2014 ESC/EACTS guidelines on myocardial revascularization

High on-aspirin treatment platelet reactivity and restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention: results of the Intracoronary Stenting and Antithrombotic Regimen-ASpirin and Platelet Inhibition (ISAR-ASPI) Registry

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess the association between high on-aspirin treatment platelet reactivity (HAPR) and the subsequent risk of restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with predominantly drug-eluting stents.

BACKGROUND

The association between HAPR and subsequent risk of restenosis after PCI is unclear.

METHODS

This study included 4839 patients undergoing PCI (02/2007-12/2011) in the setting of the Intracoronary Stenting and Antithrombotic Regimen-ASpirin and Platelet Inhibition (ISAR-ASPI) registry. Platelet function was assessed with impedance aggregometry using the multi-plate analyzer immediately before PCI and after intravenous administration of aspirin (500 mg). The primary outcome was clinical restenosis, defined as target lesion revascularization at 1 year. Secondary outcomes included binary angiographic restenosis and late lumen loss at 6- to 8-month angiography.

RESULTS

The upper quintile cut-off of platelet reactivity measurements (191 AU × min) was used to categorize patients into a group with HAPR (platelet reactivity > 191 AU × min; n = 952) and a group without HAPR (platelet reactivity ≤ 191 AU × min; n = 3887). The primary outcome occurred in 94 patients in the HAPR group and 405 patients without HAPR (cumulative incidence, 9.9% and 10.4%; HR = 0.96, 95% CI 0.77-1.19; P = 0.70). Follow-up angiography was performed in 73.2% of patients. There was no difference in binary restenosis (15.2% vs. 14.9%; P = 0.79) or late lumen loss (0.32 ± 0.57 vs. 0.32 ± 0.59 mm; P = 0.93) between patients with HAPR versus those without HAPR.

CONCLUSIONS

This study did not find an association between HAPR, measured at the time of PCI, and clinical restenosis at 1 year after PCI.

Drug-coated balloon: an effective alternative to stent strategy in small-vessel coronary artery disease-a meta-analysis

Background

Small-vessel coronary artery disease (CAD) is frequently observed in coronary angiography and linked to a higher risk of lesion failure and restenosis. Currently, treatment of small vessels is not standardized while having drug-eluting stents (DES) or drug-coated balloons (DCBs) as possible strategies. We aimed to conduct a meta-analytic approach to assess the effectiveness of treatment strategies and outcomes for small-vessel CAD.

Methods

Comprehensive literature search was conducted using PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Library databases to identify studies reporting treatment strategies of small-vessel CAD with a reference diameter of ≤3.0 mm. Target lesion revascularization (TLR), target lesion thrombosis, all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) were defined as clinical outcomes. Outcomes from single-arm and randomized studies based on measures by means of their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) were compared using a meta-analytic approach. Statistical significance was assumed if CIs did not overlap.

Results

Thirty-seven eligible studies with a total of 31,835 patients with small-vessel CAD were included in the present analysis. Among those, 28,147 patients were treated with DES (24 studies) and 3,299 patients with DCB (18 studies). Common baseline characteristics were equally distributed in the different studies. TLR rate was 4% in both treatment strategies [0.04; 95% CI 0.03-0.05 (DES) vs. 0.03-0.07 (DCB)]. MI occurred in 3% of patients receiving DES and in 2% treated with DCB [0.03 (0.02-0.04) vs. 0.02 (0.01-0.03)]. All-cause mortality was 3% in the DES group [0.03 (0.02-0.05)] compared with 1% in the DCB group [0.01 (0.00-0.03)]. Approximately 9% of patients with DES developed MACE vs. 4% of patients with DCB [0.09 (0.07-0.10) vs. 0.04 (0.02-0.08)]. Meta-regression analysis did not show a significant impact of reference vessel diameter on outcomes.

Conclusion

This large meta-analytic approach demonstrates similar clinical and angiographic results between treatment strategies with DES and DCB in small-vessel CAD. Therefore, DES may be waived in small coronary arteries when PCI is performed with DCB.

Different hydration methods for the prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy in patients with elective percutaneous coronary intervention: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Hydration is currently the main measure to prevent contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN). We aimed to compare the preventive effect of preprocedure and postprocedure hydration on CIN in patients with coronary heart disease undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

METHODS

A retrospective study included 198 cases of postprocedure hydration and 396 cases of preprocedure hydration using propensity score matching. The incidence of CIN 48 h after PCI and adverse events within 30 days after contrast media exposure were compared between the two groups. Logistic regression analysis was used to analyse the risk factors for CIN.

RESULTS

The incidence of CIN in the postprocedure hydration group was 3.54%, while that in the preprocedure hydration group was 4.8%. There was no significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.478). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that diabetes mellitus, baseline BNP and cystatin C levels, and contrast agent dosage were independent risk factors for CIN. There was no significant difference in the incidence of major adverse events between the two groups (3.03% vs. 2.02%, p = 0.830).

CONCLUSIONS

Postprocedure hydration is equally effective compared to preoperative hydration in the prevention of CIN in patients with coronary heart disease undergoing elective PCI.

International randomized trial on the effect of revascularization or optimal medical therapy of chronic total coronary occlusions with myocardial ischemia - ISCHEMIA-CTO trial - rationale and design

BACKGROUND

Chronic total occlusions (CTO) are frequent among patients with coronary artery disease. Revascularization with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is safe and feasible in experienced hands. However, randomized data are needed to demonstrate symptomatic as well as prognostic effect of CTO-PCI compared to optimal medical therapy alone.

METHODS

This trial aims to evaluate the effect of CTO PCI in patients with a CTO lesion and target vessel diameter ≥ 2.5 mm, and myocardial ischemia in the relevant territory. First, all patients are subjected to optimal medical therapy (OMT) for at least for 3 months and non-CTO lesions are managed according to guidelines. Subsequently, prior to randomization myocardial ischemia and quality of life (Seattle Questionnaire (SAQ)) is assessed. Patients are divided into two cohorts based on their SAQ score and randomized to either OMT alone or OMT and CTO-PCI. Cohort A is defined as Low- or asymptomatic patients with a quality-of-life score > 60 and/or CCS class < 2, and more than 10 % ischemia in the left ventricle (LV). Cohort B is symptomatic patients with a quality-of-life score < 60 or CCS class angina > 1 and at least ischemia in 5% of the LV. The primary end-point in cohort A is a composite of major adverse cardiac and cerebral events, hospitalization for heart failure and malignant ventricular arrhythmias. The primary endpoint in cohort B is difference in quality of life 6 months after randomization.

IMPLICATIONS

This trial is designed to investigate if CTO-PCI improves QoL and MACCE. Both positive and negative outcome of the trial will affect future guidelines and recommendations on how to treat patients with CTO.

Rates of Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in England and Wales: Impact of COURAGE and ORBITA Trials

Background

There are limited data about how COURAGE (Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation) and ORBITA (Objective Randomized Blinded Investigation With Optimal Medical Therapy of Angioplasty in Stable Angina) trials have impacted percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) practices at regional or national level. We evaluated temporal trends in elective PCI rates for stable angina and, specifically, examined the impact of the COURAGE and ORBITA trials on PCI practices in England and Wales.

Methods and Results

We used national PCI data comprising >1.2 million patients undergoing PCI between January 2006 and December 2019. Patient demographics, procedural details, and clinical outcomes were analyzed, and temporal trends in PCI rates for stable angina were compared before and after the publication of the COURAGE and ORBITA trials. Of 1 245 802 PCI procedures, 430 248 (34.5%) were performed for stable angina. Over the study period, the number of elective PCI procedures per year (30 823 in 2006 to 34 103 in 2019) and per 100 000 population estimates (50.7 in 2006 to 58.4 in 2019) remained stable. The proportion of patients undergoing elective PCI without angina symptoms almost doubled from 5.1% to 9.7%. The incidence rate of elective PCI volume after the COURAGE trial, published in 2007, was not different from before the trial was published (incidence rate ratio, 1.06 [95% CI, 0.69–1.62]). It also remained stable after the publication of the ORBITA trial in 2017 (incidence rate ratio, 0.96 [95% CI, 0.74–1.23]).

