Extremity Dysfunction After Large-Bore Radial and Femoral Arterial Access

Background

The use of large‐bore (LB) arterial access and guiding catheters has been advocated for complex percutaneous coronary intervention. However, the impact of LB transradial access (TRA) and transfemoral access (TFA) on extremity dysfunction is currently unknown.

Methods and Results

The predefined substudy of the COLOR (Complex Large‐Bore Radial PCI) trial aimed to assess upper and lower‐extremity dysfunction after LB radial and femoral access. Upper‐extremity function was assessed in LB TRA‐treated patients by the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire and lower‐extremity function in LB TFA‐treated patients by the Lower Extremity Functional Scale questionnaire. Extremity pain and effect of access site complications and risk factors on extremity dysfunction was also analyzed. There were 343 patients who completed analyzable questionnaires. Overall, upper and lower‐extremity function did not decrease over time when LB TRA and TFA were used for complex percutaneous coronary intervention, as represented by the median Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score (6.8 at baseline and 2.1 at follow‐up, higher is worse) and Lower Extremity Functional Scale score (56 at baseline and 58 at follow‐up, lower is worse). Clinically relevant extremity dysfunction occurred in 6% after TRA and 9% after TFA. A trend for more pronounced upper‐limb dysfunction was present in female patients after LB TRA (P=0.05). Lower‐extremity pain at discharge was significantly higher in patients with femoral access site complications (P=0.02).

Conclusions

Following LB TRA and TFA, self‐reported upper and lower‐limb function did not decrease over time in the majority of patients. Clinically relevant limb dysfunction occurs in a small minority of patients regardless of radial or femoral access.

Registration

URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03846752.

Comparison of transradial versus transfemoral diagnostic coronary angiography in terms of oxidative stress: Which option is more physiological?

In this randomized, single-center, clinical study we aimed to compare the oxidative stress response in patients undergoing diagnostic transradial or transfemoral elective coronary angiography. Sixty patients with stable angina pectoris undergoing elective coronary angiography to either transradial ( n = 30) or transfemoral ( n = 30) approach were included. The levels of plasma total oxidative status (TOS) were measured and compared just before and immediately after the procedure in both groups. The clinical and laboratory findings were compatible between the two groups. Although the levels of plasma total oxidative status after coronary angiography were increased in both groups (TF pTOS 20. ± :3; 34 ± 3 vs TR pTOS 18 ± 2; 23 ± 4), this was more pronounced in the transfemoral group as compared with the transradial group (ΔpTOS: 11 ± 4 vs 4 ± 3, p < 0.001) In correlation analysis, TOS levels and white blood cell counts ( r = 0.25, p = 0.042), total cholesterol levels ( r = 0.267, p = 0.041), triglyceride levels ( r = 0.253, p = 0.049), serum creatinine levels ( r = 0.260, p = 0.043) were found to be moderately positively correlated. This study showed that oxidative stress response associated with heart catheterization is more evident in patients undergoing transfemoral coronary angiography versus transradial coronary angiography.

Relationship between peripheral arterial reactive hyperemia and the index of myocardial resistance in patients undergoing invasive coronary angiography

BACKGROUND

Coronary microvascular dysfunction is a powerful prognostic factor in patients with coronary artery disease. We investigated the role of reactive digital hyperemia peripheral arterial tonometry (RH-PAT) as a non-invasive tool to identify patients with impaired coronary microvasculature.

METHODS

Patients undergoing elective coronary angiography were consecutively assessed for peripheral microvascular endothelial function before coronary angiography: both the Reactive Hyperemic Index (RHI) and the Framingham reactive hyperemic index (Endoscore) were measured. During coronary angiography, the Index of microvascular resistance (IMR) was measured in all patients, and an IMR value > 25 identified patients with coronary microvascular impairment.

RESULTS

A total of 47 patients with chronic coronary syndromes candidate to coronary angiography were included. Those with coronary microvascular impairment (n = 18 [38%]) presented with significantly lower RHI (1.68 ± 0.38 vs. 1.94 ± 0.93, p = 0.04) and Endoscore 0.50 ± 0.23 vs. 0.64 ± 0.23, p = 0.04) values as compared with patients with preserved coronary microvasculature. A significant relationship was observed between IMR with both RHI (r = 0.35, p = 0.02) and Endoscore (r = 0.34, p = 0.02). At the multivariable analysis, RHI and Endoscore were the only independent predictors of an IMR > 25.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrates that digital reactive hyperemia indexes are lower in patients with high IMR values, suggesting a role for RH-PAT as non-invasive tool for identifying patients with coronary microvascular impairment.

