Combining local regional therapy and systemic therapy: Expected changes in the treatment landscape of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma

Navigating the complexities: challenges and opportunities in conversion therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

Primary liver cancer ranks as the sixth most prevalent malignant tumor and stands as the second leading cause of cancer-related mortality globally, posing a significant threat to public health. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common type of liver cancer worldwide. Surgical resection remains the cornerstone treatment for achieving radical cure and prolonged survival in HCC patients. Contrary to Western countries, the majority of HCC patients in China present with hepatitis B virus infection and consequent liver cirrhosis, with most cases diagnosed at an intermediate or advanced stage. This complexity results in a poor prognosis. Recent advancements in local therapeutic techniques and the introduction of systemic therapies, including targeted and immunotherapy agents, have provided new avenues for both clinical and basic conversion therapy for advanced HCC. Integrating multi-dimensional local and systemic therapies, multi-modal sequential, and comprehensive multidisciplinary approaches into the management of HCC patients has demonstrated promising conversion success rates. This holistic management strategy involves combining multiple treatment modalities vertically and coordinating various disciplines horizontally. However, significant challenges remain, including the precise selection of patients eligible for conversion therapy, the optimal choice of conversion therapy regimens, and the accurate determination of surgical timing post-conversion therapy. Addressing these challenges is crucial for hepatobiliary surgeons. High-quality, randomized controlled trials are urgently needed to generate robust evidence for clinical practice. This review aims to synthesize the latest research developments both in China and internationally and examines key issues in the realm of HCC conversion therapy.

Combination therapy strategy based on selective internal radiation therapy as conversion therapy for inoperable giant hepatocellular carcinoma: A case report

BACKGROUND

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has become a growing health concern globally. Microvascular invasion and high tumor burden are key factors limiting the curative effect of selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT).

CASE SUMMARY

This case study reports a 49-year-old woman who was diagnosed with China Liver Cancer Staging (CNLC) IIIa HCC and > 15 cm tumor diameter. Initially, due to insufficient future liver remnant and vascular invasion, the tumor was unresectable; however, radical hepatectomy was performed after successful conversion therapy with SIRT using yttrium-90 (90Y) resin microspheres followed by hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) with tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) and anti-programmed death-1 (PD-1) antibody. SIRT using 90Y resin microspheres was given by the right hepatic artery and chemoembolization was simultaneously performed in the tumor's feeding vessels from the right diaphragmatic artery. HAIC was followed every three weeks with lenvatinib and tislelizumab. At 4 months post-SIRT, the tumor was downstaged to CNLC Ib and the patient successfully underwent hepatectomy. The histopathological examination of the resected specimen showed extensive necrosis.

CONCLUSION

This case study provides evidence for an integrated treatment strategy combining SIRT and HAIC with TKI and anti-PD-1 antibodies for patients with large HCC and microvascular invasion. Further confirmatory trials are required in the future.

Effect of regorafenib combined with immunotherapy and arterial chemoembolization on the survival of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective study

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effect of combining regorafenib with immunotherapy, and further adding transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), on the survival rates of patients suffering from advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted on clinical data from 219 patients with advanced HCC treated from January 2019 to December 2020 at Zhangzhou Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University. Patients were divided into two groups: regorafenib combined with immunotherapy (Group A; n = 106) and regorafenib combined with immunotherapy plus TACE (Group B; n = 113). Assessment included baseline characteristics, serum indicators, treatment response, adverse events, progression-free survival (PFS), quality of life and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Six months after treatment, Group B demonstrated a significant decrease in α-fetoprotein (AFP) levels (P < 0.001), Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels (P < 0.001), and aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) levels (P < 0.001), along with a significant increase in albumin (ALB) levels (P = 0.010) compared to Group A. The addition of TACE resulted in higher partial response rates (PR) (P = 0.044), disease control rates (DCR) (P = 0.005), overall response rates (ORR) (P = 0.014), improved 1- and 2-year survival rates (P = 0.019, 0.025), and 6-month PFS rates (P = 0.003). However, this combination therapy was related to a higher incidence of grade 3-4 adverse events.

CONCLUSION

Regorafenib combined with immunotherapy plus TACE may lead to improved short-term survival outcomes in advanced HCC patients, albeit with an increased risk of adverse events as well as possible effects on quality of life. These findings emphasize the complexity of treatment decisions in advanced HCC.

Real-world efficacy and safety of TACE-HAIC combined with TKIs and PD-1 inhibitors in initially unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Local treatment may function synergistically with immunotherapy and targeted agents. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) and hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) combined with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and programmed death-1 (PD-1) inhibitors in patients with initially unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC).