Conclusions

In this nationwide analysis, rates of elective PCI for stable angina remained stable over 14 years. Publication of the COURAGE and ORBITA trials had no impact on elective PCI activity.

Definition of Optimal Optical Coherence Tomography-Based Stent Expansion Criteria: In-Stent Minimum Lumen Area Versus Residual Stent Underexpansion

BACKGROUND

The mismatch between in-stent minimum lumen area (sMLA) and reference vessel lumen area, defined as stent underexpansion (SU), could be an important determinant of stent failure. We tested the clinical predictive value of absolute sMLA in comparison to relative SU in the context of the CLI-OPCI (Centro Per La Lotta Contro L'Infarto-Optimisation of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention) project registry.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed end procedural optical coherence tomography findings in 1211 patients (1422 lesions) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, assessing the prevalence and magnitude of residual SU and exploring correlation with outcome in comparison with sMLA.

RESULTS

In our series, both sMLA and SU were related to vessel size and anatomic lesion complexity. When compared with patients without adverse event at follow-up, those experiencing device-oriented cardiovascular events (composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization, and stent thrombosis) showed a lower sMLA (5.6±2.1 versus 6.1±2.1 mm²; P=0.011) but a comparable degree of SU (11.6±14.1% versus 11.2±13.3%; P=0.734). The prespecified cutoff value of sMLA <4.5 mm², documented in 23.8% of cases, was confirmed as independent outcome predictor for device-oriented cardiovascular events (hazard ratio [HR], 2.05 [95% CI, 1.5-2.9]) including target lesion revascularization (HR, 2.43 [95% CI, 1.7-3.5]) and stent thrombosis (HR, 3.23 [95% CI, 1.7-6.3]). A residual SU of 10%, 20%, and 30% was observed in 38.0%, 18.2%, and 7.6% of cases, respectively. No grade of residual SU significantly increased the risk of stent failure, unless if an SU >20% was associated with an sMLA <4.5 mm² (HR, 3.11 [95% CI, 1.7-5.6]). Finally, an association between stent overexpansion (ie, >110%) and device-oriented cardiovascular events was also observed (HR, 1.60 [95% CI, 1.1-2.3]).

CONCLUSIONS

Final absolute sMLA and not relative SU was associated with an increased risk of stent failure. A variable grade of SU was common, but it resulted in being clinically relevant only when associated with an sMLA <4.5 mm².

Clinical Results of Drug-Coated Balloon Treatment in a Large-Scale Multicenter Korean Registry Study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to demonstrate the efficacy and safety of treatment with drug-coated balloon (DCB) in a large real-world population.

METHODS

Patients treated with DCBs were included in a multicenter observational registry that enrolled patients from 18 hospitals in Korea between January 2009 and December 2017. The primary outcome was target lesion failure (TLF) defined as a composite of cardiovascular death, target vessel myocardial infarction, and clinically indicated target lesion revascularization at 12 months.

RESULTS

The study included 2,509 patients with 2,666 DCB-treated coronary artery lesions (1,688 [63.3%] with in-stent restenosis [ISR] lesions vs. 978 [36.7%] with de novo lesions). The mean age with standard deviation was 65.7±11.3 years; 65.7% of the patients were men. At 12 months, the primary outcome, TLF, occurred in 179 (6.7%), 151 (8.9%), 28 (2.9%) patients among the total, ISR, and de novo lesion populations, respectively. A history of hypertension, diabetes, acute coronary syndrome, previous coronary artery bypass graft, reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, B2C lesion and ISR lesion were independent predictors of 12 months TLF in the overall study population.

CONCLUSIONS

This large multicenter DCB registry study revealed the favorable clinical outcome of DCB treatment in real-world practice in patient with ISR lesion as well as small de novo coronary lesion.

Outcomes of cardiac surgery in patients with end-stage renal disease: Insights from the Israel national registries

BACKGROUND

End-stage renal disease (ESRD) has been shown to be associated with increased mortality in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. We aimed to compare the short- and mid-term mortality after cardiac surgery of patients with dialysis-dependent ESRD (DD-ESRD) to patients with normal renal function (NRF), using national registries: the ESRD registry, the adult cardiac surgery registry (ACSR), and the National Mortality Registry.

METHODS

The study population comprised 8207 adult patients who underwent either isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), isolated aortic valve replacement (AVR), isolated mitral valve replacement (MVR), or CABG + valve-related procedure, between January 2017 and April 2019. Data were retrospectively extracted and reported to the ACSR by the department of medical records of each medical center.

RESULTS

One hundred and four DD-ESRD patients (mean age 63.2 ± 8.8 years, 83.7% males) were compared with 8103 NRF patients (mean age 64.9 ± 9.8 years, 77.6% males). Median follow-up for the total cohort was of 32.0 months (IQR; 25.0, 40.0). In DD-ESRD compared to NRF patients, 30-day mortality was higher (14.4% vs. 2.3%, respectively, p = 0.0001) and 4-year survival was significantly lower (44% ± 0.06 vs. 91% ± 0.04, respectively, p = 0.0001). Fifty-three percent of DD-ESRD 30-day mortality was caused by sepsis. Risk factors associated with reduced midterm survival included: DD-ESRD patients (HR = 4.7, 95% CI; 1.2-18.2), MVR procedure (HR = 1.5, 95% CI; 1.04-2.1) and combined CABG + valve-related procedure (HR = 1.6, 95% CI; 1.2-2.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative DD-ESRD was associated with a significant increase in 30-day and mid-term mortality after cardiac surgery. The highest mortality rate was observed in valvular and combined procedures.

The diagnostic accuracy of coronary computed tomography angiography in patients with and without previous coronary interventions

BACKGROUND

Invasive coronary angiography (ICA) is the gold standard for imaging coronary arteries and the severity of coronary artery disease (CAD). Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) has undergone remarkable progress in the diagnosis of CAD.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effect of prior vs no previous coronary interventions on the diagnostic accuracy of CCTA as an alternative to ICA to improve health outcomes for patients with suspected CAD.

METHODS

A prospective cohort study was carried out among patients suspected of CAD and for evaluation of grafts and stents to investigate recurrent ischemic symptoms. 120 patients imaged by CCTA were then referred to ICA, which is considered the gold standard. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of CCTA were assessed relative to ICA.

RESULTS

Based on a per-patient analysis, the comparison with ICA reveals variations in sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy of CCTA. In patients without any previous coronary interventions, the sensitivity was 97.8%, and specificity was 95.6%. The PPV and NPV were 97.8% and 95.5%, respectively. Regarding patients with coronary artery bypass grafts (CABG), the sensitivity was 95% and specificity 100%. The PPV and NPV were 100% and 90.9%, respectively. Regarding patients with prior percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), the results were a sensitivity of 84.6%, specificity of 77.8%, PPV of 84.6% and NPV of 77.8%.

CONCLUSION

CCTA is a powerful diagnostic tool, especially for the evaluation of the major coronary arteries and evaluation of patients with prior CABG. ICA is recommended for evaluation of patients with an intracoronary stent.

Outcomes in Multivessel Coronary Disease Stratified by Society for Thoracic Surgery Risk

BACKGROUND

Surgical risk stratified outcomes following contemporary revascularization strategies have not been well described. We report these outcomes in patients undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) or Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG) for multivessel coronary disease.

METHODS

5836 patients with multivessel disease who underwent CABG (4420) or PCI (1416) were included in this retrospective observational analysis. Data was stratified based on Society of Thoracic Surgeons risk score. Score <4% was considered low risk and ≥4% was intermediate-high risk. Outcomes included mortality, inpatient readmissions and repeat revascularizations.

RESULTS

In the CABG population, 3863 (87.3%) were low surgical risk and 557 (12.6%) were intermediate-high risk. The 5-year mortality for the low risk cohort was 10.9% (95% CI 9.83-12.05) and for the intermediate-high risk cohort, it was 40.1% (95% CI 35.76-44.54). Among those undergoing PCI, 1163 (82.1%) were low risk while 249 (17.6%) were intermediate-high risk. The 5-year mortality for the low risk cohort was 21.6% (95% CI 19.10-24.26) and for the intermediate-high risk cohort, it was 61.8% (95% CI 54.72-68.70).

