Locoregional therapy and systemic cetuximab to treat colorectal liver metastases

Transarterial chemoembolisation with irinotecan (irinotecan-TACE) as salvage or post-inductive therapy for colorectal cancer liver metastases: effectiveness results from the CIREL study

BACKGROUND

A pan-European, prospective, observational study on the use of irinotecan-eluting transarterial chemoembolisation (irinotecan-TACE) was conducted to evaluate effectiveness outcomes in salvage and post-inductive/consolidation therapy settings of colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLMs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred and fifty-two patients were consecutively enrolled between February 2018 and August 2020. All patients received irinotecan-TACE for CRLMs. Response data were assessed by a central independent image review panel according to RECIST v1.1. Prognostic factors for overall survival (OS), hepatic progression-free survival (HPFS), and progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated using multivariable Cox regression. Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) at the first follow-up was assessed using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30).

RESULTS

One hundred and fifty-two (median age 66 years, 61% male) patients were prospectively enrolled. Overall, the median OS was 14.5 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 11.6-17.0 months]. The median OS (95% CI) of irinotecan-TACE as salvage therapy was 9.9 months (7.4-12.8 months) and the median PFS was 3.8 months (2.9-4.7 months). The median OS for post-inductive/consolidation therapy when used with systemic therapy or thermal ablation was 19.1 months (16.2-24.2 months), the median PFS was 6.0 months (4.5-8.7 months), and the median HPFS was 8.7 months (6.9-10.6 months).Following a multivariable analysis, negative prognostic factors for OS were Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≥2 [hazard ratio (HR) 4.3], >50 mm lesion size (HR 2.1), progressive extrahepatic disease (HR 2.0), ≥2 prior systemic therapy lines (HR 2.4), >50% liver involvement (HR 8.5), and treatment plan not completed (HR 2.0). For PFS, progressive disease outside the liver (HR 1.8) and liver involvement of 25%-50% (HR 2.0) or >50% (HR 3.4) were identified as negative prognostic factors. HRQoL was generally stable or improved overall.

CONCLUSIONS

The results from the largest, pan-European, real-life study on irinotecan-TACE for CRLMs show a comparably long median OS when used as salvage therapy and promising HPFS when used with systemic therapy or thermal ablation as post-inductive/consolidation therapy. With its potential to maintain HRQoL, irinotecan-TACE could be further integrated into systemic treatment pathways.

Efficacy of Liver Chemoembolization after Prior Cetuximab Monotherapy in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Purpose: Chemoembolization of liver lesions, metastatic from colorectal cancer (CRC), with irinotecan-loaded microspheres shows less efficacy if applied after previous systemic chemotherapy. This is because cancer cells acquire resistance to previously used chemotherapeutic agents, e.g., irinotecan or perhaps via, e.g., modulations of EGFR receptors after use of anti-EGFR antibodies. Objective: To evaluate the effects of prior treatment with anti-EGFR (cetuximab) antibodies on the efficacy of chemoembolization, with irinotecan-loaded microspheres, of liver lesions metastatic from CRC. Patients and methods: The study included 50 patients (27 female, 23 male) with inoperable liver metastases in the course of CRC who underwent a total of 192 chemoembolization procedures with microspheres loaded with 100 mg of irinotecan. Chemoembolization of the right or left liver lobes was performed alternately at three-week intervals. Patients were divided into two groups: group A (n = 26): patients who had previously received anti-EGFR (cetuximab) antibodies; and group B (n = 24): patients who had never received anti-EGFR antibodies. Response to treatment was assessed according to mRECIST criteria. Overall survival time (OS) was calculated using the Kaplan−Meier method. Evaluation of adverse effects was performed according to the Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (Version 5.0). Results: Analysis did not show a statistically significant difference in radiological response between the two groups: partial response: 36.2% in group A and 32.9% in group B (p = 0.139); and stable disease: 19.2% in group A and 21.7% in group B (p = 0.224). Post-treatment progression was comparable at 46.2% in group A and 41.6% in group B (p = 0.343). There was a significant difference in OS (p = 0.043 log-rank test), however, prior treatment with cetuximab showed no significant effect on OS in a Cox proportional hazards regression model HR 1.906 (0.977−3.716), p = 0.058. Mean OS was 15.2 months (95% confidence interval (Cl): 6 to 23 months) in group A and 13.1 months (95% Cl: 7 to 22 months) in group B. In both groups, there was a negative correlation between carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels below 10 mg/mL before surgery and OS (hazard ratio (HR) 0.83 (0.47−8.43), p = 0.005 in group A and HR 1.02 (0.56−7.39), p = 0.003 in group B). There was no significant difference in the number of prominent complications between group A (7 complications) and group B (6 complications), p = 0.663. Conclusions: Previous therapy with anti-EGFR antibodies before treatment with irinotecan chemoembolization of liver metastatic lesions did not have a significant effect on radiological response to treatment or post-treatment progression. However, higher baseline levels of CEA (>10 ng/mL) were correlated with worse OS (p = 0.039).