Endothelial dysfunction assessed by digital tonometry and discrepancy between fraction flow reserve and instantaneous wave free ratio

Background: We tested whether the level of endothelial dysfunction assessed by digital tonometry, and expressed as reactive hyperemia index (RHI), is related to occurrences of a discrepancy between fractional flow reserve (FFR) and the instantaneous wave free ratio (iFR) (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03033810).Methods: We examined patients with coronary stenosis in the range of 40-70%, assessed by both FFR and iFR (system Philips-Volcano) for stable angina. We included consecutive patients with FFR and iFR in one native coronary artery, and who had had no previous intervention.Results: We included 138 patients. Out of those, 24 patients (17.4%) had a negative FFR (with an FFR value >0.8) and positive iFR (with a iFR value ≤0.89) - designated the FFRn/iFRp discrepancy group, and 22 patients (15.9%) had a positive FFR (≤0.8) and negative iFR (>0.89) - designated the FFRp/iFRn discrepancy. RHI was higher in the discrepancy groups compared the group without discrepancy (1.73 ± 0.79 vs. 1.48 ± 0.50, p = 0.025). However, this finding was not confirmed in multivariant logistic regression analyses. Patients with any type of discrepancy differed from the agreement group by having a higher occurrence of diabetes mellitus [9 patients (21.4%) vs. 36 patients (39.6%), p = 0.029], active smoking (23 patients or 54.8% vs. 26 patients or 28.6%, p = 0.003) and lower use of calcium channel blockers (9 patients, 21.4%, vs. 43 patients, 46.7%, p = 0.004).Conclusion: The presence of endothelial dysfunction can be associated with a discrepancy in FFR/iFR. However, RHI correlated with risk factors of atherosclerosis, not with FFR or iFR.

Evolution of blood biomarker levels following percutaneous atrial septal defect closure in adults

•

A substantial number of adults with unrepaired ASD have elevated biomarker levels.

•

Percutaneous ASD closure in adults leads to acute changes in most biomarker levels.

•

TnT, CRP, RDW, GDF-15 increase immediate after ASD closure and galectin-3 decreases.

•

Long-term reverse cardiac remodeling was not reflected by a decrease in biomarkers.

•

Novel biomarkers can help to elucidate mechanisms of reverse cardiac remodeling.

Background

We sought to assess the effects of percutaneous atrial septal defect (ASD) closure on blood biomarker levels that possibly reflect reverse cardiac remodeling. Therefore, this study investigated temporal changes in six blood biomarkers following percutaneous ASD closure in adults.

Methods

In this prospective observational cohort study, adults with ASD type II scheduled for percutaneous closure were included (2012–2016). NT-proBNP, high-sensitive troponin-T (hs-TnT), high-sensitive C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), red blood cell distribution width (RDW), growth differentiation factor-15 (GDF-15) and galectin-3 were measured one day prior to ASD closure and one day, three months and one year post ASD closure, and changes were evaluated using paired T-tests. Echocardiographic measurements were obtained.

Results

Fifty patients were included (median age 50 years, 62% women, 32% NYHA II). At baseline, biomarker levels were elevated in a substantial number of patients; NT-proBNP n = 22 (45%), hs-TnT n = 6 (13%) hs-CRP n = 19 (40%), galectin-3 n = 5 (11%) and GDF n = 10 (23%). One day after ASD closure, significant increases of hs-TnT (median change (Δ) = 12 ng/L), hs-CRP (Δ = 1.9 mg/L), GDF-15(Δ = 129 pg/mL) and RDW (Δ = 0.1%) were observed, and a decrease in galectin-3 (Δ = −1.0 ng/mL). Consequently, 92% had at least one abnormal biomarker directly after closure. At three months biomarker levels returned to baseline, and while echocardiographic measures 1 year post closure were indicative of reverse cardiac remodeling, biomarker levels did not further decrease.

Conclusion

Percutaneous ASD closure in adults leads to a direct increase in most blood biomarkers, in particular hs-CRP and hs-TnT. After three months, biomarkers returned to baseline levels and remained stable up to one year.

ACRA Perfusion Study

BACKGROUND

Transradial intervention (TRI) may impair digital perfusion with hand dysfunction as a result. However, the effect of TRI on digital perfusion has never been investigated, including the influence of variations of the collateral arterial network and the effect on hand dysfunction.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We investigated the effect of TRI on digital perfusion by laser Doppler perfusion imaging. Laser Doppler perfusion imaging was performed at baseline, during radial access, TR band application, and at discharge. We compared tissue perfusion of the homolateral thumb (access site) with the contralateral thumb (comparator) during radial access as primary outcome. The hand circulation was assessed with angiography. Upper extremity function was evaluated with the validated QuickDASH questionnaire at baseline and follow-up. A significant reduction of tissue perfusion was observed during radial access and TR band application in the homolateral thumb (-32%, -32%, respectively) and contralateral thumb (-34%, -21%, respectively). We detected no perfusion difference between the homolateral and contralateral thumb during radial access (217; interquartile range, 112-364 versus 209; interquartile range, 99-369 arbitrary flux units; P=0.59). Reduced perfusion of the thumb during radial access was not associated with incompleteness of the superficial palmar arch ( P=0.13). Digital perfusion improved at discharge, though it remained below baseline levels (homolateral -11% and contralateral -14%). Hand dysfunction at 18 months was not associated with TRI-induced perfusion reduction ( P=0.54).

CONCLUSIONS

TRI is safe. Digital perfusion is reduced in both hands during radial access and TR band application but is not associated with future loss of hand function and variations of the arterial hand supply.

