Long-term follow-up of the randomised controlled trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the zotarolimus-eluting driver coronary stent in de novo native coronary artery lesions: five year outcomes in the ENDEAVOR II study

Advances in Fabrication Technologies for the Development of Next-Generation Cardiovascular Stents

Coronary artery disease is the most prevalent cardiovascular disease, claiming millions of lives annually around the world. The current treatment includes surgically inserting a tubular construct, called a stent, inside arteries to restore blood flow. However, due to lack of patient-specific design, the commercial products cannot be used with different vessel anatomies. In this review, we have summarized the drawbacks in existing commercial metal stents which face problems of restenosis and inflammatory responses, owing to the development of neointimal hyperplasia. Further, we have highlighted the fabrication of stents using biodegradable polymers, which can circumvent most of the existing limitations. In this regard, we elaborated on the utilization of new fabrication methodologies based on additive manufacturing such as three-dimensional printing to design patient-specific stents. Finally, we have discussed the functionalization of these stent surfaces with suitable bioactive molecules which can prove to enhance their properties in preventing thrombosis and better healing of injured blood vessel lining.

Second generation drug-eluting stents: a focus on safety and efficacy of current devices

Introduction: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) represents the most frequent procedure performed in medicine. Second generation drug eluting stents (DES) have been developed to reduce the rates of late and very late complications of first generation DES.Areas covered: To improve long-term efficacy and safety of patients undergoing PCI, second generation DES have been developed with novel stent platforms, biocompatible durable and biodegradable polymers and newer antiproliferative agents. In this review we provide an overview of second generation DES and their clinical trials, discussing safety and effectiveness of these devices, and outlining clinical indication for use.Expert commentary: Numerous clinical trials have demonstrated the safety and efficacy of second generation DES over the last decade. These devices represent the gold standard treatment in stable and acute coronary syndromes.

Three-year major clinical outcomes of phosphorylcholine polymer- vs biolinx polymer-zotarolimus-eluting stents: A propensity score matching study

There are limited long-term outcome data comparing BioLinx polymer (B)-zotarolimus-eluting stents (ZES) with phosphorylcholine polymer (P)-ZES. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of B-ZES with P-ZES in patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) during a 3-year follow-up period.One thousand two hundred fifty four patients who underwent PCI with P-ZES (Endeavor [ZES-E] or Endeavor sprint [ZES-S], n = 356) or B-ZES (Endeavor resolute [ZES-R] or Resolute Integrity [ZES-I], n = 889) were enrolled. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac events (MACE); the composite of total death, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), target lesion revascularization (TLR), target vessel revascularization (TVR), non-target vessel revascularization (Non-TVR), and the secondary endpoint was stent thrombosis (ST).After PSM, 2 propensity-matched (PSM) groups (275 pairs, n = 550, C-statistic = 0.730) were generated. During the 3-year follow-up period, the cumulative incidence of MACE (hazard ratio [HR], 1.525; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.920-2.526; P = .101) and ST (HR, 1.248; 95% CI, 0.335-4.4649; P = .741) were similar between P-ZES and B-ZES after PSM. However, TLR rate was significantly higher in ZES-S than ZES-I (11.3% vs 3.8%, log rank P = .029) and TVR rate was higher in ZES-S than ZES-R (14.1% vs 4.8%, log rank P = .025).In this single-center, all-comer registry, despite different polymers, P-ZES, and B-ZES showed comparable safety and efficacy during a 3-year follow-up period after PCI.

Long-term safety of bioresorbable scaffolds: insights from a network meta-analysis including 91 trials

AIMS

The aim of this study was to investigate the long-term safety and efficacy of biodegradable scaffolds and metallic stents.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We analysed a total of 91 randomised controlled trials with a mean follow-up of 3.7 years in 105,842 patients which compared two or more coronary metallic stents or biodegradable scaffolds and reported the long-term clinical outcomes (≥2 years). Network meta-analysis showed that patients treated with the Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) had a significantly higher risk of definite or probable scaffold thrombosis (ScT) compared to those treated with metallic DES. The risk of very late ScT was highest with the Absorb BVS among comparators. Pairwise conventional meta-analysis demonstrated that the elevated risk of ScT with Absorb BVS compared to cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting stents was consistent across the time points of ≤30 days (early), 31 days - 1 year (late) and >1 year (very late) ScT. In addition, target lesion failure rates were significantly higher in the Absorb BVS cohort, driven by both increased risk of target vessel myocardial infarction and ischaemia-driven target lesion revascularisation.

