Suture-Mediated Patent Foramen Ovale Closure Using the NobleStitch EL: Results from a Hospital-Based HTA

(1) Background: Patent foramen ovale (PFO) is a congenital abnormality present in up to 25% of the general population, and it is a relevant cause of cryptogenic stroke. We applied the hospital-based HTA model (AdHopHTA) to conduct a multidimensional assessment of NobleStitch EL, an innovative suture-mediated PFO closure device. We compared it to Amplatzer PFO Occluder (APO) to provide evidence to inform technologies’ governance in hospital settings. (2) Methods: For each AdHopHTA dimension we: systematically retrieved available evidence from the literature applying the PRISMA guidelines and then analyzed original clinical and cost data of a NobleStitch EL device at San Raffaele research hospital in Milan (Italy). The economic dimension was analyzed through activity-based costing and a cost analysis. We conducted semi-structured interviews with selected healthcare professionals to explore the organizational, legal, social, and ethical impact. (3) Results: A single study was included for the NobleStitch EL, with 10 for APO. Both literature data and original data showed comparable safety. Efficacy data analysis found that the PFO closure was at 89% for NobleStitch EL vs. 89–97% for APO. APO has a better impact on the budget and minor process costs. Consulted experts reported that the organizational impact of NobleStitch EL in the short and the long run as null, albeit a better impact under the social and the ethical aspects. (4) Conclusion: We suggest that there is inadequate evidence to conclude the relative efficacy of NobleStitch EL as compared to APO. Nevertheless, this report shows a good safety profile and higher costs for NobleStitch EL, with no organizational or legal impact. Further studies in selected population are recommended.

Light anti-thrombotic regimen for prevention of device thrombosis and/or thrombotic complications after interatrial shunts device-based closure

AIMS

The optimal antiplatelet therapy after atrial septal defect (ASD) or patent foramen ovale device closure (PFO) remain to be established. We evaluated the safety and effectiveness of 6-month 100 mg Aspirin (ASA) regimen in the very long-term follow up after intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) -aided interatrial shunt closure in a large retrospective cohort.

METHODS

Single-center retrospective analysis which included medical and instrumental data of 789 consecutive patients referred to our institution over a 15 years period due interatrial shunt catheter-based closure.

RESULTS

Finally, 734 patients were included in the analysis (mean age 46.1 ± 14.6 years, 398 females): ASD and PFO closure were successfully performed in 281 and 453 patients, respectively. Over the follow-up period, no major bleeding events were observed while the rate of minor bleeding events was 0.9%. Tolerance problems were detected in 3.4% of cases (n==28). In 11 patients (1.5%) an abnormal complete blood count was detected and monitored up to normalization. On a mean follow -up of 10.3 ± 3.0 years (range 1-15), 10 patients (1.36%) had a persistent moderate shunt 12 months after closure and maintained Aspirin 100 mg life-long, whereas the remaining 724 suspended the treatment after 6 months. Device thrombosis in ASD and PFO groups were 0% and 0.2%, respectively. A cerebral ischemic event occurred in 0.4% of the entire cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

A regimen of 100 mg of ASA for six months after ASD/PFO closure appeared to be both safe and effective in preventing device thrombosis and major bleedings.

Patent foramen ovale and atrial fibrillation as causes of cryptogenic stroke: is treatment with surgery superior to device closure and anticoagulation? A review of the literature

Closure of persistent foramen ovale (PFO) to avoid cryptogenic strokes is performed globally with enthusiasm but lacks prove of efficacy. We present a 79-year-old man who had had a PFO device introduced nine years previously because of cryptogenic strokes presenting as syncopes. The patient was referred from his general practitioner with two new syncopes. Transthoracic echocardiography revealed no cardiac causes of embolism. Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) revealed a misplaced device like an umbrella in a storm, but no septum defects. Holter revealed seconds-long episodes of atrial fibrillation (AF). The patient was successfully treated with anticoagulation.

