Transcatheter treatment for refractory angina with the Coronary Sinus Reducer

Coronary Sinus Narrowing for Treating Refractory Angina: REDUCER-I Multicenter "Real-World" Observational Study Primary Endpoint Analysis

BACKGROUND

Patients with refractory angina are often ineligible for revascularization and have poor quality of life despite optimal medical therapy. The coronary sinus (CS) Reducer (Shockwave Medical Inc) was safe and effective in the treatment of refractory angina in the COSIRA (Coronary Sinus Reducer for Treatment of Refractory Angina) randomized sham-controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to perform the primary endpoint analysis of the complete REDUCER-I (An Observational Study of the Neovasc Reducer System) study cohort.

METHODS

REDUCER-I is a nonrandomized, "real-world" study of patients with refractory angina treated with the CS Reducer conducted at 25 centers from 9 European countries. The primary effectiveness endpoint was an improvement in Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) class at 6 months. The primary safety endpoints were major adverse cardiac events and device- or procedure-related serious adverse events through 30 days. Study follow-up is planned through 5 years with some interim 3-year analyses included here.

RESULTS

From 2016 to 2023, 400 patients were enrolled, including 78.0% (312/400) male patients, 54.3% (216/398) with previous myocardial infarction, 73.6% (293/398) with previous revascularization, and 72.0% (280/389) CCS class III/IV. Major adverse cardiac event and serious adverse event rates were 1.6% (95% CI: 0.7-3.6) and 1.1% (4/371), respectively, with no deaths within 30 days. At 6 months, 69.8% (240/344) of patients improved by ≥1 CCS class. Six-minute walk distances improved by 34.1 ± 85.8 m at 6 months (P < 0.0001). Interim 3-year results showed CCS class and Seattle Angina Questionnaire quality of life improvements were sustained (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

The complete primary endpoint analysis of the REDUCER-I study shows patients with refractory angina were safely and effectively treated with the CS Reducer. Improvements in angina and quality of life appear sustained through 3 years.

[Coronary sinus reducer : Technical aspects, prevention and management of potential complications]

Coronary sinus reducer implantation is a percutaneous technique creating a narrowing in the coronary sinus through the implantation of an hourglass-shaped endoprosthesis. It is proposed to reduce symptoms in patients suffering from refractory angina pectoris. This innovative treatment is experiencing a major craze among interventional cardiologists. It is associated with very high procedural success rates. Complications are rare and include coronary sinus dissection or perforation and migration of the device. This review exposes the device implantation technique, the potential anatomical difficulties, the tips and tricks to overcome challenging situations. It also focuses on the prevention and management of potential complications.

Coronary Sinus Reducer Therapy for Refractory Angina and its Role in Modern Interventional Practice: A Contemporary Review

Coronary sinus reducer (CSR) implantation is an emerging treatment option for patients with refractory angina. This condition represents a major global cardiovascular healthcare challenge, with patients experiencing chronic anginal symptoms that significantly impair their quality of life and for whom few effective treatments exist. The clinical burden of refractory angina is only set to grow because of improved survival from coronary artery disease, increased life expectancy and the presence of residual angina after percutaneous or surgical coronary revascularisation. Therefore, new, effective, evidence-based therapies are urgently needed. In this review, we highlight the unmet clinical needs of patients with refractory angina, discuss the development of the CSR device and review the preclinical and clinical evidence base underlying CSR implantation. In addition, we discuss the current role of CSR implantation in contemporary interventional practice, highlighting knowledge gaps and discussing areas of on-going research.

Coronary sinus narrowing therapy: A "Reducer" for angina and beyond

Refractory Angina (RA) is an increasingly common clinical diagnosis, in which patients unsuitable for further percutaneous or surgical procedures experience anginal symptoms, despite receiving optimal medical therapy. This clinical condition challenges the everyday activities and diminishes the quality of life of these patients. A wide variety of novel therapies for this type of angina are being investigated for clinical use. One of them is coronary sinus narrowing, which is performed as a percutaneous interventional procedure using catheter-delivered device, the Reducer. The device is implanted in the coronary sinus creating a physical narrowing and a pressure gradient in the sinus. This intervention improves the impaired blood flow in the ischemic regions of the heart leading to the relief of the anginal symptoms and, therefore, the overall clinical improvement of these patients. Several clinical trials have established both the safety and efficacy of the coronary sinus Reducer, while ongoing trials are aiming to further establish the procedure's safety and efficiency in both RA and other cardiovascular diseases, such as coronary microvascular dysfunction. This review aims to discuss the pathophysiology and the role of the coronary sinus Reducer in RA, the clinical trials documenting its safety and efficacy, as well as the future perspectives of this procedure among cardiovascular diseases.