CONCLUSIONS

This study reports outcomes stratified by surgical risk after PCI or CABG in patients with multivessel coronary disease. This data can help guide revascularization strategy choice for individual patients.

NT-proBNP and Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Who Received Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Prospective Cohort Study

Background

The prognostic significance of the amino-terminal fragment of the prohormone brain-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has not been fully elucidated. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) are clinically viable indicators for the accurate, rapid, and safe evaluation of patients with STEMI. This study was designed to investigate the relationship between NT-proBNP levels and the occurrence of short-term MACEs in patients with STEMI who underwent emergency PCI.

Methods

This prospective cohort study included 405 patients with STEMI aged 20–90 years who underwent emergency PCI at the First People's Hospital of Changde City from April 6, 2017, to May 31, 2019. Stent thrombosis, reinfarction, congestive heart failure, unstable angina, and cardiac death were considered as MACEs in this study. The target-independent and -dependent variables were NT-proBNP at baseline and MACE, respectively.

Results

There were 28.25% of MACEs. Age, number of implanted stents, Killip class, infarction-related artery, applied intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP), creatine kinase (CK) peak value, CK-MB peak value, TnI peak value, and ST-segment resolution were independently associated with MACE (P < 0.05). In a multivariate model, after adjusting all potential covariates, Log2 NT-proBNP levels remained significantly associated with MACE, with an inflection point of 11.66. The effect sizes and confidence intervals of the left and right sides of the inflection point were 1.07 and 0.84–1.36 (P=0.5730) and 3.47 and 2.06–5.85 (P < 0.0001), respectively.

Conclusions

In patients with STEMI who underwent PCI, Log2 NT-proBNP was positively correlated with MACE within 1 month when the Log2 NT-proBNP was >11.66 (NT-proBNP >3.236 pg/mL).

Comparison of multiple risk scores in assessing medium-to long-term clinical outcomes in unstable angina / non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients undergoing multi vessel percutaneous coronary intervention: An observational, registry-based study in India

Objective

Post-revascularization mortality in multivessel coronary artery disease (MVCAD) has been explored via several risk scores. Here, we assessed and compared various risk scores in predicting medium to long-term clinical outcomes in unstable angina/non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (UA/NSTEMI) patients with MVCAD undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

Methods

We analyzed a cohort of a tertiary care center registry enrolling patients in South India, Kerala, with MVCAD (N = 200) who had undergone PCI between 2010 and 2018. The outcomes evaluated were all-cause mortality and major adverse cardiac events (MACE). The risk scores assessed included SYNTAX score (SS), residual SYNTAX score (rSS), SYNTAX revascularization index (SRI), age, creatinine, and ejection fraction (ACEF) score, clinical SYNTAX score (cSS), and SYNTAX score II (SSII).

Results

Of the analyzed risk scores, SSII had the best predictive capability with the area under the curve (AUC) of 0.79 in c-statistics, followed by ACEF score and cSS with AUCs of 0.74 and 0.65, respectively for all-cause mortality (p < 0.01). Kaplan–Meier survival curves and multivariate analysis by Cox regression showed SSII with cut-offs of >35.15 and > 29.55 to be the only score associated with higher mortality and MACE, respectively.

Conclusions

In UA/NSTEMI patients with relatively less complex MVCAD treated by PCI, the SSII, ACEF and cSS risk scores could predict the outcomes better. The SSII showed the best predictive performance for all-cause mortality and MACE. Scores based on baseline and residual atherosclerotic burden (SS, rSS, and SRI) performed poorly in predicting the mortality and MACE.

Pretreatment With P2Y12 Inhibitors in Patients With Chronic Coronary Syndrome Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Report From the Swedish Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty Registry

BACKGROUND

In patients with chronic coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, the optimal timing of P2Y12 inhibitors' administration is uncertain. We compared pretreatment versus treatment in the catheterization laboratory (In-Cathlab) in a real-world population.

METHODS

In Swedish Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty Registry, all patients with chronic coronary syndrome undergoing coronary angiography and ad hoc percutaneous coronary intervention, between 2006 and 2017 were identified. Pretreatment was defined as P2Y12 inhibitor administration before coronary angiography, outside the catheterization laboratory. Outcomes were net adverse clinical events including death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or bleeding within 30 days of the index procedure and in-hospital bleeding.

RESULTS

We included 26 814 patients, 8237 in the In-Cathlab, and 18 577 in the pretreatment group. In-Cathlab treatment compared with pretreatment was associated with lower risk for net adverse clinical event (4.2 versus 5.1%, adjusted hazard ratio 0.79 [0.63-0.99]), bleeding (2.3 versus 2.6%, adjusted hazard ratio, 0.76 [0.57-1.01]). and in-hospital bleeding (1.9 versus 2.1%, adjusted odds ratio, 0.70 [0.51-0.96]). The risk for death, myocardial infarction, or stroke did not significantly differ between the groups. Among the In-Cathlab treated patients, 41% received ticagrelor or prasugrel and 59% clopidogrel. Treatment with ticagrelor or prasugrel was associated with higher risk for net adverse clinical events (5.4% versus 3.4%, adjusted hazard ratio, 1.66 [1.12-2.48]), bleeding (3.4 versus 1.6%, adjusted hazard ratio, 2.14 [1.34-3.42]), and in-hospital bleeding (2.9 versus 1.2%, adjusted odds ratio, 2.24 [1.29-3.90]) but similar risk for death, myocardial infarction, or stroke, compared with clopidogrel.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with chronic coronary syndrome undergoing coronary angiography and ad hoc percutaneous coronary intervention, pretreatment with P2Y12 inhibitors, before arrival to the catheterization laboratory, was not associated with improved clinical outcomes but was associated with increased risk for bleeding. Our data support clopidogrel administration in the catheterization laboratory as the standard of care. Graphic Abstract: A graphic abstract is available for this article.

Appropriate coronary revascularization can be accomplished if myocardial perfusion is quantified by positron emission tomography prior to treatment decision

BACKGROUND

Many patients undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) without the use of non-invasive stress testing prior to treatment. The aim of this study was to determine the potential added value of guiding revascularization by quantitative assessment of myocardial perfusion prior to intervention.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Thirty-three patients (10 females) with suspected or established CAD who had been referred for a clinical coronary angiography (CA) with possibility for PCI were included. Adenosine stress and rest 13N-NH3 PET, cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR), and cardiopulmonary exercise test were performed 4 ± 3 weeks before and 5 ± 1 months after CA. The angiographer was blinded to the PET and CMR results. Myocardial flow reserve (MFR) < 2.0 by PET was considered abnormal. A PCI was performed in 19/33 patients. In 41% (11/27) of the revascularized vessel territories, a normal regional MFR was found prior to the PCI and no improvement in MFR was found at follow-up (P = 0.9). However, vessel territories with regional MFR < 2.0 at baseline improved significantly after PCI (P = 0.003). Of the 14 patients not undergoing PCI, four had MFR < 2.0 in one or more coronary territories.

CONCLUSION

Assessment of quantitative myocardial perfusion prior to revascularization could lead to more appropriate use of CA when managing patients with stable CAD.

Prevention of Iodinated Contrast Media-Induced Hyperthyroidism in Patients with Euthyroid Goiter

INTRODUCTION

Iodinated contrast media (ICM)-induced hyperthyroidism is an underestimated, potentially severe condition; however, its prevention has not been sufficiently investigated. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of ICM on thyroid status, the advantages of prophylactic therapy for iodine-induced hyperthyroidism (IIH) in patients with euthyroid goiter and cardiovascular comorbidities, and the association between the incidence of IIH and thyroid volume.

METHODS

Thirty-six euthyroid patients undergoing procedures involving ICM administration were divided into 2 groups: the first group (n = 13) received prophylactic treatment with thiamazole or thiamazole combined with sodium perchlorate during ICM exposure; the second group (n = 23) did not receive prophylaxis. Thyroid-stimulating hormone levels were evaluated before and after ICM, and thyroid hormone levels were assessed after ICM at different points in time. The morphology of the thyroid was evaluated by ultrasonography.

