Environmental Sustainability in the Cardiac Catheter Laboratory

The health care sector contributes to nearly 5% of global carbon emissions with the exponential growth of medical waste posing a significant challenge to environmental sustainability. As the impact of climate change on individuals and population health becomes increasingly more apparent, the health care system's significant impact on the environment is also raising concerns. Hospitals contribute disproportionately to health care waste with the majority arising from resource intensive areas such as operating theatres and cardiac catheter labs (CCLs). Despite the growing volume of cardiac procedures worldwide, initiatives to reduce waste from CCLs have received limited attention, overlooking opportunities for significant reduction in operational costs and carbon footprint. We aim to raise awareness of the current landscape of waste management in CCLs. We identify areas of resource optimisation and highlight practical strategies and frameworks employed elsewhere in health care to reduce waste. Importantly, we hope to empower health care workers in CCLs to make a meaningful change to their practice and contribute towards a more sustainable future.

On-line estimated peak skin dose during percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusion using new patient dose mapping technology

BACKGROUND

X-ray exposure during complex percutaneous coronary intervention is a very important issue.

AIM

To reduce patient peak skin dose during percutaneous coronary intervention procedures for chronic total occlusion using on-line estimated peak skin dose software (Dose Map).

METHODS

Throughout the procedure, Dose Map provided a map of local cumulative peak skin dose. This map was displayed in-room from 1Gy cumulative air kerma, and was updated every 0.5Gy. The operator's actions to minimize deterministic risks following map notification were collected. Skin reaction was evaluated 3 months after the procedure. A comparison with our historical X-ray exposure data (207 patients from January 2013 to July 2014) was performed.

RESULTS

From November 2015 to October 2016, 97 patients (Japanese chronic total occlusion score 2.1±1.1; 100 percutaneous coronary intervention procedures for chronic total occlusion) were prospectively enrolled. Fluoroscopy time was 40.8 (21.6-60.3) minutes, cumulative air kerma 1884 (1144-3231) mGy, estimated peak skin dose 962 (604-1474) mGy and kerma area product 115.8 (71.5-206.7) Gy.cm². Cumulative air kerma was>3Gy in 28% of cases, and>5Gy in 11% of cases. In 68% of cases, at least one action was taken by the operator after map notification to optimize skin dose distribution. Main changes included: gantry angulation (52%); field of view (25%); and collimation (13%). No skin injuries were observed at follow-up. In comparison with our chronic total occlusion historical radiation data, median cumulative air kerma and kerma area product were reduced by 31% and 33%, respectively (P<0.005.

CONCLUSION

Online skin dose mapping software allows the distribution of patient skin dose during complex percutaneous coronary intervention procedures, and may minimize X-ray exposure.

Safety and effectiveness of strategies to reduce radiation exposure to proceduralists performing cardiac catheterization procedures: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this systematic review was to synthesize the best available evidence on the effect of various radiation protection strategies on radiation dose received by proceduralists performing cardiac catheterization procedures involving fluoroscopy.

INTRODUCTION

Cardiac catheterization procedures under fluoroscopy are the gold standard diagnostic and treatment method for patients with coronary artery disease. The growing demand of procedures means that proceduralists are being exposed to increasing amounts of radiation, resulting in an increased risk of deterministic and stochastic effects. Standard protective strategies and equipment such as lead garments reduce radiation exposure; however, the evidence surrounding additional equipment is contradictory.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

Randomized controlled trials that compared the use of an additional radiation protection strategy with conventional radiation protection methods were considered for inclusion. The primary outcome of interest was the radiation dose received by the proceduralist during cardiac catheterization procedures.

METHODS

A three-step search was conducted in MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, and the Cochrane Library (CENTRAL). Trials published in the English language with adult participants were included. Trials published from database inception until July 2019 were eligible for inclusion. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the JBI critical appraisal checklist for randomized controlled trials. Quantitative data were extracted from the included papers using the JBI data extraction tool. Results that could not be pooled in meta-analysis were reported in a narrative form.

