Clinical significance of molecular subtypes of gastrointestinal tract adenocarcinoma

Research advances in the molecular classification of gastric cancer

Gastric cancer (GC) is a malignant tumor with one of the lowest five-year survival rates. Traditional first-line treatment regimens, such as platinum drugs, have limited therapeutic efficacy in treating advanced GC and significant side effects, greatly reducing patient quality of life. In contrast, trastuzumab and other immune checkpoint inhibitors, such as nivolumab and pembrolizumab, have demonstrated consistent and reliable efficacy in treating GC. Here, we discuss the intrinsic characteristics of GC from a molecular perspective and provide a comprehensive review of classification and treatment advances in the disease. Finally, we suggest several strategies based on the intrinsic molecular characteristics of GC to aid in overcoming clinical challenges in the development of precision medicine and improve patient prognosis.

Claudin-18.2 testing and its impact in the therapeutic management of patients with gastric and gastroesophageal adenocarcinomas: A literature review with expert opinion

Claudin-18.2 (CLDN18.2) is a member of the tight junction protein family and is a highly selective biomarker with frequent abnormal expression during the occurrence and development of various primary malignant tumors, including gastric cancer (GC) and esophago-gastric junction adenocarcinomas (EGJA). For these reasons, CLDN18.2 has been investigated as a therapeutic target for GC/EGJA malignancies. Recently, zolbetuximab has been proposed as a new standard of care for patients with CLDN18.2-positive, HER2-negative, locally advanced and metastatic GC/EGJA. The use of CLDN18 IHC assays to select patients who might benefit from anti-CLDN18.2 therapy is currently entering clinical practice. In this setting, pathologists play a central role in therapeutic decision-making. Accurate biomarker assessment is essential to ensure the best therapeutic option for patients. In the present review, we provide a comprehensive overview of available evidence on CLDN18.2 testing and its impact on the therapeutic management of patients with GC/EGJA, as well as some practical suggestions for CLDN18.2 staining interpretation and potential pitfalls in the real-world setting.

Combined score of Y chromosome loss and T-cell infiltration improves UICC based stratification of esophageal adenocarcinoma

Background

Staging, especially clinical lymph node staging in esophageal adenocarcinoma has only moderate sensitivity and specificity. Therefore, we evaluated combined molecular markers to predict prognosis.

Patients and methods

890 tumor tissue samples were obtained from patients who underwent surgery for esophageal adenocarcinoma with curative intent. These were stained by tissue micro array for 48 markers which are associated with tumorigenesis and correlated with clinical data (TNM-staging, overall survival) by multivariate Cox regression.

Results

Two markers (preserved Y chromosome and high grade of (CD3+) T-cell infiltration) were found to be significantly and independently associated with better overall survival. We formed a score (called CY score) from the two markers. The more markers are positive and thus the higher the score (ranging from 0 to 2), the better the overall survival, independently of UICC. Moreover, we developed a combination score of the UICC and CY score based on cluster analysis. Patients with a UICC stage of III with the presence of both traits (CY=2) can be assigned to a better prognosis group (group II), whereas patients with a UICC stage of I without both traits (CY=0) must be assigned to a worse prognosis group (group II). Therefore, patients in stage I with adverse molecular signature might benefit of multimodal therapy.

Conclusion

In summary, the CY score adds prognostic information to the UICC stage based on tumor biology in esophageal adenocarcinoma and warrants further evaluations in independent clinical cohorts.

OLIGOMETASTASIS IN GASTRIC CANCER TREATMENT: IS THERE A PLACE FOR THE SURGEON?

Metastatic gastric cancer traditionally hinders surgical treatment options, confining them to palliative procedures. The presence of metastases in these tumors is classified as M1, irrespective of their characteristics, quantity, or location. However, oligometastatic disease emerged as an intermediate state between localized and widely disseminated cancer. It exhibits diverse patterns based on metastatic disease extent, type, and location. Adequately addressing this distinctive metastatic state necessitates tailored strategies that surpass the realm of palliative care. Differentprimary tumor types present discernible scenarios of oligometastatic disease, including preferred sites of occurrence and chronological progression. Due to the novelty of this theme and the heterogeneity of the disease, uncertainties still exist, and the ability to provide confident guidelines is challenging. Currently, there are no effective predictors to determine the response and provide clear indications for surgical interventions and systemic treatments in oligometastatic disease. Treatment decisions are commonly based on apparent disease control by systemic therapies, with a short observation period and imaging assessments. Nonetheless, the inherent risk of misinterpretation remains a constant concern. The emergence of novel technologies and therapeutic modalities, such as immunotherapy, cellular therapy, and adoptive therapies, holds the potential to reshape the landscape of surgical treatment for the oligometastatic disease in gastric cancer, expanding the surgeon's role in this multidisciplinary approach. Prospective tools for patient selection in oligometastatic gastric cancer are being explored. Using non-invasive, cost-effective, widely available imaging techniques that provide real-time information may revolutionize medical practice, ensuring precision medicine accessibility, even in resource-constrained small healthcare facilities. Incorporating molecular classifications, liquid biopsies, and radiomic analysis in a complementary protocol will augment patient selection precision for surgical intervention in oligometastasis. Hopefully, these advancements will render surgeries unnecessary in many cases by providing highly effective alternative treatments.

