Optical coherence tomography: assessment of coronary artery disease and guide to percutaneous coronary intervention

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Angiographic guidance for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has significant limitations in interpretation. The superior spatial resolution of optical coherence tomography (OCT) can provide meaningful clinical benefits, although limited data is available on Asian populations. This study aimed to determine whether OCT can provide additional advantages and useful clinical information beyond that obtained by angiography alone in decision making for PCI.

METHODS

This was an observational study based on a single tertiary cardiac center in Pakistan, which includes 67 patients who underwent coronary angiogram and stenting. Their pre and post stenting OCT findings were recorded. Any additional intervention was also recorded. The data were analysed using IBM SPSS software version 26.0.

RESULTS

The mean age was 55.00 ± 9.00 years. Majority of the patients were males (65.7%). On angiography, there was an equal number of stable and ruptured plaques (38.8%). Post stenting results showed 29.9% under deployed stents and 34.3% were either undersized or mal-apposed. Out of 67 patients, 50 (74.6%) needed re-intervention after PCI. Among different procedures, post-dilatation was most common.

CONCLUSION

The main OCT benefit is in borderline lesions on CA, in whom OCT identifies significant coronary stenosis and leads to PCI indication in patients. In the post-PCI context, OCT leads to an indication of PCI optimisation in half of the coronary lesions.

Optical coherence tomography versus intravascular ultrasound for culprit lesion assessment in patients with acute myocardial infarction

Introduction

In patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) the implanted stent may not fully cover the whole intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-derived thin-cap fibroatheroma (TCFA) related to the culprit lesion (CL).

Aim

Whether this phenomenon is more pronounced when optical coherence tomography (OCT) assessment of the CL is performed is not known.

Material and methods

Thus, we aimed to assess CLs in 40 patients with AMI treated with PCI, using VH (virtual histology)-IVUS and OCT before and after intervention. The results were blinded to the operator and PCI was done under angiography guidance.

Results

Uncovered lipid-rich plaques were identified in the stent reference segments of 23 (57.5%) patients: in 13 (32.5%) of them in the distal reference segment and in 19 (47.5%) of them in the proximal reference segment. In 9 of them (22.5%) lipid plaques were found in both reference segments. In 36 (90%) patients OCT confirmed lipid plaques identified as VH-derived TCFA by VH-IVUS in the reference segments of the stented segment. However, OCT confirmed that only in 2 (5%) patients were uncovered lipid plaques true TCFA as defined by histology. Comparing IVUS and OCT qualitative characteristics of the stented segments OCT detected more thrombus protrusions and proximal and distal stent edge dissections compared to IVUS (92.5 vs. 55%, p = 0.001; 20% vs. 7.5%, p = 0.03 and 25% vs. 5%, p < 0.001, respectively).

Conclusions

Due to its superior resolution, OCT identifies TCFA more precisely. OCT more often shows remaining problems related to stent implantation than IVUS after angiographically guided PCI.

Vulnerable struts with CRE8, Biomatrix and Xience stents assessed with OCT and their correlation with clinical variables at 6-month follow-up: the CREBX-OCT study

First-generation drug eluting stents (DES) reduced the incidence of restenosis and need for repeated target lesion revascularization but, in autoptic studies, frequently resulted in incomplete endothelial coverage, which is an important predictor of late adverse events and increased mortality after stent implantation. More recently, not only uncovered, but also malapposed or protruding struts have been considered vulnerable structures, as they are deemed to perturb blood flow, whereas only struts well embedded into the vessel wall are considered stable. We compared the number of uncovered and of other vulnerable (protruding or malapposed) struts among three different second-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) (Cre8, Biomatrix, Xience), using optical coherence tomography (OCT) 6 months after implantation. Moreover, we analyzed the relationship between the percentage of vulnerable struts and the clinical characteristics of patients. 60 patients with stable angina or non-ST-Elevation acute coronary syndrome and indication to percutaneous angioplasty were randomly assigned to receive one of the three DES. After 6 months, OCT images were obtained. After 6 months, OCT images were obtained (1289 cross sections; 10,728 struts). None of the three DES showed non-coated struts or areas of stent thrombosis. Significant differences in the average number of protruding struts (Cre8: 33.9 ± 12.6; Biomatrix: 26.2 ± 18.1; Xience: 13.2 ± 8.5; p < 0.001) and in the proportion of malapposed struts (Cre8: 0.7%; Biomatrix: 0.9%; Xience: 0.0%; p = 0.040) and of incomplete stent apposition area (Cre8: 10.4%; Biomatrix: 4.7%; Xience: 0.7%; p < 0.001) were observed. No significant difference was found in neointimal hyperplasia area with a not significant tendency toward greater minimal and maximal struts thickness for Biomatrix. In comparison with Cre8 and Biomatrix, Xience showed a significantly lower proportion of vulnerable struts in all clinical sub-groups considered. In the group of 60 patients a significant relation was found between age and number of vulnerable struts (p = 0.014). The three second-generation DES were similarly effective in permitting neo-intimal formation and complete struts coating 6 months after implantation, but Cre8 and Biomatrix showed a greater proportion of protruding and malapposed struts.Trail Registry: Clinical Trials.gov Identifier: NCT02850497.

