Neoadjuvant therapy in resectable pancreatic cancer: A promising curative method to improve prognosis

Trends and Outcomes of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Clinical Stage T1 Pancreatic Cancer

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NC) for early pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains controversial. We investigate the adoption of NC and its impact on survival in clinical T1 (cT1) PDAC.

METHODS

National Cancer Database (2006-2017) was reviewed for cT1 PDAC. Patients receiving NC and surgery were compared with patients undergoing upfront surgery (US).

RESULTS

A total of 5886 patients were included. NC use increased from 4.8% in 2006 to 18.8% in 2017. The NC group (n = 618) versus the US group (n = 5268) had: younger age (66 years vs. 68 years), smaller tumor size (2 cm vs. 2.2 cm), more pancreas head tumors (77% vs. 70.6%), lower lymph-vascular invasion (25.9% vs. 40.6%), and less lymph node positivity (43.6% vs. 54.5%), p < 0.001. Factors associated with receipt of NC were: younger age, recent year of diagnosis, and treatment at an academic program. In the NC group versus the US group, median OS was 35.2 months versus 28.3 months, p < 0.001. Factors associated with improved survival included: well differentiated pathology, R0 surgical margins, and receipt of chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION

In cT1 PDAC, chemotherapy is associated with improved survival. In a surgery-first approach, only 59% of patients receive adjuvant chemotherapy. These data suggest consideration of neoadjuvant therapy for early pancreatic cancer.

Utilization and survival outcomes of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for early-stage gastric cancer

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Given increased utilization of neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) for gastric adenocarcinoma, practice patterns deviating from standard of care (upfront resection) remain unknown. We sought to identify factors associated with NAT use and survival outcomes among early-stage gastric cancers.

METHODS

The National Cancer Database identified patients with early-stage (T1N0M0) gastric cancer (2010-2020). Multivariable logistic regression assessed characteristics associated with NAT utilization compared to upfront surgery. After 1:1 propensity score matching, Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox regression assessed overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Of 6452 patients with early-stage gastric cancer, 626 (9.7%) received NAT. Patients who received NAT were more likely treated at community hospitals, had moderate to poorly differentiated disease, and tumors located in the cardia (all p < 0.05). After propensity score matching, 1,248 patients remained. Median OS for NAT was 37.1 months (IQR 20.2-64.0) versus 45.6 months (IQR 22.5-72.8) for resection (p < 0.001). Treatment with NAT remained independently predictive of worse OS on Cox regression (hazard ratio 1.19; 95% confidence interval 1.05-1.34).

CONCLUSIONS

Although patients who received NAT had more aggressive prognostic features, NAT was associated with worse OS despite accounting for this selection bias. These results highlight the importance of adhering to guidelines, regardless of differing disease characteristics, which has significant implications on outcomes.

Prognostic role of radiological splenic vessel involvement in patients with resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma of the body and tail: A retrospective analysis based on a large population

BACKGROUND

Tumors located in the pancreatic body or tail are more likely to invade splenic vessels; however, splenic artery (SpA) or vein (SpV) involvement is not included in the criteria for resectability. We aimed to analyze the prognostic role of radiological splenic vessel involvement in patients with resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) of the body and tail.

METHODS

Patients with resetable PDAC were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed. SpA and SpV involvement were graded as clear, abutment and encasement. Multivariate Cox and logistic regression analyses were used to identify prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) and risk factors for early recurrence, respectively.

RESULTS

Of the 234 patients, 94 patients had radiologic SpA invasion, including abutment in 47 patients and encasement in 47 patients, while 123 patients had radiological SpV invasion, including abutment in 69 patients and encasement in 54 patients. Patients with SpA or SpV encasement showed a significantly worse OS and recurrence-free survival than those with SpA or SpV clear (P < 0.001, respectively). In multivariate analysis, both SpA and SpV encasement were independently associated with poor OS (SpA: hazard ratio [HR] 1.89, P = 0.010; SpV: HR 2.01, P = 0.001) and early recurrence (SpA: odds ratio [OR] 4.98, P < 0.001; SpV: OR 3.71, P = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

Radiological SpA or SpV encasement independently decreases OS, and is associated with early recurrence of resectable PDAC of the body/tail.

Clinical implications and perspectives of portal venous circulating tumor cells in pancreatic cancer

Despite recent improvements in the diagnosis and treatment of pancreatic cancer (PC), clinical outcomes remain dismal. Moreover, there are no effective prognostic or predictive biomarkers or options beyond carbohydrate antigen 19-9 for personalized and precise treatment. Circulating tumor cells (CTCs), as a member of the liquid biopsy family, could be a promising biomarker; however, the rarity of CTCs in peripheral venous blood limits their clinical use. Because the first venous drainage of PC is portal circulation, the portal vein can be a more suitable location for the detection of CTCs. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided portal venous sampling of CTCs is both feasible and safe. Several studies have suggested that the detection rate and number of CTCs may be higher in the portal blood than in the peripheral blood. CTC counts in the portal blood are highly associated with hepatic metastasis, recurrence after surgery, and survival. The phenotypic and genotypic properties measured in the captured portal CTCs can help us to understand tumor heterogeneity and predict the prognosis of PC. Small sample sizes and heterogeneous CTC detection methods limit the studies to date. Therefore, a large number of prospective studies are needed to corroborate portal CTCs as a valid biomarker in PC.

Clinical diagnosis and management of pancreatic cancer: Markers, molecular mechanisms, and treatment options

Pancreatic cancer (PC) is the third-leading cause of cancer deaths. The overall 5-year survival rate of PC is 9%, and this rate for metastatic PC is below 3%. However, the PC-induced death cases will increase about 2-fold by 2060. Many factors such as genetic and environmental factors and metabolic diseases can drive PC development and progression. The most common type of PC in the clinic is pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, comprising approximately 90% of PC cases. Multiple pathogenic processes including but not limited to inflammation, fibrosis, angiogenesis, epithelial-mesenchymal transition, and proliferation of cancer stem cells are involved in the initiation and progression of PC. Early diagnosis is essential for curable therapy, for which a combined panel of serum markers is very helpful. Although some mono or combined therapies have been approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration for PC treatment, current therapies have not shown promising outcomes. Fortunately, the development of novel immunotherapies, such as oncolytic viruses-mediated treatments and chimeric antigen receptor-T cells, combined with therapies such as neoadjuvant therapy plus surgery, and advanced delivery systems of immunotherapy will improve therapeutic outcomes and combat drug resistance in PC patients. Herein, the pathogenesis, molecular signaling pathways, diagnostic markers, prognosis, and potential treatments in completed, ongoing, and recruiting clinical trials for PC were reviewed.