Long-term endothelial dysfunction after trans-radial catheterization: A meta-analytic approach

BACKGROUND

Following cardiac catheterization using radial artery (RA) access, persistent endothelial dysfunction may limit the use of RA as a conduit during coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. We reviewed published literature to investigate the effects of transradial coronary catheterization on RA endothelial function.

METHODS

We searched PubMed from inception to April 2017 for published studies assessing RA endothelial function late (≥1 month) after coronary catheterization. A total of 12 eligible published studies (n = 490 patients) were included in the final quantitative synthesis. Statistical heterogeneity among studies was assessed by the I² . A random effects model was used to calculate the pooled estimate for standardized mean difference (SMD). Meta-regression analysis was used to explore predictors of change in RA endothelial function following catheterization.

RESULTS

In all studies, a significant reduction in endothelium dependent response was observed post-catheterization (SMD = -0.53, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.93 to -0.13, P = 0.01) and a marginal, non-significant, reduction in endothelium independent response (SMD = -0.38, 95%CI: -0.77, 0.01, P < 0.059). In controlled studies, using the contralateral RA as a control, a significant impairment in endothelial function was confirmed (SMD = -6.26, 95%CI: -9.71 to -2.81, P < 0.0001), while the change in endothelium-independent response was not significant (SMD = -4.46, 95%CI: -13.3 to 4.37, P = 0.32). In meta-regression analysis male gender (z = 2.36, P = 0.018) and increasing time following catheterization (z = 2.62, P = 0.009) were associated with less RA endothelial dysfunction.

CONCLUSIONS

Transradial catheterization impairs endothelium dependent vasodilatory properties of the cannulated RA, which do not recover even several months post-catheterization. Non-recovery of vasomotor function of cannulated RAs may limit their use as arterial grafts during CABG surgery.

Endothelial dysfunction and the occurrence of radial artery spasm during transradial coronary procedures: the ACRA-Spasm study

AIMS

The aim of this study was to analyse the relation between endothelial dysfunction (ED) and the occurrence of radial artery spasm (RAS) during transradial coronary procedures.

METHODS AND RESULTS

From May 2014 to June 2015, endothelial function was assessed by EndoPAT and FMD before the procedure in 165 patients referred for coronary angiography or intervention. The primary endpoint was RAS, defined by patient's symptoms and procedural characteristics. The mean age of the study population was 63 years and 71% were male. In total 16% of the patients experienced RAS. The incidence of RAS did not differ between patients with and without ED (13.8% vs. 20.2%, OR 0.63, 95% CI: 0.25-1.58, p=0.32). The strongest predictors of RAS were a ratio of radial artery inner diameter and sheath outer diameter smaller than 1 (OR 4.7, 95% CI: 1.35-16.5, p=0.009) and a combination of clinical characteristics presented as an RAS risk score of at least 4 (p=0.007, OR 3.7, 95% CI: 1.37-9.89).

CONCLUSIONS

Endothelial dysfunction was not found to be a predictor of the occurrence of radial artery spasm in a cohort of patients undergoing elective heart catheterisation. Radial artery-sheath mismatch is the strongest pre-procedural predictor of RAS.

The effect of transradial coronary catheterization on upper limb function

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to analyze the change of upper limb function when percutaneous coronary procedures were performed through the radial artery.

BACKGROUND

It is currently unknown if upper limb function is affected by transradial (TR) catheterization.

METHODS

Between January 2013 and February 2014, upper limb function was assessed in a total of 338 patients undergoing coronary catheterization in an ambulatory setting (85% radial approach, 15% femoral approach). Upper limb function was assessed with the self-reported shortened version of the Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire. The presence and severity of upper extremity cold intolerance was assessed with the self-reported Cold Intolerance Symptom Severity questionnaire. Both questionnaires were completed before the catheterization and at 30-day follow-up. Higher scores represent worse upper limb functionality or symptoms. The nonparametric Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to assess the change of upper limb function and symptoms over time.

RESULTS

Upper limb function did not change significantly over time when catheterization was performed through the radial artery (p=0.06). The number of procedure-related extremity complaints that persisted during 30-day follow-up were not different between both access groups (TR access 10.5%, transfemoral access 11.5%; p=0.82). The upper extremity was not affected by cold intolerance after TR access at 30-day follow-up (p=0.91).

CONCLUSIONS

Upper limb function was not affected when coronary catheterizations and interventions were performed through the radial artery.

Cardiac catheterization: consequences for the endothelium and potential for nanomedicine

Cardiac catheterization results in interactions between the catheter and surfaces and the artery lumen, which is lined by the endothelium. These interactions can range from minor rubbing to severe mechanical injury. Further, in the case of radial access, even atraumatic interactions have consequences ranging from clinical complications, such as radial spasm and radial occlusion, to lasting endothelial cell dysfunction. These consequences may be underappreciated; however, endothelial cells play a central role in maintaining vascular homeostasis via nitric oxide production. Existing treatment paradigms do not address endothelial dysfunction or damage and, thus, novel therapeutic approaches are needed. Nanomedicine, in particular, offers great potential in the form of targeted drug delivery, via functionalized coatings or nanocarriers, aimed at increased nitric oxide bioavailability or reduced inflammation.