Impact of late stent malapposition after drug-eluting stent implantation on long-term clinical outcomes

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The impact of late drug-eluting stent (DES) malapposition detected by optical coherence tomography (OCT) on long-term clinical outcomes has not been clearly established. We evaluated long-term clinical outcomes of late stent malapposition (LSM) detected by OCT in a qualified study population.

METHODS

A total of 428 patients were selected from previous randomized OCT studies that evaluated the degree of strut coverage of different DESs at a 3-12-month follow-up OCT examination. These patients were assigned to one of two groups based on the presence (n = 136) or absence (n = 292) of LSM on follow-up OCT images (performed at 7.0 ± 3.4 months after DES implantation). The cumulative rates of composite events (cardiac death, target-vessel-related myocardial infarction, target-vessel revascularization, and stent thrombosis) were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

During 73.7 ± 18.3 months of follow-up, cardiac death or (very) late stent thrombosis did not occur in either group. The cumulative rate of composite events was similar among the patients in each group (6.2% in patients with LSM vs. 11.7% in those without LSM) [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.569, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.257-1.257, p = 0.163]. Target vessel-related myocardial infarction occurred in 0.7% of patients with LSM vs. 1.5% of those without LSM (HR = 0.521, 95% CI = 0.058-4.670, p = 0.560). Target-vessel revascularization was performed in 5.4% of patients with LSM vs. 10.2% of those without LSM (HR = 0.574, 95% CI = 0.246-1.343, p = 0.201).

CONCLUSIONS

Cardiac death or (very) late stent thrombosis did not occur in patients with OCT-detected LSM during long-term follow-up. The presence of OCT-detected LSM was not associated with adverse clinical events.

Clinical significance of optical coherence tomography-guided angioplasty on treatment selection

The present study aimed to observe whether optical coherence tomography (OCT)-guided angioplasty is able to provide useful clinical information beyond that obtained by angiography as well as provide recommendations for physicians that may improve treatment selection. This prospective study included 83 patients with coronary artery disease (>18 years) undergoing coronary angiography (CAG) for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (n=13), non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (n=19), stable angina (n=22), unstable angina (n=10), silent ischemia (n=11), or elective percutaneous coronary intervention (n=8). Following the initial CAG (CAG-pre), the patients underwent OCT before angioplasty (OCT-pre, 24 patients), after angioplasty (OCT-post, 22 patients), or both (37 patients). The thrombus burden, calcification and plaque dissection or rupture were compared between the OCT-pre and CAG-pre recordings. Following angioplasty, stent malapposition, suboptimal stent deployment, suboptimal stent lesion coverage, and edge dissection were compared between OCT-post and CAG-post alone. Among the 83 patients, 45.7% had single-vessel and 54.3% had multiple-vessel disease. OCT pre- and post-angioplasty revealed significantly more information on the procedure than CAG alone. This clinical information changed the clinical strategies in 41/83 (49.4%) patients, including 58 modifications of therapeutic strategy (69.9%, 58/83): Thrombus aspiration in 2 cases (2.4%), administration of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in 8 cases (9.6%), additional balloon inflation in 23 cases (27.7%), additional stent implantation in 17 cases (20.5%), avoiding stent implantation in 4 cases (4.8%), collateral intervention in 2 cases (2.4%), and guidewire reposition in 2 cases (2.4%). In conclusion, OCT-pre and OCT-post provided additional clinical information beyond that obtained by angiography alone, which resulted in modification of the treatment strategies in half of the included patients.