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients (58%) developed hyperthyroidism after ICM. Hyperthyroidism was observed more frequently in the group without prophylactic treatment than in the group with prophylaxis (65 vs. 15%, respectively; p = 0.006). No cases of overt hyperthyroidism were observed in the group receiving thiamazole with sodium perchlorate. IIH persisted for a median time of 52.5 days. Larger thyroid volume was associated with a significantly higher occurrence of ICM-induced hyperthyroidism (p = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with euthyroid goiter receiving ICM are at risk of developing hyperthyroidism. The occurrence of hyperthyroidism after ICM in euthyroid patients with goiter is higher in those with larger thyroid volume. The frequency of ICM-induced hyperthyroidism in euthyroid patients with goiter is lower in those receiving prophylactic therapy with thiamazole in monotherapy or in combination with sodium perchlorate than in those not receiving prophylactic treatment.

Health-Related Quality of Life and Angina in Fractional Flow Reserve- Versus Angiography-Guided Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: FARGO Trial (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography Randomization for Graft Optimization)

BACKGROUND

In coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), the use of fractional flow reserve (FFR) is insufficiently investigated. Stenosis assessment usually relies on visual estimates of lesion severity. This study evaluated health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and angina after FFR- versus angiography-guided CABG.

METHODS

One hundred patients referred for CABG were randomized to FFR- or angiography-guided CABG. In the FFR group, lesions with FFR>0.80 were deferred, while the surgeon was blinded to the FFR values in the angiography group. Before and 6 months after CABG, HRQoL was assessed by the health state classifier EQ-5D of the EuroQoL 5-level instrument and angina status based on the Canadian Cardiovascular Society classification system were registered.

RESULTS

Six-month angiography included FFR evaluations of deferred lesions. In total, completed EQ-5D of the EuroQoL 5-level instrument questionnaires were available in 86 patients (43 in the FFR versus 43 in the angiography-guided group). HRQoL was significantly improved and angina significantly decreased from baseline to 6 months after CABG with no difference between the randomization groups. Graft failure rates and clinical outcomes were similar in both groups. Patients with graft failure or FFR<0.80 of the previous deferred lesions had significantly lower visual analogue scale scores (78.7±14.2 versus 86.8±14.7, P=0.004) and more angina compared with patients without graft failure or FFR≥0.80 at 6-month follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

FFR- versus angiography-guided CABG demonstrated similar improvements in HRQoL and angina 6 months after CABG. Graft failure or low FFR in deferred lesions were associated with low HRQoL and angina. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02477371.

Drug-Coated Balloon versus Drug-Eluting Stent in Patients with Small-Vessel Coronary Artery Disease: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Background

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents (DES) of small-vessel coronary artery disease (SVD) is related to an increased risk of in-stent restenosis (ISR) and stent thrombosis (ST). The application of the drug-coated balloon (DCB) for patients with SVD remains controversial.

Objectives

Assess the outcomes of DCB in the treatment of SVD compared with DES in patients with SVD.

Methods

A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published up to June 2020, reporting the outcomes of DCB versus DES in the treatment of SVD, was performed.

Results

Four RCTs with 1227 patients were included. The results indicated that DCB was associated with the decreased risk for myocardial infarction (MI) compared with the DES, but the difference showed no significance (OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.24-1.03, P=0.06). And, there was no significant difference in death (OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.17-3.43, P=0.72), cardiac death (OR 1.92, 95% CI 0.74-4.98, P=0.18), target vessel revascularization (TVR) (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.51-1.28, P=0.36), target lesion revascularization (TLR) (OR 1.29, 95% CI 0.66-2.52, P=0.46), and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.61-1.38, P=0.69) between the DCB group and DES group.

Conclusion

Compared with DES, DCB was associated with a decreased risk of MI among patients with SVD, but the difference showed no significance. The application of DCB in SVD is associated with comparable outcomes of death, TVR, and MACE when compared with DES.

Shedding light on the pathophysiology of preeclampsia-syndrome in the era of Cardio-Obstetrics: Role of inflammation and endothelial dysfunction

:

Preeclampsia (PE) is a worldwide pregnancy complication with serious maternal and neonatal consequences. Our understanding of PE pathophysiology has significantly evolved over the last decades by recognizing that endothelial dysfunction and systemic inflammation, with an associated angiogenic imbalance, are key pieces of this still incomplete puzzle. In the present era, where no single treatment to cure or treat this obstetric condition has been developed so far, PE prevention and early prediction poses the most useful clinical approach to reduce the PE burden. Although most PE episodes occur in healthy nulliparous women, the identification of specific clinical conditions that increase dramatically the risk of PE provides a critical opportunity to improve outcomes by acting on potential reversible factors, and also contribute to better understand this pathophysiologic enigma. In this review, we highlight major clinical contributors of PE and shed light about their potential link with endothelial dysfunction and inflammation.

Bilateral vs Single Internal Mammary Artery Grafts for Coronary Artery Bypass in the United States

BACKGROUND

The use of the bilateral internal mammary artery (BIMA) in coronary artery bypass grafting remains controversial. The objective of this study was to investigate the long-term outcomes using the BIMA vs the single internal mammary artery (SIMA) in the United States.

METHODS

Medicare beneficiaries who underwent primary isolated coronary artery bypass surgery using the SIMA or BIMA from 1999 to 2010 were included in this retrospective study, with follow-up through 2014. Greedy matching algorithms were used for 1:4 matching on propensity score based on age, gender, year of surgery, and comorbidities. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were performed. The primary outcome was death from any cause.

RESULTS

A total of 1,156,339 and 25,005 patients who were 72 ± 7.6 years of age and 70.3 ± 7.9 years of age underwent primary isolated coronary artery bypass surgery using SIMA and BIMA, respectively. Matching created comparable groups with 95,780 SIMA and 24,160 BIMA patients. Matched median survival using SIMA vs BIMA was 11.8 vs 12.4 years (P < .001) and 9.6 vs 10 years in diabetic patients (P = .006), respectively. At 10 years of follow-up, the respective survival rates of using SIMA vs BIMA were 58.3% vs 61.1%, respectively. The stratified matched median survival using SIMA vs BIMA with 1, 2, 3, and 4 or more aortocoronary bypasses were 11.8 vs 12.3 years (P = .005), 11.7 vs 12.5 years (P < .001), 11.9 vs 12.3 years (P = .01), and 11.4 vs 12 years (P = .02), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Primary isolated coronary artery bypass surgery using the BIMA rather than the SIMA was associated with improved long-term survival. This survival advantage was independent of aortocoronary bypass grafts or patient diabetes status.

Outcomes Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Renal Transplant Recipients: A Binational Collaborative Analysis

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the clinical and procedural characteristics in patients with a history of renal transplant (RT) and compare the outcomes with patients without RT in 2 national cohorts of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) and British Cardiovascular Intervention Society (BCIS) were used to compare the clinical and procedural characteristics and outcomes of patients undergoing PCI who had RT with those who did not have RT. The primary outcome of interest was in-hospital mortality.

RESULTS

Of the PCI procedures performed in 2004-2014 (NIS) and 2007-2014 (BCIS), 12,529 of 6,601,526 (0.2%) and 1521 of 512,356 (0.3%), respectively, were undertaken in patients with a history of RT. Patients with RT were younger and had a higher prevalence of congestive cardiac failure, hypertension, and diabetes but similar use of drug-eluting stents, intracoronary imaging, and pressure wire studies compared with patients who did not have RT. In the adjusted analysis, patients with RT had increased odds of in-hospital mortality (NIS: odds ratio [OR], 1.90; 95% CI, 1.41-2.57; BCIS: OR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.05-2.46) compared with patients who did not have RT but no difference in vascular or bleeding events. Meta-analysis of the 2 data sets suggested an increase in in-hospital mortality (OR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.40-2.29) but no difference in vascular (OR, 1.24; 95% CI, 0.77-2.00) or bleeding (OR, 1.21; 95% CI, 0.86-1.68) events.

CONCLUSION

This large collaborative analysis of 2 national databases revealed that patients with RT undergoing PCI are younger, have more comorbidities, and have increased mortality risk compared with the general population undergoing PCI.

Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Transit Time Flow Measurement: Graft Patency and Clinical Outcomes

BACKGROUND

This subanalysis of the Randomized On-Off Bypass (ROOBY) trial examined transit time flow measurement (TTFM) use and its impact on graft patency and long-term clinical outcomes after coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

METHODS

Use of TTFM for ROOBY centers and surgeons was assessed. Comparative patient outcomes based on TTFM use included 1-year graft patency and 1-year and 5-year major adverse cardiac events: all-cause mortality, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and revascularization (percutaneous coronary intervention or repeat coronary artery bypass graft surgery).

RESULTS

Transit time flow measurement was used in 1067 patients (TTFM group) and not used in 501 patients (non-TTFM group); of the TTFM group, median percentage TTFM use was 79% (interquartile range, 41% to 98%) among 18 Veterans Affairs Medical Centers, and 74% (interquartile range, 13% to 98%) among 48 surgeons. Patients were comparable in age (63 ± 8.5 years TTFM vs 62 ± 8 years non-TTFM, P = .30) and estimated 30-day mortality risk (1.8 ± 1.7 TTFM vs 1.9 non-TTFM, P = .53). One-year FitzGibbon A patency was 83% (1600 of 1988 grafts) for TTFM assessed grafts and 78% (629 of 803) for non-TTFM assessed grafts (P < .01). Fewer TTFM patients had an occluded graft (29%, vs 38% non-TTFM; P = .01). Comparing TTFM patients with non-TTFM patients, 5-year major adverse cardiac event rates were 30% vs 25% (P = .06). Individual component rates were 14% vs 11% for death (P = .06), 12% vs 8.8% for myocardial infarction (P = .07), and 13% vs 12% for revascularization (P = .62).

CONCLUSIONS

The association of TTFM use with graft patency and clinical outcome is uncertain. Future randomized studies that account for patient risk factors and practice variation would help address this knowledge gap.

Possible mechanism of late lumen enlargement after treatment for de novo coronary lesions with drug-coated balloon

BACKGROUND

Drug-coated balloon (DCB) treatment for de novo coronary artery disease has demonstrated late lumen enlargement (LLE) in mid-term follow-up and it was considered as clinical benefit; however, its mechanism and the predictive factor remains unclear.

METHODS

This study enrolled 46 consecutive patients (54 lesions) treated with DCB, using intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) at the index procedure and at the 9-month follow-up. We measured IVUS parameters at 1-mm intervals and calculated the mean volume of the external elastic membrane (EEM), lumen, and plaque. We calculated the dissection index (DI) defined as summation of the following points, 2: dissection over EEM, 1: intra-EEM dissection, 0: no dissection at every 1-mm interval, and divided by lesion length.

RESULTS

IVUS showed that there was no flow limiting dissection just after DCB treatment, the mean EEM and lumen volume (LV) had significantly increased while mean plaque volume had significantly decreased at 9 months, and 74.1% lesions exhibited LLE. We divided the patients into three groups according to delta mean LV. Mean EEM volume significantly increased and mean plaque volume significantly decreased in the larger and smaller LLE groups, but not in the non-LLE group. The DI was higher in a descending order in the three groups. The multiple regression analysis demonstrated that the DI was the strongest predictor of the change in mean LV.

CONCLUSIONS

LLE after DCB treatment may be caused by vessel enlargement and plaque regression. The non-flow limiting larger dissection just after DCB treatment may strongly associate with the intending LLE.

Impact of Hospital Volume of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) on In-Hospital Outcomes in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction: Based on the 2014 Cohort of the Korean Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (K-PCI) Registry

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The relationship between the hospital percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) volumes and the in-hospital clinical outcomes of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) remains the subject of debate. This study aimed to determine whether the in-hospital clinical outcomes of patients with AMI in Korea are significantly associated with hospital PCI volumes.

METHODS

We selected and analyzed 17,121 cases of AMI, that is, 8,839 cases of non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and 8,282 cases of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, enrolled in the 2014 Korean percutaneous coronary intervention (K-PCI) registry. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to hospital annual PCI volume, that is, to a high-volume group (≥400/year) or a low-volume group (<400/year). Major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs) were defined as composites of death, cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), stent thrombosis, stroke, and need for urgent PCI during index admission after PCI.

RESULTS

Rates of MACCE and non-fatal MI were higher in the low-volume group than in the high-volume group (MACCE: 10.9% vs. 8.6%, p=0.001; non-fatal MI: 4.8% vs. 2.6%, p=0.001, respectively). Multivariate regression analysis showed PCI volume did not independently predict MACCE.

CONCLUSIONS

Hospital PCI volume was not found to be an independent predictor of in-hospital clinical outcomes in patients with AMI included in the 2014 K-PCI registry.

A Prospective Multicenter Randomized Trial to Assess the Effectiveness of the MagicTouch Sirolimus-Coated Balloon in Small Vessels: Rationale and Design of the TRANSFORM I Trial

AIMS

The objective of the study is to assess the efficacy and safety of the novel Magic Touch sirolimus coated-balloon (SCB) when compared to the SeQuent Please Neo paclitaxel coated balloon (PCB) for the treatment of de-novo small vessel coronary artery diseases (SVD).

STUDY DESIGN

The TRANSFORM I study is a randomized, multicenter, non-inferiority trial with the intent to enroll a total of 114 patients with a de-novo SVD (≤2.5 mm). Vessel size will be pre-screened by on-line QCA. After successful pre-dilatation without major coronary dissections (type C-F) nor Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction trial [TIMI] grade flow ≤2, patients will be enrolled in a 1:1 randomization to receive treatment with either the novel SCB balloon or the comparative PCB balloon. The balloon sizing will be selected according to the lumen-based approach derived from optical coherence tomography (OCT). The primary endpoint is 6-month mean net lumen diameter gain (6-month minimum lumen diameter [MLD] minus baseline MLD) assessed by quantitative coronary analysis (QCA) with non-inferiority margin of 0.3 mm in per-protocol analysis. The clinical follow-up will be conducted up to 1 year. The enrollment started in September 2020 and will complete in April 2021.

CONCLUSIONS

The TRANSFORM I trial will assess the efficacy of novel SCB in terms of non-inferiority to conventional PCB with a novel OCT measurement approach in patients with a de-novo SVD. Clinical Trial Registration URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT03913832.

Randomized Comparison Between Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Scaffold and Metallic Stent: Multimodality Imaging Through 3 Years

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to investigate the vascular responses and fates of the scaffold after bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) implantation using multimodality imaging.

BACKGROUND

Serial comprehensive image assessments after BVS implantation in the context of a randomized trial have not yet been reported.

METHODS

In the ABSORB Japan trial, 400 patients were randomized to a BVS (n = 266) or a cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting stent (n = 134). Through 3 years, patients underwent serial angiography and intravascular ultrasound or optical coherence tomography (OCT).

RESULTS

Luminal dimension at 3 years was consistently smaller with the BVS than with the cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting stent (mean angiographic minimal luminal diameter 2.04 ± 0.63 mm vs. 2.40 ± 0.56 mm, mean difference -0.37 mm [95% confidence interval: -0.50 to -0.24 mm]; p < 0.001), mainly because of smaller device area (6.13 ± 2.03 mm² vs. 7.15 ± 2.16 mm², mean difference -1.04 mm² [95% confidence interval: -1.66 to -0.42 mm²]; p < 0.001), and larger neointimal area (2.10 ± 0.61 mm² vs. 1.86 ± 0.64 mm², mean difference 0.24 mm² [95% confidence interval: 0.06 to 0.43 mm²]; p = 0.01) by OCT. BVS-treated vessels did not show previously reported favorable vessel responses, such as positive vessel remodeling, late luminal enlargement, and restoration of vasomotion, although the OCT-based healing score was on average zero (interquartile range: 0.00 to 0.00). At 3 years, intraluminal scaffold dismantling (ISD) was observed in 14% of BVS. On serial OCT, ISD was observed in 6 lesions at 2 years, where the struts had been fully apposed at post-procedure, while ISD was observed in 12 lesions at 3 years, where 8 lesions were free from ISD on 2-year OCT. In 5 cases of very late scaffold thrombosis, strut discontinuities were detected in all 4 cases with available OCT immediately before reintervention.