[Coronary sinus reducer : Literature review and issues surrounding the France Reducer registry]

Coronary sinus Reducer implantation is a percutaneous technique used to treat patients suffering from refractory angina pectoris. The device narrows the coronary sinus, increases the back pressure in the myocardial venous system and forces redistribution of coronary blood flow from less ischemic subepicardium to the more ischemic subendocardium. Multiple clinical studies had proven its efficacy to alleviate myocardial ischemia and related symptoms, and to improve the quality of life of patients with refractory symptomatic chronic coronary artery disease for whom coronary revascularization is deemed unsuitable. This literature review aims to expose the device design, its mechanisms of action, and the clinical data supporting its use. Since November 2021 Reducer's reimbursement has been granted in France by the national health authority. It is the first device to be approved under a newly established reimbursement approval process. A transitional coverage is provided with opportunities for renewal before applying for full-time reimbursement. To fulfill the requirements of the National Commission for Evaluation of Medical Devices and Health Technologies, the French Society of Cardiology has been creating the France Reducer registry. This clinical registry has been collecting data from patients undergoing coronary sinus Reducer implantation regarding their clinical situation, periprocedural information, and one-year follow-up. It is crucial for the future of this emerging therapeutic option in France. To date, 215 patients from 28 centers have been included between June 2022 and September 2023.

Coronary sinus Reducer device for the treatment of refractory angina: A multicenter initial experience

INTRODUCTION

The coronary sinus Reducer (CSR) device has emerged as a complementary therapy in patients with severe angina refractory to optimal medical therapy and not amenable to revascularization. Our aim was to assess the safety and efficacy of the CSR in a real-world setting.

METHODS

Twenty-six patients with refractory angina (RA) and evidence of myocardial ischemia attributable to the left coronary artery considered unsuitable for revascularization were treated with the CSR at two centers between May 2017 and July 2019. Safety endpoints were procedural success and complications. Efficacy endpoints, assessed at six-month follow-up, were reduction in CCS class, improvement in quality of life (QoL) assessed using the short version of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ-7), and reduction in antianginal therapy.

RESULTS

Twenty-three patients had end-stage coronary artery disease without revascularization targets and three had microvascular disease without epicardial stenosis. Procedural success was achieved in 23 patients, with two device/procedure-related complications and one anatomically-related failure to deliver the device. A total of 25 patients had the device implanted and entered the efficacy analysis. Eighteen patients (75.0%) had a reduction of at least one CCS class, 41.7% had a reduction of at least two classes, and 16.7% became asymptomatic, with a mean reduction in CCS class of 1.3±0.2 (p=0.001) at six-month follow-up. All SAQ-7 domains improved, notably physical limitation (p=0.001), angina frequency (p=0.005) and QoL (p=0.006). There was a mean reduction in anti-ischemic drugs from 3.4±1.1 to 2.9±1.2 (p=0.010).

CONCLUSION

In this real-world, multicenter experience, implantation of the CSR was associated with improvement in angina and QoL in patients with RA.

The Effectiveness of CS Reducer for the treatment of Refractory Angina - a Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Refractory angina is a debilitating condition that affects quality of life of patients worldwide, that after exhausting standard available therapies are regarded as "no option" patients. Recently, coronary sinus (CS) Reducer implantation became available and is gaining popularity in the treatment of refractory angina. The effectiveness of this therapy was demonstrated in one randomized sham-control trial and numerous uncontrolled prospective studies entailing altogether several hundred patients. We performed a meta-analysis to incorporate the data and elucidate its efficacy and safety.

METHODS

A meta-analysis of prospective studies assessing the effects of CS narrowing published in English until June 2021 was performed. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients improving ≥1 class in the Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CSS) angina score. Other endpoints included proportion of patients improving ≥2 CCS classes, procedural success, periprocedural complications, changes in Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) scores, and six-minute walk test (6MWT).