A Novel Molecular Analysis Approach in Colorectal Cancer Suggests New Treatment Opportunities

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a molecular and clinically heterogeneous disease. In 2015, the Colorectal Cancer Subtyping Consortium classified CRC into four consensus molecular subtypes (CMS), but these CMS have had little impact on clinical practice. The purpose of this study is to deepen the molecular characterization of CRC. A novel approach, based on probabilistic graphical models (PGM) and sparse k-means-consensus cluster layer analyses, was applied in order to functionally characterize CRC tumors. First, PGM was used to functionally characterize CRC, and then sparse k-means-consensus cluster was used to explore layers of biological information and establish classifications. To this aim, gene expression and clinical data of 805 CRC samples from three databases were analyzed. Three different layers based on biological features were identified: adhesion, immune, and molecular. The adhesion layer divided patients into high and low adhesion groups, with prognostic value. The immune layer divided patients into immune-high and immune-low groups, according to the expression of immune-related genes. The molecular layer established four molecular groups related to stem cells, metabolism, the Wnt signaling pathway, and extracellular functions. Immune-high patients, with higher expression of immune-related genes and genes involved in the viral mimicry response, may benefit from immunotherapy and viral mimicry-related therapies. Additionally, several possible therapeutic targets have been identified in each molecular group. Therefore, this improved CRC classification could be useful in searching for new therapeutic targets and specific therapeutic strategies in CRC disease.

Putative Clinical Potential of ERBB2 Amplification Assessment by ddPCR in FFPE-DNA and cfDNA of Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma Patients

Simple Summary

Gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GEA) has a poor prognosis. However, since the HER2 positive subgroup could benefit from trastuzumab targeted therapy, considerable effort has been spent in determining the HER2 status in these patients. To date, immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization are the gold standard methods for assessing HER2/ERBB2 overexpression/amplification in tumor specimens. However, they have several limitations due to their cost, the large number of undetermined cases, and the impossibility of longitudinal patient monitoring. Here, we report the potential of a molecular method (droplet digital PCR) to investigate ERBB2 status in both solid and liquid biopsies of GEA. Results suggest that this methodology could be used to implement current histological analysis in solid biopsy and that it may be feasible in liquid biopsy. An alternative, more sensitive method of assessing HER2 status may aid physicians in their therapeutic decision-making, benefiting the patient. Liquid biopsy could also overcome the limitations of tissue-based analyses.

Abstract

Anti-HER2 monoclonal antibody trastuzumab improves the survival of those patients with advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GEA) exhibiting HER2/ERBB2 overexpression/amplification. The current gold standard methods used to diagnose the HER2 status in GEA are immunohistochemistry (IHC) and silver or fluorescence in situ hybridization (SISH or FISH). However, they do not permit spatial and temporal tumor monitoring, nor do they overcome intra-cancer heterogeneity. Droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) was used to implement the assessment of HER2 status in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor DNA from a retrospective cohort (86 patients) and in cell-free DNA (cfDNA) samples from a prospective cohort (28 patients). In comparison to IHC/SISH, ddPCR assay revealed ERBB2 amplification in a larger patient fraction, including HER2 2+ and 0–1+ of the retrospective cohort (45.3% vs. 15.1%). In addition, a considerable number of HER2 2+ and 0–1+ prospective patients who were negative in FFPE by both IHC/SISH and ddPCR, showed ERBB2 amplification in the cfDNA collected just before surgery. cfDNA analysis in a few longitudinal cases revealed an increasing ERBB2 trend at progression. In conclusion, ddPCR in liquid biopsy may improve the detection rate of HER2 positive patients, preventing those patients who could benefit from targeted therapy from being incorrectly excluded.