Coronary evaginations and peri-scaffold aneurysms following implantation of bioresorbable scaffolds: incidence, outcome, and optical coherence tomography analysis of possible mechanisms

BACKGROUND

Peri-stent coronary evaginations may disturb flow and have been proposed as possible risk factor for late stent thrombosis. We describe incidence, predictors, and possible mechanisms of coronary evaginations 12 months after implantation of bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS).

METHODS AND RESULTS

One hundred and two BVS implanted in 90 patients (age 63 ± 13 years, 71 males, 14 diabetics) were analysed with angiography and optical coherence tomography (OCT) 12 months after implantation. Evaginations were identified as any hollow in the luminal vessel contour between well-apposed struts and were classified as major when extending ≥3 mm with a depth ≥10% of the BVS diameter. Fifty-five (54%) of the BVS (50(56%) of the patients) had at least one evagination (6.1 ± 6.2 evaginations per BVS), with a mean volume of 1.9 ± 1.9 mm(3). Major evaginations were only found in one patient, and in-BVS aneurysms in three patients (4BVS). The presence of evaginations was strongly associated with that of malapposition (P = 0.003) and strut fractures (P = 0.01). No association could be shown between the presence and volume of the evaginations and any clinical variable or the presence of uncovered struts (P > 0.5). Peri-strut low-intensity areas (PSLIA) were present in 29 (53%) of the BVS with evaginations and 12 (26%) of those without (P = 0.0049); their presence was independently associated with the presence, the number (P < 0.003) and volume of the evaginations (P = 0.004) and with that of strut fracture.

CONCLUSIONS

Optical coherence tomography-detected evaginations are relatively common after BVS implantation, but, as for modern drug-eluting metallic stents, major evaginations are very rare. Optical coherence tomography evidence of immature neointima and strut fractures were associated with more severe development of evaginations.

Advances in Automated Assessment of Intracoronary Optical Coherence Tomography and Their Clinical Application

Intravascular optical coherence tomography (OCT) is capable of acquiring 3-dimensional (3D) data of coronary arteries allowing for the assessment of plaques, stents, thrombus, side branches, and other relevant structures in a 3D fashion. Given that state-of-the-art OCT systems acquire images at a very high frame rate (up to 200 frames per second), typically a very large number of images per pullback (ie, 500 or more) need to be analyzed. The manual assessment of stents, plaques, and other structures is time-consuming, cumbersome, and inefficient and thus not suitable for on-line analysis during percutaneous coronary intervention procedures.

Stent coverage and neointimal proliferation in bare metal stents postdilated with a Paclitaxel-eluting balloon versus everolimus-eluting stents: prospective randomized study using optical coherence tomography at 6-month follow-up

BACKGROUND

In this randomized trial, strut coverage and neointimal proliferation of a therapy of bare metal stents (BMSs) postdilated with the paclitaxel drug-eluting balloon (DEB) was compared with everolimus drug-eluting stents (DESs) at 6-month follow-up using optical coherence tomography. We hypothesized sufficient stent coverage at follow-up.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 105 lesions in 90 patients were treated with either XIENCE V DES (n=51) or BMS postdilated with the SeQuent Please DEB (n=54). At follow-up, comparable results on the primary optical coherence tomography end point (percentage uncovered struts 5.64±9.65% in BMS+DEB versus 4.93±9.29% in DES; P=0.366) were found. Thus, BMS+DEB achieved the prespecified noninferiority margin of 5% uncovered struts versus DES (difference between treatment means, 0.71%; one-sided upper 95% confidence interval, 4.14%; noninferiority P=0.04). Optical coherence tomography analysis showed significantly more global neointimal proliferation in the BMS+DEB group (15.7±7.8 versus 11.0±5.2 mm(3) proliferation volume/cm stent length; P=0.002). No significant focal in-stent stenosis analyzed with angiography (percentage diameter stenosis at follow-up, 22.8±11.9 versus 16.9±10.4; P=0.014) and optical coherence tomography (peak local area stenosis, 39.5±13.8% versus 36.8±15.6%; P=0.409) was found.

CONCLUSIONS

Good stent strut coverage of >94% was found in both therapy groups. Despite greater suppression of global neointimal growth in DES, both DES and BMS+DEB effectively prevented clinically relevant focal restenosis at 6-month follow-up.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION URL

http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01056744.

Mechanisms of balloon angioplasty and repeat stenting in patients with drug-eluting in-stent restenosis

BACKGROUND

Mechanisms of lumen gain during reinterventions in patients with drug-eluting stent (DES) in-stent restenosis (ISR) remain unsettled.