Safety, Feasibility and Technical Considerations from a Prospective, Observational Study-CIREL: Irinotecan-TACE for CRLM in 152 Patients

CIREL, a prospective, Europe-wide, observational study aimed to assess the real-world feasibility and tolerability of irinotecan-based transarterial chemoembolization (LP-irinotecan TACE) for unresectable colorectal cancer liver metastases with regard to the treatment plan and adverse events (AEs). CIREL enrolled 152 eligible patients (≥18 years) with liver-only or dominant metastases treated with LP-irinotecan TACE following a multidisciplinary tumor board decision. Data were prospectively collected for baseline, the number of planned and performed sessions, and technical information and safety according to CTCAE 4.03/5.0. Results from 351 analyzed treatment sessions showed technical success for 99% of sessions, and 121 patients (79%) completed all planned sessions. Further, 60% of sessions were performed using opioids, 4% intra-arterial anesthetics, and 25% both. Additionally, 60% of patients experienced at least one peri-interventional AE of any grade; 8% of grade 3−4. Occurrence of AEs was related to larger liver-involvement (p < 0.001), bi-lobar disease (p = 0.002), and larger beads (p < 0.001). Using corticosteroids together with antiemetics showed reduced and lower grade vomiting (p = 0.01). LP-irinotecan TACE was tolerated well and had a high proportion of completed treatment plans. This minimally invasive locoregional treatment can be used together with concomitant systemic therapy or ablation.

Transarterial chemoembolization alone or followed by bevacizumab for treatment of colorectal liver metastases

AIMS

Bevacizumab (B) in association with systemic chemotherapy is commonly used for the treatment of colorectal cancer liver metastases. The aim of this study was to monitor tumor response, overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases treated with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) + B compared with TACE alone and to correlate the results with KRAS mutational status.

PATIENTS & METHODS

This was an observational multicentric case-control study (NCT03732235) on the efficacy and safety of B administered after TACE.

RESULTS

The disease control rate was significantly higher for the TACE + B than the TACE alone group (p < 0.001). KRAS wild-type patients had a significantly better disease control rate than those with KRAS mutations in the TACE + B group. Median OS and PFS were similar for the TACE + B and TACE groups, whereas median time to progression was significantly higher for the TACE + B group (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

The combination of TACE with B may improve tumor response and delay disease progression.

Intra-arterial therapy for unresectable colorectal liver metastases: A meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy of hepatic arterial infusion (HAI), conventional trans-arterial chemoembolization (cTACE), drug-eluting embolic trans-arterial chemoembolization (DEE-TACE), trans-arterial radioembolization (TARE) and their combinations with systemic chemotherapy (SCT) for unresectable colorectal liver metastases.

METHODS

A search was conducted on EMBASE, Scopus, PubMed and Web of Science for prospective non-randomized studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from inception to 20^th June 2020. Survival data of patients were recovered from original Kaplan-Meier curves by exploiting a graphical reconstructive algorithm. One-stage meta-analyses were conducted for median overall survival (OS), survival rates (SR), and restricted mean survival time (RMST), while two-stage meta-analyses of proportions were conducted to determine response rates (RR) and conversion-to-resection rates (CRR).

RESULTS

71 prospective non-randomized studies and 21 RCTs were identified comprising 6,695 patients. Among patients treated beyond first line, DEE-TACE+SCT (n=152) had the best survival outcomes of median OS of 26.5 (95%-CI: 22.5-29.1) months and 3-year RMST of 23.6 (95%-CI: 21.8-25.5) months. Upon further stratification by publication year, DEE-TACE+SCT appears to consistently have the highest pooled survival rates at 1-year (81.9%) and 2-years (66.1%) in recent publications (2015-2020). DEE-TACE+SCT and HAI+SCT had the highest pooled-RRs of 56.7% (I²=0.90) and 62.6% (I²=0.87) respectively and pooled-CRRs of 35.5% (I²=0.00) and 30.3% (I²=0.80) respectively.

CONCLUSION

Albeit significant heterogeneity, paucity of high-quality evidence and the non-comparative nature of all analyses, the overall evidence suggests that patients treated with DEE-TACE+SCT may have the best oncological outcomes and greatest potential to be converted for resection.

Updates of colorectal cancer liver metastases therapy: review on DEBIRI

Colorectal cancer is a worldwide public health issue, presenting an advanced stage at diagnosis in more than 20% of patients. Liver metastases are the most common metastatic sites and are not indicated for resection in 80% of cases. Unresectable colorectal cancer liver metastases that are refractory to systemic chemotherapy may benefit from transarterial chembolization with irinotecan-loaded beads (DEBIRI). Several studies show the safety and efficacy of DEBIRI for the treatment of colorectal cancer liver metastases. The development of transarterial chembolization and the introduction of new embolics have contributed to better outcomes of DEBIRI. This article reviews the current literature on DEBIRI reporting its use, efficacy in terms of tumor response and survival and side effects.