A literature review showed that: (i) the efficacy of PFO closure devices has not been proven in any trial, but was demonstrated in a meta-analysis comparing three different devices; (ii) PFO devices are rarely controlled by TEE during or after insertion; (iii) residual shunts are detected in up to 45% of cases; (iv) there is an increased rate of post-arrhythmic complications; (v) the risk of AF in congenital heart disease increases with increasing age, with a 13% risk of transient ischemic attacks and stroke; and (vi) surgical treatment of PFO was found to have a 4.1% risk of complications including stroke.

The question to be asked is whether device closure of PFO should be avoided, considering that PFO is a congenital heart defect with risks of AF and (cryptogenic) stroke? Heart surgery should be a treatment option for symptomatic PFO.

Multidisciplinary assessment of PFO with substantial right-to-left shunting and medium-term follow-up after PFO device closure: A single-center experience

Objectives

To describe the multidisciplinary assessment of patent foramen ovale (PFO) with substantial right‐to‐left shunting (RLS) and medium‐term follow‐up after PFO closure for stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA).

Background

PFO closure is a therapeutic option to prevent recurrent ischemic event in patients with cryptogenic stroke and TIA. The apparent lack of benefit seen in previous studies was in part due to the inclusion of patients with alternate mechanisms of stroke/TIA. However, the long‐term follow‐up results of RESPECT trial confirmed that PFO closure could reduce the recurrence rate of stroke compared to medical therapy. The obvious difference between RESPECT and the other studies is that RESPECT recruited more relevant patients with substantial RLS.

Methods

From May 2013 to October 2015, all subjects diagnosed as cryptogenic stroke or TIA with substantial RLS who underwent PFO closure at our institution were included. All patients underwent multidisciplinary assessment to exclude stroke/TIA with definite etiology. Baseline characteristics, clinical manifestations, procedural, and follow‐up data were reviewed.

Results

A total of 219 consecutive patients with substantial RLS undergoing PFO closure were identified. There were no procedure‐related deaths, strokes, or TIA. Mean follow‐up was 2.0 ± 0.7 years. Early residual shunting was visible in 9 patients (4.1%); however, during follow‐up, only 3 patients (1.4%) had residual RLS detected by contrast transthoracic echocardiography (cTTE). The annual risk of recurrent ischemic stroke or TIA was 0.457%.

Conclusions

PFO closure can be performed safely and effectively in patients with cryptogenic stroke or TIA. In selected patients with substantial RLS, following appropriate multidisciplinary assessment, excellent results with low incidence of recurrent events may be achieved.

Patent foramen ovale

Patent foramen ovale (PFO) is the most common congenital heart abnormality of fetal origin and is present in approximately ∼25% of the worldwide adult population. PFO is the consequence of failed closure of the foramen ovale, a normal structure that exists in the fetus to direct blood flow directly from the right to the left atrium, bypassing the pulmonary circulation. PFO has historically been associated with an increased risk of stroke, the mechanism of which has been attributed to the paradoxical embolism of venous thrombi that shunt through the PFO directly to the left atrium. However, several studies have failed to show an increased risk of stroke in asymptomatic patients with a PFO, and the risk of stroke recurrence is low in patients who have had a stroke that may be attributed to a PFO. With the advent of transoesophageal and transthoracic echocardiography, as well as transcranial Doppler, a PFO can be routinely detected in clinical practice. Medical treatment with either antiplatelet or anticoagulation therapy is recommended. At the current time, closure of the PFO by percutaneous interventional techniques does not appear to reduce the risk of stroke compared to conventional medical treatment, as shown by three large clinical trials. Considerable controversy remains regarding the optimal treatment strategy for patients with both cryptogenic stroke and PFO. This Primer discusses the epidemiology, mechanisms, pathophysiology, diagnosis, screening, management and effects on quality of life of PFO.