CONCLUSIONS

Absorb BVS implantation was associated with increased risk of long-term and very late ScT compared to current-generation metallic DES. The risk of ScT occurred with a rising trend beyond one year.

Seven-year clinical outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with biodegradable polymer coated sirolimus-eluting stent: Results from a single-center real-world experience

Objective

The aim of the present study was to assess seven-year clinical outcomes of biodegradable polymer coated Supralimus sirolimus-eluting stent (S-SES) [Sahajanand Medical Technologies Pvt. Ltd., Surat, India] in real-world patients with coronary artery disease.

Methods

This observational, retrospective study was carried out in all 346 consecutive enrolled patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with the S-SES, between April 2008 and December 2009, at a single center. We analyzed major adverse cardiac events (MACE) [a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI), target lesion revascularization (TLR) and target vessel revascularization (TVR)] as primary outcomes at seven-year follow-up.

Results

Out of 346 patients, seven-year follow-up was obtained in 327 (94.5%) patients and hence results were analyzed for 327 patients. At seven-year, MACE occurred in 41 (12.5%) patients, consisting of 23 (7.0%) cardiac deaths, 14 (4.3%) TLR, and 4 (1.2%) TVR. The incidence of late stent thrombosis was observed in 3 (0.9%) patients. At follow-up of seven-year, the cumulative event-free survival was found to be 84.7% by Kaplan-Meier method.

Conclusions

The present study demonstrated satisfactory and sustained seven-year clinical outcomes as evidenced by the low rates of MACE and ST for the biodegradable polymer coated S-SES.

Safety and efficacy of second-generation drug-eluting stents compared with bare-metal stents: An updated meta-analysis and regression of 9 randomized clinical trials

The efficacy of second-generation drug-eluting stents (DES; eg, everolimus and zotarolimus) compared with bare-metal stents (BMS) in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention was challenged recently by new evidence from large clinical trials. Thus, we aimed to conduct an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) evaluating the efficacy and safety of second-generation DES compared with BMS. Electronic databases were systematically searched for all RCTs comparing second-generation DES with BMS and reporting clinical outcomes. The primary efficacy outcome was major adverse cardiac events (MACE); the primary safety outcome was definite stent thrombosis. The DerSimonian and Laird method was used for estimation of summary risk ratios (RR). A total of 9 trials involving 17 682 patients were included in the final analysis. Compared with BMS, second-generation DES were associated with decreased incidence of MACE (RR: 0.78, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.69-0.88), driven by the decreased incidence of myocardial infarction (MI) (RR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.48-0.95), target-lesion revascularization (RR: 0.47, 95% CI: 0.42-0.53), definite stent thrombosis (RR: 0.57, 95% CI: 0.41-0.78), and definite/probable stent thrombosis (RR: 0.54, 95% CI: 0.38-0.80). The incidence of all-cause mortality was similar between groups (RR: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.79-1.10). Meta-regression showed lower incidences of MI with DES implantation in elderly and diabetic patients (P = 0.026 and P < 0.0001, respectively). Compared with BMS, second-generation DES appear to be associated with a lower incidence of MACE, mainly driven by lower rates of target-lesion revascularization, MI, and stent thrombosis. However, all-cause mortality appears similar between groups.

Primary Stenting of Totally Occluded Native Coronary Arteries III (PRISON III): a randomised comparison of sirolimus-eluting stent implantation with zotarolimus-eluting stent implantation for the treatment of total coronary occlusions

AIMS

We investigated whether sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) are superior to next-generation zotarolimus-eluting stents (ZES) in treating patients with total coronary occlusions (TCO).