METHODS

We sought to assess the mechanisms of acute lumen gain after balloon angioplasty (BA) and repeat drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation in patients with DES-ISR. Following a prospective protocol 29 consecutive patients with DES-ISR were sequentially treated with BA and new DES implantation under a multimodality intracoronary imaging assessment including intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and optical coherence tomography (OCT). Imaging studies were systematically obtained, at baseline, after BA, and after DES. Results of interventions were compared using volumetric and morphometric (ISR pattern and injury score) analyses.

RESULTS

IVUS and OCT demonstrated that acute lumen gain after BA and DES equally results from a reduction in intra-stent neointimal volume and further DES expansion. As compared with BA, repeat DES implantation not only increased final lumen (baseline 39.6±18.5mm(3), post-BA 58.6±26.6mm(3), post-DES 84.2±30.8mm(3), all p<0.001) but also provided a smoother lumen (injury score 1.57±0.86 vs 0.22±0.26, p<0.001). At the 9th month of angiographic follow-up (86% patients) in-stent late loss was 0.44±0.5mm and 4 patients (16%) developed ISR. The ISR pattern on OCT was not associated with the injury score after interventions or late angiographic findings. Likewise, the injury score did not predict late angiographic outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with DES ISR, lumen gain equally results from a reduction in intra-stent neointimal volume and further DES expansion. As compared with BA, repeat DES implantation provides a larger and smoother coronary lumen.

Mechanisms, pathophysiology, and clinical aspects of incomplete stent apposition

Incomplete stent apposition (ISA) is characterized by the lack of contact of at least 1 stent strut with the vessel wall in a segment not overlying a side branch; it is more commonly found in drug-eluting stents than bare-metal stents. The accurate diagnosis of ISA, initially only possible with intravascular ultrasound, can currently be performed with higher accuracy by optical coherence tomography, which also enables strut-level assessment due to its higher axial resolution. Different circumstances related both to the index procedure and to vascular healing might influence ISA occurrence. Although several histopathology and clinical studies linked ISA to stent thrombosis, potential selection bias precluded definitive conclusions. Initial studies usually performed single time point assessments comparing overall ISA percentage and magnitude in different groups (i.e., stent type), thus hampering a comprehensive understanding of its relationship with vascular healing. Serial intravascular imaging studies that evaluated vascular response heterogeneity recently helped fill this gap. Some particular clinical scenarios such as acute coronary syndromes, bifurcations, tapered vessels, overlapping stents, and chronic total occlusions might predispose to ISA. Interventional cardiologists should be committed to optimal stent choices and techniques of implantation and use intravascular imaging guidance when appropriate to aim at minimizing acute ISA. In addition, the active search for new stent platforms that could accommodate vessel remodeling over time (i.e., self-expandable stents) and for new polymers and/or eluting drugs that could induce less inflammation (hence, less positive remodeling) could ultimately reduce the occurrence of ISA and its potentially harmful consequences.

Healing course of acute vessel wall injury after drug-eluting stent implantation assessed by optical coherence tomography

BACKGROUND

Vessel wall injury after drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation can be characterized in detail by optical coherence tomography (OCT). Little is known about the healing course of these phenomena.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In 62 lesions (62 patients), the incidence of acute vessel trauma was assessed in the stented region and the edge segments immediately after DES implantation. The healing course of these injuries was assessed at 9-month OCT follow-up using a software algorithm allowing for reliable spatial comparison of baseline and follow-up cross-sectional images. Tissue prolapse (TP) and tissue protrusions were detected in 81 and 35% of lesions, respectively. A total of 342 intra-stent dissection flaps (ISD) and 114 intra-stent dissection cavities (ISC) were visualized in 98 and 81% of lesions, respectively. Thirty-five lesions (56%) showed edge dissections (EDs). No residual TP or protrusion was observed at follow-up. Incomplete healing was seen in 8% of ISD and in 20% of ISC. For ED, a residual flap was observed in one-third of the initially dissected stent edges. Incomplete healing of acute vessel injury was associated with the presence of underlying atherosclerotic disease at baseline. Uncovered and malapposed stent struts were observed more often with incomplete healing of vessel injury at follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Acute vessel wall trauma is highly prevalent immediately after DES implantation. Most of these injuries are minor and resolve at mid-term follow-up. Incomplete healing of ISDs seems to be associated with other OCT findings suggesting delayed arterial healing.