CONCLUSIONS

In this multimodality serial imaging study, luminal dimension at 3 years was smaller with the BVS than with the cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting stent. ISD, suspected to be one of the mechanisms of very late BVS thrombosis, was observed in a substantial proportion of cases at 3 years, which developed between post-procedure and 2 years and even beyond 2 years. (AVJ-301 Clinical Trial: A Clinical Evaluation of AVJ-301 [Absorb™ BVS] in Japanese Population [ABSORB JAPAN]; NCT01844284).

Outcomes of Early Versus Delayed Transcatheter Closure of Post-Myocardial Infarction Ventricular Septal Defect

BACKGROUND

Post myocardial infarction ventricular septal defect (VSD) is a rare, but devastating complication which carries a poor prognosis if left untreated. Optimal therapy remains unclear and surgical repair is associated with high mortality.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of our study is to compare 30-day survival in patients with early versus late primary transcatheter repair of post myocardial infarction ventricular septal defect.

METHODS

We performed a comprehensive search of published data through SCOPUS and identified published reports of primary transcatheter closure of post myocardial infarction VSD. We included case reports and series that reported timing of VSD closure and 30-day survival and excluded those with prior surgical repair. Early repair was defined as transcatheter closure within 14 days of diagnosis of VSD while late repair was defined as transcatheter closure after 14 days of diagnosis of VSD.

RESULTS

A total 27 publications describing 193 patients were identified in the SCOPUS search. We excluded 8 publications with no reported timing of VSD repair or 30-day outcome. Of the 193 patients initially included, a total of 126 patients fulfilled all the criteria and were included in the final analysis. The overall 30-day survival rate was found to be 62.7% (79 patients). In the early repair group, only 36.2% of the patients were still alive at 30 days compared to 85.3% in the delayed repair group, P < .01. No significant difference in age, gender, presence of shock, VSD size, presence of significant residual shunt, location of VSD or infarction was observed. The early repair group was found to have a significantly larger Qp: Qs ratio as well as larger occluder size and lower rate of successful repair.

CONCLUSION

Compared to the late repair group, the early transcatheter VSD repair group had a larger pre-procedure Qp:Qs and worse 30-day survival. Further studies are needed to determine the optimal timing of transcatheter repair of a post myocardial infarction VSD.

Contemporary Use and Trends in Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in the United States: An Analysis of the National Cardiovascular Data Registry Research to Practice Initiative

Importance

Recent data support percutaneous revascularization as an alternative to coronary artery bypass grafting in unprotected left main (ULM) coronary lesions. However, the relevance of these trials to current practice is unclear, as patterns and outcomes of ULM percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in contemporary US clinical practice are not well studied.

Objective

To define the current practice of ULM PCI and its outcomes and compare these with findings reported in clinical trials.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This cross-sectional multicenter analysis included data collected from 1662 institutions participating in the National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR) CathPCI Registry between April 2009 and July 2016. Data were collected from 33 128 patients undergoing ULM PCI and 3 309 034 patients undergoing all other PCI. Data were analyzed from June 2017 to May 2018.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Patient and procedural characteristics and their temporal trends were compared between ULM PCI and all other PCI. In-hospital major adverse clinical events (ie, death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and emergent coronary artery bypass grafting) were compared using hierarchical logistic regression. Characteristics and outcomes were also compared against clinical trial cohorts.

Results

Of the 3 342 162 included patients, 2 223 570 (66.5%) were male, and the mean (SD) age was 64.2 (12.1) years. Unprotected left main PCI represented 1.0% (33 128 of 3 342 162) of all procedures, modestly increasing from 0.7% to 1.3% over time. The mean (SD) annualized ULM PCI volume was 0.5 (1.5) procedures for operators and 3.2 (6.1) procedures for facilities, with only 1808 of 10 971 operators (16.5%) and 892 of 1662 facilities (53.7%) performing an average of 1 or more ULM PCI annually. After adjustment, major adverse clinical events occurred more frequently with ULM PCI compared with all other PCI (odds ratio, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.39-1.53). Compared with clinical trial populations, patients in the CathPCI Registry were older with more comorbid conditions, and adverse events were more frequent.

Conclusions and Relevance

Use of ULM PCI has increased over time, but overall use remains low. These findings suggest that ULM PCI occurs infrequently in the United States and in an older and more comorbid population than that seen in clinical trials.

Nonemergent Percutaneous Coronary Intervention on an Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Supported with Impella® Heart Pump in Patients Ineligible for Surgical Revascularization

Objectives

We sought to assess if ineligibility to coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) constitutes a risk factor in patients who underwent a nonemergent unprotected left main coronary artery (ULMCA) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with prophylactic Impella® heart pump support.

Background

ULMCA PCI in patients not deemed eligible for CABG is associated with significantly worse outcomes compared to ULMCA PCI in eligible patients.

Methods

Patients from the cVAD Registry and the PROTECT II trial who underwent a nonemergent ULMCA PCI were identified. We compared in-hospital mortality and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular event (MACCE) rates as well as 30-day survival and MACCE rates between CABG ineligible and CABG eligible patients.

Results

A total of 331 patients were included (293 Impella 2.5®, 38 Impella CP®); 227 were ineligible for CABG and 104 were eligible. Baseline characteristics were remarkable for a trend toward higher rate of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in the ineligible patients. In-hospital mortality (3.52% vs. 5.77%; p=0.383) and MACCE (6.61% vs. 7.69%; p=0.816) rates as well as 30-day survival (92.0% vs. 93.4%; Log-Rank p-value =0.781) and MACCE (88.1% vs. 90.1%; Log-Rank p-value=0.648) rates were not different between the two groups.

Conclusions

The results of our study suggest that prophylactic Impella support appears to mitigate the risks inherent to surgical ineligibility in patients undergoing a nonemergent ULMCA PCI. Our results require further investigation.

Effect of Operator Volume on In-Hospital Outcomes Following Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Based on the 2014 Cohort of Korean Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (K-PCI) Registry

Background and Objectives

The relationship between operator volume and outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) has not been fully investigated. We aimed to investigate the relationship between operator PCI volume and in-hospital outcomes after primary PCI for STEMI.

Methods

Among the total of 44,967 consecutive cases of PCI enrolled in the Korean nationwide, retrospective registry (K-PCI registry), 8,282 patients treated with PCI for STEMI by 373 operators were analyzed. PCI volumes above the 75th percentile (>30 cases/year), between the 75th and 25th percentile (10–30 cases/year), and below the 25th percentile (<10 cases/year) were defined as high, moderate, and low-volume operators, respectively. In-hospital outcomes including mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), stent thrombosis, stroke, and urgent repeat PCI were analyzed.

Results

The average number of primary PCI cases performed by 373 operators was 22.2 in a year. In-hospital mortality after PCI for STEMI was 571 cases (6.9%). In-hospital outcomes by operator volume showed no significant differences in the death rate, cardiac death, non-fatal MI, and stent thrombosis. However, the rate of urgent repeat PCI tended to be lower in the high-volume operator (0.6%) than in the moderate-(0.7%)/low-(1.5%) volume operator groups (p=0.095). The adjusted odds ratios for adverse in-hospital outcomes were similar in the 3 groups. Multivariate analysis also showed that operator volume was not a predictor for adverse in-hospital outcomes.

Conclusions

In-hospital outcomes after primary PCI for STEMI were not associated with operator volume in the K-PCI registry.

Identifying patients with refusal of percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction: a classification and regression tree analysis

The purpose of the present study is to develop and validate a prediction tool to identify patients who refuse to receive percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) rapidly. We developed a risk stratification model using the derivation cohort of 288 patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in our hospital and validated it in a prospective cohort of 115 patients. There were 52 (18.1%) patients and 18 (15.7%) patients who refused PCI among derivation and validation cohort, respectively. A classification and regression tree (CART) analysis and multivariate logistic regression were used for statistical analysis. The decision-making factors for refusal of PCI were also investigated. The CART analysis and logistic regression both showed that self-rated mild symptom was the most significant predictor of not choosing PCI. The model generated three risk groups. The high-risk group included: self-rated mild symptoms; self-rated severe symptom, glomerular filtration rate < 60 ml/min/1.73m². The intermediate-risk group included: self-rated severe symptom, glomerular filtration rate ≥ 60 ml/min/1.73m² and age ≥ 75 years. The low-risk group included: self-rated severe symptom, glomerular filtration rate ≥ 60 ml/min/1.73m² and age < 75 years. The prevalence for refusal of PCI of the three groups were 45%-44%, 18% and 4%, respectively. The sensitivity was 88% and the negative predictive value was 96%. And similar results were obtained when this prediction tool was applied prospectively to the validation cohort. Patients at low and high risk can be easily identified for refusal of PCI by the prediction tool using common clinical data. This practical model might provide useful information for rapid recognition and early response for this kind of crowd.

