Head to Head Comparison of Stress Echocardiography with Exercise Electrocardiography for the Detection of Coronary Artery Stenosis in Women

Evaluating Ischemic Heart Disease in Women: Focus on Angina With Nonobstructive Coronary Arteries (ANOCA)

Ischemic heart disease (IHD) is common in women, and cardiovascular disease is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality. While obstructive coronary artery disease is the most common form of IHD, millions of women suffer from angina with nonobstructive coronary arteries (ANOCA), an umbrella term encompassing multiple nonatherosclerotic disorders of the coronary tree. The underlying pathology leading to ischemia in these syndromes may be challenging to diagnose, leaving many women without a diagnosis despite persistent symptoms that impact quality of life and adversely affect long-term cardiovascular prognosis. In the last decade, there have been significant advances in the recognition and diagnostic evaluation of ANOCA. Despite these advances, the standard approach to evaluating suspected IHD in women continues to focus predominantly on the assessment of atherosclerotic coronary artery disease, leading to missed opportunities to accurately diagnose and treat underlying coronary vasomotor disorders. The goal of this review is to describe advances in diagnostic testing that can be used to evaluate angina in women and present a pragmatic diagnostic algorithm to guide evaluation of ANOCA in symptomatic patients. The proposed approach for the assessment of ANOCA is consistent with prior expert consensus documents and guidelines but is predicated on the medical interview and pretest probability of disease to inform a personalized diagnostic strategy.

Sex Differences in Coronary Artery Disease: Insights From the KoRean wOmen'S chest pain rEgistry (KoROSE)

Interest in sex differences in coronary artery disease (CAD) has been steadily increasing. Concurrently, most of the data on these differences have primarily been Western-oriented. The KoRean wOmen'S chest pain rEgistry (KoROSE), started in 2011, has since published numerous research findings. This review aims to summarize the reported differences between men and women in CAD, integrating data from KoROSE. Cardiovascular risk in postmenopausal women escalates dramatically due to the decrease in estrogen levels, which normally offer cardiovascular protective effects. Lower estrogen levels can lead to abdominal obesity, insulin resistance, increased blood pressure, and endothelial dysfunction in older women. Upon analyzing patients with CAD, women are typically older and exhibit more cardiovascular risk factors than men. Diagnosing CAD in women tends to be delayed due to their symptoms being more atypical than men's. While in-hospital outcome was similar between sexes, bleeding complications after percutaneous coronary intervention occur more frequently in women. The differences in long-term prognosis for CAD patients between men and women are still a subject of ongoing debate. Pregnancy and reproductive factors also play a significant role as risk factors for cardiovascular disease in women. A notable sex disparity exists, with women found to use fewer cardiovascular protective drugs and undergo fewer interventional or surgical procedures than men. Additionally, women participate less frequently than men in clinical research. Through concerted efforts to increase awareness of sex differences and mitigate sex disparity, personalized treatment can be provided. This approach can ultimately improve patient prognosis.

Approach to Imaging Ischemia in Women

Approach to imaging ischemia in women Coronary artery disease in women tends to have a worse short- and long-term prognosis relative to men and remains the leading cause of mortality worldwide. Both clinical symptoms and diagnostic approach remain challenging in women due to lesser likelihood of women presenting with classic anginal symptoms on one hand and underperformance of conventional exercise treadmill testing in women on the other. Moreover, a higher proportion of women with signs and symptoms suggestive of ischemia are more likely to have nonobstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) that requires additional imaging and therapeutic considerations. New imaging techniques such as coronary computed tomography (CT) angiography, CT myocardial perfusion imaging, CT functional flow reserve assessment, and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging carry substantially better sensitivity and specificity for the detection of ischemia and coronary artery disease in women. Familiarity with various clinical subtypes of ischemic heart disease in women and with the major advantages and disadvantages of advanced imaging tests to ensure the decision to select one modality over another is one of the keys to successful diagnosis of CAD in women. This review compares the 2 major types of ischemic heart disease in women - obstructive and nonobstructive, while focusing on sex-specific elements of its pathophysiology.

