised here is simple, reproducible, and clinically valuable in predicting complications risk in symptomatic patients undergoing CAS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew A. Fanous
- Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences
- Department of Neurosurgery, Gates Vascular Institute, Kaleida Health, Buffalo, New York
| | - Sabareesh K. Natarajan
- Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences
- Department of Neurosurgery, Gates Vascular Institute, Kaleida Health, Buffalo, New York
| | - Patrick K. Jowdy
- Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences
- Department of Neurosurgery, Gates Vascular Institute, Kaleida Health, Buffalo, New York
| | - Travis M. Dumont
- Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences
- Department of Neurosurgery, Gates Vascular Institute, Kaleida Health, Buffalo, New York
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona
| | - Maxim Mokin
- Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences
- Department of Neurosurgery, Gates Vascular Institute, Kaleida Health, Buffalo, New York
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida
| | | | - Adam Goldstein
- Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences
- Department of Neurosurgery, Gates Vascular Institute, Kaleida Health, Buffalo, New York
| | - Michael M. Wach
- Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences
- Department of Neurosurgery, Gates Vascular Institute, Kaleida Health, Buffalo, New York
| | - James L. Budny
- Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences
- Department of Neurosurgery, Gates Vascular Institute, Kaleida Health, Buffalo, New York
| | - L. Nelson Hopkins
- Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences
- Department of Neurosurgery, Gates Vascular Institute, Kaleida Health, Buffalo, New York
- Department of Radiology, School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences
- Toshiba Stroke and Vascular Research Center, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, New York
- Jacobs Institute, Buffalo, New York
| | - Kenneth V. Snyder
- Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences
- Department of Neurosurgery, Gates Vascular Institute, Kaleida Health, Buffalo, New York
- Department of Radiology, School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences
- Toshiba Stroke and Vascular Research Center, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, New York
- Department of Neurology, School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences
| | - Adnan H. Siddiqui
- Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences
- Department of Neurosurgery, Gates Vascular Institute, Kaleida Health, Buffalo, New York
- Department of Radiology, School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences
- Toshiba Stroke and Vascular Research Center, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, New York
- Jacobs Institute, Buffalo, New York
| | - Elad I. Levy
- Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences
- Department of Neurosurgery, Gates Vascular Institute, Kaleida Health, Buffalo, New York
- Department of Radiology, School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences
- Toshiba Stroke and Vascular Research Center, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, New York
| |
Collapse
|