METHODS AND RESULTS

In a prospective, randomised trial we compared the SES with the zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES; Endeavor or Resolute) after successful recanalisation of TCO. During the first phase of the trial, 51 patients were assigned to receive the SES and 46 patients to receive the Endeavor ZES. In the second phase we randomised 103 patients to the SES group and 104 patients to the Resolute ZES group. The primary endpoint was in-segment late lumen loss at eight-month follow-up. At eight months, patients in the SES group had less in-segment and in-stent late loss as compared to the Endeavor group: -0.13±0.3 mm vs. 0.27±0.6 mm (p=0.0002) and -0.13±0.5 mm vs. 0.54±0.5 mm (p<0.0001), respectively. In contrast, the SES and the Resolute ZES showed comparable amounts of in-segment (-0.03±0.7 mm vs. -0.10±0.7 mm, p=0.6) and in-stent (0.03±0.8 mm vs. 0.05±0.8 mm, p=0.9) late loss.

CONCLUSIONS

In the treatment of TCOs, the SES was associated with superior angiographic outcomes compared to the Endeavor ZES. On the other hand, the SES and the Resolute ZES showed comparable angiographic outcomes.

WITHDRAWN: Drug-eluting stents versus bare metal stents for angina or acute coronary syndromes

This review 'topic' has been included in work being carried out as part of a Health Technology Assessment commissioned by the National Institute for Clinical Excellence in England and Wales. Details of this research is available via www.nice.org.uk.

The views and opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the HTA programme, NICE, NIHR, NHS or the Department of Health.

The review has been split into 2 reviews that will be published as "Drug‐eluting stents versus bare‐metal stents for stable ischaemic heart disease" and "Drug‐eluting stents versus bare‐metal stents for acute coronary syndrome".

The editorial group responsible for this previously published document have withdrawn it from publication.

Duration of clopidogrel-based dual antiplatelet therapy and clinical outcomes after endeavor sprint zotarolimus-eluting stent implantation in patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome

BACKGROUND

The optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) remains controversial in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). We sought to compare outcomes after the implantation of zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES) between patients with ACS who received clopidogrel-based DAPT for >6months and those treated for ≤6months.

METHODS

From a registry of patients treated with ZESs between October 2005 and January 2010, 1740 patients with ACS were selected for the present analysis. Landmark analyses were performed for ACS patients who were event-free at 6months follow-up (n=1674). The primary outcome was a major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular event (MACCE), including all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), target vessel revascularization (TVR), stent thrombosis, or stroke. We also performed adjustments for the baseline characteristics of patients, using their propensity-score matching (n=469 pairs).

RESULTS

During a median follow-up of 22.5months, the rate of MACCE was 6.4% in patients with DAPT >6months (n=1140) and 4.7% in patients with DAPT ≤6months (n=534) (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.05; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.61-1.82; p=0.86). After propensity-score matching, DAPT >6months was not found to be associated with a lower incidence of MACCE compared with DAPT ≤6months (adjusted HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.44-1.45, p=0.46). The rates of all-cause death or MI, TVR, stent thrombosis, and stroke also did not differ significantly between two groups.

CONCLUSION

DAPT for >6months do not seem to be associated with improved clinical outcomes in patients with ACS undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with ZES.

Clinical utility of platinum chromium bare-metal stents in coronary heart disease

Coronary stents represent a key development for the treatment of obstructive coronary artery disease since the introduction of percutaneous coronary intervention. While drug-eluting stents gained wide acceptance in contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention practice, further developments in bare-metal stents remain crucial for patients who are not candidates for drug-eluting stents, or to improve metallic platforms for drug elution. Initially, stent platforms used biologically inert stainless steel, restricting stent performance due to limitations in flexibility and strut thickness. Later, cobalt chromium stent alloys outperformed steel as the material of choice for stents, allowing latest generation stents to be designed with significantly thinner struts, while maintaining corrosion resistance and radial strength. Most recently, the introduction of the platinum chromium alloy refined stent architecture with thin struts, high radial strength, conformability, and improved radiopacity. This review will provide an overview of the novel platinum chromium bare-metal stent platforms available for coronary intervention. Mechanical properties, clinical utility, and device limitations will be summarized and put into perspective.

Primary endpoint results of the OMEGA Study: One-year clinical outcomes after implantation of a novel platinum chromium bare metal stent

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Bare metal stents (BMS) have similar rates of death and myocardial infarction (MI) compared to drug-eluting stents (DES). DES lower repeat revascularization rates compared to BMS, but may have higher rates of late stent thrombosis (ST) potentially due to impaired endothelialization requiring longer dual anti-platelet therapy (DAPT). OMEGA evaluated a novel BMS designed to have improved deliverability and radiopacity, in comparison to currently available platforms.

