Epicardial Fat Thickness and Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio are Increased in Non-Dipper Hypertensive Patients

Meta-analysis of differences in neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio between hypertensive and non-hypertensive individuals

This study systematically reviewed the evidence regarding differences in the neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) level between hypertensive and normotensive individuals as well as between patients with dipper and non-dipper hypertension (HTN). PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were systematically searched up to 20 December 2021. This was done without any limitation with regard to date, publication, or language. Pooled weighted mean differences (WMD) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were reported. We assessed the quality of studies based on the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). In total, 21 studies were included in our study. There was a significant increase in NLR levels for the hypertensive group in comparison to the control group (WMD = 0.40, 95%CI = 0.22-0.57, P < 0.0001). In addition, the NLR levels were higher in the non-dipper than in the dipper group (WMD = 0.58, 95%CI = 0.19-0.97, P = 0.003). Our findings showed that hypertensive patients had higher level of NLR than normotensive individuals.

Association between epicardial adipose tissue and blood pressure: A systematic review and meta-analysis

AIMS

Epicardial adipose tissue has been reported to be associated with the development of cardiometabolic disease. Whether this is true for hypertension and non-dipper blood pressure remains controversial. Here, we conducted a systemic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the association between EAT and blood pressure.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Pubmed, Embase, and Web of Science were searched for relevant papers. Studies reported on the difference of EAT thickness between hypertensive and normotensive patients, or those recorded odds ratio (OR) between EAT and hypertension were included. The standard mean difference (SMD) and ORs were extracted and pooled using a random-effects model respectively. We further assessed the effect of EAT on circadian rhythm of blood pressure by combining multiple-adjusted ORs for non-dipper blood pressure. Seven studies with an overall sample of 1089 patients reported the mean difference of EAT thickness between hypertensive and normotensive patients, and the hypertensive patients had higher EAT (SMD = 1.07; 95% CI: 0.66-1.48; I2 = 89.2%) compared with controls. However, the pooled association between EAT and hypertension from two studies was not significant (OR = 1.65, 95%CI 0.62-4.68; I2 = 87.5%). The summary risk effect of EAT on non-dipper blood pressure from six studies comprising1208 patients showed that each 1 mm increment of EAT was associated with a 2.55-fold risk of non-dipper blood pressure.

CONCLUSION

Hypertensive patients tend to present higher EAT thickness near the right ventricular wall and increased EAT thickness might be associated with high risk of non-dipper blood pressure. Future researches are warranted to determine the causal link between EAT and hypertension and the underlying mechanism.

Pretreatment combination of platelet counts and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio predicts survival of nasopharyngeal cancer patients receiving intensity-modulated radiotherapy

Background

Increased cancer-related inflammation has been associated with unfavorable clinical outcomes. The combination of platelet count and neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio (COP-NLR) has related outcomes in several cancers, except for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). This study evaluated the prognostic value of COP-NLR in predicting outcome in NPC patients treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT).

Materials and methods

We analyzed the data collected from 232 NPC patients. Pretreatment total platelet counts, neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and COP-NLR score were evaluated as potential predictors. Optimal cutoff values for NLR and platelets were determined using receiver operating curve. Patients with both elevated NLR (>3) and platelet counts (>300×10⁹/L) were assigned a COP-NLR score of 2; those with one elevated or no elevated value were assigned a COP-NLR a score of 1 or 0. Cox proportional hazards model was used to test the association of these factors and relevant 3-year survivals.

Results

Patients (COP-NLR scores 1 and 2=85; score 0=147) were followed up for 55.19 months. Univariate analysis showed no association between pretreatment NLR >2.23 and platelet counts >290.5×10⁹/L and worse outcomes. Multivariate analysis revealed that those with COP-NLR scores of 0 had better 3-year disease-specific survival (P=0.02), overall survival (P=0.024), locoregional relapse-free survival (P=0.004), and distant metastasis-free survival (P=0.046). Further subgrouping by tumor stage also revealed COP-NLR to be an unfavorable prognostic indicator of 3-year failure-free survival (P=0.001) for locally advanced NPC.

Conclusion

COP-NLR score, but not NLR alone or total platelet count alone, predicted survival in NPC patients treated with IMRT-based therapy, especially those with stage III/IVA, B malignancies.