RESULTS

Data from 9 studies, including 846 patients was included. An improvement of ≥1 CSS class occurred in 76% [95% CI 73%- 80%] of patients. Improvement of ≥2 CSS classes was observed in 40% of patients (95% CI of 35-46%). Procedure success was 98%, with no major and 3% of non-major periprocedural complications. Post procedural SAQ scores and 6MWT distance were significantly improved.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients suffering from angina refractory to medical and interventional therapies, CS narrowing implantation improves symptoms and quality of life, with a low complication rate. These results are consistent in one randomized trial and in multiple prospective, uncontrolled studies.

Coronary sinus narrowing for the treatment of refractory angina: a multicentre prospective open-label clinical study (the REDUCER-I study)

BACKGROUND

The REDUCER-I study is a prospective (with a retrospective component), open-label, multi-centre, international, post-market study, which collects long-term data of patients with refractory angina treated with the Reducer. Here we present the overall clinical outcomes of the first 228 patients enrolled.

AIMS

The aim of this study is to examine the safety and efficacy of the coronary sinus (CS) Reducer in improving angina severity and quality of life in patients suffering from angina pectoris, refractory to medical and interventional therapies.

METHODS

REDUCER-I is a multicentre, non-randomised observational study. Enrolled patients had refractory angina pectoris Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) class II-IV and were treated with Reducer implantation.

RESULTS

In the first 228 patients (81% male, 68.3±9.6 years), the procedural success rate was 99%, with only one adjudicated possible procedural or device-related MACE. Mean CCS class decreased from 2.8±0.6 at baseline, to 1.8±0.7 at two years. Improvement in ≥1 CCS class was observed in 82%, and in ≥2 CCS classes in 31% of patients at two years. At baseline, 70% of the cohort were reported to be in CCS class III-IV; this portion was reduced to 15% at follow-up. Additional measured parameters of functional class and quality of life were also improved.

CONCLUSIONS

Interim results from the ongoing REDUCER-I study confirm the high safety profile of this therapy in patients suffering from refractory angina. The results also demonstrate sustained improvement in angina severity and in quality of life up to two years.

Safety and efficacy of coronary sinus narrowing in chronic refractory angina: Insights from the RESOURCE study

INTRODUCTION

Refractory angina (RA) is considered the end-stage of coronary artery disease, and often has no interventional treatment options. Coronary sinus Reducer (CSR) is a recent addition to the therapeutic arsenal, but its efficacy has only been evaluated on small populations. The RESOURCE registry provides further insights into this therapy.

METHODS

The RESOURCE is an observational, retrospective registry that includes 658 patients with RA from 20 centers in Europe, United Kingdom and Israel. Prespecified endpoints were the amelioration of anginal symptoms evaluated with the Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) score, the rates of procedural success and complications, and MACEs as composite of all-cause mortality, acute coronary syndromes, and stroke.

RESULTS

At a median follow-up of 502 days (IQR 225-1091) after CSR implantation, 39.7% of patients improved by ≥2 CCS classes (primary endpoint), and 76% by ≥1 class. Procedural success was achieved in 96.7% of attempts, with 3% of procedures aborted mostly for unsuitable coronary sinus anatomy. Any complication occurred in 5.7% of procedures, but never required bailout surgery nor resulted in intra- or periprocedural death or myocardial infarction. One patient developed periprocedural stroke after inadvertent carotid artery puncture. At the last available follow-up, overall mortality and MACE were 10.4% and 14.6% respectively. At one, three and five years, mortality rate at Kaplan-Meier analysis was 4%, 13.7%, and 23.4% respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

CSR implantation is safe and reduces angina in patients with refractory angina.

Non-pharmacological treatment of refractory angina: The coronary sinus reducer, the new kid on the block

Refractory angina is defined as persistent angina (≥3 months) despite optimal medical and interventional therapies. It is increasing in frequency, due to the success of current medical and interventional therapies in improving the prognosis of coronary artery disease. Long-term mortality is similar to that of patients with asymptomatic stable disease, but it affects patients' quality of life, and has a significant impact on health care resources. Several therapeutic targets have been investigated, most with disappointing results. Many of the techniques have been abandoned because of lack of efficacy, safety issues, or economic and logistic limitations to wider applicability. The primary focus of this review is the coronary sinus Reducer, supporting evidence for which, although scarce, is promising regarding safety and efficacy in improving anginal symptoms and quality of life. It is also accessible to virtually all interventional cardiology departments.