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted on patients diagnosed with initially uHCC who received combined treatment of TACE-HAIC combined with TKIs and PD-1 inhibitors from July 2020 to February 2023. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) and adverse events (AEs). Objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) and conversion surgery rate (CSR), whereas the secondary endpoints.

RESULTS

After screening, a total of 62 patients were selected for this study. The overall median OS was 18.2 (95% CI 16.24-20.16) months and median PFS was 9.2 (95% CI 7.24-11.16) months. Based on the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST) criteria and RECIST v1.1 criteria, ORR was 67.7% (42/62), and the DCR was 90.3% (56/62), the CSR was 27.4% (17/62). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were transaminitis (56.4%, 35/62), nausea and vomiting (43.5%, 27/62), thrombocytopenia (37.1%, 23/62), abdominal pain (33.9%, 21/62), and fever (33.9%, 21/62).

CONCLUSIONS

TKIs combined with PD-1 inhibitors plus TACE-HAIC therapy represents an effective and tolerable treatment option in patients with uHCC. Patients undergoing surgery after combination therapy may have survival benefits.

Salvage liver transplantation versus curative treatment for patients with recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Salvage liver transplantation (SLT) is an effective treatment option for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (rHCC) following primary curative treatment (CUR). However, its efficacy remains controversial compared to that of CURs, including repeat liver resection (RLR) and local ablation. This meta-analysis compared the efficacy and safety of these procedures.

METHODS

A systematic literature search of the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases for studies investigating SLT and CUR was performed. Outcome data, including overall and disease-free survival, tumor response, and operative and postoperative outcomes, were independently extracted and analyzed by two authors using a standardized protocol.

RESULTS

Fifteen cohort studies comprising 508 and 2050 patients with rHCC, who underwent SLT or CUR, respectively, were included. SLT achieved significantly longer overall survival than both CUR (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.56, 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 0.45-0.68; I2 = 34.6 %, p = 0.105) and RLR (HR: 0.64, 95 % CI: 0.49-0.84; I2 = 0.0 %, p = 0.639). Similar significantly better survival benefits were observed compared with CUR (HR: 0.30, 95 % CI: 0.20-0.45; I2 = 51.1 %, p = 0.038) or RLR (HR: 0.31, 95 % CI: 0.18-0.56; I2 = 65.7 %, p = 0.005) regarding disease-free survival. However, SLT resulted in a longer operative duration and hospital stay, larger amount of blood loss, higher rate of transfusion and postoperative morbidity, and slightly higher postoperative mortality than CUR.

CONCLUSION

SLT was associated with better long-term survival than CUR or RLR in patients with rHCC after primary curative treatment.

Transarterial chemoembolization with molecular targeted therapies plus camrelizumab for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The safety and efficacy of transarterial chemoembolization plus molecular targeted therapy (MTT) combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in primary liver cancer have been demonstrated. However, the evidence for TACE plus MTT combined with ICIs in the treatment of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (RHCC) is limited. Given the excellent performance of this combination regimen in primary liver cancer, it is necessary to evaluate the efficacy of TACE plus MTT combined with ICIs in RHCC.

METHODS

A total of 88 patients with RHCC treated with TACE plus MTT combined with camrelizumab (TACE-TC group, n = 46) or TACE plus MTT (TACE-T group, n = 42) were retrospectively collected and analyzed. In this study, we evaluated the effectiveness and safety of combination therapy for patients with RHCC by analyzing tumor response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), laboratory biochemical indices, and adverse events (AEs).

RESULTS

TACE-TC was superior to TACE-T in PFS (14.0 vs. 8.9 months, p = 0.034) and OS (31.1 vs. 20.2 months, p = 0.009). Moreover, TACE-TC achieved more preferable benefits with respect to disease control rate (89.1% vs. 71.4%, p = 0.036) and objective response rate (47.8% vs. 26.2%, p = 0.036) compared with TACE-T in patients with RHCC. Compared with the TACE-T group, the AFP level in the TACE-TC group decreased more significantly after 3 months of treatment. Multivariate analysis showed that treatment option was a significant predictor of OS and PFS, while the portal vein tumor thrombus and interval of recurrence from initial treatment were another prognostic factor of PFS. There was no significant difference between the TACE-TC and TACE-T groups for Grade 3-4 adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

A combination therapy of TACE, MTT, and camrelizumab significantly improved tumor response and prolonged survival duration, showing a better survival prognosis for RHCC patients.