Pilot study of bisoprolol 8mg transdermal patch at bedtime before coronary computed tomography angiography

BACKGROUND

Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) is recommended for first-line evaluation of stable coronary artery disease, and there is a standard protocol to control heart rate (HR) in guidelines. However, time is required to decrease HR to the recommended ≤60 beats per minute (bpm). We investigated whether the bisoprolol 8mg transdermal patch at bedtime on the day before CCTA can achieve a target HR and simplify the CCTA process.

METHODS

We randomly assigned 63 patients with an HR of ≥70 bpm and systolic blood pressure ≥120mmHg to a standard protocol group (n=33) or a group (n=30) that applied a bisoprolol 8mg transdermal patch (Bis) at bedtime on the day before CCTA evaluation. The primary endpoint was a change in HR between enrollment in the study and the time of CCTA evaluation. The secondary endpoints were elapsed time from arrival at the CCTA suite to starting CCTA image acquisition, and the rates of oral metoprolol and intravenous landiolol administration (UMIN00035246).

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics did not significantly differ between two groups. HR was significantly lower upon arrival at the CCTA suite in Bis, than standard protocol group (67.5±7.8 bpm vs. 75.0±10.6 bpm; p=0.00002), and the amount of elapsed time from arrival to the start of CCTA evaluation was also significantly decreased in Bis group (76.9±34.9min vs. 94.8±29.2min; p=0.0356). Rates of oral metoprolol and intravenous landiolol administration did not significantly differ between two groups (63.3% vs. 83.3%, p=0.143 and 36.7% vs. 60.0%, p=0.12, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The bisoprolol 8mg transdermal patch lowered HR and decreased the amount of time needed for CCTA, thus streamlining the evaluation process.

New-generation mechanical circulatory support during high-risk PCI: a cross-sectional analysis

AIMS

The aim of the study was to establish the value of new-generation mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices such as HeartMate PHP, Impella CP and PulseCath iVAC2.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We retrospectively analysed all consecutive elective high-risk PCI procedures performed in the Erasmus Medical Center (2011-2018) in order to compare MCS protected and unprotected patients. The primary endpoint was a composite of procedure-related adverse events including death (<24 hours), cardiac arrest, need for vasopressors, rescue MCS, endotracheal intubation and limb ischaemia with need for surgery. Secondary endpoints included 30-day survival. A total of 198 elective high-risk PCI patients were included (69 [35%] MCS protected, 129 [65%] MCS unprotected). When compared with unprotected patients, MCS protected patients had a significantly worse left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (25±10 vs 33±8%, p<0.01) and higher SYNTAX I score (33±11 vs 24±8, p<0.01). The primary endpoint occurred in 26 (20%) of the unprotected patients and in 6 (9%) of the MCS protected patients (OR 0.38, 95% CI: 0.15-0.97, p=0.04). Patients under 75 years of age, with a SYNTAX I score above 32 and with an LVEF below 30% showed most potential benefit from MCS. Survival during the first 24 hours after the procedure and at 30 days was significantly higher in MCS protected patients (100% vs 95%, p=0.04 at 24 hours, and 98% vs 87%, OR 10.32, 95% CI: 1.34-79.31, p=0.006 at 30 days).

CONCLUSIONS

In a consecutive real-world cohort of high-risk PCI patients, protection with new-generation MCS resulted in better procedural outcomes despite worse EF and more complex coronary artery disease at baseline. Larger prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Left main coronary artery disease: pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment

The advent of coronary angiography in the 1960s allowed for the risk stratification of patients with stable angina. Patients with unprotected left main coronary artery disease have an increased risk of death related to the large amount of myocardium supplied by this vessel. Although coronary angiography remains the preferred imaging modality for the evaluation of left main coronary artery stenosis, this technique has important limitations. Angiograms of the left main coronary artery segment can be difficult to interpret, and almost one-third of patients can be misclassified when fractional flow reserve is used as the reference. In patients with clinically significant unprotected left main coronary artery disease, surgical revascularization was shown to improve survival compared with medical therapy and has been regarded as the treatment of choice for unprotected left main coronary artery disease. Two large-scale clinical trials published in 2016 support the usefulness of catheter-based revascularization in selected patients with unprotected left main coronary artery disease. In this Review, we describe the pathophysiology of unprotected left main coronary artery disease, discuss diagnostic approaches in light of new noninvasive and invasive imaging techniques, and detail risk stratification models to aid the Heart Team in the decision-making process for determining the best revascularization strategy for these patients.

Association Between Residual Platelet Reactivity on Clopidogrel Treatment and Severity of Coronary Atherosclerosis: Intrinsic Hypercoagulability as a Mediator

INTRODUCTION

High on-treatment residual platelet reactivity (HRPR) was associated with greater atherosclerosis burden. We examined whether intrinsic hypercoagulability (IHC) could be attributed to that association in patients treated by drug-eluting stents.

METHODS

This retrospective observation enrolled a total of 891 coronary artery disease (CAD) subjects. Platelet and coagulant reactivity was measured by thrombelastography. At least 24 h after a 300-mg dose of clopidogrel, adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-induced maximum amplitude of clot strength (MA_adp) > 47 mm represented HRPR. Thrombin-induced platelet-fibrin clot strength (MA_thrombin) and blood fibrinogen surrogated intrinsic coagulability. Using mediation analysis to evaluate the effect of IHC on the relationship between the number of narrowed coronaries and HRPR on clopidogrel.

RESULTS

More HRPR on clopidogrel and higher intrinsic coagulability were observed in more severe coronary atherosclerosis, especially in the three-vessel disease. After adjustment for confounding factors, the number of narrowed coronaries (OR_adj = 1.343, 95% CI 1.063-1.695, p = 0.013), MA_thrombin (OR_adj = 1.106, 95% CI 1.058-1.157, p < 0.001), and fibrinogen (OR_adj = 1.003, 95% CI 1.001-1.005, p = 0.012) were all independent positive predictors for HRPR. MA_thrombin and fibrinogen were meaningful mediators for the significant positive association of the number of narrowed vessels and HRPR on clopidogrel, which were enhanced by around 30% and 43%, respectively, for this effect.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study to demonstrate that the positive correlation between the number of stenotic coronaries and HRPR on clopidogrel may be partly attributed to IHC, which may enhance the risk stratification, guide more precise coagulation in multi-vessel disease after drug-eluting stents, and therefore deserve further study.

Nonischemic Causes of Cardiogenic Shock

Although cardiogenic shock is uncommon in the emergency department, it is associated with high mortality. Most cardiogenic shock is caused by ischemia, but nonischemic etiologies are essential to recognize. Clinicians should optimize preload, contractility, and afterload. Volume-responsive patients should be resuscitated in small aliquots, although some patients may require diuresis to improve cardiac output. Vasopressors are important to restore end-organ perfusion, and inotropes improve contractility. Intubation and positive pressure ventilation impact hemodynamics, which, depending on volume status, may be beneficial or deleterious. Knowing indications for mechanical circulatory support is important for timely consultation or transfer as indicated.

Drug-coated balloon versus drug-eluting stent in de novo small coronary vessel disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Drug-coated balloon as a novel therapeutic strategy has been used to treat restenosis in cases of bare metal and drug-eluting stents. However, evidence of its safety and efficacy is scarce in de novo small coronary artery vessel disease. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of the drug-coated balloon and the drug-eluting stent.