Non-pharmacological treatment of refractory angina: The coronary sinus reducer, the new kid on the block

Refractory angina is defined as persistent angina (≥3 months) despite optimal medical and interventional therapies. It is increasing in frequency, due to the success of current medical and interventional therapies in improving the prognosis of coronary artery disease. Long-term mortality is similar to that of patients with asymptomatic stable disease, but it affects patients' quality of life, and has a significant impact on health care resources. Several therapeutic targets have been investigated, most with disappointing results. Many of the techniques have been abandoned because of lack of efficacy, safety issues, or economic and logistic limitations to wider applicability. The primary focus of this review is the coronary sinus Reducer, supporting evidence for which, although scarce, is promising regarding safety and efficacy in improving anginal symptoms and quality of life. It is also accessible to virtually all interventional cardiology departments.

Coronary Sinus Reducer for the Treatment of Chronic Refractory Angina: Will This Challenge the Treatment of Coronary Chronic Total Occlusions?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The prevalence of angina despite optimal medical therapy is high among patients with coronary chronic total occlusions. Despite advancements in techniques and operator's experience, percutaneous revascularization of coronary chronic total occlusions is still associated with a not negligible risk of failures and complications. The Coronary Sinus Reducer, a new device developed to improve angina, has shown promising results in terms of efficacy and safety in patients with refractory symptoms. The aim of this review is to summarize the evidence so far available and to guide clinicians in the selection of patients with chronic total occlusions that could benefit more from Coronary Sinus Reducer implantation.

RECENT FINDINGS

A recently published study suggests a clear value of this device in patients with chronic total occlusions. This is likely to be related to the presence of a well-developed collateral circulation. A careful evaluation of risks and benefits of both myocardial revascularization and Coronary Sinus Reducer implantation should be done in all the cases in order to better define the optimal strategy for the patient. The Coronary Sinus Reducer implantation has a rationale in patients with chronic total occlusion as an alternative or additional therapy to myocardial revascularization.

Long-term outcomes of patients undergoing coronary sinus reducer implantation - A multicenter study

BACKGROUND

Coronary sinus (CS) narrowing by reducer implantation has emerged as a safe and effective therapy for patients suffering from refractory angina. However, data regarding the clinical benefit of this treatment over time is lacking.

METHODS

Patients undergoing successful reducer implantation were enrolled prospectively to clinical registries at three medical centers. Those with more than 2-years of follow-up were included in the present analysis. Peri-procedural data, data regarding adverse events, and current evaluation of angina severity (Canadian Cardiovascular Society [CCS] class) were collected.

RESULTS

Overall, 99 consecutive patients (77% males, mean age 69.8 ± 9.4) with severe angina were enrolled between September 2010 and October 2017 and included in the present analysis. No procedure-related complications were recorded. During a median follow up time of 3.38 years (IQR 2.95-4.40), 15.1% of the patients died, 9% experienced myocardial infarction (MI) and 21% underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Mean CCS class was 3.1 ± 0.5 at baseline, improved to 1.66 ± 0.8 at 1 year (p < .001), and remained low through 2-years and at last follow up (1.72 ± 0.8 and 1.71 ± 0.8, p > 0.5 for both, in comparison to 1 year). At baseline 91% of patients reported severe disabling angina (CCS class 3-4), at 1 year only 17.9% suffered from disabling angina, p < .001, and this portion remained low overtime (19% at last follow up).

CONCLUSION

Long-term mortality of patients undergoing reducer implantation is similar to that reported for patients with stable coronary artery disease. The previously reported short-term efficacy of the reducer, reflected by significant improvement of angina symptoms, is maintained over time.