METHODS/MATERIALS

OMEGA was a prospective, multicenter, single-arm study enrolling 328 patients at 37 sites (US and Europe). Patients received the OMEGA stent (bare platinum chromium element stent) for the treatment of de novo native coronary artery lesions (≤28 mm long; diameter ≥2.25 mm to ≤4.50mm). The primary endpoint was 9-month target lesion failure (TLF: cardiac death, target vessel-related MI, target lesion revascularization [TLR]) compared to a prespecified performance goal (PG) based on prior generation BMS. All major cardiac events were independently adjudicated. DAPT was required for a minimum of 1 month post procedure.

RESULTS

In the OMEGA study, the mean age was 65; 17% had diabetes mellitus. The primary endpoint was met; 9 month TLF rate was 11.5%, and the upper 1-sided 95% confidence bound of 14.79% was less than the prespecified PG of 21.2% (p<0.0001). One-year event rates were low including a TLF rate of 12.8% and an ST rate of 0.6% at 12 months.

CONCLUSIONS

One-year outcomes of OMEGA show low rates of TLF, revascularization and ST. This supports safety and efficacy of the OMEGA BMS for the treatment of coronary artery disease.

Efficacy and safety of drug-eluting stents in the real world: 8-year follow-up

Background:

Drug-eluting stents have been used in daily practice since 2002, with the clear advantages of reducing the risk of target vessel revascularization and an impressive reduction in restenosis rate by 50%-70%. However, the occurrence of a late thrombosis can compromise long-term results, particularly if the risks of this event were sustained. In this context, a registry of clinical cases gains special value.

Objective:

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of drug-eluting stents in the real world.

Methods:

We report on the clinical findings and 8-year follow-up parameters of all patients that underwent percutaneous coronary intervention with a drug-eluting stent from January 2002 to April 2007. Drug-eluting stents were used in accordance with the clinical and interventional cardiologist decision and availability of the stent.

Results:

A total of 611 patients were included, and clinical follow-up of up to 8 years was obtained for 96.2% of the patients. Total mortality was 8.7% and nonfatal infarctions occurred in 4.3% of the cases. Target vessel revascularization occurred in 12.4% of the cases, and target lesion revascularization occurred in 8% of the cases. The rate of stent thrombosis was 2.1%. There were no new episodes of stent thrombosis after the fifth year of follow-up. Comparative subanalysis showed no outcome differences between the different types of stents used, including Cypher®, Taxus®, and Endeavor®.

Conclusion:

These findings indicate that drug-eluting stents remain safe and effective at very long-term follow-up. Patients in the "real world" may benefit from drug-eluting stenting with excellent, long-term results.

Advances in stent technologies and their effect on clinical efficacy and safety

The introduction of intracoronary stents represented a major advance in interventional cardiology. While bare metal stents set the benchmark for improved safety over angioplasty, intimal hyperplasia and subsequent restenosis were important limitations. First-generation drug-eluting stents demonstrated significant improvements in efficacy, but not necessarily safety, and further technologic developments have focused on optimizing both. Current advances and understanding in stent design continue to improve on these concepts. This review summarizes past and present technology with particular emphasis on the principles underlying the efficacy and safety of drug-eluting stents, and offers a glimpse into the next generations of stents aimed at treating symptomatic coronary artery disease.

Evolving management of patients treated by drug-eluting stent: prevention of late events

SUMMARY

Drug eluting stents (DES) were introduced in clinical practice to overcome the problem of in-stent restenosis (ISR) that limited the overall efficacy of percutaneous coronary revascularization with bare metal stent (BMS). Long-term outcome data confirm a sustained benefit of DES as compared with BMS. However, this benefit is mainly evident in the first year of follow-up. Indeed, DES-related events may extend over this time, due to late events (late ISR and/or very late stent thrombosis). Prevention of late failure of DES may become a specific therapeutic target.