RESULTS

Fifteen randomized controlled trials were included in the review. Six radiation protection strategies were assessed: leaded and unleaded pelvic or arm drapes, transradial protection board, remotely controlled mechanical contrast injector, extension tubing for contrast injection, real-time radiation monitor, and a reduction in frame rate to 7.5 frames per second. Pooled data from two trials demonstrated a statistically significant decrease in the mean radiation dose (P < 0.00001) received by proceduralists performing transfemoral cardiac catheterization on patients who received a leaded pelvic drape compared to standard protection. One trial that compared the use of unleaded pelvic drapes placed on patients compared to standard protection reported a statistically significant decrease (P = 0.004) in the mean radiation dose received by proceduralists.Compared to standard protection, two trials that used unleaded arm drapes for patients, one trial that used a remotely controlled mechanical contrast injector, and one trial that used a transradial protection board demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in the radiation dose received by proceduralists.Similarly, using a frame rate of 7.5 versus 15 frames per second and monitoring radiation dose in real-time radiation significantly lowered the radiation dose received by the proceduralist. One trial demonstrated no statistically significant difference in proceduralist radiation dose among those who used the extension tubing compared to standard protection (P = 1).

CONCLUSIONS

This review provides evidence to support the use of leaded pelvic drapes for patients as an additional radiation protection strategy for proceduralists performing transradial or transfemoral cardiac catheterization. Further studies on the effectiveness of using a lower fluoroscopy frame rate, real-time radiation monitor, and transradial protection board are needed.

Estimation of patient skin dose in fluoroscopy: summary of a joint report by AAPM TG357 and EFOMP

BACKGROUND

Physicians use fixed C-arm fluoroscopy equipment with many interventional radiological and cardiological procedures. The associated effective dose to a patient is generally considered low risk, as the benefit-risk ratio is almost certainly highly favorable. However, X-ray-induced skin injuries may occur due to high absorbed patient skin doses from complex fluoroscopically guided interventions (FGI). Suitable action levels for patient-specific follow-up could improve the clinical practice. There is a need for a refined metric regarding follow-up of X-ray-induced patient injuries and the knowledge gap regarding skin dose-related patient information from fluoroscopy devices must be filled. The most useful metric to indicate a risk of erythema, epilation or greater skin injury that also includes actionable information is the peak skin dose, that is, the largest dose to a region of skin.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The report is based on a comprehensive review of best practices and methods to estimate peak skin dose found in the scientific literature and situates the importance of the Digital Imaging and Communication in Medicine (DICOM) standard detailing pertinent information contained in the Radiation Dose Structured Report (RDSR) and DICOM image headers for FGI devices. Furthermore, the expertise of the task group members and consultants have been used to bridge and discuss different methods and associated available DICOM information for peak skin dose estimation.

RESULTS

The report contributes an extensive summary and discussion of the current state of the art in estimating peak skin dose with FGI procedures with regard to methodology and DICOM information. Improvements in skin dose estimation efforts with more refined DICOM information are suggested and discussed.

CONCLUSIONS

The endeavor of skin dose estimation is greatly aided by the continuing efforts of the scientific medical physics community, the numerous technology enhancements, the dose-controlling features provided by the FGI device manufacturers, and the emergence and greater availability of the DICOM RDSR. Refined and new dosimetry systems continue to evolve and form the infrastructure for further improvements in accuracy. Dose-related content and information systems capable of handling big data are emerging for patient dose monitoring and quality assurance tools for large-scale multihospital enterprises.

Radiation doses during cardiac catheterisation procedures in India: a multicentre study: Radiation dose study

AIMS

Established, evidence-based measures of radiation are required to minimise its hazards, while maintaining adequate image quality. The aim of this study is to evaluate radiation data and generate reference radiation levels for commonly performed coronary catheterisation procedures in India.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In this prospective, observational study, all procedures were performed in accordance with the established standards using Innova IGS 520/2100-IQ catheterisation laboratories. Demographic, procedural and radiation data were collected. Dose reference limits (DRL) were established as the 75th percentile of the total distribution. There were 2,906 coronary angiograms (CAG), 750 percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) and 715 CAG+PCI. DRLs for dose area product were: 19.6 Gy·cm2 for CAG, 49.8 Gy·cm2 for PCI and 72.0 Gy·cm2 for CAG+PCI, respectively. Median cumulative air kerma levels were: 185 mGy for CAG, 533mGy for PCI, and 891 mGy for CAG+PCI. Male gender, higher BMI, combining CAG+PCI, fluoroscopy time, number of cine frames, and image acquisition settings were significant contributors to increased radiation dose.