Usefulness of Coronary Sinus Reducer Implantation for the Treatment of Chronic Refractory Angina Pectoris

The coronary sinus (CS) Reducer is a novel device designed for the management of patients with severe angina symptoms refractory to optimal medical therapy and not amenable to further revascularization. Aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and the safety of the CS Reducer device in a real-world, multicenter, and country-level cohort of patients presenting with refractory angina pectoris. The study included patients affected by refractory angina pectoris who underwent CS Reducer implantation in 16 centers. Clinical follow-up was carried as per each center's protocol. One hundred eighty-seven patients were included. Technical and procedural success were achieved in 98% and 95%, respectively. Minor peri-procedural complications were recorded in 8 patients. During a median follow-up of 18.4 months, 135 (82.8%) patients demonstrated at least 1 CCS class reduction after Reducer implantation, and 80 (49%) patients at least 2 CCS class reduction. Mean CCS class improved from 3.05 ± 0.53 at baseline to 1.63 ± 0.98 at follow-up (p < 0.001). Treatment benefit was also reflected in a significant improvement in quality of life scores and in a reduction of the mean number of anti-ischemic drugs prescribed for patient. In conclusion, in this multicenter, country-level study, the implantation of CS Reducer in patients with refractory angina pectoris resulted to be safe and effective in reducing of angina pectoris and improving quality of life.

Refractory Angina-Unsolved Problem

The article discusses pharmacologic and interventional therapeutic options for patients with refractory angina. Refractory angina refers to long-lasting symptoms (≥3 months) due to established reversible ischemia in the presence of obstructive coronary artery disease, which cannot be controlled by escalating medical therapy with second-line and third-line pharmacologic agents, bypass grafting, or stenting. Due to an aging population, increased number of comorbidities, and advances in coronary artery disease treatment, incidence of refractory angina is growing. Although the number of therapeutic options is increasing, there is a lack of randomized clinical trials that could help create recommendations for this group of patients.

Refractory Angina: From Pathophysiology to New Therapeutic Nonpharmacological Technologies

Despite optimal combination of guideline-directed anti-ischemic therapies and myocardial revascularization, a substantial proportion of patients with stable coronary artery disease continues to experience disabling symptoms and is often referred as "no-option." The appraisal of the pathways linking ischemia to symptom perception indicates a complex model of heart-brain interactions in the generation of the subjective anginal experience and inspired novel approaches that may be clinically effective in alleviating the angina burden of this population. Conversely, the prevailing ischemia-centered view of angina, with the focus on traditional myocardial revascularization as the sole option to address ischemia on top of medical therapy, hinders the experimental characterization and broad-scale clinical implementation of strongly needed therapeutic options. The interventionist, often the first physician to establish the diagnosis of refractory angina pectoris (RAP) following coronary angiography, should be aware of the numerous emerging technologies with the potential to improve quality of life in the growing population of RAP patients. This review describes the current landscape and the future perspectives on nonpharmacological treatment technologies for patients with RAP, with a view on the underlying physiopathological rationale and current clinical evidence.

Coronary Sinus Reducing Stent for the Treatment of Refractory Angina Pectoris: A Health Technology Assessment

Aim

To summarize the evidence on the clinical effectiveness and safety of coronary sinus reducing stent (CSRS) therapy in refractory angina pectoris (AP) patients.

Methods

We performed a systematic literature search in common databases (n=4). The evidence obtained was summarized according to GRADE methodology. A health technology assessment (HTA) was conducted using the HTA Core Model^® for Rapid Relative Effectiveness Assessment. Primary outcomes for the clinical effectiveness domain were the proportion of patients with improvement in two or more Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) angina score classes, overall mean reduction of CCS class, and Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) quality of life (QoL) score improvement. Outcomes for the safety domain were adverse device effects (ADEs) and serious adverse device effects (SADEs).

Results

One randomized controlled trial (RCT) was identified. Outcomes that showed statistically significant differences between CSRS and sham treatment (in favor of CSRS) were CCS angina score improvement of one or two classes, overall mean reduction of CCS class, and SAQ QoL score improvement. Concerning safety, the sham-controlled trial data indicate that there were fewer SADEs in the intervention group (19%) than in the control group (46%). SADEs reported in observation studies ranged from none to 30%. The most frequently reported SADEs were death and stable angina. In the RCT, the only case of death occurred in the control group. Concerning clinical effectiveness, the risk of bias (RoB) was rated to be low, and concerning safety, the RoB was rated to range from low to moderate. As assessed by GRADE, the overall strength of evidence for effectiveness and safety was moderate. Internal and external validity of the evidence base were low.

Conclusion

Even though the current evidence indicates that the assessed technology, CSRS, is potentially more effective than sham intervention for refractory AP patients, the lack of internal validity of the studies undermines the partially positive results.