Use of drug-eluting stents in acute myocardial infarction with persistent ST-segment elevation: results of the ALKK PCI-registry

BACKGROUND

Drug-eluting stents (DES) reduce the rate of in-stent restenosis (ISR) and target vessel revascularization significantly when compared with bare metal stents (BMS). Their beneficial effects have been demonstrated in patients with acute myocardial infarction also, but the use of DES in the latter population seems to be still limited in clinical practice.

METHODS AND RESULTS

From January 2006 to December 2011, 25,424 patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction were enrolled in the German ALKK PCI-registry. In 5,467 patients (21.5 %), a DES was implanted in the culprit segment, in 16,911 patients (66.5 %) a BMS, and 2,959 patients (11.6 %) received neither DES nor BMS. The rates of DES for typical subgroups were 31.7 % in patients with diabetes, 36.6 % in unprotected left main stenosis, 32.4 % in ostial lesions, 32.0 % for a stent length >15 mm, 26.2 % for a stent diameter ≤3 mm, and 58.5 % for ISR. There was a wide range in the use of DES between the different ALKK hospitals with a minimum of 2.3 % and a maximum of 58.3 % for the total study period (median 22.0 %, quartiles 14.6 and 37.5 %).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite convincing data for the use of DES in patients with STEMI, there is still an underuse of DES in this clinical setting in Germany. This is particularly worrying for the subgroups of patients and lesions with a high risk of restenosis. Further efforts are needed to reduce the skepticism about DES and to improve guideline adherent treatment.

Experience with BioMatrix BES and other DES in all-comers setting: a retrospective overview

New generation DES are effectively used in all spectrum of coronary artery diseases (CAD) and are replacing earlier DES and BMS. Biolimus A9™-eluting stent is a new generation DES containing the anti-proliferative drug biolimus A9™ incorporating a biodegradable abluminal coating that leaves a polymer-free stent after drug release enhancing strut coverage while preventing neointimal hyperplasia. A retrospective data analysis was done in patients treated with DES, with a major share of Biolimus A9™ (BA9™) drug-eluting stents (DES) at Bombay Hospital, Mumbai. A total of 158 patients with 219 lesions were treated with DES, comprising Biolimus A9-eluting stent and others and the major adverse cardiac events (MACE) rate and stent thrombosis (ST) at 1, 6, 12 months and 24 months were analyzed. Mace rate was 3.16% for average follow-up of 19 months. There were 3 cases of ST (2 of acute and 1 of subacute onset) and one non-cardiac death reported during this time. This retrospective data demonstrates good one- and two-year clinical safety and efficacy of DES, especially of BioMatrix stents in real world setting.

Randomized comparison of Zotarolimus-Eluting Endeavor Sprint versus bare-metal stent implantation in uncertain drug-eluting stent candidates: rationale, design, and characterization of the patient population for the Zotarolimus-eluting Endeavor Sprint stent in uncertain DES candidates study

BACKGROUND

The use of drug-eluting stent (DES) instead of bare-metal stent (BMS) in patients at high stent thrombosis or bleeding risk as well as in those at low restenosis risk (ie, uncertain DES candidates) remains a matter of debate. Zotarolimus-Eluting Endeavor Sprint stent (E-ZES) (Santa Rosa, CA) is a hydrophilic polymer-based second-generation device with unique drug fast-release profile, which may allow for a shorter dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) duration without safety concerns.

HYPOTHESIS

The primary objective is to assess whether E-ZES implantation followed by a shorter than currently recommended course of DAPT will decrease the incidence of 12-month major adverse cardiovascular events as compared with BMS in undefined DES recipients. Actual duration of DAPT regimen will be dictated by patients' characteristics and not by stent type and, as such, can be as short as 30 days after intervention in both stent groups.

STUDY DESIGN

The ZEUS study is an open-label randomized clinical trial conducted at 20 clinical sites in Italy, Switzerland, Portugal, and Hungary. With 1,600 individuals, this study will have 85% power to detect a 33% difference in the primary end point consisting of the composite of death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization.

SUMMARY

The ZEUS trial aims to assess whether the use of E-ZES, followed by a DAPT duration regimen based on patients' characteristics and not by stent type, is superior to conventional BMS implantation in undefined DES recipients who qualify for the presence of high thrombosis, bleeding, or low restenosis risk criteria.