METHODS

The PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane library databases were searched for studies published up to October 17, 2018. Studies comparing the drug-coated balloon with the drug-eluting stent strategy in patients with de novo small coronary artery vessel disease (reference diameter, <3 mm) were identified. The clinical outcomes were nonfatal myocardial infarction, cardiac death, all-cause death, target lesion revascularization, and target-vessel revascularization. Data were analyzed using the statistical software RevMan (version 5.3). Fixed effects models were performed to calculate the pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). Sensitivity analyses were used to detect potential sources of heterogeneity, while subgroup analyses were implemented to assess the differential effects.

RESULTS

Three randomized controlled trials and 3 nonrandomized controlled studies were identified. Six studies including a total of 1800 patients compared the differences between the drug-coated balloon and the drug-eluting stent strategies in patients with de novo small coronary artery vessel disease. The results indicated that the drug-coated balloon strategy was associated with a significant reduction in nonfatal myocardial infarction (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.31-0.90, P = .02) compared with the drug-eluting stent strategy, while insignificant inter-strategy differences were observed in cardiac death (OR 1.56, 95% CI 0.73-3.33, P = .25), all-cause death (OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.25-1.23, P = .15), target lesion revascularization (OR 1.24, 95% CI 0.73-2.1, P = .43), and target-vessel revascularization (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.59-1.52, P = .84).

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis suggests that the drug-coated balloon strategy is noninferior to the drug-eluting stent strategy, delivering a good outcome in nonfatal myocardial infarction, and can be recommended as an optimal treatment strategy in patients with de novo small coronary artery vessel disease. Larger randomized controlled studies with longer follow-up periods are needed to further confirm the benefits of the drug-coated balloon strategy.

Intracoronary near-infrared spectroscopy and the risk of future cardiovascular events

Objectives

The objectives of this study were to investigate if findings by intracoronary near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) are associated with future cardiovascular events and if NIRS can differentiate culprit from non-culprit segments in patients with coronary artery disease.

Methods

The study included 144 patients with coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and combined NIRS-IVUS imaging at two Swedish hospitals. The NIRS-derived lipid core burden index (LCBI), the 4 mm segment with maximum LCBI (MaxLCBI4mm) and the IVUS-derived maximum plaque burden (MaxPB) were analysed within the culprit segment and continuous 10 mm non-culprit segments of the index culprit vessels. The association with future major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), defined as all-cause mortality, acute coronary syndrome requiring revascularisation and cerebrovascular events during follow-up was evaluated using multivariable Cox regressions. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to test the ability of NIRS to discriminate culprit against non-culprit segments.

Results

A non-culprit maxLCBI4mm ≥400 (HR: 3.67, 95% CI 1.46 to 9.23, p=0.006) and a non-culprit LCBI ≥ median (HR: 3.08, 95% CI 1.11 to 8.56, p=0.031) were both significantly associated with MACCE, whereas a non-culprit MaxPB ≥70% (HR: 0.61, 95% CI 0.08 to 4.59, p=0.63) was not. The culprit segments had larger lipid cores compared with non-culprit segments (MaxLCBI4mm 425 vs 74, p<0.001), and the ROC analysis showed that NIRS can differentiate culprit against non-culprit segments (c-statistics: 0.85, 95% CI 0.81 to 0.89).

Conclusion

A maxLCBI4mm ≥400 and LCBI ≥ median, assessed by NIRS in non-culprit segments of a culprit artery, were significantly associated with patient-level MACCE. NIRS furthermore adequately discriminated culprit against non-culprit segments in patients with coronary disease.

The association between CRP / Albumin ratio and in-stent restenosis development in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

BACKGROUND

Although interventional methods are the first-line treatment options in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), the incidence of stent restenosis (SR) is frequent. We investigated the relationship between CRP/albumin ratio (CAR), a novel indicator of inflammatory response, and SR in this study.

METHOD

This study was carried out on the patients who underwent coronary angiography in our clinic between January 2017 and September 2017. Two groups were generated according to restenosis status (group 1: restenosis (-), group 2: restenosis (+)), and clinical biochemical and angiographical features were compared. As baseline demographic and angiographic characteristics are slightly different in two groups, propensity score matching analysis was performed to reduce bias. 45 SR patients were matched on a 1:1 basis were enrolled final cohort.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 55 ± 5.1 and 80% were male; Cox regression model was performed to demonstrate independent predictor of restenosis development; and during the one-year follow-up period, CAR (P < 0.001) was found an independent predictor of SR CONCLUSION: In this study, we demonstrate that there may be a strong relationship between SR development and CAR. We implied that inflammatory reaction may be an important diagnostic tool for prediction of SR development in STEMI patients.

Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Acute Coronary Syndrome: Focus on Safety and Completeness of Revascularization

Background Emergency coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in the setting of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) has been associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Avoiding cardiopulmonary bypass might be advantageous, but the role of off-pump CABG (OPCAB) remains controversial, as it has been associated with incomplete revascularization in several studies. The objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility, efficacy, and outcome of OPCAB surgery in ACS patients.

Methods We performed a retrospective review of ACS patients who underwent on-pump CABG (ONCAB) or OPCAB, either emergently or delayed, at our institution.

Results Between January 2015 and December 2016, a total of 205 consecutive ACS patients underwent either ONCAB (109 patients, 53.2%) or OPCAB surgery (96 patients, 46.8%). EuroSCORE II levels (5.6 ± 7.2 vs 4.9 ± 6.5, p = 0.226) and demography were comparable between groups.

A trend towards lower postoperative mortality was observed in OPCAB patients (2.1 vs 5.5%). The incidence of postoperative stroke and low cardiac output syndrome, as well as the duration of inotropic support and the need for re-sternotomy, was significantly lower in the OPCAB group (p < 0.05).

CABG performed instantly in an emergency situation was not associated with increased mortality or morbidity when compared with delayed procedures, and OPCAB surgery in emergency patients was associated with lower postoperative morbidity and shorter stays in the intensive care unit (p < 0.05).

There were no differences in completeness of revascularization between groups (median 1 [1–1.33;0.33–1.67] OPCAB versus median 1 (1–1.33;0.67–2) ONCAB, p = 0.617), even in the emergency setting.

Conclusion OPCAB surgery is safe and effective in ACS and may be considered in hemodynamically stable patients in the emergency setting.

A focused review on optimal coronary revascularisation in patients with chronic kidney disease: Coronary revascularisation in kidney disease

Concomitant chronic kidney disease (CKD) and coronary artery disease (CAD) is known to have poor outcomes. With a thorough literature review, we discuss the pathophysiological basis behind accelerated atherosclerosis in CKD, and the role of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in these patients, focusing on drug-eluting stents, coronary artery bypass grafting, and adverse outcomes. We discuss factors contributing to poor outcomes in these patients, and the need for more work in this subgroup.

Culprit versus multivessel coronary intervention in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis of randomized trials

BACKGROUND

The 2015 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association update on primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) recommended PCI of the non-infarct-related artery at the time of primary PCI (class IIb recommendation). Despite evidence supporting complete revascularization in STEMI, its benefit on mortality rates is uncertain.

METHODS

We searched all available databases for randomized controlled trials comparing complete multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention (CMV PCI) with infarct-artery-only revascularization in patients with STEMI. Summary risk ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for both the efficacy and safety outcomes.

RESULTS

Nine randomized controlled trials fulfilled the inclusion criteria, yielding 2991 patients. Follow-up periods ranged from 6 to 36 months. Compared with infarct-related artery-only PCI, CMV PCI was associated with significantly lower rates of major adverse cardiac events [relative risk (RR)=0.54, 95% CI=0.41-0.71; P<0.00001], cardiovascular mortality (RR=0.48, 95% CI=0.28-0.80; P=0.005), and repeat revascularization (RR=0.38, 95% CI=0.30-0.47; P<0.00001). Although, contrast-induced nephropathy and major bleed rates were comparable between both groups, CMV PCI failed to show any reduction in all-cause mortality (RR=0.75, 95% CI=0.53-1.07; P=0.11) and nonfatal myocardial infarction (RR=0.69, 95% CI=0.43-1.10; P=0.12).

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that in patients with STEMI and multivessel disease, complete revascularization is safe, and is associated with reduced risks of major adverse cardiac events and cardiac death along with a reduced need for repeat revascularization. However, it showed no beneficial effect on all-cause mortality and nonfatal myocardial infarction.