Feature tracking and mapping analysis of myocardial response to improved perfusion reserve in patients with refractory angina treated by coronary sinus Reducer implantation: a CMR study

Coronary sinus (CS) Reducer implantation improves myocardial perfusion and symptoms in patients with debilitating refractory angina. Its impact on myocardial remodeling remain uncertain. Aim of the present study was to assess possible impact of CS Reducer on myocardial systolic-diastolic deformation and microstructural remodeling, as assessed through cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) feature tracking and mapping analysis. Twenty-eight consecutive patients with refractory angina underwent multiparametric stress CMR before and 4 months after CS Reducer implantation. Eight patients were excluded (6 for absence of inducible ischemia, 2 for artifacts). Modifications in 3D systo-diastolic myocardial deformation were evaluated using feature tracking analysis on rest cine images. Myocardial microstructural remodeling was assessed by native T1 mapping, cellular and matrix volume and extracellular volume fraction (ECV). Collaterally, the percentage of ischemic myocardium (ischemic burden %) and the myocardial perfusion reserve index (MPRI) were measured. After CS Reducer implantation, myocardial contractility improved (ejection fraction rose from 61 to 67%; p = 0.0079), along with longitudinal (from - 16 to - 19%; p = 0.0192) and circumferential strain (from - 18 to - 21%; p = 0.0017). Peak diastolic radial, circumferential and longitudinal strain rate did not change (p > 0.05), and no changes in native T1, ECV, cellular and matrix volume were observed. Myocardial perfusion improved, with a reduction of ischemic burden (13-11%; p = 0.0135), and recovery of intramural perfusion balance in segments with baseline ischemia (MPRi endocardial/epicardial ratio from 0.67 to 0.96; p = 0.0107). CS Reducer improves myocardial longitudinal and circumferential strain, without microstructural remodeling and no impact on diastolic proprieties.

Technical aspects in coronary sinus Reducer implantation

Refractory angina is a growing problem, predominantly due to advanced coronary artery disease, associated with a reduced quality of life and an increased hospitalisation rate with a corresponding impact on healthcare resources. There is an unmet clinical need to be addressed by novel therapeutic approaches. Over the last few years, a treatment approach causing a controlled coronary sinus narrowing by implantation of a balloon-expandable, hourglass-shaped, stainless steel mesh (i.e., the coronary sinus Reducer) has arisen with promising initial short-term and midterm results, in terms of reducing angina and ischaemia burden and improving quality of life. Guidance with proper implantation algorithms and knowledge on how to address potential complications will improve interventional outcomes and foster a wider application of this novel therapeutic approach. In this review, we summarise the implantation technique, the causes of potential complications, and algorithms focusing upon their practical management, based on the experience of the authors.

The Coronary Sinus Reducer – Clinical Evidence and New Perspectives On An Emerging Tool in the Treatment of Refractory Angina

Collapse

The Reducer device in patients with angina pectoris: mechanisms, indications, and perspectives

Despite available pharmacological and interventional therapies, refractory angina is a common and disabling clinical condition, and a major public health problem, which affects patients' quality-of-life, and has a significant impact upon health care resources. Persistent angina is common not only in patients who are not good candidates for revascularization, but also in patients following successful revascularization. Clearly, there is a need for additional treatment options for refractory angina beyond currently available pharmacological and interventional therapies. It is of pivotal importance, in this condition, to practice a patient-centred health assessment approach, measuring success of a new therapy by its effects on patients' symptoms, functional status, and quality-of-life, rather than hard clinical endpoints as used in clinical studies. The coronary sinus Reducer is a novel technology designed to reduce disabling symptoms and improve quality-of-life of patients suffering from refractory angina. This review serves to update the clinician as to current evidence and future perspectives of the optimal utilization of this innovative technology.

Percutaneous management of periprocedural coronary sinus Reducer migration

Coronary sinus Reducer represents a novel therapeutic option for refractory angina. As emerging evidence of both reduction in angina symptoms and reduction of myocardial ischemia burden might lead to increased Reducer implantations, knowledge on how to manage potential complications is of clinical importance. We report a successful management of scaffold migration in right atrium.

New Advances in the Management of Refractory Angina Pectoris

Refractory angina is a significant clinical problem and its successful management is often extremely challenging. Defined as chronic angina-type chest pain in the presence of myocardial ischaemia that persists despite optimal medical, interventional and surgical treatment, current therapies are limited and new approaches to treatment are needed. With an ageing population and increased survival from coronary artery disease, clinicians will increasingly encounter this complex condition in routine clinical practice. Novel therapies to target myocardial ischaemia in patients with refractory angina are at the forefront of research and in this review we discuss those in clinical translation and assess the evidence behind their efficacy.