Impact of metabolic syndrome on clinical outcomes after new generation drug-eluting stent implantation: the 'obesity paradox' phenomenon is still apparent

BACKGROUND AND AIM

New generation drug-eluting stents (DES) have improved clinical outcomes. However, their impact on patients with metabolic syndrome (MS) is still unclear as there is no sufficient data. Therefore, we evaluated the impact of the new generation DES on patients with an isolated lesion in the proximal segment of the left anterior descending artery (pLAD) suffering from MS.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We evaluated 511 patients with a pLAD lesion. Of these, 147 patients had MS. The major adverse cardiac events (MACE) including death, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI) and target lesion revascularization (TLR) were defined as primary end points. Stent thrombosis was also evaluated. MACEs had a trend to be higher in non-MS group (8.24% vs 3.40%, p = 0.05) during 20 months mean follow-up period. Rates of cardiac death (1.37% vs 0.68%, p = 0.67), non-fatal MI (1.92% vs 0.0%, p = 0.20), TLR (4.94% vs 2.04% MS, p = 0.21) and thrombosis (3.29% vs 1.36%, p = 0.36) were not significantly different in non-MS and MS group. The Kaplan-Meier curve revealed: MS group: 96.59% vs non-MS group: 91.75% (p = 0.04). MS was a favorable independent predictor for MACE (hazard ratio (HR) 0.34, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.12-0.93, p < 0.03). In addition, independent predictors for MACE were BMI ≥ 30 kg/m(2) (HR 0.87 95% CI 0.79-0.96 p = 0.008) and diabetes mellitus (HR 2.01 95% CI 0.99-4.11, p = 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The 'obese paradox' phenomenon is found in the era of new generation DES. In order to investigate the underlying mechanism for this phenomenon further studies are required.

A higher colour grade yellow plaque was detected at one year after implantation of an everolimus-eluting stent than after a zotarolimus-eluting stent

OBJECTIVE

Neoatherosclerosis or atherosclerosis progression is one of the mechanisms of long-term stent failure. Yellow plaque detected by angioscopy has been associated with advanced atherosclerosis and the future risk of a coronary event. We compared the yellow colour of the stented segment between zotarolimus-eluting stents (ZES) and everolimus-eluting stents (EES) at 1 year after implantation.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

PATIENTS

Consecutive patients underwent angioscopic examination 1 year after the implantation of ZES (n=45) or EES (n=45) at a de novo native coronary lesion.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The maximum yellow colour grade (grade 0-3) of the stented segment, maximum and minimum neointima coverage grade (grade 0-2) and the presence of thrombus were examined. The neointima heterogeneity index was calculated as maximum - minimum coverage grade.

RESULTS

Maximum yellow colour grade was higher in EES than in ZES (1.3±0.9 vs 0.4±0.8, p<0.001) and maximum (2.0±0.2 vs 1.2±0.5, p<0.001) and minimum (1.5±0.6 vs 0.7±0.5, p<0.001) coverage grade was higher in ZES than in EES. The neointima heterogeneity index was not different between ZES and EES (0.4±0.5 vs 0.5±0.6, p=0.42). The incidence of thrombus was very low and was not different between ZES and EES (2% vs 4%, p=0.55).

CONCLUSIONS

Although both ZES and EES had good healing with homogeneous neointima coverage and a low incidence of thrombus, EES had more advanced atherosclerosis as shown by the presence of higher grade yellow plaque than ZES at 1 year after implantation.

Stent thrombosis: an overview

Stent thrombosis is a challenging problem following percutaneous coronary intervention that can lead to serious clinical consequences, such as death and acute myocardial infarction. Its pathophysiology is not yet completely known, and there are several causes suggested, such as incomplete stent endothelization, presence of polymers and late incomplete stent apposition. One of the main predictors is the early discontinuation of dual antiplatelet therapy. Stent improvements related to their design, with more friendly metallic platforms, thinner biocompatible or biodegradable polymers, absence of polymers, and even stents manufactured with bioabsorbable materials, could make the percutaneous procedure much safer and effective, allowing its application in increasingly complex anatomic and clinical scenarios, with low thrombosis rates.