CONCLUSIONS

This study established reference radiation dose levels for diagnostic and interventional coronary procedures in India, which were comparable to and in the lower range of international standards.

Radiation protection in the cardiac catheterization laboratory

The trend towards more minimally invasive procedures in the past few decades has resulted in an exponential growth in fluoroscopy-guided catheter-based cardiology procedures. As these techniques are becoming more commonly used and developed, the adverse effects of radiation exposure to the patient, operator, and ancillary staff have been a subject of concern. Although occupational radiation dose limits are being monitored and seldom reached, exposure to chronic, low dose radiation has been shown to have harmful biological effects that are not readily apparent until years after. Given this, it is imperative that reducing radiation dose exposure in the cardiac catheterization laboratory remains a priority. Staff education and training, radiation dose monitoring, ensuring use of proper personal protective equipment, employment of shields, and various procedural techniques in minimizing radiation must always be diligently employed. Special care and consideration should be extended to pregnant women working in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. This review article presents a practical approach to radiation dose management and discusses best practice recommendations in the cardiac catheterization laboratory.

Effectiveness of protection strategies for reducing radiation exposure in proceduralists during cardiac catheterization procedures: a systematic review protocol

REVIEW QUESTION

What is the effectiveness of radiation protection strategies for reducing the radiation dose received by the proceduralist during cardiac catheterization procedures?

Efficacy of radiation dose reduction due to real-time monitoring and visualization of peak skin dose during coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention

OBJECTIVES

This study assessed that the use of real-time monitoring and visualization of peak skin dose could reduce radiation dose during coronary angiography (CAG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

BACKGROUND

Exposure to ionizing radiation has dose related effects including skin damage. Reducing the radiation exposure is important during CAG and PCI. The skin dose-tracking system (DTS) has a real-time monitor of radiation peak skin dose.

METHODS

A total of 323 consecutive patients who underwent CAG and PCI between September 2014 and June 2015 were enrolled. Patients were classified into with DTS group (CAG alone in 104 and PCI in 57 patients) or without DTS group (CAG alone in 106 and PCI in 56 patients).

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in reference air kerma between CAG alone with and without DTS groups. Reference air kerma with DTS group during PCI was lower than without DTS group (204.6 ± 141.1 mGy vs. 294.2 ± 237.4 mGy, P = 0.016). Moreover, kerma area product (17.8 ± 13.0 Gycm² vs. 25.2 ± 19.3 Gycm² , P = 0.019) and number of cine runs (12.8 ± 5.0 vs. 15.5 ± 6.5, P = 0.013) with DTS group were lower than without DTS group. Multiple regression analysis showed increased reference air kerma was associated with male gender, body mass index and type B2/C lesion. Conversely, DTS correlated with decreased reference air kerma.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of DTS could reduce radiation dose during PCI. Real-time radiation monitoring and visualization of peak skin dose was effective for the patients with PCI.

Radiation safety in the cardiac catheterization lab: A time series quality improvement initiative

BACKGROUND

Interventional cardiologists have one of the highest annual radiation exposures yet systems of care that promote radiation safety in cardiac catheterization labs are lacking. This study sought to reduce the frequency of radiation exposure, for PCI procedures, above 1.5Gy in labs utilizing a Phillips system at our local institution by 40%, over a 12-month period.

METHODS

We performed a time series study to assess the impact of different interventions on the frequency of radiation exposure above 1.5Gy. Process measures were percent of procedures where collimation and magnification were used and percent of completion of online educational modules. Balancing measures were the mean number of cases performed and mean fluoroscopy time.

INTERVENTIONS

Information sessions, online modules, policies and posters were implemented followed by the introduction of a new lab with a novel software (AlluraClarity©) to reduce radiation dose.

RESULTS

There was a significant reduction (91%, p<0.05) in the frequency of radiation exposure above 1.5Gy after utilizing a novel software (AlluraClarity©) in a new Phillips lab. Process measures of use of collimation (95.0% to 98.0%), use of magnification (20.0% to 14.0%) and completion of online modules (62%) helped track implementation. The mean number of cases performed and mean fluoroscopy time did not change significantly.

CONCLUSION

While educational strategies had limited impact on reducing radiation exposure, implementing a novel software system provided the most effective means of reducing radiation exposure.