Percutaneous Device to Narrow the Coronary Sinus: Shifting Paradigm in the Treatment of Refractory Angina? A Review of the Literature

Refractory angina pectoris is defined as a chronic debilitating condition characterized by the presence of chronic anginal symptoms due to a severe obstructive and/or diffuse coronary artery disease that cannot be controlled by the combination of medical therapy and/or revascularization (percutaneous or surgical). In addition, the presence of myocardial ischemia as a cause of the symptoms must have been documented. The coronary sinus reducer (CSR) is a recently introduced percutaneous device to treat patients with severe anginal symptoms refractory to optimal medical therapy and not amenable to conventional revascularization. The purpose of this review is to describe the current evidence from available studies measuring the clinical effect of the CSR implantation on the health and well-being of patients with refractory angina.

Safety and efficacy of a device to narrow the coronary sinus for the treatment of refractory angina: A single-centre real-world experience

Objective

The coronary sinus Reducer is a recently introduced device to treat patients with severe angina symptoms refractory to optimal medical therapy and not amenable for conventional revascularisation. We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of the Reducer in a real-world cohort of patients with refractory angina.

Methods

This is a single-centre retrospective registry. Patients with severe angina symptoms, objective evidence of myocardial ischaemia using any adequate non-invasive modality and without options for conventional revascularisation were regarded eligible for Reducer implantation.

Results

Twenty-three patients (74 % male, mean age 70 ± 8 years, 91.3 % previous bypass surgery, 82.6 % previous percutaneous intervention, 47.8 % previous myocardial infarction, 52.2 % diabetes mellitus) underwent Reducer implantation. The safety endpoint (successful implantation of the first device without device-related adverse events) was met in all patients. After a median follow-up of 9 (8–14) months the efficacy (any reduction in Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) class and revascularisation-free survival) was reached in 17 patients (74 %): 8 patients (34.8 %) improved by 1 CCS class, 7 (30.4 %) by 2 CCS classes and 2 (8.7 %) by 3 CCS classes. One patient died 4 months after implantation because of progressive heart failure (not associated with Reducer implantation).

Conclusion

In this single-centre real-world experience, Reducer implantation was safe and demonstrated excellent clinical efficacy in the treatment of refractory angina at mid-term follow-up.

Efficacy of a device to narrow the coronary sinus in refractory angina

BACKGROUND

Many patients with coronary artery disease who are not candidates for revascularization have refractory angina despite standard medical therapy. The balloon-expandable, stainless steel, hourglass-shaped, coronary-sinus reducing device creates a focal narrowing and increases pressure in the coronary sinus, thus redistributing blood into ischemic myocardium.

METHODS

We randomly assigned 104 patients with Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) class III or IV angina (on a scale from I to IV, with higher classes indicating greater limitations on physical activity owing to angina) and myocardial ischemia, who were not candidates for revascularization, to implantation of the device (treatment group) or to a sham procedure (control group). The primary end point was the proportion of patients with an improvement of at least two CCS angina classes at 6 months.

RESULTS

A total of 35% of the patients in the treatment group (18 of 52 patients), as compared with 15% of those in the control group (8 of 52), had an improvement of at least two CCS angina classes at 6 months (P=0.02). The device was also associated with improvement of at least one CCS angina class in 71% of the patients in the treatment group (37 of 52 patients), as compared with 42% of those in the control group (22 of 52) (P=0.003). Quality of life as assessed with the use of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire was significantly improved in the treatment group, as compared with the control group (improvement on a 100-point scale, 17.6 vs. 7.6 points; P=0.03). There were no significant between-group differences in improvement in exercise time or in the mean change in the wall-motion index as assessed by means of dobutamine echocardiography. At 6 months, 1 patient in the treatment group had had a myocardial infarction; in the control group, 1 patient had died and 3 had had a myocardial infarction.

CONCLUSIONS

In this small clinical trial, implantation of the coronary-sinus reducing device was associated with significant improvement in symptoms and quality of life in patients with refractory angina who were not candidates for revascularization. (Funded by Neovasc; COSIRA ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01205893.).