Impact of a Geometric Correction for Proximal Flow Constraint on the Assessment of Mitral Regurgitation Severity Using the Proximal Flow Convergence Method

Clinical Situations Associated with Inappropriately Large Regurgitant Volumes in the Assessment of Mitral Regurgitation Severity Using the Proximal Flow Convergence Method in Patients with Chordae Rupture

BACKGROUND

Regurgitant volume (RVol) calculated using the proximal flow convergence method (proximal isovelocity surface area [PISA]) has been accepted as a key quantitative parameter for the diagnosis of and clinical decision-making with regard to severe mitral regurgitation (MR). However, a recent prospective study showed a significant overestimation of RVol by the echocardiographic PISA method compared with the MR volume measured using magnetic resonance imaging. We aimed to evaluate the frequency of overestimation of RVol by the PISA method and the clinical conditions that require a different quantitative method to correct the overestimation.

METHODS

We retrospectively enrolled 166 consecutive patients with degenerative MR and chordae rupture, in whom RVol was measured using both the PISA and two-dimensional Doppler volumetric methods. The volumetric method was used to measure total stroke volume using the two-dimensional Simpson biplane method, and forward stroke volume was measured using pulsed Doppler tracing at the left ventricular (LV) outflow tract. RVol by the volumetric method was calculated using total stroke volume - forward stroke volume. Severe MR was defined as an RVol >60 mL.

RESULTS

All patients had severe MR based on RVol by the PISA method, but 68 (41.1%) showed RVol by the volumetric method values of <60 mL, resulting in discordant results. The patients with discordant results were characterized by a higher prevalence of female sex, lower body surface area, smaller LV diastolic and systolic dimensions and volumes, smaller left atrial volume, smaller PISA angle, and lower frequency of flail leaflets (39.7% vs 62.2%, P = .004). Multivariate analysis revealed that LV end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) and PISA angle were independent factors, with the best cutoff LVEDV and PISA angle being 173 mL and 103°, respectively. During follow-up (median, 3.4 years; interquartile range, 2.0-4.8 years), mitral valve repair and replacement were performed in 103 and six patients, respectively. The 2-year mitral valve surgery-free survival rate was higher in the discordant group (51.8% ± 0.06% vs 31.2% ± 0.05%, P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Even in the patients with documented chordae rupture, the PISA method alone resulted in inappropriate overestimation of MR severity in a significant proportion of patients. Thus, an additive quantitative method is absolutely necessary in patients with a small LVEDV or narrow PISA angle.