Outcomes of patients treated with the everolimus-eluting stent versus the zotarolimus eluting stent in a consecutive cohort of patients at a tertiary medical center

Background

In this study we compared the outcomes of the everolimus-eluting stent (EES) versus the zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES) in patients treated at a tertiary medical center, with up to one year of follow-up.

Methods

Unselected consecutive patients were retrospectively recruited following stenting with the ZES (n = 197) or EES (n = 190). The first 100 consecutive patients in each cohort underwent syntax scoring. The primary endpoint of the study was target vessel failure, defined as the combined endpoint of cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization. Secondary endpoints included target lesion revascularization, target lesion failure, acute stent thrombosis, total death, cardiac death, and non-fatal myocardial infarction.

Results

The two groups were similar, including for Syntax scores (19.6 ± 12.8 versus 20.6 ± 13.6), number of stents per patient (2.9 ± 1.9 versus 2.9 ± 2.1), and cardiovascular risk factors. By one year, the primary outcome occurred in 20.8% EES versus 26.7% ZES (P = 0.19) patients. The secondary endpoints were as follows: target lesion revascularization (8.9% versus 20.6%, P = 0.003), target vessel revascularization (18.9% versus 25.6%, P = 0.142), definite and probable stent thrombosis (0% versus 2.5%), non-fatal myocardial infarction (2.7% versus 3.6%), and mortality (3.2% versus 5.1%) for the EES versus the ZES, respectively.

Conclusion

EES had similar target vessel failure to ZES, but superior target lesion revascularization and target lesion failure at one year of follow-up in an unselected cohort of patients.

Drug-eluting coronary stents - focus on improved patient outcomes

The development of stent has been a major advance in the treatment of obstructive coronary artery disease since the introduction of balloon angioplasty. Subsequently, neointimal hyperplasia within the stent leading to in-stent restenosis emerged as a major obstacle in long-term success of percutaneous coronary intervention. Recent introduction of drug-eluting stents is a major breakthrough to tackle this problem. This review article summarizes stent technology, reviews progress of drug-eluting stents and discusses quality of life, patient satisfaction, and acceptability of percutaneous coronary intervention.

2-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of everolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting stents for coronary revascularization in daily practice. COMPARE (Comparison of the everolimus eluting XIENCE-V stent with the paclitaxel eluting TAXUS LIBERTÉ stent in all-comers: a randomized open label trial)

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of the Xience V (Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, California) everolimus-eluting stent (EES) with the Taxus Liberté (Boston Scientific, Natick, Massachusetts) paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES) at 2-year follow-up.

BACKGROUND

COMPARE (Comparison of the everolimus eluting XIENCE-V stent with the paclitaxel eluting TAXUS LIBERTÉ stent in all-comers: a randomized open label trial) demonstrated a superior clinical outcome of EES over PES at 1 year in all comers. Whether this superiority is maintained after discontinuation, at 12 months, of dual antiplatelet therapy is unclear.

METHODS

Patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with limited exclusion criteria were randomly allocated to EES or PES. The 2-year pre-specified endpoints are composites of safety and efficacy and stent thrombosis.

RESULTS

Follow-up was completed in 1,795 of 1,800 patients (99.7%). The groups had similar baseline characteristics. At 2 years, significantly fewer EES patients took dual antiplatelet therapy (11.4% vs. 15.4%, p = 0.02). The primary composite of all death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization occurred in 9.0% of EES patients and 13.7% of PES patients (relative risk [RR]: 0.66; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.50 to 0.86) driven by a lower rate of myocardial infarction (3.9% vs. 7.5%; RR: 0.52; 95% CI: 0.35 to 0.77) and target vessel revascularization (3.2% vs. 8.0%; RR: 0.41; 95% CI: 0.27 to 0.62), in parallel with a lower rate of definite or probable stent thrombosis (0.9% vs. 3.9%; RR: 0.23; 95% CI: 0.11 to 0.49). Differences significantly increased between 1- and 2-year follow-up for the primary composite endpoint (p = 0.04), target vessel revascularization (p = 0.02), and definite or probable stent thrombosis (p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

The substantial clinical benefit of the EES over the PES with regard to measures of both safety and efficacy is maintained at 2 years in real-life practice with an increasing benefit in terms of safety and efficacy between 1 year and 2 years.