Cardiovascular Imaging for Ischemic Heart Disease in Women: Time for a Paradigm Shift

Heart disease is the leading cause of death among men and women. Women have a unique phenotype of ischemic heart disease with less calcified lesions, more nonobstructive plaques, and a higher prevalence of microvascular disease compared with men, which may explain in part why current risk models to detect obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) may not work as well in women. This paper summarizes the sex differences in the functional and anatomical assessment of CAD in women presenting with stable chest pain and provides an approach for using multimodality imaging for the evaluation of suspected ischemic heart disease in women in accordance to the recently published American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology guidelines for the evaluation and diagnosis of chest pain. A paradigm shift in the approach to imaging ischemic heart disease women is needed including updated risk models, a more profound understanding of CAD in women where nonobstructive disease is more prevalent, and algorithms focused on the evaluation of ischemia with nonobstructive CAD and myocardial infarction with nonobstructive CAD.

Diagnostic accuracy of regadenoson stress echocardiography: concordance with gated-spect myocardial perfusion imaging

Regadenoson Stress Echocardiography (RSE) can detect myocardial ischemia, and its diagnostic accuracy should be evaluated. We sought to investigate the agreement between RSE and gated-SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) and appraise its diagnostic accuracy. Consecutive patients (n = 202) referred for non-invasive evaluation of myocardial ischemia, with (38.6%) or without a previous coronary artery disease (CAD) diagnosis, were enrolled. Both tests were performed simultaneously. Invasive coronary angiography (CA) is considered the gold standard. The mean age was 70.9 (9.8) years, and 59.9% were male. The prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors (arterial hypertension [81.7%], diabetes mellitus [37.6%], hypercholesterolemia [71.8%], and smoking [18.8%]) was high. Forty-four patients (21.8%) had a non-interpretable electrocardiogram, 15 (34.1%) of them were a result of ventricular paced-rhythm, while 29 (65.9%) were a result of advanced left ventricular branch block. The overall agreement between both diagnostic techniques was good: Gwet's AC1 0.66 (CI95% 0.55 to 0.76), and it was higher in patients without a previous CAD diagnosis: 0.76 (CI95% 0.65 to 0.87). In the biased sample (those who underwent CA), RSE and nuclear study sensitivity was 0.50 and 0.78 and specificity was 0.75 and 0.75, respectively. We noted a dramatic reduction in sensitivity for RSE after debiasing (debiased sensitivity of 0.16), and the negative predictive value was similar to the biased and debiased samples. RSE is in strong agreement with gated-SPECT MPI. However, its low sensitivity and negative predictive value preclude its use as a bedside test to detect myocardial ischemia.

Postnatal undernutrition in mice causes cardiac arrhythmogenesis which is exacerbated when pharmacologically stressed

Growth restriction caused by postnatal undernutrition increases risk for cardiovascular disease in adulthood with the potential to induce arrhythmogenesis. Thus, the purpose was to determine if undernutrition during development produced arrhythmias at rest and when stressed with dobutamine in adulthood. Mouse dams were fed (CON: 20% protein), or low-protein (LP: 8%) diet before mating. A cross-fostering model was used where pups nursed by dams fed LP diet in early [EUN; postnatal day (PN) 1–10], late (LUN; PN11–21) and whole (PUN; 1–21) phases of postnatal life. Weaned pups were switched to CON diets for the remainder of the study (PN80). At PN80, body composition (magnetic resonance imaging), and quantitative electrocardiogram (ECG) measurements were obtained under 1% isoflurane anesthesia. After baseline ECG, an IP injection (1.5 µg/g body weight) of dobutamine was administered and ECG repeated. Undernutrition significantly (P<0.05) reduced body weight in LUN (22.68±0.88 g) and PUN (19.96±0.32 g) but not in CON (25.05±0.96 g) and EUN (25.28±0.9207 g). Fat mass decreased in all groups compared with controls (CON: 8.00±1.2 g, EUN: 6.32±0.65 g, LUN: 5.11±1.1 g, PUN: 3.90±0.25 g). Lean mass was only significantly reduced in PUN (CON: 17.99±0.26 g, EUN: 17.78±0.39 g, LUN: 17.34±0.33 g, PUN: 15.85±0.28 g). Absolute heart weights were significantly less from CON, with PUN having the smallest. ECG showed LUN had occurrences of atrial fibrillation; EUN had increases of 1st degree atrioventricular block upon stimulation, and PUN had increased risk for ventricular depolarization arrhythmias. CON did not display arrhythmias. Undernutrition in early life resulted in ventricular arrhythmias under stressed conditions, but undernutrition occurring in later postnatal life there is an increased incidence of atrial arrhythmias.