Commemorating the 15-year anniversary of TAVI: insights into the early stages of development, from concept to human application, and perspectives

Bioengineered percutaneous heart valves for transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a comparative evaluation of decellularised bovine and porcine pericardia

Glutaraldehyde-treated, surgical bioprosthetic heart valves undergo structural degeneration within 10-15 years of implantation. Analogous preliminary results were disclosed for percutaneous heart valves (PHVs) realized with similarly-treated tissues. To improve long-term performance, decellularised scaffolds can be proposed as alternative fabricating biomaterials. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether bovine and porcine decellularised pericardia could be utilised to manufacture bioengineered percutaneous heart valves (bioPHVs) with adequate hydrodynamic performance and leaflet resistance to crimping damage. BioPHVs were fabricated by mounting acellular pericardia onto commercial stents. Independently from the pericardial species used for valve fabrication, bioPHVs satisfied the minimum hydrodynamic performance criteria set by ISO 5840-3 standards and were able to withstand a large spectrum of cardiac output conditions, also during extreme backpressure, without severe regurgitation, especially in the case of the porcine group. No macroscopic or microscopic leaflet damage was detected following bioPHV crimping. Bovine and porcine decellularized pericardia are both suitable alternatives to glutaraldehyde-treated tissues. Between the two types of pericardial species tested, the porcine tissue scaffold might be preferable to fabricate advanced PHV replacements for long-term performance. CONDENSED ABSTRACT: Current percutaneous heart valve replacements are formulated with glutaraldehyde-treated animal tissues, prone to structural degeneration. In order to improve long-term performance, bovine and porcine decellularised pericardia were utilised to manufacture bioengineered replacements, which demonstrated adequate hydrodynamic behaviour and resistance to crimping without leaflet architectural alteration.

Transcatheter treatment of native aortic valve regurgitation: Results from an international registry using the transfemoral ACURATE neo valve

•

Native aortic valve regurgitation (NAVR) presents technical challenges for TAVR.

•

This is the largest study on NAVR patients treated with the ACURATE neo valve.

•

Intraprocedural mortality was 0%, device success 87.5% and moderate PVL rate 8.3%.

•

Device success tended to be higher with perimeter-based >10% oversizing.

Background

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has been validated for the treatment of severe symptomatic aortic stenosis in patients at high and intermediate surgical risk. Recently, TAVR has been proposed as an alternative to medical therapy in inoperable patients with severe native aortic valve regurgitation (NAVR). This multicenter international registry sought to evaluate safety and efficacy of TAVR with the self-expandable ACURATE neo valve in a cohort of patients with NAVR.

Methods

A total of 24 patients with severe NAVR treated by TAVR between September 2016 and October 2018 in 13 European centers were included. Clinical, procedural and follow up data were inserted in a dedicated database. Outcomes were codified according to Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 criteria.

Results

Mean age was 79.4 years, 58.4% were female. Mean EuroSCORE II and STS score were 5% and 3.9%, respectively. Device success was 87.5%. Moderate paravalvular leak (PVL) was found in two (8.3%) of patients, both with a perimeter oversizing index <10%. Implantation of a second device was necessary in three cases (12.5%), one for severe PVL and two for device displacement. New pacemaker implantation rate was 21.1%. At 30 days, stroke and all-cause mortality rates were 0% and 4.1%, respectively.

Conclusions

This multicenter study suggests good feasibility and early safety of transfemoral TAVR with the self-expandable ACURATE neo device in patients with severe NAVR refused for surgery. Rates of moderate PVL, new pacemaker implantation and need for a second valve were higher than those reported for TAVR in aortic stenosis.

Ten-year experience with transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement in Finland

Aim: We investigated the outcomes of transcatheter (TAVR) and surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in Finland during the last decade. Methods: The nationwide FinnValve registry included data from 6463 patients who underwent TAVR or SAVR with a bioprosthesis for aortic stenosis from 2008 to 2017. Results: The annual number of treated patients increased three-fold during the study period. Thirty-day mortality declined from 4.8% to 1.2% for TAVR (p = .011) and from 4.1% to 1.8% for SAVR (p = .048). Two-year survival improved from 71.4% to 83.9% for TAVR (p < .001) and from 87.2% to 91.6% for SAVR (p = .006). During the study period, a significant reduction in moderate-to-severe paravalvular regurgitation was observed among TAVR patients and a reduction of the rate of acute kidney injury was observed among both SAVR and TAVR patients. Similarly, the rate of red blood cell transfusion and severe bleeding decreased significantly among SAVR and TAVR patients. Hospital stay declined from 10.4 ± 8.4 to 3.7 ± 3.4 days after TAVR (p < .001) and from 9.0 ± 5.9 to 7.8 ± 5.1 days after SAVR (p < .001). Conclusions: In Finland, the introduction of TAVR has led to an increase in the invasive treatment of severe aortic stenosis, which was accompanied by improved early outcomes after both SAVR and TAVR. Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03385915 Key Messages This study demonstrated that the introduction of transcatheter aortic valve replacement has led to its widespread use as an invasive treatment for severe aortic stenosis. Early and 2-year survival after transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement has improved during past decade. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement has fulfilled its previously unmet clinical needs and has surpassed surgical aortic valve replacement as the most common invasive treatment for aortic stenosis.