Clinical significance and prognostic relevance of KRAS, BRAF, PI3K and TP53 genetic mutation analysis for resectable and unresectable colorectal liver metastases: A systematic review of the current evidence

BACKGROUND

Hepatic resection is considered the optimal potentially curative treatment for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). Following resection, up to two-thirds of patients will develop recurrence within 5-years. Genetic mutation analysis of CRLM, especially KRAS status, has been proposed as a means to guide treatment, as well as identifying patients who can derive the most survival benefit from hepatic resection.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was conducted the PubMed, Embase and Cochrane library through February 8th, 2018. The following algorithm was applied: "(colorectal OR rectal OR colon OR colonic) AND (liver OR hepatic) AND (metastasis OR metastases) AND (gene OR mutation OR KRAS OR BRAF OR SMAD4 OR RAS OR TP53 OR P53 OR APC OR PI3K OR MSI OR EGFR OR MACC1 OR microsatellite)."

RESULTS

From the 2404 records retrieved, 78 studies were finally deemed eligible; 47 studies reported mutational data on patients with resectable CRLM, whereas 31 studies reported on patients with unresectable CRLM. Mutational analyses were mostly performed on the CRLM specimen rather than the primary CRC. The vast majority of studies reported on the KRAS mutational status (88.5%, n = 69/78). Prevalence of KRAS mutations ranged from 25% to 52%. Most studies reported that RAS mutation was a negative prognostic factor for overall (OS) (n = 24) and recurrence-free (RFS) (n = 9) survival; a few reports noted no effect of RAS mutational status on OS (n = 4) or RFS (n = 6). Twelve studies reported on BRAF mutations with a prevalence of BRAF mutation ranging from 0 to 9.1% in resected CRLM specimens. BRAF mutation was strongly associated with a worse prognosis. TP53 and PIK3CA gene mutations did not affect long-term outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

The biological status of each tumor provides the basis for individualized cancer therapeutics. Data on the mutational status on CRLM should be a part of multidisciplinary discussions to help inform the therapeutic approach, type of chemotherapy, as well as timing and approach of surgical resection.

Multidisciplinary approach of colorectal cancer liver metastases

Large bowel cancer is a worldwide public health challenge. More than one third of patients present an advanced stage of disease at diagnosis and the liver is the most common site of metastases. Selection criteria for early diagnosis, chemotherapy and surgery have been recently expanded. The definition of resectability remains unclear. The presence of metastases is the most significant prognostic factor. For this reason the surgical resection of hepatic metastases is the leading treatment. The most appropriate resection approach remains to be defined. The two step and simultaneous resection processes of both primary and metastases have comparable survival long-term outcomes. The advent of targeted biological chemotherapeutic agents and the development of loco-regional therapies (chemoembolization, thermal ablation, arterial infusion chemotherapy) contribute to extend favorable results. Standardized evidence-based protocols are missing, hence optimal management of hepatic metastases should be single patient tailored and decided by a multidisciplinary team. This article reviews the outcomes of resection, systemic and loco-regional therapies of liver metastases originating from large bowel cancer.

Hepatic intra-arterial injection of irinotecan drug eluting beads (DEBIRI) for patients with unresectable colorectal liver metastases: A systematic review

PURPOSE

To systematically review the safety and efficacy of transarterial drug-eluting beads, irinotecan (DEBIRI) for the treatment of pretreated patients with unresectable colorectal liver metastases (CRLM).

METHODS

A systematic search of the current literature was conducted to extract publications reporting on the use of DEBIRI for CRLM. Data on the safety and efficacy was extracted and tabulated. Weighted average values (WAV) were calculated for each variable to provide a single value representing the pooled safety and efficacy data.

RESULTS

13 studies (15 treatment arms) were evaluated, comprising a total of 850 patients. There were 6 prospective phase I/II trials, 5 retrospective trials and 2 randomized control trials. All papers involved patients previously treated with systemic chemotherapy. The weighted average all-grade toxicity rate was 35.2% (range; 6-100%). The high-grade WAV toxicity rate was 10.1% (range; 0-32%). Weighted average response rates were 56.2% and 51.1% according to RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) and modified RECIST/EASL (European Association for the Study of the Liver) response criteria respectively. The weighted average progression-free survival and overall survival were 8.1 months and 16.8 months, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Transarterial DEBIRI is safe and effective in the treatment of unresectable CRLM to the liver. Further studies are warranted to better define its role in the treatment algorithm of this patient subset.

DEBIRI plus capecitabine: a treatment option for refractory liver-dominant metastases from colorectal cancer

Aim: This single institution Phase II study evaluated drug-eluting beads loaded with irinotecan (DEBIRI) plus capecitabine in pretreated patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases. Patients & methods: Forty patients with liver-limited or liver-dominant disease, who have failed at least two previous lines of chemotherapy, underwent either four DEBIRI at 2-week interval or two DEBIRI every 4 weeks for bilobar or single-lobe metastases, respectively. Capecitabine was given at 1000 mg/m² twice-daily on days 1-14 every 3 weeks. Results: Seven partial responses and 12 stable diseases were observed, achieving a disease control rate of 47.5%. Median progression-free survival and overall survival resulted 4 and 8 months, respectively. Grade 3 adverse events occurred in 6/40 points (15%) of patients. Conclusion: DEBIRI plus capecitabine is a valid treatment option for heavily pretreated patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases.